User talk:Rodeocowboy36

Rodeocowboy36, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Rodeocowboy36! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 1 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Brinsworth House page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Royal Variety Performance with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY:

Hi Oshwah, Many thanks for your comments concerning the Royal Variety Performance page. The sections that we deleted were very in-accurate so we replaced them with accurate wording and correct information. For your information, we work officially for the Royal Variety Performance and the Royal Variety Charity in an official capacity, so the information that we substituted is 100% accurate. We are however, new to Wikipedia, so we now understand the importance of doing many references, so we have started again and included loads of references. We have deleted, for now, everything that we have added without references, so we hope this is now ok? Please let us know if not, as we want to make the page as informative and as accurate as possible. Looking forward to your advice. Many thanks ----Rodeocowboy36 (talk) 21:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Variety Performance[edit]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry that I had to drop it back to one of the earlier versions, but what you had been adding failed a large number of our guidelines. We have a WP:Manual of Style which articles are supposed to follow, and there were many, many breaches in your version. Perhaps if you spent your initial Wiki time making yourself familiar with those guidelines, you will find life to be much easier and more profitable. There is also the Teamroom (see the first thread on this page) which is a great place to ask others questions on how to approach things or what formatting to use in what circumstances. They are always delighted to be able to help. Cheers – SchroCat (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurie Mansfield has been accepted[edit]

Laurie Mansfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333 -blue 03:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Royal Variety Performance

added links pointing to Queen Mary, Her Majesty Queen Mary, Variety, Cambridge Circus and Palace Theatre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Rodeocowboy36, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giles Richard Cooper (April 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still needs to focus with only the best available amount of additional in-depth third-party news sources overall, but not press releases and trivial passing mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giles Richard Cooper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Copyright problem: Royal Variety Charity[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Royal Variety Charity, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.royalvarietycharity.org/brinsworth-house/history-of-brinsworth-house http://www.royalvarietycharity.org/news/detail/eabf-officially-changes-name-to-the-royal-variety-charity http://www.royalvarietycharity.org/royal-variety-performance/archive/detail/2015-london-royal-albert-hall, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Royal Variety Charity and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Royal Variety Charity, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Royal Variety Charity. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Royal Variety Charity with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Royal Variety Charity saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! /wiae /tlk 13:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have just flagged the same issue in Royal Variety Performance. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 13:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

== Hi I'm sorry for causing any confusion and for there being belief of a potential COI. There isn't. I am not employed by anyone and am not connected with or work for any employee of the Royal Variety Charity. I am simply a supporter of this charity - amongst many others. I would love to see this charity, including its senior management represented better on Wikipedia and also other charities and their management represented better. I have no other motive and I'm sorry for misleading anyone or betraying myself as anything different. I work alone, love Wiki and all it stands for and just want to learn the procedures better and create great content. Apologies again and really hope this is now all clear. Thank and please keep up your great work any connection ==

Hello, Rodeocowboy36. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Giles Richard Cooper, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm sorry for causing any confusion and for there being belief of a potential COI. There isn't. I am not employed by anyone and am not connected with or work for any employee of the Royal Variety Charity. I am simply a supporter of this charity - amongst many others. I would love to see this charity, including its senior management represented better on Wikipedia and also other charities and their management represented better. I have no other motive and I'm sorry for misleading anyone or betraying myself as anything different. I work alone, love Wiki and all it stands for and just want to learn the procedures better and create great content. Apologies again and really hope this is now all clear. Thank and please keep up your great work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodeocowboy36 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 15 April 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Rodeocowboy36, but I just can't see how to reconcile this denial with your earlier statement here (timestamped 06:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)) that "we work on the admin team for the royal variety charity and the royal variety performance and have done major overhauls of the wiki pages for both these". Who are "we"? Please understand that Wikipedia accounts are for individual, not shared, use. You say that you work on the admin team of the charity, and then the next day you tell us that you are "… not employed by anyone and [are] not connected with or work for any employee of the Royal Variety Charity". Forgive me, but I can't see any way in which both of those statements can be compatible. Would you be kind enough to tell us which is the truth? Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Giles Richard Cooper has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Giles Richard Cooper. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giles Richard Cooper (April 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insertcleverphrasehere was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Giles Richard Cooper instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

seems to have been already completed manually

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giles Richard Cooper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Insert CleverPhrase Here 07:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Giles Richard Cooper[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Giles Richard Cooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.royalvarietycharity.org/home/welcome/giles-cooper-biog/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Giles Richard Cooper[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Giles Richard Cooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G13, Kind of. It hasn't been abandoned for 6 moths, but the article was previously moved to the article space via copy/paste and has been updated considerably there.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Insert CleverPhrase Here 22:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rodeocowboy36. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]