User talk:MaranoFan/Archive 9

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

• The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
• Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
• Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
• Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
• BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

If you have time

Hi MaranoFan, hope you are well. If you have time and only if you have time, I'd would be grateful if you could leave some comments here. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

I have to admit I was taken aback when I was one of the only music editors not invited to the first peer review, lol. I will try to contribute something.--NØ 05:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

MaranoFan, my apologies. It was a rather poor judgement on my part and I completely understand why it must have made you feel upset. I'll be honest- when I opened the PR at the time, I remember asking your help with another article which I was planning to nominate at FL. I felt bad about asking your help again for the PR, and thought I should probably see if anyone else is willing to review the article. I don't want you to see this as an excuse for not inviting you back then, I just want you to know that you'd crossed my mind but I didn't want to bother you. I hope you are well, and I look forward to your comments. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry about it!--NØ 07:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

LIghts Up FAC

Hi MaranoFan, thank you for your help at the PR. :) I have nominated it now at FAC. You are welcome to comment, if you would like to. Hope you have a great day. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 06:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Triple Crown

Congratulations to MaranoFan, who is hereby awarded the Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown for their incredible contributions to Wikipedia. Keep up the great work! Damien Linnane (talk) 07:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for being kind and helpful. Your feedback has been invaluable and helped to improve "Lights Up' to FA. Regards, Viridian Bovary (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

No (Meghan Trainor song) peer review

Hello again. I noticed that you recently closed the peer review for the "No" (Meghan Trainor song) article. I hope that my review did not come across as rude or too much and apologies if that was the case. I do think the article has potential to be a featured and best of luck with the work on the article and any other Wikipedia projects. Aoba47 (talk) 18:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Aoba47, your review was perfect! The review process just made me give the article a deeper read which, in turn, made me realize that way too much work will be needed. I haven't been that motivated lately, lol. I look forward to working with you again.--NØ 12:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

• Best of luck with the edits and I will be more than happy to help with the article anytime (whether it is for a peer review or a FAC). I always enjoy seeing editors work on song article with an eye toward a FA. I completely understand your point about motivation. I have had plenty of false starts for potential projects in my sandbox lol. I hope you are having a great weekend so far. Aoba47 (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

1. The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
2. Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
3. Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
4. Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
5. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
6. BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
7. Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
8. Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
• Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

David Berman - FAC

Per your previous interest participation in the FAC for A Crow Looked at Me, I thought you may be interested in the current FAC for David Berman (musician). DMT Biscuit (talk) 10:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Why is it wrong to add Riley Sabara to Meghan Trainor's Wikipedia page?

Hi MaranoFan, I realized you recently reverted my edit regarding Meghan's son (Riley Sabara) on her Wikipedia page. Why is that so? What's wrong? Wuuluuu (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

You should have referred the link in the edit summary.--NØ 04:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup & the Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive

Hi there, you're receiving this note because you're currently signed up for the 2022 WikiCup and don't yet have any points in the competition. As you may know, scoring any points in the first round is traditionally sufficient to advance to the second, and a fast way to get 5 points is to complete a good article review. Given that the January 2022 Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive is active for another 10 days, you might be interested in pitching in. Complete one review, and you'll be on to the next round in WikiCup; complete two or three, and you'll also be eligible to win some barnstars. As always, quality reviews with attention to detail are expected. Cheers, --Usernameunique (talk) 19:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

"DJ Luian" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect DJ Luian and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#DJ Luian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Muhandes (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

"Mambo Kingz" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mambo Kingz and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Mambo Kingz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Muhandes (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

"Kelmitt" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kelmitt and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 27#Kelmitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Muhandes (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bhasha Sumbli

The article Bhasha Sumbli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

She fails WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

can you make this article possible please?

Hello, if you can, can you make an article on COMPLETE MESS by 5 Seconds of Summer?

Thanks - ThatWeirdPro Thatweirdpro (talk) 01:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, if you can, can you make an article on COMPLETE MESS by 5 Seconds of Summer?

Thanks - ThatWeirdPro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatweirdpro (talk • contribs) 01:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Thatweirdpro. Looking at 5 Seconds of Summer discography, I am not sure this song meets the notability thresholds described at WP:NSONGS. Please produce some links to coverage in reliable secondary sources if you can find them and I will look into it.--NØ 01:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

I found some but idk if it’ll help:

https://5sos.fandom.com/wiki/Complete_Mess

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/5-seconds-of-summer-complete-mess-video-1315727/amp/

https://soundigest.com/2022/03/09/5sos-complete-mess/?amp=1

https://www.songmeaningsandfacts.com/complete-mess-by-5-seconds-of-summer/

https://www.bmg.com/us/news/5SOS-Complete-Mess.html Thatweirdpro (talk) 05:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Hmm, unfortunately only Rolling Stone meets the reliability thresholds out of the sources available. Hopefully there will be more coverage about this song in the parent album's reviews.--NØ 01:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Remember the Name

Hello!

I want to remove the chart peaks in the commercial performance section for France, Italy, and the Netherlands as the last paragraph looks more like a supermarket grocery list than anything else. On top of that, there is no need for all those chart peeks. Tell me if you agree with this.

Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

The changes seem fine. Go ahead. Also refer to my reply on your talk page. Regards.--NØ 02:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

I have added more reviews to the song, feel free to c/e or add anything else. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Sounds great, MarioSoulTruthFan. Go ahead with whatever changes you see fit. It is fine now that we have agreed to be co-nominators.--NØ 17:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi! I'm good with the changes, I added a couple more reviews and that was it. I believe its the best I can come up with. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

1. Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
2. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
3. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
6. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
7. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for As It Was

On 5 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article As It Was, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Harry Styles's goddaughter voices the opening words in "As It Was"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/As It Was. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, As It Was), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing MaranoFan a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the wishes!—NØ 20:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Hello again. I just wanted to say congratulations on the recent FAC promotion for the "No" (Meghan Trainor song) article. I guess they did not say no to that lol. I'll just see my way out after that bad pun lol. Aoba47 (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Aoba47 (see I can do puns too lol). Your contributions have been nothing short of instrumental in my success in the FAC space, seriously.--NØ 18:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

I am glad that I could help in any way, but I would say that your success is due to your hard work and persistence. I always appreciate a good pun lol. Aoba47 (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of No (Meghan Trainor song)

Congratulations, MaranoFan! The article you nominated, No (Meghan Trainor song), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hog Farm (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Remember the Name (Ed Sheeran song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Remember the Name (Ed Sheeran song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

please add late night talking cover

Hello, do you think you can add the Late Night Talking cover by Harry styles? It’s cuz I’m on mobile. Here’s the link:

https://shopuk.hstyles.co.uk/products/late-night-talking-digital-single-download-alt-cover

Thank you Thatweirdpro (talk) 00:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Thatweirdpro, I see you figured out how to upload it so I just went ahead and replaced it with a 300x300-resized png file for you. For copyright reasons, the dimensions cannot be higher than that and it is the preferred format.--NØ 05:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I was gonna say never mind, but thanks for the help tho Thatweirdpro (talk) 05:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)