User talk:Lugnuts/Archive 56

Thank you

Hi, My sincere appreciation and thanks go to you for your such invaluable contributions on Wikipedia. I've started to create some wiki pages on sportsperson. Kindly keep an eye to make sure that I don't make any mistake. Nalbarian^talk 09:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Nalbarian. With Prince Balwant Rai the only mistake is that he hasn't played in a match yet, so therefore fails WP:NCRIC. Please do not create biographies for individuals who have not played in either a first-class, List A or T20 match. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Lugnuts, thanks for your prompt reply. I just read the WP:NCRIC. I'll keep that in mind. Nalbarian^talk 10:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and quick question

Hi, I'm fairly new to editing here and have a question I was hoping you could answer. I noticed that you deleted a few galleries I created for athletes, saying that the photos added nothing to the article. Why do recent action shots of athletes, in your view, not add something new? Many thanks and all the best, Bob Ramsak (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Bob Ramsak. Using this edit as an example, I don't believe this adds anything to the page. There's already a very clear picture to indentfy her in the infobox. The gallery pic is tiny (before clicking on it), and I'm using a decent-sized monitor. And WP:GALLERY states "Wikipedia is not an image repository (and) A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article". If there was no image already in the article, then it would be fine. Hope that helps. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for the clarification. I agree, Wikipedia should not be used as an image repository. In this case though, the main image is already five years old, which is why I thought another, more recent one, wouldn't do any harm. In any case, I'll add links to related media in Wiki Commons in future. Cheers, Bob Ramsak (talk) 12:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

short descriptions

Hi Lugnuts (loop in Revirvlkodlaku, Good day Lugnuts. I come here in good will and giving me 2c on request for comment as per the conversation Here-1 between Revirvlkodlaku and I where you had a conversation with Revirvlkodlaku before on the topic User talk:Lugnuts/Archive 54#Reverting short article descriptions on your talk page. I have added about 15K short descriptions so far and when I started joining Short disc project, I had some communication with the editor/admin who champion the project - see here. Thus, it is no right or wrong way to write the short descr and it can also be written more than 40 characters as long as we aim to write the short descr in brief, clear and summaries of the subject. The short descr of film articles can be written (1) year+flim (2019 film) such as in Nostradamus (film), Fire at Sea and Notebook (2019 film) ; (2) year+film+director (1994 film by xxx) - such as in Legends of the Fall, First Knight, The Silence of the Lambs (film) and The Last of the Mohicans (1992 film) ; year+film+film genres+director (2010 dram film by xxxx) such as in The Piano, Nixon (film) and there are also short descr consists of year+film+country (2019 Indian film) such as in Mia Madre and Quiet Comes the Dawn or year+film+country+language+genres+director such as in Good Newwz, The Body (2019 film) and Mardaani 2. Safe safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for this. Surely the s/d for The Body (2019 film) is anything but short?! It can be written as year+film+country+language+genres+director, but that defeats the purpose of a short description and the very definition of the word short. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, The above examples some of the way s/d are written for s/d is a flexible system as long as it is brief and concise to describe the subject. Some of the s/d can be rewritten of course, such as to remove a work or two and also some s/d can add another word for I have seen a lot longer s/d where by certain title/nouns can not be abbreviated or it will confuse the reader. The point here is (I dont know which article Revirvlkodlaku referred to) was to add " film's country of origin" (an extra word) such as from 2019 film to 2019 Italian film and I see no harm but appropriate to descript the subject. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I don't know who Revivloadku is, but maybe they could spend their time working through the millions and millions of pages that don't have a s/d, instead of getting bogged down in the minutiae of one or two articles. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Here -User talk:Lugnuts/Archive 54#Reverting short article descriptions - is the conversation between you and Revivloadku (werewolf). I dont know which articles you guys referred and if you guys have involved in silent ew as per Revivloadku message to me on my talk page. Revivloadku had contacted you for a discussion on adding additonal word and you asked for request for comment and that was how / why I am here. Whether it is best to work on billion of missing s/d is one thing (I truly understand where you come from). To have a discussion and understand of what can be written of s/d is another as s/d is a flexible system as long as it brief/concise about the subject. Reiterate my comment - to add one more word into 2 word s/d for a total of 3 words is appropriate to describe the subject better and I see no harm in doing so and that is my 2c. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I vaguely recall that conversation. I'll stick with what I said back then. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, thank you for your attempt to intervene and to introduce a third voice to my discussion with Lugnuts. This individual, though they may feign ignorance, consistently changes short descriptions on film articles whose s/d I alter. If required, I can provide an extensive list of these titles, even ones where the changes have been repeated, though I don't think this is a good use of anyone's time. As you can see, they are not willing to be flexible on the topic, despite your convincing examples of what constitutes a good and valid short description. In my opinion, this is a case of obstinate and anti-collaborative Wikipedia editing, and it is a shame to see this type of attitude from such an experienced editor. werewolf (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

So what is your definition of short? It seems to be the opposite of what it actually means. As I've already said, there are thousands of film articles without a s/d - maybe add those. And please change your signature (or username), as it is confusing. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Lugnuts, we've already been over this. I pointed out that "short" is fairly subjective, it doesn't mean "as short as it can possibly be without losing all value" and it doesn't mean "cannot include country of origin". This discussion is less about the definition of the word "short" and more about how adding one or two (arguably useful) words or components doesn't make the description unnecessarily long (or even not short), and stubbornly shortening s/d's to whatever you decide is long enough is non-democratic and even non-collaborative. As for your continued insistence that I add s/d's to articles which don't have any, that is a complete non sequitur. I am adding as many s/d's as I can, but this shouldn't preclude me from doing other things on Wikipedia, such as improving what I consider to be inadequate s/d's. I'm not a one-trick pony and there's no reason to ignore existing issues in order to focus on other areas of interest. As for my name...I still haven't figured out how to change it, can you help? werewolf (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Lugnuts, The guidelines for short for s/d is 40 characters and if necessary can be slight longer - see How to write a short description and the hist diff of the conversation between me and the admin who champion the project which I have provided to your early - see here again. Example: s/d from "2019 film" to "2019 Italian film" still within 40 character limit and does provide better description, still serve its function and within the guideline - No harm here at all. Cassiopeia^(talk) 04:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Revirvlkodlaku, Good day. As for your name change in the user name in sign off, you could do that in your Preferences" page (see on top of the Wikipedia page and look for "Preferences"). Look for "Signature" and remove the pipe and werewolf on the signature field. Cassiopeia^(talk) 03:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

You said "Thus, it is no right or wrong way to write the short descr", so I'll continue to it how I see fit, which is neither right or wrong. If you need to disucss Wolfy changing his signature, do it anywhere but here. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Lugnuts, Yes there is no right or wrong way to write the s/d as long as it is concise and well-descript the subject. I dont know who silently reverted who s/d edits between you and Revirvlkodlaku; however if any editors or Revirvlkodlaku place year+flim+country for film s/d, then we hope you would be kind to let the s/d stands for all of us here is to contribute to Wikipedia project. I apologies to Lugnuts for using two lines in your talk page to help an editor and didnt know that I would upset you. As for User:Revirvlkodlaku, I hope you could let this matter go and work on other articles/tasks of your fancy. I came here in good-will and gave my two cents for request for comment. I hope all parties involved here are in good spirit here on forward and stay safe. Best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 07:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

"Oiseaux" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Oiseaux. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 5#Oiseaux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cose da pazzi

The article Cose da pazzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, no reviews found in a WP:BEFORE. Wikipedia articles in other languages had no citations that could help this pass WP:NFILM either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Another image of Juan Maria Uribezubia

Thanks for your thanks. FYI, there exists another image of Juan Maria Uribezubia. Wouterhagens (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

@Wouterhagens: - whichever one you think is the best/clearest image of him should be used. Don't mind which one and thanks for finding the pics! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Najeeb Tarakai

On 6 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Najeeb Tarakai, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 19:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Germany Barnstar of National Merit
	For the second time I would like to give you a barnstar, this time doing a good job in Germany-based articles. Cupper52 (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Ve Germans aren't all smiles und sunshine. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Where...?

Hi, I want to know which articles are high on vandalism because I want to help stop vandalism on Wikipedia.

Thanks, Wellthisistherepaer (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Take a look at Special:RecentChanges and start by checking anything changed by an IP address. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Impressive total! I cannot even imagine making one million edits! AltruisticHomoSapien (talk) 22:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! The trick is to make 999,999 edits, and then make one more. :D Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Andrew Jeffcoat

Hi, I recently noticed you deleted his personal best section which I put in, and you said it was unsourced. All the short course sources have been provided, do I need to link the long course sources too? Obama gaming (talk) 22:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Yes - everything you add needs to be sourced to verify those facts. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

So would you like me to link the results PDF for his long course personal bests? The three links in the section I added in the first paragraph cover his short course personal bests. Regards Obama gaming (talk) 07:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, that would be fine. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Blue is the Warmest Color

All that this IP edit did was copy a few sentences from the "Critical response" section and put them in the lede. Whether or not that content was appropriate for the lede, it seems to have been a good-faith edit that did not obviously violate any policy or guideline. I'm not going to challenge your decision to revert, but, with respect, I think that you should have provided an edit summary. Tamzin (they/them) | o toki tawa mi. 11:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi. The jist of that is literally covered (and sourced) in the line before the text they added with "Many critics declared it one of the best films of 2013". Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

I see your reasoning. I chose not to revert when the edit came up on my watchlist, but I do see why you did. But I still think that this is reasoning you should have given in the summary. It was a good-faith edit and deserved to be treated as such. Tamzin (they/them) | o toki tawa mi. 12:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Emerging Cricket Podcast again

Have a listen to the newest podcast... They are looking for you now!!! Ankurc.17 (talk) 07:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Haha, will have a listen later - thanks! :D Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

They have given me a grilling since joining their volunteers... I know nothing! Bs1jac (talk) 20:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bs1jac: more than happy for them to contact me on WP if they have any questions, or they can via proxy through yourself. Let them know I've linked one of their podcasts on my userpage in the bright orange bar! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Sri Lanka Ports Authority Cricket Club

Hi. I read here that the Sri Lankan Ports Authority Cricket Club ownership has been transferred from the SLPA and will be renamed Ace Captital Cricket Club from the new season. I had the reference (the format isn't very good, but I couldn't be bothered to tidy up the page right now). I was going to move the page to Ace Capital Cricket Club and then rewrite slightly, but then I realised that there is also a page for the original name of the club - Seeduwa Raddoluwa Cricket Club; that one just says that the club was renamed to SLPACC in 2011. Not sure what to do, but I think edit SLPACC with a little text taken from Seeduwa Raddoluwa Cricket Club; then move SLPACC to the new name, and then turn the SRCC to a redirect page pointing to the newest team name? Bs1jac (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

That's a head-scratcher for first thing on a Sunday morning! :D I'll have a think, and let you know. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi

I addecmore to jean driancourt. Mosavou2866 (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Gerald Gardner (scriptwriter)‎

I'm going to suggest that you rethink the short description you just gave on Gerald Gardner (scriptwriter)‎ - while he did write some books, the most notable ones were actually just adding text to existing photographs, not the sort of thing that "author" is usually wielded for. More importantly, much of his writing that gets recognition is not prose, it's screenwriting (as reflected in the title disambiguation), particularly on The Monkees. As such, "American writer" or perhaps "American humor writer" is much more appropriate than "American author".

I am not going to make the change myself, as I have a conflict of interest in regards to Gardner at this point (as a publisher, I publish a book of cartoons that he wrote.) I leave it to your consideration. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

There no Categories accident for Ashot Melikjanyan

we can't find that he died in plane crashed. can you add Categories for Ashot Melikjanyan? i don't remember it too. Ryan Pikachu (talk) 23:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Create a article named Bangabandu T20 Cup

Please Saidur Mursalin (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

The reason of removing the current situation of Mujib 100 T20 cup

Why you removed my data? Can you add logo? Saidur Mursalin (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Zappa (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zappa (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zappa (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. L1A1 FAL (talk) 22:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

WTF? Thanks, Lug! Sam Sailor 18:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I've long gone past the point of being surprised on here! Long time no see (or is that sea...) Hope all is well with you in this crazy world. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

As always, you manage to hoist the ensign of politeness on a spar where few of us can reach. I'm appaled to see that articles keep getting nominated for deletion without any consideration of the sources. Does the nominator pop a chubby? Do their pants get moist? Sam Sailor 20:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

So, I was originally intending to take the page for an identically-titled film about musician and composer Frank Zappa that is being released this month. I still don't see how the notability of the subject of the present article is established, but clearly, I've touched a nerve and have been outvoted. Is every film at a major film festival automatically notable?

As to why I did not reply on the deletion discussion, A) I forgot about the nomination, as I have things that occupy my time in real life, and B) the discussion wasn't even kept open for 24 hours.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

WP:BEFORE would have saved you some time. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Update Burial for Sergei Khrushchev.

we found that Sergei Khrushchev was buried at Novodevichy Cemetery. his body taken to russia from united states. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/211603438/sergey-nikitich-khrushchev Ryan Pikachu (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Find-a-Grave is not a reliable source. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

What about that? alot news in russia said he was buried at that Cemetery next to his father. https://ria.ru/20200621/1573247290.html https://tass.ru/obschestvo/8780547 Ryan Pikachu (talk) 05:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I don't know the validity of every single source. Please raise it at WP:RSN. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:14, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

also can you add buried for Michael Hordern? we found that he was not cremated at sea, he was buried in churchyard. https://books.google.com/books?id=7-DgDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA352&lpg=PA352&dq=Michael+Hordern+cremated&source=bl&ots=6WKHCEAm9L&sig=ACfU3U3oX_MRSDbCNXf4Y0C7y6Sed9SlkA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi2hqzQoPzsAhVCKH0KHYTsDVo4ChDoATAFegQIChAC#v=onepage&q=Michael%20Hordern&f=false https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/107083477/michael-murray-hordern Ryan Pikachu (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

John Campbell (runner) page

Hello and good day. I added John Campbells 1990 Boston Marathon performance and screwed it up a little bit.Wanted to source with John Campbell's Hicks Bay page and Sports Illustrated Vault page and messed up. Can you fix the sources for me. I meant well, but didn't come out right. Thank you and have a good day.2601:581:8402:1EE0:7404:AAF:39D0:215F (talk) 20:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Fixed! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

stanislaw sielanski, what is the meaning of your vandalisms?

Undid revision 981089314 by Lugnuts (talk)lugnutty, dont you have no shame, you reverted good info, polish sources were given, yet you made this article look shitty just like u r! and u violated 3rr policy!congratulations! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.176.65.109 (talk) 01:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

An Inlet of Muddy Water

Hello. You omitted the info regarding the difference between the film's ending and the novel's ending. If you find it inappropriate in the plot section (for whatever reason, as I do not consider it trivial), what do you suggest instead? A separate section like e.g. "literary source"? Thanks, 87.178.155.42 (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, that would be fine, I guess. The film's plot should detail what actually happens on screen, not what might have happened, or what did happen in the book. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

That's what I did now, thanks. 87.178.155.42 (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

2020-21 BBL

Greetings sir, Shall we have separate pages for each of the teams in BBL like 2020-21 Melbourne Stars season or else only 2020-21 BBL Season Main page is enough? If you agree, I'll create 8 pages for 8 teams and I'll inform you. Or else I edit only 2020-21 BBL Season Main page sir. Waiting for your concern. Thank you :)) Kirubar (talk) 16:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not a fan of the stand-alone team season articles for T20 franchise cricket. However, if you're willing to put time and effort into making them more than a stats-dump, with lots of prose, then sure, go for it. Don't know if they've been done for previous seasons, so maybe ask other editors to see what they think. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Then ok sir. We'll handle only main page sir. If you don't mine, could you please tell me how to delete a template? I created 2020-21 BBL Match 1 like that for 21 matches as of now. I want to delete them. Tell me how to delete the templates sir:)) Kirubar (talk) 07:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi. If you're the only editor, then add this code to each template: {{Db-author}} Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Templates

Well. In those string of scores and bowling figures, I felt that the team score should be highlighted somewhat. So I edited those stuff. I don't know about the consensus. Sorry. Hereafter, I won't do like that. Thank you for giving me instructions throughly. Kirubar (talk) 08:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Masayoshi Uchida

Hi Lugnuts. While looking through Olympedia today, I found a Japanese swimmer named Masayoshi Uchida that doesn't seem to have an article or be even mentioned in the respective articles about the events he took part in. Do you know whether an article has been made about this person yet. Thanks, Lettler^{hello • contribs} 16:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Lettler:. Thanks for spotting this and bringing him to my attention. I had a quick look at his Olympedia profile, and saw he was a swimmer, and I know I worked through all of the Olympic swimmers. So looking at that, he finished 5th in the first heat of the 100m freestyle in 1920, which brought me here. That would match with Masaren Uchida's results. Looking at the old Sports Ref link from Web Archive, you can see the page was at "Masaren Uchida" on their site. Since 2016, new data has been found, with his name updated on Olympedia. I've moved his article to the updated name. Another thing I have setup is on Wikidata to search by Olympedia ID. So if you come across a similar case, you can check to see if they exist under another name. Hope that helps. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

IPL 2021

With the end of 2020 IPL, the next IPL (2021) is just 5 months away. However, a page is yet to be created. Hence, I request you to create "2021 Indian Premier League" page since I don't have that permission. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Churot (talk • contribs) 14:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

No. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok then. I'll get someone else to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Churot (talk • contribs) 15:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Sock

Hi. This user, User:TabiMah1234 seems like a sock of User:The Floka. Their edits are similar and are replying the same way if reverted. Can you get this into admins' attention? Thanks. Human (talk) 11:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Ah, nevermind. I did it. Just support my claim. Human (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Done and done. Thanks for spotting this - I've also let the blocking admin know. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

@A Simple Human: - all sorted, along with page protection for the PSL to keep the socks away. Enjoy the finals of the tournament! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Seems like he wont stop. [1] Human (talk) 20:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Revert them per WP:BANREVERT. If he keeps it up, then a range-block can be done on the IP address. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Bangabandhu T20 Cup

Can you please tell me why you removed those pictures and table I collected? Saidur Mursalin (talk) 12:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Did you bother to do a preview before inserting those massive images? Also, we don't add team logos into articles, apart from the team page itself. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Massive? Saidur Mursalin (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Are you kidding? Saidur Mursalin (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

That's why I hate Wikipedia Saidur Mursalin (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes, no, and I hate liquorice. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Women's U19 World Cup ICC

Do you have any information about when the U19 Women's World Cup T20 will be held ? Flydon Melrick Picardo (talk) 05:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

No, sorry I don't. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Urgent help needed

Hi. User:Mraneshfernando has created three pages Kanagarathinam Kabilraj, Theivendiram Dinoshan and Vijayakanth Viyaskanth. These articles do not yet meet notanility guidlines but might in future when the tournament starts. Can you please look into it redirect them? Deleting them so close to the tournament doesnt look nice either. I am currently busy now and might not edit for today. Thanks Human (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Done - moved them to their user-space. This new editor means well, but I've dropped a few notes on their talkpage about new cricketers and infoboxes. I'm going to WP:AGF for now, but if anything else crops up, please let me know. Thanks! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

My Stars

This is one of many articles you've created without good citations. Is it notable? Instead of removing links to articles on notable subjects that need to be moved to mainspace, how about improving citations and establishing notability for your work? FloridaArmy (talk) 12:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

"notable subjects that need to be moved to mainspace" - if they're notable, why don't you simply create the article instead of making a draft? Feel free to add any cites to existing articles too. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Because I'm not allowed to per an editing restriction. You can move them yourself. You do a lot of great work and I applaud it. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Redundant categories in film articles

Hello. I'm a bit baffled by your addition of category 1967 films in this edit. I clearly explained that it is redundant in an edit summary. You see, category 1967 drama films leads directly to the 1967 films category. I hope you understand what I am talking about. Thanks.--97.116.115.87 (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Per WP:FILMCAT the top-level cats of year, country and language are placed on ALL film articles, regardless of the sub-cats. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Is there is a way to dispute this? Thanks.--97.116.115.87 (talk) 18:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Yep - you can raise it at the Film Project. Note that it's come up many times before, and the long-standing local consensus is to have the top-level categories. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Odd. Thanks.--97.116.115.87 (talk) 19:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Running to the Sky.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Running to the Sky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Afd

Hey, could you help out at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best PC Ecuador. Thanks, Seacactus 13 (talk) 19:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC).

Refrain

Please refrain from deleting important sources Terminator 800 and T-800 (talk) 11:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Is it 1st April already? Maybe you could start to read the articles and add sources yourself. Pretty much every single one of all of your edits has been reverted. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Troy Johnson (cricket)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Troy Johnson (cricket). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Troy Johnson (cricketer). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Troy Johnson (cricketer). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Sheila Nelson

Hi! I am sorry I reverted you here. She was much much much better known as a teacher than as anything else. Obviously a music teacher is also a musician (well, some are!) but I feel that the more specific description is much more useful to readers than the general. If you look at the obits like this and this, and possibly the a national or two if/when they get round to it, the emphasis is all going to be on her massive influence as a teacher. If she had stayed as a performer then I don't think there would be this impact, and possibly/probably no article. I'd be happy to discuss this further on the Talk page if you like. Cheers DBaK (talk) 11:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

@DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: - thanks for your post. Just change it to "English teacher" if you prefer, or whatever you think is best for the subject. I don't know the topic area, and was just looking at the recent deaths page. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Okey doke and thanks very much! DBaK (talk) 11:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Das Feuerzeug.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Das Feuerzeug.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

I cracked up seeing this in AfD tonight: GOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!! Thanks for the laugh! :) Missvain (talk) 03:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Hehe, no problem. Always here to spread the joy. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Rubel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Rubel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Human (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

This isnt any sort of warnings. Just another one of those accounts after I tried redirecting it to a new (and correct) article I created and failed. Human (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

No worries - if you spot anymore, just ping me and I'll tag it with the db-author flag so it can be speedy. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Another AfD

Hey, could you help at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Renev. Apparently they just don't care about grand Tour cyclists anymore.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Susanne Lingheim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susanne Lingheim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Lingheim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 22:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Some articles

Hi. I'm not sure of what to do about the Fortune Barishal and Beximco Dhaka articles. These are just one off teams as this is not an annual tournament. But they played official T20 matches. These articles are also very poorly written. Also I have no idea why a T10 team Bangla Tigers exists. These T10 teams changes name every year. I put that one up for AfD previously but no one was interested so the case was closed. Human (talk) 15:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I'd send both to AfD, and drop a note at WT:CRIC for more input. The Fortune article is pretty much the same as the main tournament's article, but obviously focusing on that one team, whereas the Beximco article has even less info than that. I guess if someone was going to make them into some of the LPL pages, such as Colombo Kings, it would be a start, but I don't think these are worth saving! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Why not just redirect them to the tournament article? Like the Euro T20 Slam. I mean they did play T20 matches. Human (talk) 15:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes, that would be fine too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Arthur Norton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur Norton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Norton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 04:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Collan Nicholas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Collan Nicholas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collan Nicholas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 04:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lewis Newnham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lewis Newnham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Newnham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 04:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

@Lugnuts:: This is an interesting one - you'll see my suggestion at the AfD. If we were to redirect in cases like this, would we do it to the first team if there were a handful which had similar significance and just a match each? In some cases it might be easy - say, one for Yorkshire, one for MCC and one for Cambridge, I could see opting to redirect to the county club. But what here?

Fwiw I agonised about what to do with all of this batch of AfDs. I know we tend not to agree in general at this sort of level, but I do understand the logic of your argument. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

@Blue Square Thing: sorry for not replying earlier - I was sorting out the headache of the rescheduled CWC pathway. Mercy! If they've played two matches, one for each team, probably the best thing is to redirect to the list for first team they played for. Or at least to whatever list exists at the time. I've no issue with what happens to the AfD outcome, I've stated my rationale to keep, but (as of typing this) looks like it'll end up as a delete. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:20, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Frederick Nel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Nel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Nel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 04:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

List of Border representative cricketers

I think I converted all the short dashes to long dashes at this, but you might want to check that I didn't screw it up. Be interested to hear your thoughts on the format btw - obviously very much my preferred style, but that doesn't mean I'm right. Well, not always... Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Morning! Looks good to me, and I can use the long-dash for finishing off the rest of the list. Thanks for your work on this! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

You take up the majority of the new pages list every time I check it, and I can commend that. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bruce Cook (cricketer)

The article Bruce Cook (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG as I couldn't find any resources for this player.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 06:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Greetings

Thanks for your contributions for wikipedia pages related to cricket and cricketrs. Keep it up and updated wikipedia pages related to cricket and cricketers. Syed Zain Ul Abideen Bukhari (talk) 07:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Will do! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Stop deleting my edits

Hello. Do you have any enmity with me? Why do you delete every single article I write? I also give correct sources. I don’t understand what is your problem? You must tell me why you delete my edits such as you did to Faheem Ashraf? I will have to resist against you. You make Wikipedia suck. Mr. Master of Editor (talk) 17:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey! What is your problem? Why don't you response? You have written useless sentences, "Push me and I will resist". Now I will resist. Mr. Master of Editor (talk) 07:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Grinch-mas!

To one and all. To all editors, to all the talkpage stalkers, the sportos, the motorheads, geeks, sluts, bloods, wastoids, dweebies, dickheads. Have a good one! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Cricket Barnstar
		Congratulations for all the hard work you have done in the creation of cricket articles that provide such good coverage of the sport globally. All the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexander Gale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Gale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Gale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 14:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Gorton (cricketer)
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden Anderson

cricket

Despite what you insinuate in your edit summaries, I have no beef with you. I have a problem with the many cricket articles about people who lack notability (in the general sense, not the NCRIC sense). My next edit after the Alexander Gale redirect was a similar redirection of John Aris, created by Bobo192. I don't care who created these pages (found by random cricket category or list browsing, or by new page patrolling). For cricket, chances are quite big that a page will have been created by you. So what? I don't treat these different from pages created by others, I'm not looking for them, but I'm not going to avoid them. Please drop the insinuations to the contrary. Fram (talk) 15:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Well, clearly you do have an issue with me. That's fine, I will continue this with ongoing correspondence with Arbcom about your conduct. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of George Cooper (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Cooper (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Cooper (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lance Druery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lance Druery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance Druery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lester Warden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lester Warden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lester Warden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Ryan (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Ryan (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Ryan (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Dudley Gradwell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dudley Gradwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudley Gradwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Glen Granger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glen Granger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Granger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ernest Greathead for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernest Greathead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Greathead until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rowan Grebe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rowan Grebe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowan Grebe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 06:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Sachiko Hidari

You have re-entered the info that Hidari's film Far Away was entered into the Berlinale competition with another source not any more reliable than imdb, but still the Berlinale site itself nowhere states that her film was shown there. Please explain. Thank you. Robert Kerber (talk) 18:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, Film Affinity is a WP:RS when it comes to films selected at film festivals. I know that some of the older archives on sites like Berlin, Venice, etc, are not up to date. I've added another source from the New York Times. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Lugnuts
	Hi Lugnuts, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Ho, ho, ho! Thanks Davey. Have a good one too! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Bah Humbug! , You're welcome and thanks will!, All the best for 2021, Cheers. –Davey2010^Talk 21:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

File:Christmas tree in field.jpg	Merry Christmas Lugnuts
	Hi Lugnuts, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia this past year, like this tree, you are a light shining in the darkness. Onel5969 TT me 12:07, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you - have a good one too! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Do you think this is notable?

Hi, I was looking through Wikipedia and found this article. I didn't know if it passes WP:CRIN since it features a domestic team but also features and A and B team. I don't want to accidentally nominate it for AFD if it is actually notable, so I am asking for your view. Thanks. CreativeNorth (talk) 14:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, this tournament is notable, as it's part of the Indian domestic season, with List A status. Despite the names of the teams (see also the 2016–17 Duleep Trophy), they are notable. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:38, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: Thanks, that's why it's good to check ey! Have a nice rest of the day. CreativeNorth (talk) 17:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

No problem! Have a good one, too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Question

Why did you do this? --93.76.60.24 (talk) 20:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

I removed an unsourced claim. It needs a reliable source to verify it. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:38, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Oh okay, got it. 93.76.60.24 (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Damian Smith (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damian Smith (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damian Smith (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 00:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Shazam Ramjohn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shazam Ramjohn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shazam Ramjohn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 00:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mohindra Boodram for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohindra Boodram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohindra Boodram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 00:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Arun Gokoel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arun Gokoel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Gokoel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 00:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Pakistani cricket team in Bangladesh in 2017 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pakistani cricket team in Bangladesh in 2017 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistani cricket team in Bangladesh in 2017 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 09:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Epitome (film)

Why have you deleted the links 1953 in film and Japanese film in the head section of this article? They are conform to WP standards, also please compare e.g. to lengthy quality film articles. Thank you. Robert Kerber (talk) 19:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi. See WP:OVERLINK and WP:EGG. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

While I would agree to a certain degree with 1953 in film which is also linked in the category section, I do not regard the country of origin as WP:OVERLINK. Please re-consider linking it either in the head section or in the info box. Thank you. Robert Kerber (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

If you read WP:OVERLINK it states "the following are usually not linked - countries (e.g., Japan/Japanese, Brazil/Brazilian)" Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Wolf (1955 film)

Hmmm… not that my life depends on it, but while I could see your point with linked countries, I still can't see which section in WP:OVERLINK and/or WP:EGG doesn't allow for linking 1954 in film which is a valid annual film overview and might be of interest for users as any other link in this article? I had this discussion with another user, and he could finally see my point. Maybe you could help me with yours? Thanks Robert Kerber (talk) 18:05, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

WP:EGG explains it with "Per the principle of least astonishment, make sure that the reader knows what to expect when clicking on a link". So seeing 1954 linked, the least astonishment would be to link to the actual year, which is pointless. This was discussed at length with the Film Project, with a consensus NOT to link to xxxx in film in the lead (or indeed, anywhere). I can't find the discussion(s) right now, but if your life does depend on it, start a new thread at WT:FILM. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

I already did so in the meantime (WT:FILM), curious what'll come out of it. Thanks Robert Kerber (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Super. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Lugnuts: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

And a Happy New Year to you, too! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2021!

Abishe (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you! Have a good one too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy 2021

Churot (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

May 2021 bring lots of joy to you. Regards, Churot (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Order of sections in films

You changed the order of sections in Wolf (1955 film). My info according to MOS:MOVIE is that there is no defined order. Has there been an update on film article formatting, or why the change? Thanks Robert Kerber (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year Lugnuts!

Happy New Year!

Lugnuts,
Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Thanks for all your help this year and let’s hope next year is much less dramatic. CreativeNorth (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Yes, hopefully 2021 will be better. Have a good one. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 19:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Happy New Year to you, too! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks :) Empire AS ^Talk! 19:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Tahaaleem ^Talk— is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Tahaaleem ^Talk 19:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)