User talk:Reaver55

December 2020

Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Not Fucking Around Coalition—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Merry Christmas! Asartea ^{Talk Contribs!} 06:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Competence is required

Unjustified warns like this and attacks like this are an indication that you are not here to edit constructively. This is called WP:Disruptive editing and if you persist with such edits your account will end up blocked. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Warnings were justified Thank you

:Hello, Reaver55, :Do not post misguided warnings on the talk pages of editors you disagree with. This is disruptive editing and continued persistence will result in a loss of editing privileges. Focus on the content, not on trying to "get back" at editors who hold different opinions than you. This is a collaborative editing project and conflict happens all of the time here, you have to be able to be civil in the face of disagreement or you should find another hobby. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11,

12 May 2021 (UTC)

All Warnings were valid thank you goodbye!

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Reaver55 reported by User:Tbhotch (Result: ). Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Weren't you spouting nonsense about China uncensored being funded by a "Cult" aka Falun gong? Stop spouting CCP Propaganda China bot. You live in West Taiwan.

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mewnst (talk) 06:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Just to let anyone who comes accross this page, I will be crossing this notice out when it's done. It's what I do I'm not ashamed to show my mistakes. Especially when repeated users attempt to bring this up repeatedly as some sort of "evidence" Then calls it a toxic smear tactic when I do it. Reaver55 (talk) 18:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Never remove other editors’ comments from ANI

Doug Weller talk 20:08, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

I sure hope when I start giving my opinion Like what I'm being reported for I don't get into any trouble. Already did. Reaver55 (talk) 20:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Cracker (term). Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Frankly, I think there is no way you won't be blocked for personal attacks and harassment, but you really need to stop digging. bonadea contributions talk 21:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

While I may have undid this warning I will not undid the undid of my response defending myself and point of view. If you wish to delete for "comment on content, not on fellow editors" then the other editors articles commenting on me as an editor should be removed as well for neutrality. I will keep my edit reverted on "Cracker(Term)" unless ALL "Comments on fellow editors" are removed. You must maintain a level of neutrality. Reaver55 (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 13:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

• Compare various warnings removed from this page and this ANI thread. Bishonen | tålk 13:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC).