User talk:Panda m.

Speedy deletion nomination of Thitiya Rangsitpol[edit]

Hello Pandamanitkul,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thitiya Rangsitpol for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Celestinesucess (talk) 05:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dps04 (talk) 08:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thitiya Rangsitpol[edit]

This is an English language Wikipedia, I don't understand your text.Xx236 (talk) 08:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thitiya Rangsitpol[edit]

Hello Pandamanitkul,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thitiya Rangsitpol for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pandamanitkul, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Pandamanitkul! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lt.Col. Thita Manitkul[edit]

Hello Pandamanitkul,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lt.Col. Thita Manitkul for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 10:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't recreate the page.Xx236 (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You shuld quote reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 10:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please compare e.g. Krasae Chanawongse, it's a full page.Xx236 (talk) 10:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to move your page but I failed. Please copy your text User:Pandamanitkul/Lt.Col. Thita Manitkul into your sandbox and work on it. Xx236 (talk) 11:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

redirecting to user space from mainspace[edit]

Please stop re-creating a redirect in the article space (main space) to your user draft. It is not allowed, and continued action in this manner will be viewed as disruptive. Wikipedia:Your First Article may be of help to you. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 00:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thitiya Rangsitpol[edit]

Hello Pandamanitkul,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thitiya Rangsitpol for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with.File:..Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul.jpg I link with ไฟล์:Lt.Col. Thitiya Rangsitpol both are my Mather picture in her name and her maiden name And I want to know if she can be in English wiki or not Because she important enough in Thai wiki but they keep deleting in English and I cannot use other file in English page I want to know why only in English is deleting

Pandamanitkul (talk) 10:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Thai Wikipedia and the English Wikipedia are separate sister projects whose guidelines on what content is acceptable may disagree. So whether or not the Thai Wikipedia has an article about that lieutenant colonel is irrelevant to whether or not the English Wikipedia should have an article about her. That said, the draft seems rather ill-supported by references, with some of those cited not mentioning Manitkul at all. The image you uploaded clearly is not your own work; it's a copyright violation. Huon (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thita Manitkul (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject is probably notable on account of having been a legislator. However, a footnote to that effect is required. The discussion of policy is non-neutral and is not encyclopedic. This draft has tone issues and appears to be written to advance her policies as well as to describe her.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thita Manitkul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul .jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul .jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thita Manitkul has been accepted[edit]

Thita Manitkul, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg[edit]

Where is the evidence that File:Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg is in the public domain? Is it posted at her website, perhaps, with a clear license statement? —C.Fred (talk) 04:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do u mean by clear license statement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandamanitkul (talk • contribs)

Meaning, does it say on the page somewhere that the image is in the public domain? —C.Fred (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC) She put in Google photo domain just now will that be ok?[reply]

File permission problem with File:Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg, which you've attributed to Thita Manitkul. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lt.Col.Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lt.Col.Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?[edit]

Someone made a comment over at commons:Commons talk:Abuse filter#Report by 171.98.37.212 that they were related to Thitiya Rangsitpol (apparently another name for the subject of the article Thita Manitkul). I believe that the person who made that comment was you, editing while logged out (based on the files mentioned and your subsequent attempts to edit the discussion). Could you please confirm or deny this? —LX (talk, contribs) 09:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chulalongkorn University Notable alumni photo[edit]

Hi Pandamanitkul

   please use another photo and resize it like any other photos.

Thanks MrMFMan (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License status of File:Lt.Col.Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg[edit]

You just applied, in quick succession, two different license templates to File:Lt.Col.Thitiya Rangsitpol.jpg. Frankly, I doubt that either of them is true.

Can you please explain, here on your talk page, where exactly you came by that image? Is it your original creation that you gave away to a political party? Or did you find it on the internet somewhere (probably a political campaign page)? —C.Fred (talk) 04:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC) It was from the election in 2005 and she ran as party list in 35 th but the party loss and win only 26th place and all the picture I upload was I took a picture from the real poster you can see the curve below.[reply]

what is the correct copyright and permission with the image that I use mobile phone took myself do I need the person permission .The other 2 file I upload about the same time and her husbands answer and gave permission was delete . Is it has to the person permission .She was on the plane so that why I ask her husband . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.98.37.212 (talk) 00:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 13:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Panda m.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quote about homosexuals[edit]

"Homosexuals are no different..." attributed to Sukavich Rangsitpol

This quote is in a book: Media Fortunes, Changing Times: ASEAN States in Transition edited by Russell Hiang-Khng Heng.

I can't see the reference (29) in the Google Books preview so you may need to buy a paper copy. Link:

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4wyh6DqlDuQC&pg=PA217&dq=Sukavich+Rangsitpol+Thailand&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjX_KWSjcLQAhWKK8AKHSJyBkEQ6AEIRTAI#v=onepage&q=Sukavich%20Rangsitpol%20Thailand&f=false

Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Panda m.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thita Manitkul for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thita Manitkul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thita Manitkul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul_012 (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thita Manitkul[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thita Manitkul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/pg/MinistryofDefenceThailand/posts/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:47, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]