User talk:LoneWolf1992

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, LoneWolf1992! Thank you for your contributions. I am KennethSides and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

KennethSides (talk) 21:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Australian Motorist Party[edit]

Hello, LoneWolf1992, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Australian Motorist Party, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! JamesBWatson (talk) 10:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • You posted a message to my talk page about the proposed deletion of Australian_Motorist_Party. I will give you some information that I hope will help. (You may have noticed that on my talk page I say I will answer questions there. Usually I do so, to avoid fragmenting discussions, but in this case I think it will be more helpful to you if the information is on your talk page.)
You say you are wondering what you can add so the article doesn't get deleted. That may not be the best question to ask first. First, you should ask whether the party satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If it does, then the links I give below will, I hope, help you to know what to add to show that it does. However, if the subject does not satisfy the notability guidelines, then unfortunately it is not suitable to be the topic of an article. An article on a notable subject may be rewritten so as to make the notability more evident, but no amount of rewriting of an article will turn a non-notable subject into a notable one. I have, unfortunately, seen many people come to Wikipedia to write an article on a subject they care about, see it deleted, and spend a great deal of time and effort rewriting it to try to avoid the reasons why the first version was deleted, only to see it deleted again, until eventually they leave, frustrated. I hope you won't have that experience. The way to avoid it is to start by being aware of what Wikipedia's notability requirements are, and first try to consider objectively whether or not the subject satisfies those requirements. If it does, then the next step is to assemble sources to show that it does. If not, then the best thing will be to accept that Wikipedia is not the right place to write about the subject.
The sort of thing needed to establish notability is to be found in the notability guidelines. I see that you are fairly new to editing Wikipedia, and I don't know how much (if anything) you know about those guidelines. Unfortunately there are, in my opinion, far too many of them, and they can be bewildering for a newcomer, but I will direct you towards some pages which are relevant in this case. You don't necessarily need to study and learn every detail of all of them, but you should at least have a quick look through them, and read the bits which seem most relevant. If you have not already done so I suggest you start by having a look at Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations, which is not an official guideline, but it summarises a lot of relevant information which would otherwise require looking in numerous places. The actual notability guidelines that are most relevant in this case are the general notabilty guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). If you do decide that the subject satisfies the notability guidelines then you should have a look at the guideline on reliable sources.
Since you are fairly new to editing Wikipedia, you probably don't know the complexities of the different mechanisms for deletion of articles. There are three of these: speedy deletion, proposed deletion (commonly abbreviated to "PROD"), and nomination for an Articles for Deletion discussion (commonly abbreviated to "AfD"). In the case of a proposed deletion or "PROD", which is what applies at present to the article you have written, if you don't think the article qualifies for deletion you can simply remove the "proposed deletion" notice from the article. If you do that, that will stop the article from being more or less automatically deleted after a week. However, it is still possible for someone to nominate it as an AfD. If that happens then a page will be created for a discussion as to whether the article should be deleted, in which case you must not remove the AfD notice from the article, but you will be perfectly free to take part in the discussion.
I have made a fairly brief search for information about the Australian Motorist Party, and what I have found makes it look as though it is not notable in Wikipedia's sense. I say that not in order to be discouraging, but to avoid unjustified hopes, to reduce the risk that you will put a lot of work into a doomed task, and suffer severe disappointment. Do first consider the question "does this satisfy the notability guidelines?" and be prepared for the possibility that the answer is "no". If, however, the answer is "yes", then I wish you the best success with the article.
Finally, I will give you another welcome message, which gives rather more links to potentially helpful pages than the one which KennethSides gave you above. Don't try to read them all at one go, but dip into them as and when they become relevant. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello LoneWolf1992! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Miscellaneous

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! JamesBWatson (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forever Young (Alphaville song)[edit]

You might want to have a look at WP:NAMB to learn when hatnotes are appropriate. Best regards and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 15:58, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zhou Enlai[edit]

Your edit on Zhou Enlai was reverted, I put it back. Phrases like "brainwashing" are clearly POV when stated a fact, even if there is a citation to someone. I removed nonsense that called Mao a "demigod accountable to no one" and that was reverted by the same person who reverted you. I'm glad you have worked to keep the page encyclopedic, as opposed to the person pushing his non-encyclopedic POV on the page. Adelson Velsky Landis (talk) 22:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Hi, LoneWolf. Just fyi, the four-tilde signature (~~~~) is for signing posts to talk pages. You don't need to use it in edit summaries. (Thanks for using edit summaries, though. They're very helpful.) Rivertorch (talk) 06:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited List of political parties in Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Social Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?[edit]

Hi LoneWolf1992,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

  1. Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
  2. If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
  3. What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchuk@wikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thanks for your feedback on deletion notices, and for helping us better understand the deletion process from the point of view of new Wikipedians! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited List of youth organizations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Government in exile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the article[edit]

Hi LoneWolf1992. Thank you for creating Australian Motorist Party. I had no idea that a political party like that existsed. I've made a number of updates to the article that you can see here. I've included a number of references to various news articles that contain more information. I figured I'd let you know about it in case you ever wanted to work on the article in the future. I also wanted to thank you for putting up with all the wiki-politics that go on around here. From my perspective, the politics here can be very tiresome so I hope thay haven't dampened your enthusiasm for contributing. Thanks again for the article and best of luck to you. 64.40.54.186 (talk) 04:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

Hi LoneWolf. Just thought I'd mention. It's up to you but you don't have to add ~~LoneWolf1992~~ to your edit summaries. SlightSmile 00:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure what that someone said is to add "~~~~" at the end of posts on talk pages only. Look at your message on my talk page and see how a bot had to sign your message for you.
Like this message I'm putting on your talk page now. I'm adding "~~~~" at the end of the text which will cause the system to automatically put my signature. Try it. SlightSmile 00:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's good. Also, I think that you're putting only three ~'s. It's better to put four ~'s so that it shows username, talk page and date. Me too there's still a ton of stuff I don't know. I'm glad to see you're enjoying yorself here. All the best. SlightSmile 01:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christian Social Union of Bavaria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Regionalism
English Mistery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anti-liberalism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Napoleonic Code, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Liberal and Nativism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historical unrecognized states, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belorussian, Soviet republic and Empire of China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people from Sheffield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Bulldog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of historical unrecognized states (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye
List of political party symbols (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Racialism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pretender, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fleming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rochester Cathedral[edit]

Hi LoneWolf. I've moved the picture you added down to the Lady Chapel, since I believe that is where the image is from. I've also changed the caption slightly. The figure is St. George and the flag is the symbol of St. George. You are quite right that the flag of England incorporates that of St. George' cross, but in this instance it is the saint's identity not the country's identity that is being established. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:10, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I get it and I found the picture on another page so I copy and pasted it there because it was relevent to the article. Thans for telling my why you were making the changes. LoneWolf1992 (talk 12:26, 10 Ocotber 2012 (UTC)

Is This a Zombie?[edit]

Your recent editing history at Is This a Zombie? shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Please also see my reply to your request on my talk page. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 11:30, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for February 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soviet invasion of Manchuria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Arthur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, LoneWolf1992! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to List of Gunslinger Girl characters, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

  • If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
  • If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greenland[edit]

I appreciate that your edits are in good faith, however, Greenland is an autonomous country within the Kingdom of Denmark, not a part of Denmark proper, and its parliamentary elections belong on the National Electoral Calendar. This is similar to how Queen Elizabeth II is Queen of the Commonwealth Realms, which encompasses the UK, but also Canada, India, Australia, and other countries -- that doesn't mean Canadian national elections are UK local elections though! I hope this has clarified the subject for you, and good luck in your editing. ^_^ --4idaho (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I gave up on editing that I didn't want to get flagged for edit warring though I still contend it shouldn't be there. Canda, India and Australia are independent countries so they do belong there but, Greenland is, as you said, autonomous not independent hence why I removed it. LoneWolf1992 (talk 4:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mockumentary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternate universe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor[edit]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Gerald Shields leading the masses to improve Wikimedia one cosmetically fashionable photograph at a time. North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar
Gerald Shields, founder of the North Korean Fashion Watch, awards you the North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar for your continuing efforts to add reliable and poignant discussions about North Korean topics, such as the 2014 comedy movie The Interview. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of The Angry Video Game Nerd episodes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • , ''[[Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1991 video game)|Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade]]'' (NES, Taito (DVD-only), ''[[Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1991 video game)|Indiana Jones and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Black Panther Party may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Infobox Historical American Political Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of video game console launch games may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *''[[Pinball (Microvision|Pinball]]''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bird flu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Constantine XI Palaiologos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National hero. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Darrell Green, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cat video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gabriel of Belostok may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • //www.church.by/resource/Dir0262/Dir0263/Page0288.html Saint Gavriil] Belarusian Orthodox Church]</ref>
  • in the Former Soviet Union, the President of the American Association of Jews from the former USSR)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fusang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fusō. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks[edit]

This may be a little late, but I just noticed this edit where you removed four redlinks. Why? Redlinks are helpful in pointing out potential article subjects, preventing new articles from being orphans, evaluating areas where Wikipedia needs additional coverage, etc. Admittedly, there are some things that shouldn't be linked, but what did you feel was wrong with those four links? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 14:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spaniards in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, LoneWolf1992. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, LoneWolf1992. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, LoneWolf1992. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Choke (sports)[edit]

Hey Lonewolf. I reverted your addition to this article because the cites you provided do not indicate this as a choke. I agree it was a catastrophic fall apart for the Falcons, but it's not ours to decide if it was a choke. If you can find reliable sources that indicate it as a choke, maybe. But, the article shouldn't be a long list of every time a journalist thinks a choke happened. I've considered starting a list article of chokes, to depopulate this article of so many of them. I welcome your thoughts on that? --Hammersoft (talk) 02:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of active separatist movements in Africa[edit]

A little quick on the trigger, maybe? Surely there's no need to mention the same separatist state twice. Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but there was no need to erase what you did. LoneWolf1992 19:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a bunch of red links, double mentions and unsourced claims (in particular a highly dubious population figure), while keeping the references. If I removed anything that should have been kept, you could have just re-added it. I can't say I appreciate having constructive edits be treated as vandalism. If you could let me know what you think I left out, I can give it a second try. Regards, Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 00:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United States Pacifist Party for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States Pacifist Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Pacifist Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 18:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Right Alliance (Belarus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traditionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you could stop being a purveyor of right-wing propaganda, that'd be awesome.[edit]

Thanks in advance. PeaceandKarats (talk) 22:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I've been here for a decade and you're new. Don't tell me what to think or to edit. LoneWolf1992 (user talk) 19:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don't misunderstand me. I'm not questioning the majority of your edits, which are of course valid. However, for the instances where you behave like a right-wing editor, you should expect to be treated like one. All I'm saying is don't disseminate falsehoods, to wit; to wit; to wit.

Now, if you've been on Wikipedia for 10 years, surely you must know that by now, which means you're better than these edits. Falsehoods, whether conservative or liberal, don't belong on Wikipedia. At least that point should be indisputable. That is all I'll say on the matter. At the end of the day, you'll do things your way and I'll do things my way, and that's all there is to it.PeaceandKarats (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LoneWolf1992&oldid=1187209308"