User talk:Osps7/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of "Mohamed Lubbad"

Mohamed Lubbad, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 15:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edmon imseeh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edmon imseeh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmon imseeh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 Please do not delete the article, the article is for a world famous and well-known personalities. Please do not delete the article, as it is the first Palestinian working in the fashion field

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Edmon imseeh. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Edmon imseeh. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osama Odat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osama Odat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osama Odat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello Osps7. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Osps7. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Osps7|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 12:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Alqadi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Alqadi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Alqadi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tabarbour

Hello, Osps7,

Thank you for creating Tabarbour.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gawanmeh Gate moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gawanmeh Gate, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 04:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aleatum gate moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aleatum gate, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 04:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Journalists Syndicate moved

I moved your article here: Journalists Syndicate. -Lopifalko (talk) 12:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Lahoon (Jordan) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Al-Lahoon (Jordan), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi,

..and welcome!

I am trying to clean up a bit in some Jordanian villages, and I came across That Ras village (Karak), which you recently started.

A couple of issues: the article says: "That Ras is located 30 km to the southeast of the city of usury," which makes no sense to me. Is it usury -> Al-Karak?

Secondly, the co-ord of the village is exactly the same as for Al-Karak --> obviously wrong; where is this village located?

Thirdly, I have problems finding any sources about this village? Is it mentioned in the census, etc? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Huldra

Thanks for this note, I will edit the article, add sources, and correct linguistic errors Osps7 (talk) 05:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2020 Sudan floods

On 10 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 Sudan floods, which you created and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 05:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Iron Gate (Jerusalem) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Iron Gate (Jerusalem), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Also it is very difficult to understand the article as written, and it does not seem to be based on the sources cited. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saleem Haj Yahia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saleem Haj Yahia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinian Journalists Syndicate moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yousef Salama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yousef Salama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yousef Salama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Shrike (talk) 17:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:A/I/PIA "users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict.".

You were already told not to edit regarding the conflict such edit is not allowed [1] if you continue to do so you will be reported to admins --Shrike (talk) 06:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC) --Shrike (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission (Palestine) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission (Palestine), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lmhkm lswry.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Lmhkm lswry.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.flickr.com/photos/osps7/50690761952/in/dateposted-public/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gawanmeh Gate

Hello, Osps7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gawanmeh Gate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aleatum gate

Hello, Osps7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aleatum gate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanaa Alsarghali

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sanaa Alsarghali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RationalPuff (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abd al-Sattar Qasim

The article Abd al-Sattar Qasim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and he doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria of WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abd al-Sattar Qasim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abd al-Sattar Qasim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abd al-Sattar Qasim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saleem Haj Yahia

Hello, Osps7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saleem Haj Yahia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Palestinian Journalists Syndicate

Hello, Osps7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Iron Gate (Jerusalem)

Hello, Osps7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Iron Gate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My personal page!

Hey man, you can do whatever you want for any article, I don't care about Jordan Arrests (2021), but don't edit my personal page next time!! Since I wrote this article, I'll include it in my articles, even if it was merged. -- Malkawi99 (talk) 09:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malkawi99 .. Is your personal page an objective article as well? I hope that you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and not violate them, and before you create an article research it. Hope you were aware of the policies :) English Wikipedia is not like Arabic, man! Osps7 (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Osps7, What do you mean "English Wikipedia is not like Arabic"?! In fact, I researched for the article before start writing it, but I haven't seen your article, so it seems like you wrote it quickly before I start writing it.

It doesn't matter and I dont care for this. But don't edit my personal page like this. I'm familiarized with Wikipedia's policies, and didn't violate them. Malkawi99 (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Osps7 and Malkawi99: We can't have more than one article about the same topic so can the two of you agree which title you are going to use and just merge them, it's irrelevant who made the article first, the community owns the article.Selfstudier (talk) 10:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Osps7 and Malkawi99: Now we are at 2021 Jordanian coup d'état attempt as well, lol.Selfstudier (talk) 10:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier:.In fact, I am satisfied with any decision. But to tell the truth, Osps7 created the article before me, he created his article and translated it automatically from Arabic Wikipedia (he created it before me, but when I started writing my article, his article did not appear to me). I created my article after I read several news, and I wrote it without translation. Also, "Detained persons" section has also been added to his article as I wrote it literally. Malkawi99 (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha lol. What a dilemma!. I don't think "coup d'état" is an appropriate term for what happened, because the Jordanian army didn't say it was a coup. -- Malkawi99 (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Palestinian Journalists Syndicate

Hello, Osps7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Palestinian Journalists Syndicate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wehda Street massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wehda Street massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wehda Street massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 08:52, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Old City of Nablus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Old City of Nablus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osama, I saw you have created this article - which I have been thinking of creating myself. I created the Old City of Hebron article last year. A bunch of maps of cities in Mandate Palestine have been uploaded to commons today - see the subcats in Commons:Category:Survey of Palestine. This one in particular will be helpful for your Old City article. It will also help with your Touqan Palace and Al-Nimr Palace articles – can you identify exactly where they are located on this map? Onceinawhile (talk) 11:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

BilledMammal (talk) 03:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alaa Najjar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alaa Najjar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alaa Najjar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaa Najjar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mz7 (talk) 05:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsolicited Suggestion

Hi Osps7, I just read your comment on the AFD for EMHRM and thought it might be worth pointing you in the direction of WP:CIVIL. I don't believe it was your intent, but the last paragraph of your comment there could be seen as uncivil, and it might be worth reading that policy in order to avoid misunderstandings in the future. BilledMammal (talk) 21:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rasha Kelej

Hi the page history shows you added a deletion template to this article but that template points to a 2017 deletion discussion. If she’s a senator she is definitely notable anyway but I wanted to let you know if you are seeking deletion there is some kind of technical fault in your nomination. (Sorry forgot to sign) Mccapra (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussions

When you nominate an article for deletion, as you did with Ahmed Al-Rimawi, you should state in an edit summary that that is what you are doing. In this case I have rectified your omission already, but please bear that in mind for the future. It also seems that the deletion discussion is malformed, with no headers or links. Please either follow the insructions at WP:AFD or use an automated tool such as Twinkle. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken pity on you and fixed the nomination, however in the future it may be better to ask for help or to wait and see. In this case, I was making a lap back to the article to see what became of the csd and would've nominated myself if I had been given the chance. At any rate, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Al-Rimawi is now live and correctly configured. You'd best watch the page, my guess is people will have some questions over the course of the nom. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alaa Najjar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alaa Najjar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaa Najjar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Emir Alemdar 80 (talk) 07:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Consulate General in Jerusalem

The article British Consulate General in Jerusalem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Consulates General are not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 04:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI + working with other accounts

Are you affiliated with or working with the accounts 'MontyWasHere' and 'Omedia2015'? In your edits today on the Tarek Aggad page, you restored the exact same brazen puffery that those two accounts added to the article in 2020[2][3], which I find puzzling. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Snooganssnoogans Do you see that I work with other accounts? This is strange. I am always neutral and do not violate any Wikipedia policy. The article, in its old form, is more expressive than the real picture of the person, and I hope that you will adhere to the politeness of the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osps7 (talk • contribs)

I can't answer for User:Snooganssnoogans, but I can see that you did far more than revert the change of image, and reintroduced brazen puffery. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Embassy of China, Ramallah

The article Embassy of China, Ramallah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tamkeen Insurance Company

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tamkeen Insurance Company, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 09:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamkeen Insurance Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamkeen Insurance Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamkeen Insurance Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Behind the moors (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Osps7! Your additions to Birzeit University have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Old City of Nablus

Hello, Osps7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Old City of Nablus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Osps7

Thank you for creating Tadamon massacre.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:States of Exception or Exceptional States cover image.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:States of Exception or Exceptional States cover image.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of States of Exception or Exceptional States

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on States of Exception or Exceptional States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/states-of-exception-or-exceptional-states-9780755626427/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:States of Exception or Exceptional States cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:States of Exception or Exceptional States cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AbdulMajeed Melhem moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AbdulMajeed Melhem, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AbdulMajeed Melhem (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AbdulMajeed Melhem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Osps7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Osps7. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sumaya Alnasser, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tetrainn (talk) 10:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

What does it mean that I have a conflict of interest?

I have been on Wikipedia for more than 6 years, and I have great knowledge of all policies, and I have also contributed to discussing policies.

I have opened a discussion to delete the article due to suspicions of a conflict of interest. The person who wrote the article works for her! Did you know this?

It is also very interesting that you have 82 amendments registered 8 months ago and are making baseless accusations!! Osps7 (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AbdulMajeed Melhem

Hello, Osps7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AbdulMajeed Melhem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bedivere (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Murders of journalists in Gaza (October 2023)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Murders of journalists in Gaza (October 2023) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/138086 and https://cpj.org/2023/10/3-palestinian-journalists-killed-1-injured-2-missing-in-gaza-israel-conflict/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Fram, then it's better to try to fix the article instead of nominating it for deletion, knowing that all news sites contain the same wording! And this is news, not a document, a photo or a historical text!!

Knowing that I have reworked the article. Osps7 (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Osps7:, I don’t think you understand what Fram said. For one thing, copyright violations is truly breaking the law. You broke the law when you created the article. Nominating it for deletion is step 1 (as a way to fix the problem). While it is nominated for deletion, it is either your responsibility, or other editor’s choice to correct the problem. In this circumstance, I corrected the problem, so the deletion nomination was removed. However, you really need to read WP:NPOV. The article is completely filled with tons of bias and weasel wording. Heck, before I commented here (post-copyright violation fixing), I had to fix the article from where you wrote “occupying forces” instead of Israel. Please read WP:NPOV and understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a news organization. If you have any questions, you can reach me on my talk page. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Al-Aqsa Flood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Al-Aqsa Flood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Selfstudier (talk) 17:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder of the the Arab-Israelis conflict is a contentious topic

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 06:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]