User talk:LordGalvatronYT

Adding Article

I want to make a article for Transformers: Human Alliance (game).Nelspeedracer (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Pac-man in popular culture

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Pac-man in popular culture. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pac-Man. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pac-Man. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ike1x (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers x Evangelion

Hi, I wanted to explain further why I removed some of your recent additions. The section at Neon Genesis Evangelion (franchise) about the crossover already has its own article, which you created, Transformers x Evangelion. The text doesn't need to appear in both places. In addition, Transformers x Evangelion is in severe need of a copy edit. Just the first sentence has capitalization errors, subject-verb errors, verb tense errors, a misspelling, "a angel," and is a run-on mess. Due to a lack of formatting, the page is pretty unreadable. Can you have someone (not me) look this over for you?

Please understand: I'm not trying to be critical or hurtful, but if you want your article to remain, it needs to be brought up to a basic standard of writing quality. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 08:32, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transformers x Evangelion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sideswipe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Star Trek vs Transformers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Trek vs Transformers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek vs Transformers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article being deleted fir what reasons? talk:Nelspeedracer

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nelspeedracer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of amusement rides based on anime and manga franchises for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of amusement rides based on anime and manga franchises is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of amusement rides based on anime and manga franchises until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:10, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cracker! The Best Dog in Vietnam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cracker! The Best Dog in Vietnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolfman vs Godzilla Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfman vs Godzilla Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jorm (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Black Lives Matter for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. – ².O.^Boxing 16:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – ².O.^Boxing 17:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Black Lives Matter for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. SN54129 17:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about there is the group accused of being silent when a non-cop kills a black and it wasn't on there so I wanted to bring up that subject there in a kindly way Nelspeedracer (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, VRChat, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic

Please stop adding the Ugly Sonic appearance as an official voice of Sonic. See the talk page. -- ferret (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Yeeno. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, GigaBash, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 02:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Freyja. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Freyja, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 19:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're extremely close to a block as your talk page is just a mass of warnings for disruption and unsourced editing. -- ferret (talk) 00:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The shows and games is the source here I seen them here the primary source here.(Seven Deadly Sins and TenSura).For Rimuru and Guy Crimson thing it been states in a show. I can grab screenshots if you desire more proof. Can't source Fandom or other wikis for various reasons. LordGalvatronYT (talk) 17:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I source something from a Anime mobile game exactly? LordGalvatronYT (talk) LordGalvatronYT (talk) 17:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't find WP:RS to support additions, then evidently it isn't notable enough to be included on a general Wikipedia article. Various gods of mythology have appeared in thousands upon thousands of games, it's not important information. TylerBurden (talk) 20:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then I looked up Freyja Seven Deadly Sins and found on something on Frejya for Seven Deadly Sins on IGN (a reliable source. https://www.ign.com/videos/the-seven-deadly-sins-grand-cross-official-chapter-6-ragnarok-trailer so would that be enough or need more sources. There is also another on PlayerOne but I do see it on list of reliable and unreilable sources so https://www.player.one/seven-deadly-sins-grand-cross-ragnarok-chapter-6-154152 I wanna see if it is ok source or not? LordGalvatronYT (talk) 00:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article already makes the point that Freya appears in video games, there is no need to include every appearance, especially not mobile games that don't even have their own article. What about this appearance makes it so special that it warrants inclusion despite several other video game examples? TylerBurden (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly because it is from a Mobile Game based on the popular Seven Deadly Sins Anime/Manga series and she featured in the original Rangarok: Fate of the Gods storyline. She is Goddess of Beauty like original myth though she has a pet tiger and when Rangarok approached she was forced to sacrifice her fairy subjects to replenish her brother Freyja's health since he was severely weakened by the upcoming event. LordGalvatronYT (talk) 23:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transformers: Animated, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Fourth Wall. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, USS Redfish (SS-395), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Plus, it is already mentioned with a citation earlier in the article. Donald Albury 01:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]