User talk:Raith09

elcome to Wikipedia Raith09, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance	Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.	Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by pressing or in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC) John from Idegon (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Rfaith09 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 22:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't believe i should be blocked, i referenced all my sources and gave accurate information. Raith09 (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the only account i have that i'm aware of, i'm not doing anything that involves Sock puppetry

Decline reason:

Well, we know now that's not true. Please go back to original account. There you can address the copyvio issue and any WP:COI issue and any other issue I don't know about. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the Guide to appealing blocks and i'm not aware of any sock puppetry, please unblock my account or at least let me know what i need to do to fix it, thanks

Decline reason:

removing duplicate-- see discussion interwoven with unblock requests -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So it's just a coincidence that this account added a picture that was uploaded by another account to an article that the other account had also edited, and there is one character difference in your usernames? (Adding that the original account was blocked years ago, and the coincidental usernames have no relationship to the name of the article edited)... Gotta say....not buying it. At all. Stop using this account, go to your original account and request an unblock. But I wouldn't bother doing it for at least six months, and for those six months, do not edit Wikipedia at all. Even via an IP. John from Idegon (talk) 21:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raith09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello User John from Idegon, that was an old account from year ago, i thought that was deleted and this is the only account i have. i don't even have access to that email address anymore, can you please unblock this account. this is my primary email and account. I haven't done anything wrong with this account and i've referenced my sources. That old account is no more.

Decline reason:

removed duplicate -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thought this was the only account you were aware of....now you are aware of the other account? LOL. The original account was blocked for cause (copyright violations). You're filing multiple unblock requests without waiting for an answer on the earlier ones. I couldn't unblock you if I wanted to, as I am not an administrator. But if I were, I wouldn't. John from Idegon (talk) 23:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralizationsAreBad: What do you think. Oldaccount/new account?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]