User talk:Sarah GM

Internet Universality moved to Draft:Internet Universality[edit]

Internet Universality has been moved to Draft:Internet Universality due to the excessive number of disambiguation links making the article unsuitable for inclusion in mainspace at this time. Please fix the disambiguation links before requesting restoration of the page to mainspace. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Universality[edit]

When you write articles such as Internet Universality please just wikilink words once when they are first mentioned. Once in the lead and once in the body of the article is a good rule of thumb. This article contains 12 links to UNESCO, for example. If you need any further assistance, please get in touch. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! Sarah GM (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Online hate speech[edit]

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Sarah GM, thanks for creating Online hate speech!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Since this article focuses mostly about efforts to curtail it, it does not cover motivation, or much about freedom of speech.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sarah GM! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! GigglesnortHotel (talk) 20:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your warm welcome! Very much appreciated. Sarah GM (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Privacy, free expression, and transparency for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Privacy, free expression, and transparency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Privacy, free expression, and transparency until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Sarah GM, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Sustainable Development Goal 16 have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa 17:42, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018[edit]

Your addition to International Programme for the Development of Communication has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Windhoek Declaration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chili (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! It was a silly mistake. Best, Sarah GM (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

It's clear you have good intentions here, but you also seem to be looking to use Wikipedia as a platform for activism, which is not permitted. Wikipedia articles are required to remain strictly neutral, and to never advocate for anyone or anything, not even good causes. Please try to make smaller contributions toward articles rather than massive text dumps. Also, since it's become very clear you have a conflict of interest in regards to UNESCO, please suggest edits based on that on the talk page of articles rather than making them directly and follow all other conflict of interest guidelines, and remember that material from them should not be stated in Wikipedia's voice as simple fact. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:33, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sources[edit]

Hi would you mind explaining why you have systematically broken a large number of URLS in you sources? This avoids them being accessed, you have sytematically added nowiki code and added spaces to these references. I am having a hell of a job cleaning this up. I hope it is not an attempt to hide copyright violation. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Domdeparis:I think its a bug in Visual Editor causing this issue, I'll work with Sarah to work out what is going wrong and file a ticket on Phabricator if needed, thanks for trying to fix it. How would adding nowiki around URLs hide copyright violation? Is this a thing people do? John Cummings (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@John Cummings: Copyvio checks the URLs that are on the page and if the URLs are broken or hidden with <nowiki> then the tool can't check them. As Sarah has been warned about copyvio and has never replied or posted on any talk page and seems to have ignored the warnings this sets off alarm bells. Users that do not engage in discussion sometimes become problem users. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Domdeparis: just to let you know that not posting on talk pages doesn't mean that I don't read and acknowledge the comments made by you and others. I simply don't feel comfortable doing so, but always do my best to make things better. Best. Sarah GM (talk) 12:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah thanks for your reply. The trouble is that Wikipedia is a collaboratif project that aims to build consensus in editing and editors that do not acknowledge comments on their talk page may just be ignoring them especially when the same problem has been repeated. You might want to read WP:DISRUPTSIGNS especially #4 as this will explain why alarm bells go off sometimes. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Domdeparis: thank you for explaining, Wikipedia can be more complicated than we would think. I will try to express myself more and am taking into account everything that is said in here. Sarah GM (talk) 13:16, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. You don't have to get into long conversations but just a minimum to reassure other editors that you are not just ignoring what is being said. Happy editing! Dom from Paris (talk) 13:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Domdeparis:, thanks for the clarification about the tool and explaining things further, I didn't know that was how it worked, I thought it used a general web search. John Cummings (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, when you run the tool it automatically checks "search engine" and "links in page". This is the explanation at the top of the page "This tool attempts to detect copyright violations in articles. In search mode, it will check for similar content elsewhere on the web using Google, external links present in the text of the page, or Turnitin(provided by EranBot), depending on which options are selected. In comparison mode, the tool will skip the searching step and display a report comparing the article to the given webpage, like the Duplication Detector." Dom from Paris (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the explanation :) John Cummings (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media pluralism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internal conflict in South Sudan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Media independence for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Media independence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media independence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sarah GM. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Online youth radicalization[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Online youth radicalization, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260382, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Online youth radicalization and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Online youth radicalization, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Online youth radicalization. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Online youth radicalization with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Online youth radicalization saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Chris Capoccia 💬 22:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]