User talk:Mr. Lama

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia Mr, Lama.

List of flags

Just wanted to say thanks for your recent addition on the United States article. You'll have to excuse some editors, they are some times too quick to delete the contributions of others when no sources are provided and they are within their rights. I would have waited a bit and given you a chance to do that. The list of flags and ethnic populations was a nice addition, but we need to provide the source. If you know the name of the publication and author all you have to do is list it after the list, like this:

<ref>AuthorName, Year, Title of work, p.123</ref>

There are other more specialized ways to list the source, but for now that would suffice. If the source is from a web page, make sure it is a relaiable source and simply include the Url address instead of the page number.

Once again, welcome! -- Gwillhickers (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Canada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. You added Italian to the list of recognized official regional languages without adding anything to the article to support the claim. As far as I know, no official governmental business is performed in Italian in Canada. I could be wrong and a reference would settle that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Lady Gaga. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Born to Be Gladiators

Hello Mr. Lama,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Not Born to Be Gladiators, may be copied from http://www.israelfilmcenter.org/israeli-film-database/films/not-born-to-be-gladiators. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your addition to Not Born to Be Gladiators has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 12:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Red Caps (TV series)

Hi, I'm Barney the barney barney. Mr. Lama, thanks for creating Red Caps (TV series)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. refs

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Virus Attack

Hello, Mr. Lama,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Virus Attack should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virus Attack .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Salimfadhley (talk) 13:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucky Luke (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Carey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dingo Pictures

Hello Mr. Lama,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dingo Pictures for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Abhinav (talk) 08:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dingo Pictures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dingo Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dingo Pictures until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blake Gripling (talk) 14:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Not Born to Be Gladiators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everyday (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Jaws 3-D, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kronk's New Groove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Italian Spiderman poster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Italian Spiderman poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Alien (1979) Space Jockey.png.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alien (1979) Space Jockey.png.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Alien (film), may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm LM2000. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of films considered the worst, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 03:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read the criteria for List of films considered the worst. Multiple reliable sources must be provided which call a film "the worst" in order for it to be included. Also, do not change Titanic's 2012 entry. A reliable source describes its position as the lowest ranked film on IMDB bottom 100. IMDB lists are not reliable so you need a secondary source, like that one if you're going to use that list to get a film included, like you tried to do with your edit.LM2000 (talk) 03:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Planet of the Vampires Skeleton.png.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Planet of the Vampires Skeleton.png.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Pompeii (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. STATic message me! 22:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Legend of the Titanic. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. MarnetteD|Talk 22:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Alien (film). ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 11:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Planet of the Vampires Skeleton.png.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Planet of the Vampires Skeleton.png.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Planet of the Vampires Skeleton.png.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Planet of the Vampires Skeleton.png.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Czar. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Silver the Hedgehog, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. czar ♔ 12:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

100% list

Hi, please only add entries which have had 20 or more reviews. Otherwise any film could have just one or two good reviews and have a 100% score.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:PlanetVampiresSkeleton.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PlanetVampiresSkeleton.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Template:Teletoon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 00:38, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zombi 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Splatter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jaws in Japan

added a link pointing to Jaws

Mockbuster

added a link pointing to CGI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films with a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zombie Nation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Caligula (film), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Jaws (film) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kong: The Animated Series. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 00:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grizzly (1976 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bootleg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Worst films

Stop adding inadequate films to this list. There are advisory warnings all over the page not to add films without fulfilling the criteria and I explicitly told you what you were doing wrong in June. In order for a film to be added to this list, MULTIPLE RELIABLE SOURCES MUST CITE IT AS BEING AMONGST THE WORST EVER MADE. A few harsh reviews isn't enough. Even one critic calling it "the worst' isn't enough. You've got to have multiple legitimate critics describing it as being the bottom of the barrel.LM2000 (talk) 18:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Ed Edd n Eddy film.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ed Edd n Eddy film.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Film languages

This attribute is not for exhaustively listing every language ever uttered in a film. The primary language is the ONLY one to be listed. There are some limited exceptions where a film is clearly bilingual. Please see here Template:Infobox_film#Parameters for more info. -Oosh (talk) 11:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deep Blood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rabbids Big Bang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aladdin's adventures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aladdin's adventures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aladdin's adventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGGoose (talk) 19:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pinocchio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teacher's Pet (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Titanic: The Legend Goes On, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jurassic Park (film). Avono (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Dinosaur from the Deep.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dinosaur from the Deep.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic Boom Wii U.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonic Boom Wii U.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 03:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Network parameter is for original broadcast network only

Hi, in these edits from August, and this edit from November, you added multiple networks to the |channel= parameter. Per template instructions, the parameter is for the original broadcast network only, not for every network the series ever aired on. Please keep this in mind going forward. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mr. Lama. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Sources

Hi, this edit is not in keeping with proper Wikipedia editing. Firstly, we don't source articles by hastily adding instructions in our edit summaries like "See IMDb". Sources should be added as inline citations. Please see Referencing for Beginners to learn how. Secondly, IMDb is not considered a reliable source because it is user contributed, as is TV Tropes, TV.com, and even Wikipedia. None of these are considered reliable sources. See also WP:TVFAQ, WP:FILM/R and WP:RS. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeated addition of unreferenced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Month for Repeated addition of unreferenced data following block for same reason. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Apocalypse Pompeii.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Apocalypse Pompeii.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 23:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Giovannigiulio (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 05:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Aatank poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aatank poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Alien 2 blu ray.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alien 2 blu ray.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Alien Origin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alien Origin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Android Cop.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Android Cop.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Deep Blood.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Deep Blood.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Gormiti Nature Unleashed Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gormiti Nature Unleashed Logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Gormiti logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gormiti logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Inspector Rex.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Inspector Rex.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Jaws in Japan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jaws in Japan.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Metal Gear Solid, Philanthropy poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Metal Gear Solid, Philanthropy poster.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:My Voyage to Italy DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:My Voyage to Italy DVD.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pinocchio 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pinocchio 2008.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rabbids Big Bang.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rabbids Big Bang.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Virus Attack.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Virus Attack.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Jack Skellington.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jack Skellington.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Italian Spiderman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Italian Spiderman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ed Edd n Eddy film.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ed Edd n Eddy film.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dinosaur from the Deep.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dinosaur from the Deep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghost Son film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghost Son film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of In Verbis Virtus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In Verbis Virtus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Verbis Virtus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pet Pals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pet Pals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet Pals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Son, the Hero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Son, the Hero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Son, the Hero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucky Luke (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucky Luke (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Luke (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghost Son for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghost Son is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Son until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red Caps (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Caps (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Caps (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Water & Bubbles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Water & Bubbles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water & Bubbles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clic & Cat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clic & Cat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clic & Cat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 22:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dinosaur from the Deep for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinosaur from the Deep is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur from the Deep until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gladiators of Rome (2012 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gladiators of Rome (2012 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gladiators of Rome (2012 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Adventures of Marco & Gina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Adventures of Marco & Gina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Marco & Gina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apocalypse Pompeii for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apocalypse Pompeii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apocalypse Pompeii until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taco & Paco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taco & Paco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taco & Paco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 01:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rabbids Big Bang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rabbids Big Bang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbids Big Bang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 01:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Water & Bubbles

The article Water & Bubbles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability or importance, article has not been sourced since its creation in 2013.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.