Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 69

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please sign your comments by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).

Wondering why your pages were speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

WhatALlana (talk)

Just a line to thank you for blocking indefinately, WhatALlana (talk) S/he was driving me mad last night! -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Godofundead30

I reported this user at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GodofUndead30 after noticing some odd edits and what seemed to be WP:EVADE, while he was still unblocked. Looks like you already blocked him again. Is there a procedure I should follow now to close it, or should I leave the investigation open so in the future the facts are known if there's a recurrence? -- ferret (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Let's leave the investigation open to make sure there are no sleeper accounts. I've commented on the SPI page. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Msys Test Automation Solutions

I would like to request an approval for my article of Msys Test Automation Solutions page. It is an information about the test automation tool and its features. Let me know if there is Unambiguous advertising or promotion in my article content.

{{Help me}} - Look at the article talk page ASAP!! Mdann52 (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allafricancinema

Hello Nawlin I do not know how to leave a message on your talk page so I have written it here for you to see. you immediately deleted my page allafricancinema which I think u should have given me time to edit up to your standard. I was on my way to writing about several online African platform as this is lacking on Wikipedia as a whole especially when compared to other north american and European online platforms. I did follow the format for blinkbox even though this is a bigger site. Thank you for killing my enthusiasm even before I get started and I bet you're not even African. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obi-talker (talk • contribs) 15:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this is very weird

Special:Contributions/Zak123456789. Look especially at the talk page archives... it's all extremely strange, and I suspect some fuckery is going on. → ROUX ₪ 16:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks like he just copied and pasted one of my talk pages. I don't think this is anything more than a kid playing around. Thanks for the heads-up, though. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whaaaaaaaat...

I can't get my head around it, what just happened with this article!? Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 20:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • An IP had added promotional language to an otherwise-ok article. Another admin deleted the whole article as spam. A new user tried to rewrite it, but also in promotional fashion. I deleted that one, but then looked at the history and realized that the spam should have been reverted in the first place, without deletion of the article. So I restored and reverted. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Thanks for explaining. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 20:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Known for the foes they make

You must be proud of the number of jerks, fools and spammers you anger (at least judging by the vandalism you endure)! --Orange Mike | Talk 22:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warfaze (band)

I have provided a reliable source for the band http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=116922 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmzayeem (talk • contribs) 15:33, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • That is a valid source. Now you need to fix the second problem, which is that the article was a cut and paste of the band's Banglamusic page. If you can rewrite the article in your own words, following Wikipedia's reliable sourcing and neutrality requirements, feel free to repost. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for replying, can you give me the link of the website please?? I don't think the whole article is copied but few sentences may look similar to other website. I can omit those or rewrite it. Thanks! --Kmzayeem (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It was http://www.banglamusic.com/artists/warfaze . NawlinWiki (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I think I can rewrite it no problem, what should I do now?? --Kmzayeem (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How can I get the article back?? --Kmzayeem (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Write a draft in your userspace at User:Kmzayeem/Warfaze, and let me know when you're ready for me to look at it. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can I get the article in the userspace?? I need the infobox which I created in the deleted page!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmzayeem (talk • contribs) 06:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article restoration

Hello. I saw that you had recently deleted this article as it had been created by a banned user. The article had sufficient content and was made to minimize the length of the topic article. While it would seem pertinent to revert abusive edits, this one was indeed constructive and the user had given a valid reason to create it. Could you restore it for that sake? Secret of success (talk) 14:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The general consensus is that edits by banned users should be immediately removed whether good faith or vandalism. The reason is because banned users are no longer allowed on Wikipedia. It sounds counter productive, but consider this for a moment. There was a legitimate reason for their ban. If we allow even good edits to stay, they are not really banned from editing. Editing would still be allowed albeit more tricky. In addition, if we remove their edits then it denies them the satisfaction of having the edit. They can have no satisfaction of having participated. We generally do not acknowledge removing it or any other acknowledgement of the banned user either. This is to deter them from continuing to do so. On the other hand, if you want to get a copy of it so you can produce an article of your own, I'd be happy to email you the contents.--v/r - TP 19:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you could email the contents, please do so. Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 14:53, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I recreated the article. Secret of success (talk) 16:13, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Um, what?

Here, specifically. Lorem got caught by an edit filter. He thought creating an account would fix the problem. He found out his IP was account-creation-blocked by you, and assumed you blocked him for hitting the edit filter. So he logs back in and asks you a question in that context. Is there something I'm missing here? Someguy1221 (talk) 02:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The full sequence of events:

  • 23:28, 10 July Lorem makes a good faith edit that is stopped by an Edit Filter
  • 22:58 to 23:46 July 10 Lorem creates two redirects and one user talk page in good faith. The redirect from AAAAAAA! is actually a popular page on uncyclopedia. The redirect to sun was from a symbol Lorem thought looked like a sun. The user talk page was a warning for the person who tripped the same filter on the same page as Lorem, which he presumably came across trying to figure why he couldn't make his edit.
  • 00:07, 11 July 2012 Lorem thinks maybe if he starts a new account his edit will go through. He logs off to find that his dynamic IP was blocked by yourself, and he assumes it's because you saw him hit the filter. That's what he was talking about when he left a message on your talk page.

Looking at this, I don't see long-term vandalism. I see a confused newbie who needs a little help, but is acting in good faith. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    • This really doesn't seem like it's a new editor, and the pattern of immediately editing articles about sex and Uncyclopedia is very suspicious. I will give the benefit of the doubt and leave it unblocked (I see that you did so already), but let's watch this one very closely. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are u online?

I need little help of yours.Iamthewinnerofthemonth (talk) 21:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RevDel

Please RevDel the edit summaries only of the following edits per CFRD #2 and/or 3: [1] [2]. Thanks. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another one: [3]. This one is borderline so I'd appreciate if you would take a look. Thanks. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, that one really doesn't qualify under #2 or #3. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COFAQ#DELETE

Creating page with shown there. Funny, eh? Xentram (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Heh, I hadn't noticed they'd posted twice like that. Thanks for cleaning it up! :) C.U.T.K.D T | C 20:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hemmerle article deleted

I wrote an article yesterday on a jeweller called Hemmerle which was deleted as it contained 'copywrited information.' It was all in my own words so what was the copyrighted information? Was it it references I included to media articles and if so which ones? Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemmerle. Sophiecampos (talk) 08:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give any advice on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiecampos (talk • contribs) 11:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bariatric Fusion Article Deleted

About a week ago I wrote an article about a company called Bariatric Fusion. Just noticed today for it being 'not notable' or 'advertisement'? In the field of Bariatrics, this company revolutionized post-op vitamin regiments and are definitely worthy of an article. I was more wondering what I could do to improve it or change it to comply with wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazil4444 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Revolutionized" vitamin regimens? That sure sounds like an ad to me, unless you can find reliable, third-party sources that say that and not just your own opinion. See WP:RS. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marisa Weiss Deletion

I'd like to inquire why Dr. Marisa Weiss' page was 'speedily deleted' this past Monday... she is the founder of Breastcancer.org, which is the leading online resource (site reaches 28 million people globally) for breast cancer and breast health.

Your reason for deletion was 'personal promotion' and G.11... however if Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of any person, then why does (for example) Nancy Brinker have a wikipedia page? She is the founder of the Susan G. Komen foundation, which is no different than the content/page we attempted to upload....

If we are missing any information or you feel the page needs to be fundamentally rewritten, please specify what, and describe what additional content we need. I cannot accept that the page was taken down simply for 'unambigious' promotion.

Thank you.

JMeibach (talk · contribs)

(talk page stalker) Language such as "world's most utilized online resource for expert medical and personal information", "visionary advocate for her innovative and steadfast approach", "author of four critically acclaimed books", "a key focus" and "renowned leader" got the article deleted. Also: who is the "we" you keep referring to? --Orange Mike | Talk 19:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nawlinwiki

Since this user isn't going to be editing anytime soon, have you considered redirecting its userpage and user talk page to your own? If this weren't a userspace issue, I'd create it on {{R from other capitalization}} grounds. Nyttend (talk) 19:26, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prudl Deletion

Please explain why an article that was just created about half and hour ago was speedily deleted. It contained information regarding a language learning company. I literally left to walk my dog and had planned on adding more information to the article and found it gone. This page is informative about a company and what they do, no different than facebook or even Rosetta Stone Software.

I didn't even get to add my sources or other information before it was deleted. Hasbanye1 (talk) 22:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick check in re an investigation I'm doing

Do you remember whose LTA you believed User:Ollie the teenager to have been? — Coren (talk) 00:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canabalt

In September 2009 you deleted an article for the videogame Canabalt. I've created a draft which I believe begins to illustrate why it should be considered notable. Any chance of getting it reinstated? Somnolentsurfer (talk) 02:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks ok to me. The page is not protected, so feel free to move your draft there. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Loofer

Just letting you know I've blocked Khalifa Alansari as a sock of SuperLoofer (blocked by you for vandalism). Same drivel and refs that mentioned everything but the subject required. He may take note of the warning I gave him before I discovered your block and put mine on. He may not... Peridon (talk) 01:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

personality disorder

you applied indefinate move protection to personality disorder back in 2009 because of vandalism. However the title of the article is dumb and really should be called "personality disorders" as it is a category of disorders - obviously plural.--Penbat (talk) 10:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFPP

You have a request at RFPP related to the Personality disorder page. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 10:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slenderman?

I've seen that the Wikipedia page on Slenderman has been deleted, created again, and deleted again, a large amount of times. Currently being the last moderator to have deleted the page, could you explain why?

Page Triage newsletter

Hey all. Some quick but important updates on what we've been up to and what's coming up next :).

The curation toolbar, our Wikimedia-supported twinkle replacement. We're going to be deploying it, along with a pile of bugfixes, to wikipedia on 9 August. After a few days to check it doesn't make anything explode or die, we'll be sticking up a big notice and sending out an additional newsletter inviting people to test it out and give us feedback :). This will be followed by two office hours sessions - one on Tuesday the 14th of August at 19:00 UTC for all us Europeans, and one on Wednesday the 15th at 23:00 UTC for the East Coasters out there :). As always, these will be held in #wikimedia-office; drop me a note if you want to know how to easily get on IRC, or if you aren't able to attend but would like the logs.

I hope to see a lot of you there; it's going to be a big day for everyone involved, I think :). I'll have more notes after the deployment! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 19:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blatent Copyright Infringment?

Could you please explain why you classed the page for intY Ltd, as a "Blatent Copyright Infringement" and deleted it inside of a minute without further explanation?

The information on it was wholly accurate and referenced, and all required permissions were obtained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davewils82 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)Left a note explaining that we cannot accept copyrighted material and delete articles about non-notable subjects as well. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having spoken to Ian, would it be possible to obtain a copy of the original text of the page? The intention will be to re-submit a new page however with the required changes made and additions of notable references from Reuters and Yahoo News. Davewils82 (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your old proxy block

Do you have any recollection about this block (198.168.27.224 (talk · contribs)) [4]? Could you comment there please. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • See my comment there and block modification. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Andy VanDette article

Hi NawlinWiki,

I saw that you had deleted my article on Andy VanDette, due to questionable notability of the subject. I think it is clear that my subject is noteworthy. My sources show that he has worked with momentous names in the music industry and has been credited on many best-selling albums. Moreover, he is referenced in over 40 other pages on wikipedia. He has mastered some of my favorite albums of all time- he's mastered some of the best-selling bands ever. My sources show that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsingleyMD (talk • contribs) 18:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Here is a list of things that can make a creative professional note-worthy: Creative professionals Shortcuts: WP:ARTIST WP:AUTHOR WP:CREATIVE WP:ECONOMIST WP:FILMMAKER Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals: The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics) for guidelines on academics

My independent and reputable (industry standard) source albumcredits.com shows Andy VanDette's album credits. From these credits, you can see that:

  • The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. (Wikipedia also contributes to this)
  • The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.

He is so significant, in fact, that BloombergBusinessweek decided to interview him here: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-12/making-music-sound-better-on-itunes

If you need more proof of the credits, here are some links: http://www.grammy365.com/blogs/new-york-studio-art-craft-professional-mastering-featuring-masterdisk-engineers http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/d3a68788-a5d5-4ca4-9bbe-411167c2ae7d/credits.mp

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsingleyMD (talk • contribs) 20:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add that not only do these sources show his reputability, but so do the hard, print, reliable, album credits to the following albums: Rush- Sector 1, Rush- Sector 2, Rush - Sector 3, Rush - Retrospective volume III, David Bowie (Hours/Earthling), Deep Purple - Rapture of the Deep, Uncle Kracker - No Stranger to Shame.

Thanks. AsingleyMD (talk) 20:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • A lot of people get credited on albums, and I don't see anything in WP:N that indicates that being credited with production work on albums creates notability. The Bloomberg article is an independent source, but it's not *about* Mr. VanDette. It's about Itunes, and merely interviews Mr. VanDette. That doesn't count as a source showing *his* notability. You need to find sources that discuss Mr. VanDette himself, and show why he's notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How about this line: The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work. Mastering is one of the 3 steps of music creation: The Artist's Performance, Mixing, and Mastering. The mastering engineer plays a major role in creating an album.

AsingleyMD (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    • We can't just take your word for that. Got a source? Is there any indication that other mastering engineers are recognized as notable (in external sources)? NawlinWiki (talk) 14:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does it help that mastering engineers win GRAMMY awards? http://www.grammy.com/nominees (ctrl+f for "mastering") Here is a source cited by the Mastering engineer wikipedia page that has already been approved as a valid source that discusses mastering: http://musicmasteringonline.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=35 AsingleyMD (talk) 15:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    • Has your guy won a Grammy? That would be sufficient. Otherwise, we will need an external source recognizing him as notable among mastering engineers. Again, it's not enough that he was a mastering engineer on notable albums. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Wilson of Porcupine Tree, whom Music Radar placed amongst "The 30 greatest live acts in the world today"[^ Archive/Original. "The 30 greatest live acts in the world today" by Music Radar. (16 June 2011)], said this about Andy Vandette in an issue of Tape Op magazine: “I have worked with him a few times and he really cares. All you want is someone who can go the extra mile, and he has an affinity with the music. He’s a perfectionist — I once saw him discard a whole vinyl cut because he could get another half dB out of it — and I really trust him". — Steven Wilson discussing Andy VanDette, Tape Op, Sep/Oct 2009. In 2007 the band was nominated for a Grammy Award for Best Surround Sound Album with their album Fear of a Blank Planet[6] and then again in 2010 with The Incident.[7]http://www.musicramble.com/50th-annual-grammy-nominations/ Grammy.org. If this isn't enough, I would like to refute the opinion that being the mastering engineer on very notable projects does not make you noteworthy enough to be on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsingleyMD (talk • contribs) 16:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC) AsingleyMD (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User Malik Shabazz repeatedly removing my talk page comments

Hi Nawlin, User:Malik_Shabazz is repeatedly deleting a comment I posted on user 211.26.243.21's talk page. So far, he's done it three times and appears that he will not stop even though I warned him each time that he's violating WP:TPO. He claims I am trolling, when in fact I am asking a question, as you will see.[5][6][7][8][9][10] --76.189.114.163 (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a disinterested observer, I say you are trolling with those questions. QU TalkQu 21:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I asked a question, which cannot be censored. Under which guidelines of WP:TPO can it be removed? Thanks. --76.189.114.163 (talk) 21:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling and vandalism." You appear to be trying to "round up" support to launch an attack on another editor, at least that's how I read your question - and that's trolling. QU TalkQu 21:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is no censorship here since this is not a free-speech zone. The guideline you link to includes trolling as a valid reason for removal. There's two editors already that consider your comments to be trolling. Do it again and I'll block you. Drmies (talk) 21:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That is only your interpretation. That is an amazing stretch. It says nothing like that. I simply asked a question. That is all. Which noticeboard can I file a complaint on about this? Thanks. --76.189.114.163 (talk) 21:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ANI, but beware the boomerang if you do. QU TalkQu 21:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My intentions were not as you inferred. My words did not say or imply any of those things. What that user did with the images was wrong, but all I did was ask him/her a question. --76.189.114.163 (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --76.189.114.163 (talk) 22:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block of new user

Hi, I saw you blocked Lionsroamthepedia (talk · contribs) for "long-term abuse." But how is that possible? This user joined 10 minutes ago. Is it a suspected SPA? --Jprg1966 (talk) 19:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's the "Cat Creek" nonsense vandal. Have a look at his first edit especially for identification and the second edit is blatant vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, OK. Didn't know about this guy. Carry on. --Jprg1966 (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Heads up: Youcantescapethelions (talk · contribs) --Jprg1966 (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also: Lionsarethemostawesomeanimal (talk · contribs) --Jprg1966 (talk)

Looks like he's creating a bunch of sleeper accounts: Thelionsroamaroundthecreeks (talk · contribs), Thelionsroamtheworld (talk · contribs), possibly Catsinthejungle (talk · contribs) and Thecatsinthejungle (talk · contribs), Dontmesswiththecats (talk · contribs), Youthinkthisisajoke (talk · contribs). --Jprg1966 (talk) 20:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Never mind, Elockid is on it. Sorry to keep bugging you! --Jprg1966 (talk) 20:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages newsletter

Hey all :)

A couple of new things.

First, you'll note that all the project titles have now changed to the Page Curation prefix, rather than having the New Pages Feed prefix. This is because the overarching project name has changed to Page Curation; the feed is still known as New Pages Feed, and the Curation Toolbar is still the Curation Toolbar. Hopefully this will be the last namechange ;p.

On the subject of the Curation Toolbar (nice segue, Oliver!) - it's now deployed on Wikipedia. Just open up any article in the New Pages Feed and it should appear on the right. It's still a beta version - bugs are expected - and we've got a lot more work to do. But if you see something going wrong, or a feature missing, drop me a note or post on the project talkpage and I'll be happy to help :). We'll be holding two office hours sessions to discuss the tool and improvements to it; the first is at 19:00 UTC on 14 August, and the second at 23:00 on the 15th. Both will be in #wikimedia-office as always. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I just need to know this [11].

Hi, I think you something misunderstanding to me. It is proper procedure who POV dispute with Admin. WP:UNINVOLVED This is the only way user can protest to edit war with admin. I want help. --Ejwcun (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to ignore this, as the user is a sock of Truesight (talk · contribs). Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rare Tea Co

Hi NawlinWiki,

I see you've deleted the new article for Rare Tea Company under G11. The article will be recreated - I'm going to oversee this and ensure that it is objective, well sourced and informative, covering the company's existence, history and notable facets. This isn't intended as a puff-piece page for publicity, merely as background on a notable British company. The initial 5-minute deletion seemed rather to be jumping the gun. Expect dozens of notable sources and a straight approach. We will not be deleting any fair, well-sourced additions - live long and wiki.

Just giving feedback on the deletion. Thanks for your time.

Dermasurgeon & Dermasurgery

Just a note to let you know that the above articles which you edited recently has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dermasurgeon. KTC (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Thank you :) Samar Talk 14:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know why the page on Dulal Roy waas deleted? Dulal Roy (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article that I deleted in 2011 had no content, just links. Feel free to create an article. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Don E. Hall

I was wondering why my entry of Don E Hall under Weber State University was removed? I am a successful businessman who was a student and student body officer who attended the school. If I did not follow protocol, please let me know what that is and I will be happy to do so. I can be contacted at dehall@q2consultants.com 204.126.147.87 (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article did not indicate that Mr. Hall met our standards for notability, see WP:BIO. Also, you should not be writing about yourself, see WP:COI. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_69&oldid=1144398732"