User talk:Monozigote/Archive1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
As I said, I don't talk much..., but I try contributing a lot. Under various monikers, I've been on WP for about 10 years and mainly contributed to the English and Italian versions (with some French & Spanish interventions) in areas varying from History to Judaism (especially the whole translation of the Judaism portal into Italian), from Fine Arts to Philosophy and Sociology, etc. What I need is more free time... as I travel a lot for my educational work. Well, I suppose, when I retire...--Monozigote (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. Sorry, I originally nominated this article for deletion under Wikipedia's rules since normally biographies of living persons would need at least one source to be created, but I noticed that actually the subject is deceased. You should still look to add citations to reliable sources to the article. More information is available here WP:CITE. Welcome to Wikipedia and good luck on creating your article. If you have any questions, please feel free to message me. Connolly15 (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Will do, ta.--Monozigote (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- The world is a small place, che cosa insegni all'Università di Edimburgo? Connolly15 (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Eheheh, no, siamo non imparentato. Passione - ho studiato italiano all'universita' in Canada e adesso la mia fidanzata e' italiana quindi e' ancora piu' importante (ma lei parla inglese com'e' la sua madrelingua). Connolly15 (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Smile!
|
A smile for you
You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.0.230 (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
Logos
Hi, Good point from Dunn, but probably needs to go to a new subsection of some type, for it is not about the OT. I will leave it to you. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- You're right. I'm really unsure how to subtitle it: the whole exposition of this theme has essential O.T. roots, but it continuously compares & contrasts with Johannine and Patristic derivatives... So, how about "Derivatives from the Old Testament"? I'll ponder it, and then fix it. Many thanks for the prompt advice.--Monozigote (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Fine, but in many cases the sect title will suggest itself after the section is finished. The heart of it is that Paul, John, etc. were living in that age in that context and drew on the OT, of course. A valid point. So your "O.T. roots" term may be best anyway. But in the long term, some IP will show and change it in 6 months, so cannot be cast in stone anyway. History2007 (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Understood, and well said. Titles are not my forte and you rightly advise the solution... I'll recap as soon as I finish the section, which should be soon enough. Ciao.--Monozigote (talk) 22:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- I liked the material you added on Christology, and I specially like O'Collins in general. I left a note on Sophia about link formats, in that the Biblegateway links may all get WP:LINKROT if Biblegateway dies tomorrow, but Wikisource is the general future direction of Wikipedia. And articles that already use Wikisource would achieve uniformity by using those. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
That's great, thanks! I'll keep it in mind, and use Wikisource when possible. However, as you may see from various quotations and respective links, from time to time I use different versions of the Bible text and insert the ref accordingly: I check the Hebrew vv. and then select the most appropriate translation from Biblegateway (or Bible browser)... Hopefully they won't die too soon! I'm grateful for your assistance.--Monozigote (talk) 21:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Fine. The OT case was not what I was thinking about, it was mostly the NT links. And in general, no one is ever happy about the NT version and using Wikisource avoids the denominational debates anyway. And yes, I do think O'Collins has been somewhat overlooked by others. It is not just his Christology that is impressive, but also on other issues. History2007 (talk) 21:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm so glad I found another O'Collins appreciator: I thought I was standing alone. I met him in Rome, when he was at the Gregorian Uni, and we exchanged Aussie jokes... Actually, I was surprised Wikipedia didn't have a bio entry for him - so I created one, well, actually two (the Italian as well). I just quickly read your page and we seem to share a passion for History and the Arts (but my PhD is not in CS - my brain wouldn't be able to cope... although recently I seem to spend my professional life in front of a screen and masochistically not satisfied, I also waste away in the Wikipedia quicksands). Arrivederci.--Monozigote (talk) 21:30, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting that you have met him... He does deserve an article, of course. I actually do not personally know any theologians to speak of - my mis-spent youth was in the computing world. And I usually think of Wikipedia in terms of sandcastles more often than quicksand... History2007 (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Gavin Extence has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Randykitty (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Jeez, man, give me time! I'm still working on it! It'll be referenced, it'll be referenced, I promise...--Monozigote (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Randykitty (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
The detailed information that you added about pencils is partly on topic, and partly right off topic. There is an article on Drawing an an article on Plumbago drawing and I presume an article on Pencil. An article on Sketch doesn't required detailed information about all the different grades of pencil and the types of drawing that they suit. It needs to be put elsewhere. In fact one of the other articles I observed already has details of grades of pencils.
You might as well have a list of brush types and sizes, types of crayon, types of ink and so on, because all these things are used for sketching. One of the significant characteristics of a "sketch" is that it can be done with the proverbial "thumbnail dipped in tar" and on any receptive surface, such as a flattened cigarette box, or a damask serviette. Likewise it is pointless to list grades of paper. Amandajm (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- You may be right. I started it as a short entry for "pencil drawing", not knowing where to place it... In fact "pencil drawing" redirects to Sketch (drawing) -- so I posted it there, but then I lost my way, aborting it. Perhaps "pencil drawing" should be a separate article, and then I could write it. Well, anyway, thanks for fixing it.--Monozigote (talk) 13:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland
I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I don't suppose you attend any local Wikimeets? There are a few coming up (see Wikipedia:Meetup/UK). If you can attend one, I'd love to meet you and discuss if you might be able to help the paid WiR in other ways? Let me know if it's possible. If not, no worries! Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 15:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- and again! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 22:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Native Latin Speaker?
In what way are you a native Latin speaker?--Herb-Sewell (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I was raised in the Roman Suburra by a Jewish gladiator from Safed... Nihil est--in vita priore ego imperator Romanus fui. Die dulci fruere!--Monozigote (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Catalan Culture Challenge
I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 06:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Many thanks for this. I'll see whether I can participate, time permitting.--Monozigote (talk) 11:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon
Hey there! As a Wikipedian in Scotland I thought you might be interested in the Scottish Fairground Culture editathon taking place on 7 May at the Riverside Museum - drop me a line if you'd like to know more! Lirazelf (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Lirazelf: Thanks for the news. I live around the Moray Firth - if it's anything I can participate in from here, fine, let me know!--Monozigote (talk) 10:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hey there! We're not able to do a livestream, I'm afraid - but if you're interested in contributing or improving articles, either on the day or at a different time, that'd be amazing! I'm compiling a list of online resources on the event page which should help, and I'll have a think about ways in which we could invite remote participation.. Lirazelf (talk) 11:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Shabbat Shalom, again!
Shabbat Shalom, Monozigote! I hope all is well. I have a bit of a quandary for you. Someone called "Gac" over on the Italian version of CJCUC is giving me a hard time and keeps undoing my revisions stating that the "italiano" is "illeggibile". Could you please help me out with the Italian? Blessings to you, my friend. --Omer Toledano (talk) 15:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much, my friend. Keep up the good work. Blessings. --Omer Toledano (talk) 04:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Monozigote. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.
Monozigote (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I cannot understand why I've been blocked: I hardly edit anything any more, as I've retired and dedicate myself to intense leisure activities which do not include editing Wikipedia. From time to time, possibly once or twice a year, on reading a wiki-article, I may correct (often without logging in) a typo or update a broken link -- that's about all. Perhaps I've been hacked? Don't know, but I would appreciate your unblocking my account, should you want my future (occasional) contributions. Moreover, the blockage is most unpleasant -- and sadly depressing -- for an affectionate editor who contributed actively for more than a decade, especially on it.wiki. Thank you.
Accept reason:
See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
I do not see a block on this account. If you are still unable to edit, please tell the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit. 331dot (talk) 23:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Monozigote (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I I knew it, there must be some glitch! Here's what appears each time I try to do any edits: "You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them.
Editing from 81.156.239.0/24 has been blocked (disabled) by Ponyo for the following reason(s): Wikipedia Checkuser.svgCheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address or network has been used (not necessarily by you) to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse. Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block. IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. Please request an account under your preferred username. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. If using the form, please refer to this block under "comments". If e-mailing, please refer to this block in your message.
Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.
This block has been set to expire: 20:19, 16 April 2019.
Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators." ... And naturally, I'm unable to access to page editing mode. Moreover, the IP addresses change each time.
Accept reason:
I've granted you IP block exemption, which should let you edit through any blocks we need to perform to stop unrelated vandalism. You can contact me if you have any further problems. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you NinjaRobotPirate - It works (to test it, I've just fixed a broken link). Ciao.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Copyright problem: Epigraphy
Hi, Monozigote; the following message is about some edits from ten years ago, so more than likely you will have no recollection of it. Apologize for templating you, but adding the following is required by the guideline on copyright I'm following.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Epigraphy article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Mathglot (talk) 04:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- You're right, I can't even remember writing on en.wiki! However, thank you for message and keep up the good work. Ciao. Monozigote (talk) 10:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
April 2023
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Alex Delaware. — Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)