Jump to content

User talk:SONIANKIT135

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, SONIANKIT135, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Ways to improve Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh[edit]

Hello, SONIANKIT135,

Thank you for creating Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Maybe three reliable,independent, secondary sources will be better to prove notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Synoman Barris}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 11:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of schools in Delhi[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of schools in Delhi appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Govt. Co-Ed. Sr. Sec. School, Sector 2, Dwarka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schools are not inherently notable and need to pass WP:GNG guidelines. I've moved your article draftspace where you can improve it by adding relevant information from third party, reliable and independent sources. Once you're done, you need to click on the "Submit your draft for review!" and if it is found to be in compliance with GNG guidelines, it'll moved to mainspace otherwise declined again for improvements. A look WP:42 may help you quickly what to do! ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, SONIANKIT135! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 01:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of schools in Delhi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
You have already been warned for adding a school without an article to this list, please do NOT do it again - Arjayay (talk) 09:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sir, I will keep in mind SONIANKIT135 (talk) 10:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Rich Smith was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still fails WP:NSCHOOL, been submitted 3 times now with no real improvement.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 10:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

 I have added school's own Link, the authority's Link and also about the School, sir please tell me that what I have to add. SONIANKIT135 (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it seems you have tried to circumvent the draft process by recreating this article in the mainspace, after the draft was rejected as not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please read the message above for requesting help. Thanks (pinging reviewer to let them know) Steven (Editor) (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rajkiya Pratibha Vikas Vidyalaya, Sector 10, Dwarka does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors — stubs are to be avoided. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 03:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have seen a page G.B.S.S. School No.1, Shakti Nagar. In this page also there is no more references but its still published. That's why I am requesting you to please recheck my both pages which are currently in draftspace. Sir please publish both the pages as soon as possible. The pages are: 1. Govt. Co-Ed. Sr. Sec. School, Sector 2, Dwarka 2. Rajkiya Pratibha Vikas Vidyalaya, Sector 10, Dwarka

Sir please kindly accept my request and publish both the pages.

Thank you SONIANKIT135 (talk) 06:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi,

I noticed you regularly edit the page List of sitting judges of High Courts of India. Thank you for your edits. I would like to request you to please make sure you include an edit summary with your edits, as per WP:FIES so that other editors understand the changes you have made. Thank you. - Naushervan (talk) 04:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, SONIANKIT135. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Govt. Co-Ed. Sr. Sec. School, Sector 2, Dwarka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the page, please publish the page. SONIANKIT135 (talk) 10:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, SONIANKIT135. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajkiya Pratibha Vikas Vidyalaya, Sector 10, Dwarka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the page, now you can check it. Please publish the page. SONIANKIT135 (talk) 10:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SONIANKIT135. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Govt. Co-Ed. Sr. Sec. School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! VV 08:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello SONIANKIT135! Your additions to N. V. Ramana have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SONIANKIT135. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajkiya Pratibha Vikas Vidyalaya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Verifability[edit]

Information icon When you update information in articles please can you give a thought to verifiability. Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations. Your edits would be much more useful if you cited the sources you used for the information you add. Also, when you updated the article on Allahabad High Court in April you changed information next to an existing citation.[1] The citation was for information added to the article in 2017, and was not relevant to the new information. The right thing to have done was to move the citation to the information it supported, and provided a new citation for the new information.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon If you are going to change Jammu and Kashmir High Court‎ in articles to something else, you need to provide reliable sources that explicitly state that Jammu and Kashmir High Court‎ is now called something else, and when this change took place. You have had the concept of verifiability explained to you before.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding publish of two pages.[edit]

Respected Sir/Madam,

       Sir I have tried to improve two draft pages Govt. Co-Ed. Sr. Sec. School, Sector 2, Dwarka and Rajkiya Pratibha Vikas Vidyalaya, Sector 10, Dwarka. The pages are currently in draftspace. Its a request to you to sir please see the both pages and please publish both of them as soon as possible. Sir, please kindly accept my request. SONIANKIT135 (talk) 06:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of C. T. Ravikumar[edit]

Hello SONIANKIT135,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged C. T. Ravikumar for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How should communication work in the Wikipedia Android app?[edit]