User talk:NoonIcarus/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A New Year With Women in Red![edit]

Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1981, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 17:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: Hi! Thanks for the message, I'll add the reference. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NoonIcarus, thanks my friend. Needless to say, your previous edits to year-and-date articles need sources too. I'm not going to be a jerk to revert all of them, but I'd advise citing everything you can get your hands on. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: Thank you :) I have added again the entry with the reference. Almost always I include content with its references, but I have noticed that in the year-and-date articles the norm apparently is to not include references. In this case it seems that it was particularly important, since the source in the main article appeared to have a dead link. I'll be more careful in the future, please let me know if I can help in any other way. --NoonIcarus (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NoonIcarus, yeah, it's a long story and I am running into some pushback about this. The thing is that for a long time, consensus accepted that no sources were necessary in those articles. Therefore they grew and were formed without sources. Recently (I don't know when or where) consensus changed, and we decided to apply WP:V to all those articles now, especially for new entries. I am currently hunting for the relevant discussion which put that into place. But that is why they are in the current state and I have begun notifying people of this new need for sources, because it is somewhat unexpected, given the history.
Thanks for your understanding and cordial conversation. I appreciate your help. Elizium23 (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23:Ah, that clarifies a lot. I have to thank you once again for the information, it's a good moment to know about it now that there are several articles that I plan on adding to the pages. I'll make sure to let other users about the situation, I can either look up the discussion in question or you can leave it in this talk page, if it isn't too much of a bother. Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your email[edit]

Everything's good, glad you're back to working on cinema articles! Kingsif (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for La Vega raid[edit]

On 14 January 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article La Vega raid, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 01:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2020 Cagua fire[edit]

Notice

The article 2020 Cagua fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable fire.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lettlerhello • contribs 03:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lettler: Hi! Many thanks for the notice! I have further expanded the article and removed the tag afterwards. Please let me know if you still have WP:GNG in this regard. Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NoonIcarus, Looks much better now. Thank you. Lettlerhello • contribs 13:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Rodríguez[edit]

Hi. I've noticed you put a COI tag on Francisco Rodríguez that could be related to my editing. I'll ask you to state your sources for such COI at the time of the edits or remove the tag.Naldox (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Naldox:, regards. You have uploaded Francisco Rodríguez's picture in Wikimedia Commons, stating that it was your own work and that its description was "Economist Francisco Rodríguez during an interview in Caracas, on december 8th, 2019"[sic], which can lead to believe that you personally know Rodríguez or that you have a connection with him. Furthermore, over half of your main space edits since 2016 have been about Rodríguez (58%); an article where 47.7% of authorship and 36.7% are yours. Such is the case that after six months of inactivity, you have asked directly about the tag in the article only almost a week after it was placed.
If you believe you have a COI, per WP:DCOI, you should let other editors know about it. Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 15:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @NoonIcarus: as I stated before, photo was taken during an interview I did with Rodriguez in Caracas in December, 2019. As a journalist, I do have contact with sources, but as the ethics code of my profession states, we should disclose COI beforehand. I do not have a COI in this case. I was just checking in my edits today, since I believe I'm gonna start a project on Venezuelan media. I think it was just timing, and the fact that I have some free time today. In any case, WE do have an open discussion about Rodríguez's article and its references open since June. Regards, Naldox (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your replies, @Naldox:, they help to clarify the situation, I hope likewise my explanations have been satisfactory enough. Please let me know how I can help in any other way. Best regards. --NoonIcarus (talk) 16:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @NoonIcarus:Why is it the COI notification still hanging in Francisco Rodríguez. It is actually refraining me to do any other changes, such as primary sources. Why is this still an issue and how do we solve this? Do we need to upscale this? Regards, Naldox (talk) 22:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Naldox: Hi. The COI tag remains because you have admitted mantaining a relation with the subject of the article, and it's important to keep in order for other editors to learn and solve potential issues. The tag does not refrain you from continuing editing in the article, although it strongly encourages you not to. You can continue using the talk page to express proposals or ideas. Also, what do you mean with "upscale"? Best wishes. --NoonIcarus (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for 2020 Cagua fire[edit]

On 29 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 Cagua fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that eleven people, nine of them underage, died in a sugar plantation fire in Cagua, Venezuela, while trying to hunt rabbits? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 Cagua fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 Cagua fire), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Many thanks! --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Year articles[edit]

No, sadly there isn't, though it's not for want of trying. Nowadays we tend to discuss individual new entries on the article Talk page if there is any controversy, and go on consensus. However, the guidance I usually give new users is that before adding any new entries to Year articles, they should consider the following:

  1. Is the individual internationally notable? (Sometimes, but not always, the number of languages into which the article has been translated is an indicator.)
  2. Is the person already in the relevant Year in Topic articles?
  3. Is a reliable source cited?

If they can't answer "Yes" to all three questions, they should not add. In the case of 2020, I might also advise checking the Talk page first to ensure that the person in question hasn't already been discussed. Deb (talk) 08:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: Fair enough! They look as good references regardless, many thanks! I'll consider them in the future and ask if I have any other questions. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Deb: Come to think of it, is it alright to include entries whose day of death would be the first in the article, particularly in older years? In other words, is the criteria only important for people sharing a birth or death date or is it more flexible when there are few articles in the section? --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's very flexible. It's really meant to make people think about what they are doing. Some people, especially when they come here new, see adding entries as an easy way of "contributing". To be honest, a lot of the Year in Topic articles need a lot of work and they'd be contributing more if they concentrated on those, but I don't think everyone even realises those pages exist. Deb (talk) 08:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Deb: Understood, I'll bear it in mind. Thank you very much! --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hy!!clearly i love these articles isnt there more Baloyi khazamulae (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Devin Stone moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Devin Stone, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 14:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farahnaz Forotan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farahnaz Forotan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farahnaz Forotan (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Banner talk 13:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ANI Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#PailSimon.  // Timothy :: talk  18:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TimothyBlue: Thank you for the notice! --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request for English-to-Spanish on a short article[edit]

Hello, I found your page through the Category:Translators en-es page.

The article EG LNG Pipeline Suspension Bridge is about a major point of infrastructure in the African country of Equatorial Guinea, which speaks Spanish, but right now the article is only available in English. I unfortunately don't speak Spanish well enough to translate, but I think this article would be beneficial and relevant to Equatorial Guinean readers and broader Spanish speakers on Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration for translating this, no worries if you aren't available. Have a good day!

Pirate-Prototype (talk) 07:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Pirate-Prototype[reply]

@Pirate-Prototype: Hi! You're right, and I absolutely agree. I see the article is currently a stub and I don't know if it will be expanded before a translation, but I think that there shouldn't be a problem translating it in the following days. Thanks for the notice and best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 09:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pirate-Prototype: Translated! :) --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, it's appreciated! Have a nice day! :) --Pirate-Prototype (talk) 14:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Pirate-Prototype[reply]
@Pirate-Prototype: You're welcome! You too! --NoonIcarus (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ CubaHavana2018 moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CubaHavana2018[edit]

As the section header says. Notifying you in case you later find the page unexpectedly missing. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 10:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aseleste: It's good to know, thanks for the notice! --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy St. Patrick's Day[edit]

Happy St. Patrick's Day!
I hope your St. Patrick's Day is enjoyable and safe. Hopefully next year there will be more festive celebrations.
Best wishes from Los Angeles.   // Timothy :: talk 
@TimothyBlue: Thank you! Likewise, you too :) Hopefully next year will be better. --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Por el gráfico actualizado del Grupo de Lima. Bonaaq (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonaaq: Wow! This is quite a surprise, ¡muchas gracias! --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red[edit]

Hi there, NoonIcarus, and welcome to Women in Red. I see from this page that you have been receiving our monthly priorities for some time but it's good to see you are now an official member. I hope you will continue to create many more new biographies of women. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Hi! Many thanks! I'll sure ask if I have any questions :) Have a good day! --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Wollstonecraft Award 2021[edit]

Mary Wollstonecraft Award 2021
On behalf of WP:WPWW, with appreciation for the women writer biographies you created during first quarter 2021. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:26, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosiestep: Thank you very much! Best regards :) --NoonIcarus (talk) 18:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Farahnaz Forotan[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Farahnaz Forotan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 11:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Marijn Heule[edit]

On 6 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marijn Heule, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that assisted by computers, Marijn Heule helped devise a proof of Keller's conjecture in dimension seven, a 90-year-old math problem? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marijn Heule. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marijn Heule), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Farahnaz Forotan[edit]

On 13 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Farahnaz Forotan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the start of Afghan peace talks in 2019, journalist Farahnaz Forotan travelled the country to collect testimonies from women and prevent the rollback of their freedoms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Farahnaz Forotan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Farahnaz Forotan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Narutolovehinata5[edit]

Hello, NoonIcarus. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Trudi Birger.
Message added 00:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are you still planning to add content to the article? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Hi! Sorry for the late response! Yes, I was planning on expanding the article after seeing the comments on the nomination, but I was able until now. I have added more content now, although I fear that I might not found more references without repeated information later. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Trudi Birger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Schwede66 09:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image added[edit]

Hello, I've included an image of Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti in her infobox, please feel free to revert this edit if you wish. Amitchell125 (talk) 20:34, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitchell125: On the contrary! Thank you so much for adding it! --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Trudi Birger[edit]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://dental-dvi.org.il/trudi-birger-founder-of-dvi-1927-2002/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Many thanks for the notice! I will do my best to fix the issues. --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti[edit]

The article Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Trudi Birger[edit]

On 9 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trudi Birger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after surviving the Holocaust, writer Trudi Birger moved to Israel with her family and founded a non-profit dental clinic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trudi Birger. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Trudi Birger), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti[edit]

The article Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ana Lucrecia Taglioretti for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 05:41, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on getting it through GAN Kingsif (talk) 05:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitchell125 and Kingsif: Thank you so much! I wasn't expecting this so soon, this is quite a pleasant surprise. I'll try to do some last improvements in the short term. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the welcome[edit]

I wanted to mention you on my page but I think I didn’t properly mentioned you, so thanks for the welcome

also thanks for the sources, I am still struggling with wikipedia UI, but I think I’ll get it over time

I also have a question, I have a lot of content that I know by heart that I can add to articles as improvement, is it okay if I add them even without any source?

here is one example of what I have written, let me know what you think and how should I proceed: (this is means to be inserted in the anarcho-capitalism page)

Dispute over Anarchism

There is a dispute over whether ancaps are anarchists or not. Many, if not all, of the anarchist schools do not consider ancaps as true anarchists. Ancaps on the other hand, do not consider the other anarchist schools as true anarchists.

Anarcho-capitalism is, in principle, an ideology centered around consent at it’s core. This makes it reject any type of coercion, being it done by an individual or an authority, and being the free-market and respect to private property the only compatible socioeconomic organizations with it.

Because of it’s principle, ancaps are first capitalists. It is by accident that their principles that all relationships in society should be consented leads to the notion that a government should also be consented (aka, private governance). Because of this, a state would cease to exist, causing the “anarcho” prefix Ancap has (while governing services still exist).

Because of this, it raises the dilemma of _what it means to be anarchist?_ Some anarchist schools do not consider Ancap to be anarchist because it allows hierarchies (the private governance), others says that Ancap is not anarchist because it causes hierarchies by allowing private property of means of production (which to them needs a state to exist and they believe it cannot exist without it). And on the the other hand, ancaps do not consider these other anarchist schools to be anarchists because they would intervene by force in a consented hierarchy.

So ultimately, Ancap is an ideology centered around consent, and by consequence, capitalism, that happens to take consent to such extreme that even governments would also work under the price system. That’s the only thing that can be said for sure. But it still is possible to see ancaps calling themselves anarchists to the point where “anarchist” and “capitalist” becomes interchangeable terms from their point of view. Iron Capitalist (talk) 23:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Iron Capitalist:, hi! In short, no, it is never alright to include information that is not references, specially when talking about something like political theory, contrary to reportable facts or events. If you know the information by heart then it surely means that you must have learned or read it from somewhere, is that right? You can try recalling where did you find the information and cite it in the article, if you wish.
I would also advise to be extra careful to not include personal interpretations or thoughts, and you can cite one or multiple scholars when talking about a definition ("According to...", "...argues..."). If you have time, I would recommend you to read or take a look at Help:Introduction, whose link is included in your welcome message, as well as Wikipedia:No original research#Verifiability and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Best regards and happy editing! --NoonIcarus (talk) 17:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
thanks! Iron Capitalist (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome, any time you want :) --NoonIcarus (talk) 20:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Abortion in Venezuela has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1990, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Elizium23 (talk) 16:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: Thank you for reminding me again. I also included entries in the 2012 and 2013 articles with respective references, but it slipped from my mind in this case. I have restored the content with the appropiate reference. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Daisy Myers[edit]

On 24 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article [[]], which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, ), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

42.110.156.52 (talk) 05:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --NoonIcarus (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey NoonIcarus, I'm not sure what this IP was doing, but the Daisy Myers DYK has not run yet — it's scheduled to appear on the Main Page tomorrow, 29 May, at 12:00 UTC. You should receive an actual DYK credit for it then. DanCherek (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: Hi! I suspected as much after checking the front page and the archives, it appeared too soon for me. Thanks for the notice! --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism[edit]

Just to let you know that, almost three months after your first contribution, The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism is now completed.Lindsay658 (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lindsay658: I have followed the improvements now and then, the work is astounding compared to the first version of the article. I would have never expected the page to have such a shape, thank you so much. Would you be alright if the article is nominated as Good Article? --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be delighted!Lindsay658 (talk) 03:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for San Miguel del Ene attack[edit]

On 26 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article San Miguel del Ene attack, which you initiated and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Daisy Myers[edit]

On 29 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Daisy Myers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2017 film Suburbicon was inspired by Daisy Myers's family, who faced racially charged harassment and violence in all-white Levittown, Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daisy Myers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Daisy Myers), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marie-Thérèse Schins moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Marie-Thérèse Schins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 18:55, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, NoonIcarus

Thank you for creating Kosovo–Venezuela relations.

User:1TWO3Writer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please try to reword your article to avoid copyvio. WP:CV

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|1TWO3Writer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

1TWO3Writer (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1TWO3Writer: Hi! Thank you for your review. I have run Earwig's Copyvio Detector on the article, but it says a violation is unlikely. If you have a concern regarding the copyright of the text, please let me know in more detail. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Noon,
I made some changes that lowered the copy violations. Do not worry, it was just some friendly advice. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 01:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@1TWO3Writer: Roger that :) Many thanks! --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pemon conflict[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pemon conflict you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:01, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devin Stone has been accepted[edit]

Devin Stone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Devonian Wombat: Thank you! --NoonIcarus (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Pedro Molina (caricarurist)[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Pedro Molina (caricarurist) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 11:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CeeGee: Thanks for the notice once again! I'll watch out for any other issues if needed. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advice?[edit]

Hi and thanks so much for your contributions to improving the Nicaragua coverage—it’s so thin and needs so much work! Since you’ve been involved, I wondered if I could ask for a suggestion: I would like to nominate Medardo Mairena for DYK but I’m not sure what an interesting fact would be, while paying special attention to neutrality because of the attention on the homepage. If you have time to read it and anything jumps out as especially interesting, I’d be grateful to hear it! Thanks much. Innisfree987 (talk) 07:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Or any other suggestions you have about improving the entry, would welcome those too! Innisfree987 (talk) 07:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC))[reply]
@Innisfree987: Hi! Thanks! I have to thank you too for your contributions as well; they're badly needed, especially due to the incoming elections. In my experience, personal traits and anecdotes are usually excellent material for hooks, what could usually be considered as trivia. The one that catch my eye the most is that he grew "corn, quiquisque, and yucca", but there might be references that include more biographic informatio. I could also ask how prominent the Constitutionalist Liberal Party and wonder if there is additional information about his family. I think the current hook is alright because it can be considered as trivia, but I hope the mention of politics is not too problematic. In any case, luckily you're still able to include additional hooks once the nomination has started. Good luck with your nomination! I'll see if I can give a hand later. --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NoonIcarus, thank you for checking it out—yes my concern was that most of the sources about him focus on politics, which is not great for DYK but it’s hard to think of something else... but yes maybe there is a way to make what he farms sound “hooky”. Thank you, I will give that a try and by all means, yes I’d welcome any ideas for additional hooks that can still be added. If I’m overlooking any interesting sources, also, would be glad to know! Your collaboration is much appreciated. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing! :) --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tiféret Israel Synagogue attack[edit]

On 15 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tiféret Israel Synagogue attack, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Tiféret Israel Synagogue, the oldest in Caracas, Venezuela, was profaned during the 2008–2009 Gaza War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tiféret Israel Synagogue attack. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tiféret Israel Synagogue attack), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August Editathons from Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

1963 Dominican coup d'état moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 1963 Dominican coup d'état, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@John B123: Thanks for the notice! --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pedro X. Molina[edit]

On 31 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pedro X. Molina, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nicaraguan cartoonist Pedro X. Molina has had to flee his home country twice in his lifetime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pedro Molina (caricarurist). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pedro X. Molina), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

a barnstar for you![edit]

Women in Red Women in Latin America contest
NoonIcarus Thank you for your additions July 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Srobodao84 -- Srobodao84 (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism[edit]

The article The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Srobodao84 -- Srobodao84 (talk) 16:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism[edit]

The article The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Srobodao84 -- Srobodao84 (talk) 21:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:¿Y tú quién eres? poster.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:¿Y tú quién eres? poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

a barnstar for you![edit]

Women in Red Women in Latin America contest
NoonIcarus Thank you for your additions August 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regime change pages and Cuba[edit]

Hello @NoonIcarus:, thanks for your contributions on United States involvement in regime change and the Latin American page. The pages are already much better than before. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the discussion on the Talk:Central Intelligence Agency regarding this section Central Intelligence Agency#Cuba: Sabotage and Terrorism. I corrected some misrepresented sources and reorganized the section but was completely reverted with frankly false reasoning. The section is not very balanced at all and poorly written. GelShick92 (talk) 00:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GelShick92: Hi! At first sight, starting with the title, there seems to be a neutrality violation. I will try to take a closer look in the future. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Democratic Republic of the Congo–Kosovo relations for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Democratic Republic of the Congo–Kosovo relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic Republic of the Congo–Kosovo relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vanjagenije (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pemon conflict[edit]

The article Pemon conflict you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pemon conflict for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello NoonIcarus,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211


Online events:


Special event:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

a barnstar for you![edit]

Women in Red Women in Latin America contest
NoonIcarus Thank you for your additions September 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Angola–Kosovo relations[edit]

Notice

The article Angola–Kosovo relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Substance and sources in this article are not about bilateral relations between Angola and Kosovo, but about Angola–Serbia relations, even if Kosovo independence have been treated in meetings between Angolan and Serbian politicians and diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarioGom (talk) 11:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Alex Saab[edit]

I've commented on your revert on the article Alex Saab on the talk page of that article. --79.100.149.219 (talk) 09:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

November 2021 backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

Hi, I do not view my edits as disruptive. I am providing well-sourced information. I do not see you engaging on the talk page before reverting my edits. The references to Wikipedia's policies, without specifically explaining how they apply to my edits, do not seem appropriate. NS T429 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NS T429: Hi! Thank you for your message. I'm sorry if my notice was not descriptive enough, but I felt it was necessary to place it after you insisted in implementing a change that has been disputed at least twice. Anachronist has offered an explanation regarding the concerns per WP:UNDUE for the change, as well as the lack of discussion in the talk page. This, of course, can change in the future, but this has been an edit attempted multiple times. Please let me know if I can be of any help. Best regards! --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AlternateHistoryHub (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ThadeusOfNazereth was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Unfortunately, I don't think the sourcing shows notability just yet - Most of the primary sources have been removed, which is good, but the other sources are a mix of single-line mentions in articles about something else (which isn't WP:SIGCOV) are are advertisement-esque list articles, which probably aren't WP:RELIABLE.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 23:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, NoonIcarus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 23:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of 2021 Ukrainian coup d'état plot for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Ukrainian coup d'état plot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Ukrainian coup d'état plot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein 12:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Angola–Kosovo relations moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Angola–Kosovo relations, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia[edit]

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Verónica Forqué[edit]

On 14 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Verónica Forqué, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Barquisimeto shooting moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 2020 Barquisimeto shooting, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022 with Women in Red[edit]

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1963 Dominican coup d'état[edit]

Information icon Hello, NoonIcarus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1963 Dominican coup d'état, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NoonIcarus/Archive_7&oldid=1178867132"