User talk:Nhutchison

This is Nhutchison's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karlton Hester (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

You need a wider body of sources, not just UC Santa Cruz talking about him. Has his work been covered in newspapers, trade journals, etc? Can you cite some of those?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karlton Hester and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nhutchison, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karlton Hester (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We specifically still need all major additional reviews since what's here is still not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karlton Hester and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karlton Hester has been accepted

Karlton Hester, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karlton Hester.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Karlton Hester.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nhutchison. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hot Club of San Francisco has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hot Club of San Francisco. Thanks! Storchy (talk) 21:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hot Club of San Francisco (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hot Club of San Francisco and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 06:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Hot Club of San Francisco

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Hot Club of San Francisco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Duplicate Draft of Draft:Hot Club of San Francisco

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Akevsharma (talk) 06:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nhutchison,

I have moved this draft back to your User space. It's okay to have a copy of a draft in your User space, in addition to one in Draft space, but please do not submit two drafts on the same subject for Articles for Creation review. It just iritates the reviewers to have to review similar drafts at the same time. Pick the one in the best shape and just submit that one for AFC review.

If you have questions about draft creation or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz,

My apologies. I didn't intend to have two separate drafts and totally understand why that would be annoying for reviewers! My draft has been rejected (for reasons I now understand) and I want to ensure I don't make the same mistake again. It is my understanding that both of my drafts have been removed from the review process at this point (one rejected from Akevsharma and one removed by you) so if I edit and resubmit one of them this shouldn't be an issue. If I've misunderstood please let me know. Thank you!

Best,

Nelsen Nhutchison (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hot Club of San Francisco has been accepted

Hot Club of San Francisco, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Storchy (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! S0091 (talk) 17:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Nhutchison! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you S0091! I really appreciate your help and the welcome! Nhutchison (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]