User talk:Mkoronowski

Welcome to Wikipedia

Mkoronowski, you have done a splendid revision of the Centrifugal compressor article, for which I thank you.

However, it is evident from the discussions you posted on the Talk:Centrifugal compressor page that you need help on how to properly use a Discussion page. Please read the helpful comments I left for you on that Talk:Centrifugal compressor.

Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! - mbeychok 07:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Notifying you of response at Talk:Centrifugal compressor

I just responded to your latest postings at Talk:Centrifugal compressor. Regards, - mbeychok 20:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Need help?

I don't understand what you're up to in trying to move your draft article to the subpage. Would you like me to just copy it there for you, so you don't lose all the headings and figures and such? Dicklyon (talk) 02:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

yes, please. there is a big difference between being a wiki expert and a topic expert. i do appreciate you help. btw, a bot ripped a bunch of corrections into my centrifugal compressor edits. some i guess are ok, the others stink. what should i do? go back and correct the important stuff again? or chat with who? thanks, martin koronowski, Mkoronowski (talk) 03:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Give me a link and I'll look at it and see what I can suggest. I'll move your draft now (copy in edit mode in history from one page, paste into the subpage). Dicklyon (talk) 04:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

centrifugal compressor is what BilCat changed as shown in the history. as i read the actual article the text i thought deleted was not. my wiki markup skill stinks. yet the bot was still inconsistent on my highlighted text which i did for a reason.

specifically, turbomachinery, regardless of subclass is all similar, designed with the same applied mathematics. it is very important academically to show this similarity and uniformity. if a college student uses wiki as an intro, it will be useless without consistent notation and sound definitions of fundamentals. i see a real excellence elsewhere but not yet in turbomachines. thanks, i am sorry to waste your time. i do appreciate your help!!! , Mkoronowski (talk) 04:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

If you go in the history and click on a "prev" link you can get a URL to post as a "diff", like this. It shows that he moved some images closer to the top, simplified some overly-complicated links, removed some improper capitalization, and not much else. I'll add the space he squeezed out. What did he do that bothers you? Dicklyon (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I just did this. You might be able to correlate some of my changes with the WP:MOS. We only capitalize proper nouns, and we only bold the article topic, and we don't put double blank line (I didn't get all those yet). Other than that, I didn't read it. Oh, and User:BilCat is not a bot. Dicklyon (talk) 05:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

live and learn. I understand the proper noun rule, i think there should be a modified rule for science and technology. but, no problem. i appreaciate the help. some day in the future, I'll understand why i thought text and captions were deleted per what i saw in the history comparison, yet they are still there in the article. what a relief. as far as the bot thing, he could have said something human, where is captcha when you need it. haaahaaa. thank you and i am sorry about the panic. my bad. my angst has been on the immenant danger level working my way through this stuff. if i had a nickle every time i rolled my eyes i'd be rich, maybe 200 bucks. it must be friday and late and a full moon. time for bed.

i do have a question, first a little about my muscular dystrophy and the wheel chair, no im not steven hawking. anyway, my speech recognition , dragon, is not compatable with the references template. i can type slow with one hand, one finger but have a micro keyboard and cant use the asci keyboard to get special characters. no you see why so few caps and lots of typos. i've started to copy and paste my article in and out of word 2010. any suggestions here? maybe a different external editor written for wiki? back in the day, i forget when, we used to write fortran code (pause for laugh) that wrote custom fortran and scripts to automate our analysis. I have to think a "what you see is what you wiki" editor is out there. just to help the un wikified. Mkoronowski (talk) 05:56, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure what to suggest. I just use the editor in the browser. If you want help formatting refs, you can put what you know in a talk page section and ask someone to put it into the article. Dicklyon (talk) 04:01, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

The cite tool in the edit window (click the "cite" icon, then click the tab for the type of citation: web, journal etc) allows you to enter the reference information without using any special characters. The reference will be inserted properly formatted automatically when you click "add citation". SpinningSpark 09:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Dick, can you please check something for me. in the scientic community Mach Number, Reynolds Number and similar ilk discoveries are always considered proper nouns. Mach Number refers to the equation which is a unique entity not a class of items. What is wiki policy? can it be improved to accomodate this? the Mach Number is like having a city named after you. Mkoronowski (talk) 06:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Dick, I looked around wiki math and found a slight inconsistency, in general the practice would be Mach number as the proper noun. thxs for the help. Mkoronowski (talk) 07:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Most scientific works do not capitalize "number" in those contexts; check books, where you see it capitalized only in headings. In wikipedia, we don't even capitalize in headings, excepts for words that are almost always capitalized in reliable sources. Dicklyon (talk) 03:58, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Your request for assistance

You have some replies at WP:EAR SpinningSpark 23:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Typing

In your post at Editor Assistance you brought up issues with your voice recognition software. If you don't find a compatible WYSIWYG editor, I'd be happy to act as your amanuensis. If you copypaste some sort of unformatted citation onto the article talk page and then indicate somehow which citations go where, I can take care of formatting for you. Does that sound workable? --Danger (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

thankyou and i will ask you for help soon. i am still going to try various techniques to see if i can master anything that i think is effective for me. one problem i have is the following needs to be linked to the following web site,http://www.asme.org/kb/standards#des=PTC, i just don't know how to do this. thankyou Mkoronowski (talk) 19:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. I fixed it in Centrifugal compressor. The cite template has a "url= " field in all of its forms. --Danger (talk) 19:39, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

If you need assistance in the near future (next three weeks or so), please leave a message on my talk page. I will be watching messages, but I may not remember to check article changes while running around like a decapitated chicken in real life. Danger (talk) 02:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

And do you need help with capitalization? We use sentence case (as opposed to title case as some works do) for all titles and headings as well as for sentences. If you need help fixing those, let me know and I'll take a pass over it. Dicklyon (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Dick, yes i do. thankyou! I also need help formating tables. only if you have time.Mkoronowski (talk) 18:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't do tables. Dicklyon (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Compressor map.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Compressor map.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Feedback

Your request for feedback at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 May 1 has been replied to. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mkoronowski. You have new messages at WP:MCQ.
Message added 19:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

starting rewrite of turbo machinery

use link User:Mkoronowski/turbomachinery Mkoronowski (talk) 15:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

start rewrite of centrifugal pump

use link

Talk:Centrifugal pump/new draft Mkoronowski (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

working copy of centrifugal compressor, add design methodology

use link User:Mkoronowski/Centrifugal compressorMkoronowski (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Threatening editors at Mechanical fan

A dispute over the scope of an article is no excuse to start threatening other editors with bans, let alone blocks. You have no authority to start throwing such threats around, any nore than any other editor. Your track record for making accusations is poor, let alone their accuracy. Nor are your own edits a shining example of clarity or good copywriting. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

points well made. 1)help the newbees out more, working in wiki is rough at best. 2)i removed it once before, 3)a commercialization of a vena contracts is salesmanship, dysons product has a mechanical fan in the base, that is how it works.4) problem is, that unless you do something wrong, no one gives advice. please tell me if wiki is suppose to be brand name free or not. 5)who out there mentors the newbees, i need help and have asked. sometimes i get answers, sometimes i don't. as far as the reckless accuracy, is it corrected to your satisfaction or not?Mkoronowski (talk) 23:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Issue

The article is not NPOV without the list, beacuse it is listing some car brands, thst why the list is there, if you go thru the article you see it gives credits to some car brands which does not earn it. I explained that in the edit comment already. And the list is good encyclopedic data, whihc is often search by users -->Typ932 ^T·C 02:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

do you agree that the article is about turbochargers?

that obvious

are you an automobile enthusiast?

Yes

should the list of cars include any more?

No but the article need historical background

why does this list of cars present a npov?

Because there is mentioned other cars in the main text, which doesnt even need to be mentioned. Did you actually read the whole article??? I doubt you have not even read the article thru.

why does the list only include american and european cars?

1980 Mitsubishi Lancer GT Turbo is this european or american car? I cant change the fact that others did not make turbocharged cars before europeans or americans.

should the first turbocharged cars from every auto manufacturer be added just to be fair?

No but the article should have historical section and I think its good to have info about the pioneers, this is common also on other wikipedia articles

do you what to see a comparable list of all military aircraft that use(d) turbochargers?

?

... light aircraft ...?

... performance aircraft ...?

... all trucks from around the world ...?

... all heavy/industrial/marine diesels from around the world ...?

should the non automotive lists be in separate articles?

you are free to add other data/info wikipedia is free encyclopedia

would the article get too long?Mkoronowski (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

If the article grows too big then it can be splitted, there is also list of Manufacturers of turbochargers do you think its needed? -->Typ932 ^T·C 18:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

if the list of manufacturers is included and conforms to wiki's commercialization rules then i have no problem as long as it makes an effort to include all manufacturers, including Russia and china. currently it does not and it has been too many years since i've worked with any Chinese turbo-machinery manufacturers to remember them. One of my peers used to be in development at one of the two big russian firms. i hope i made sense. please excuse my speech recognition software. i am disabled and just learning how to use it.Mkoronowski (talk) 19:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

the Mitsubishi lancer is a Japanese car with an english name. does it have a different name in japan? was it the only Japanese car to be turbo'ed during the 15 years your list covers? it is only 1 out of list. it is very likely that japan was using the same car with possibly a different name in 78 or 79. I also think other Japanese manufacturers might very likely had tc'd competitors by 82.

yes i have read the whole article all the way through, that is why i tried to develop a new outline for it. it was a little messy. i have started to rewrite specific sections that cover fundamentals, paragraph by paragraph. it is of course a turbocharger article. i have completed or assisted in the aero design of one or more locomotive turbochargers, automotive turbochargers, automotive centrifugal superchargers, micro turbines based on turbos and a turbo specially sized for a fuel cell. Mkoronowski (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

do you think anyone would like to know how to match their own turbocharger to their engine? also, as i learned from Andy yesterday do contributors need to balance their contributions against other interests or is it ok to load the article with auto applications since that is what you know?Mkoronowski (talk) 19:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Mkoronowski. You have new messages at Dolphin51's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

compressor.jpg is named incorrectly

I think it is fair to rename the existing file, rather than creating a clone, since it does not make much sense, the existence of two files are identical, but differ in name only! The use dl file "Compressor.JPG" was given only because the older (original), not because he was correct.

If I'm not mistaken you can also make commons "redirect".--A7N8X (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

thankyou, where can i go to learn how to do this? Mkoronowski (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Centrifugal compressor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages APU and Radial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:AeroTurboDomain.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status of File:PhysTurboDomain.PNG and File:AeroTurboDomain.PNG

Hello Mkoronowski, in the upload logs of File:PhysTurboDomain.PNG and File:AeroTurboDomain.PNG you mentioned "fair use". These two files look like they were scanned from a book. Yet both of these files are attributed to yourself, and licensed as CC-zero. Can you please explain exactly where they come from? It is important to clarify this, so as to determine whether they can be moved to Wikimedia Commons. Thank you, Ariadacapo (talk) 09:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Help me!

Dear Wiki-persona

Please help me with...I am helping the family and estate of Katherine Hoover (flutist, composer, ...) edit Katherine's wiki article. My work is in my sandbox. in contrast to my centrifugal compressor article, i must be absolutely rigorous with these edits. i'm doing this as a favor to Katherine's husband and her son. Katherine's husband is her estate's executor and new owner of Papagena Press.

How can the estate executor acquire authoritative control over the page?

 •there have been edits and deletions that are in error.

Is there a classical musically inclined expert contributor that i can work with to assure i am following the highest standards for composers, flutists, and college faculty?

 •to be expeditious, I've been copying and re-writing other section's from other wiki articles.

Sincerely Martin, Mkoronowski (talk) 17:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Mkoronowski (talk) 17:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately, you cannot obtain complete control over a page even if you may be uniquely positioned to add accurate information (and that is in fact against policy, Wikipedia:Ownership of content), though if you can make use of your knowledge or any insights for locating sources, that can only help. The best way to find experienced volunteers that are interested in the field is to find the relevant WikiProject, in this case Wikipedia:WikiProject Music and Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians, and ask on the talk page. This may take some time for smaller WikiProjects. You should also add {{WikiProject Biography}} to the talk page of the article once it is published, which will place it in the categories to be noticed by the people who watch for these articles. Please also note that as you are affiliated with the article subject, you are considered to have a conflict of interest by our policy. Here is a simple guide to help you get started. Alpha3031 (t • c) 18:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,753 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Katherine Hoover

Hello, Mkoronowski. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Katherine Hoover, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)