User talk:Rfc1394/2022

Friday

15

November

2024

04:04 UTC

Welcome to the archives of Paul Robinson's talk page for 2018.
Main (Current) Rfc1394 (talk • contribs)

All of 2022

Proposed deletion of File:Loves Theme 22Sec.ogg

The file File:Loves Theme 22Sec.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Portion——of the instrumental Love's Theme not proven contextually significant to the whole piece. Possibly easily conveyed in text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Culture club-karma chameleon-28 sec.ogg

The file File:Culture club-karma chameleon-28 sec.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Portions of Karma Chameleon heard in sample not proven contextually significant to the whole song, despite continuing popularity. Easily conveyed in text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Washington Square.ogg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ShowYear

Template:ShowYear has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:U.S. Supreme Court composition 2005–2006

Template:U.S. Supreme Court composition 2005–2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

QOI (image format)

I've finished touching the page for the moment, apologies if I was causing you edit conflicts. (Hohum ^@) 19:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elton john-levon-29 sec.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elton john-levon-29 sec.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Donovan-wear your love like heaven-25 sec..ogg

The file File:Donovan-wear your love like heaven-25 sec..ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ten seconds longer than the limits of MOS:SAMPLE, i.e. ten percent of the song's runtime (148 seconds). Also, chorus/refrain and another portion of the song heard in the sample inadequate to help readers fully understand the song (as a whole). May fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:All Summer Long Beach Boys 28 Sec.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:All Summer Long Beach Boys 28 Sec.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn

Hello, Rfc1394, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Velella, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Velella}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holmby Productions, Inc. v. Vaughn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"37th century" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 37th century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#37th century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"36th century" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 36th century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#36th century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"35th century" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 35th century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#35th century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"34th century" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 34th century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#34th century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"33rd century" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 33rd century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#33rd century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"32nd century" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 32nd century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#32nd century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"31st century" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 31st century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#31st century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Software defined manufacturing

Hello, Rfc1394. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Software defined manufacturing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Database templates has been nominated for merging

Category:Database templates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

804 Area Code

The image linked at File:Area code 804.png has been made incorrect by the Virginia SCC's decision to overlay area code 686 on 804. Can you edit the file such that it reflcts the change? Thanks so much!

Sincerely,

JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 15:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Rfc1394 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]