User talk:PhilB1883
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, PhilB1883. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Danny Bergara, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. HaeB (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Danny Bergara, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
PhilB1883, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi PhilB1883! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC) |
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Danny Bergara. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Seconding what MS wrote. At Wikipedia, verification is everything. David notMD (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at User talk:Materialscientist, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello PhilB1883. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Danny Bergara, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:PhilB1883. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PhilB1883|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Also, you need to read policies such as the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and citation policies. Randompointofview (talk) 04:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I did see you tried to get permission to post a picture here, but you need to know that image permission only for Wikipedia is useless, as the Wikipedia:Image use policy requires broader permission to be given. Of course, it is possible to only release a low resolution version of the image if needed. Randompointofview (talk) 04:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived[edit]
|
|
Hi PhilB1883! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|