User talk:Sabine Hagmann

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Sabine Hagmann, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Sabine Hagmann, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sabine Hagmann! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

May 2020[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang, from its old location at User:Sabine Hagmann/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 12:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kylie, Sabine Hagmann (talk) 17:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC);[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yu-Chen Wang has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yu-Chen Wang. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two Drafts[edit]

User:Sabine Hagmann You have created two drafts that are almost the same but not the same on Yu-Chen Wang. Please merge them into one draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yu-Chen Wang (June 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for submitting this draft. Please take a look at WP:NARTIST and see if enough info can be found to meet those criteria. Please do ask at the help desk or the Teahouse if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 05:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yu-Chen Wang (September 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Young In Hong[edit]

Hello, Sabine Hagmann. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Young In Hong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Sabine Hagmann. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Didem Özbek, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, Rosguill, I know Didem Özbek as I am an artist myself and know many artists. I don't think I have a conflict of interest because of that though. Sabine Hagmann (talk) 22:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yu-Chen Wang (December 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Young In Hong (February 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's not clear that she satisfies WP:ARTIST (or anything else in WP:PERSON).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Young In Hong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Young In Hong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response here. NB I don't say that she's not "notable" (I have no knowledge or opinion about this), just that I can't infer "notability" from the draft in its current state. -- Hoary (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yu-Chen Wang has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yu-Chen Wang. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yu-Chen Wang has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yu-Chen Wang. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yu-Chen Wang has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yu-Chen Wang. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Sabine Hagmann! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Yu-Chen Wang Submission declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Sabine Hagmann! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Young_In_Hong Submission declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yu-Chen Wang[edit]

Hello, Sabine Hagmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yu-Chen Wang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent collections?[edit]

Hi! Has any of Young In Hong's work been put in the permanent collections of any major museum? If so, that in and of itself would be a sign of notability artist-wise. I saw that her work was exhibited in a major museum, which is good, but to establish how that passes NARTIST there needs to be coverage of this.

One big note I want to specify is that coverage doesn't have to be in English - it just has to be in places Wikipedia would see as reliable. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ReaderofthePack, I will look into this Sabine Hagmann (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yu-Chen Wang (August 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add secondary sources as well. This draft largely relies on primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheBirdsShedTears

Thank you for your time to review and comment on my submission. I checked the Wikipedia pages you recommended, Referencing for beginners and Citing sources, but couldn't figure out why the article is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Aren't the following sources reliable enough?

Wall Street International
UAL University of Arts London
a-n The Artists Information Company
ArtRabbit
Outset Contemporary Art Fund
ArtAsiaPacific
Journal for Artistic Research (JAR)
Apollo Magazine
Financial Times

Kind regards Sabine --Sabine Hagmann (talk) 13:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources that are closely associated with the subject are called "primary sources", which according to Wikipedia are not useful for satisfying notability. You will need to provide secondary sources such as newspapers, books, magazines or similar. Sources should discuss the in detail. Please note, passing mentions are not sufficient to establish notability. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Young In Hong has been accepted[edit]

Young In Hong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yu-Chen Wang (January 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yu-Chen Wang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Your edit to Alicia Paz has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa I am not sure what edit you are referring to, as it is deleted, with the references and links, and I can not check it anymore. I am not aware of any copyright problems, I thought I had quoted with correct references. Would you be so kind to let me know what it is you have deleted? Thank you and kind regards, Sabine Hagmann (talk) 11:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content I removed is almost identical to some found in https://www.mal217.org/media/mal/163417-dp_english_alicia_paz_juntas-1.pdf. It's at the top of page 3, the first paragraph, starting with ". The last chapter, Juntas, ..."— Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, thank you for the link. I was not aware of that pdf, but as it is the press release, I guess, it is ok to quote it (actually desired), dn't you think so? Sabine Hagmann (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are for the most part written in our own words. Quoting a press release is not the encyclopedic kind of content we are looking for. You could try writing a brief summary in your own words.— Diannaa (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hi Sabine Hagmann! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]