User talk:Ofcourseofcourse

Welcome!

Hello, Ofcourseofcourse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Please review WP:BAND as well. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:JensonButton61.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JensonButton61.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. beardybloke (talk) 09:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:440544-felipe-massa-crash-in-hungary-gp.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:440544-felipe-massa-crash-in-hungary-gp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. beardybloke (talk) 13:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding copyright infringements

... to articles like Jenson Button. Continuing to do so will lead to your account being blocked. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fernando Alonso. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 09:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fernando Alonso, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 10:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted all but one of your picture uploads as they appear to have been copied from other people's work and not your own. For File:Canning Bridge.JPG we need you to describe what the picture is of, and what kind of license you wish to release the picture under. CC-BY-SA-3.0 is the recommended license. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hej

Hvorfor kopierer du en andens brugerside? (Svar på dansk ... hvis du kan...) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 12:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Logo web.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Logo web.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 12:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Prix Race Manager (Game)

The article Grand Prix Race Manager (Game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable game with no publisher or developer.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 13:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010 (Continued)

I see that on your user page you have placed a number of barnstars. These barnstars have the signatures of editors who are supposed to have awarded them to you, but in fact this does not appear to be the case. Please in future be more careful: it is considered unacceptable to misrepresent the opinions of other editors. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Millesgården has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. The edit you reverted here cannot reasonably be regarded as vandalism, even if you happen to disagree with it. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Grand Prix Race Manager (Game)

I have nominated Grand Prix Race Manager (Game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Prix Race Manager (Game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 12:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Straighten up and fly right

I've blocked you from editing for 24 hours.

On the basis of this terrible edit, I could have blocked you from editing indefinitely. But there have, in the past, been some good edits from this account. But nothing good of late, including awarding yourself other peoples' barnstars and pointlessly bad edits like this.

So take this block as a final warning: you need to get back on the path you started out on, making good edits and good articles. If you continue on the disruptive path you've set off down, then next disruptive edit you make or vandal edit you save will result in a permanent block. Got it? ⇦REDVƎRS⇨ 08:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bio-photo.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Bio-photo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 12:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Greg rust.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Greg rust.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 18:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Southperthskyline.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Southperthskyline.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Southperthskyline.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Southperthskyline.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 12:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Greg rust.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Greg rust.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Cousins, you may be blocked from editing. The-Pope (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fernando Alonso, you may be blocked from editing. Ged UK 18:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Julia Gillard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Lear's Fool 06:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ofcourseofcourse

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Lear's Fool 06:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ofcourseofcourse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was hacked

Decline reason:

In that case, it cannot be unblocked - see WP:GOTHACKED. I have made the block indefinite. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File copyright problem with File:Canning Bridge.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Canning Bridge.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:16, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]