This is the 38th page of my talkpage archives, dated mid-September 2007 to early-October 2007. Please do not edit this page. If you wish to leave a message, click here! :)
Dearest Mailer diablo,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to Hirohisat, Wizardman, and Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.
I would like to move this page be deleted, I notice it has been some time since it was last nominated for removal, and given I am engaged in a similar argument about the Chris Erskine page, I might as well nominate this too... unfortunately I am not sure how to get it a new page to be wiped, and I notice you gave the verdict for the previous debate.
You were associated with the deletion of the Redintegration page. I am wondering whether there was 'any' content at all one that page. I have created a Wiktionary entry for the word and may create a redirection to an article (either Associationism or Association of Ideas) that has a little content about it. Redintegration is also occasionally used as a title for avant-garde music pieces. As an old word it can also appear in quotes, where style discourages links.
Please let me know if there was ever any content. I would like to extract whatever I can from previous efforts. DCDuring 15:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
That's what I feared. Thanks for getting back to me so fast. DCDuring 15:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and DihydrogenMonoxide for nominating me.
Just found this, which is the exact same as the just AFD'ed one, but it was created before the AFD closed. Can it be speedied? --Rschen7754 (TC) 04:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 58 supports, 1 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified. Addhoc 19:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 16:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the translation to my Chinese welcome template! I'd completely forgotten that needed to be done, but you came out of the blue to finish it up. Thanks very much, and happy editing as always! Hersfold(t/a/c) 20:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
You have deleted Link-distance. Can you tell me why? It does make sense, maybe it's too mathematician or English is not clear enough. But not nonsense! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flocsy (talk • contribs) 08:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
How can I use the <ref> macro to make several different references to different sources, without having to repeat the full citation for each reference?
Thanks, Archive μ! Thank you for voicing your opinion in my RfA, which passed today with a unanimous 79/0/0 tally. It feels great to be appreciated, and I will try my best to meet everyone's expectations. If you have any advice or tips, feel free to pass them along, as I am sure that I will need them! Cheers,hmwith talk 21:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5)[1]. Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Wikipedia.
How can I recreate the content a page you deleted - I used this great list from time to time: List_of_Nintendo_DS_downloadable_games? I want to recreate the list on another Wiki? == :-) JessGertsen
Hi, I noticed that you recently applied the Singapore coat of arms to {{Politics of Singapore}} and {{Infobox Court Case}}. While I think that the coat of arms is attractive and suitable for these infoboxes, rule 3(1) of the Singapore Arms and Flag and National Anthem Rules (Cap. 296, R1, 2004 Rev. Ed.) states: "[N]o person shall, without the prior written permission of the Minister or any authorised officer — (a) print, publish, manufacture, sell, offer for sale or exhibit for sale; (b) cause to be printed, published, manufactured, sold, offered for sale or exhibited for sale; (c) send, distribute or deliver to, or serve on, any other person; or (d) cause to be sent, distributed or delivered to, or served on, any other person, any writing, material or object in or on which appears the Arms or any token, insignia, emblem or other thing that so nearly resembles the Arms as to be capable of being mistaken for the Arms." Rule 3(2) states: "[N]o person shall, without the prior written permission of the Minister or any authorised officer, use or apply the Arms on any writing, material or object." That was why the coat of arms was replaced with Image:Singov top 02.gif in {{Politics of Singapore}}, as these regulations do not apply to use of that logo.
This matter needs to be discussed further, so I'm posting a modified copy of this message on the talk page of the SGpedians' notice board. Further discussion on the matter can take place there. Cheers, Jacklee 18:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, yes, I'm aware of the Wikipedia:Featured articles process. So far, I've only been able to get one article, "Richard Hakluyt" (it's not a Singapore-related one), up to FA status, and you can see from "Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Richard Hakluyt" that it was a very tortuous process. I honestly don't think I have time right now to get any additional articles up to FA level as I'm busy working on my PhD. Which articles that I've worked on do you think are worth trying to get up to FA status? Cheers, Jacklee 21:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Of all the DYK expiring today or tomorrow, I think your's is the best. As a result, I've added it to the next update list. Since this is the first time that I have done it, you may review it to see if I did it correctly.
Good work writing the article.Chergles 17:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know I put it in the wrong spot. I put it in another section. Hopefully, I did it correctly this time. If not, I'll let someone else try. Chergles 17:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
One more request. Can you also delete Talk:Mishpachah_Lev-Tsiyon/Archive_1 as it is no longer relevant and contains a lot of personal information on it? I tried blanking it, but all it did was add a new discussion page to the already deleted article. Thanks. :) Drumpler 18:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello. See my comments here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Russavia#Singapore_Airlines_fleet
Do you think this is a good suggestion? The suggestion is that I have some ideas to improve the Singapore Airlines Fleet article into more than a list. (2 of my ideas are mentioned in the AFD. I have many more ideas.) However, this type of article takes a lot of effort because it's getting little pieces of information from many sources, not just summarising a webpage from the airline's website. If the AFD is delayed, I am willing to help improve WP.
If you think my idea is stupid, just let me know. I don't mind being called an idiot if it's true. Archtransit 20:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
After the shareholders have approved the merger, the merger has to be approved by the creditors of KCR, in a meeting to be held in mid/late October. Then, LegCo has to publish the gazette of the merger, and then the merger would be in effect 28 days after that period, so the merger should be done by the end of the year. (According to Ming Pao, [1], that is)--Alasdair 12:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
On 10 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lock v. Goh, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Thanks for participating in my RfA, which closed successfuly. I leave you with a picture of the realBlood Red Sandman! Note his 'mop' is slightly deadlier than mine! - - Blood Red Sandman(Talk)(Contribs) 18:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
My dear Wikipedian Mailer diablo,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 36 supports, 3 opposed, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Thank you and good day.
Credits
This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.
We are one of the major educational publishers in Hong Kong specialised in the publication of textbooks on various subjects across the spectrum of the Hong Kong secondary school curriculum.
We are now publishing 2 textbooks "Discovering Mathematics 3B (English Edition)" and "Discovering Mathematics 3B (Chinese Edition)" for the local secondary students. We would be grateful if you could grant us permission to reproduce the following photo as teaching material in the books.
Description of the photo: Top view of Bukit Natok in Singapore
As the books are going to be published soon, your earliest attention to this matter is much appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
Lo Cheuk King
Photo Permission Editor
Times Publishing (Hong Kong) Ltd
Unit B2, 6/F, Eastern Sea Industrial Building
48-56 Tai Lin Pai Road, Kwai Chung
New Territories, Hong Kong
(tel: 852-29457276)
(fax: 852-24813379)
(email: cheukking at manhattanpress -.- com -.- hk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.215.133.197 (talk) 08:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC)