User talk:Sarvatra/Archives/1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
February 2017
Hello, I'm Adamgerber80. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 12 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the MS Dhoni page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
No. 15/21 IAF Squadron
I have observed that you removed data added by me and suspected me about adding data without research. So, i would like clarify i live there there and posses much more information, so if you have sources with conflicting information i am open for discussion. I added satellite imagery because some idiot was engaging in edit war and wont stop removing data. Aman 17:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC) Guramandeep (talk)
Thanks
Hey Sarvatra, Thanks for updating the new Air Force commanders. I might need some help with creating the articles for the new commanders (Air Force and Army). Please, let me know if you can help. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Adamgerber80:, yeah I can help. Let's make a list of articles need to be created and then start with them. —Sarvatra (talk) 03:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Adamgerber80: Just finished with Harjit Singh Arora. Please take a look. —Sarvatra (talk) 07:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. Looks good. We also had @FlyingBlueDream: who created Raghunath Nambiar. FlyingBlueDream, welcome and thanks for your contributions. The other important article we need to create is the new Commander of Training Command, P C Thimayya. Here are some references I found ([1],[2],[3], [4], [5]). I think this enough to get a page started. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Adamgerber80: I improved and resubmitted Draft:Balakrishnan Suresh. Please take a look. —Sarvatra (talk) 07:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. Looks good. We also had @FlyingBlueDream: who created Raghunath Nambiar. FlyingBlueDream, welcome and thanks for your contributions. The other important article we need to create is the new Commander of Training Command, P C Thimayya. Here are some references I found ([1],[2],[3], [4], [5]). I think this enough to get a page started. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Adamgerber80: Just finished with Harjit Singh Arora. Please take a look. —Sarvatra (talk) 07:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Balakrishnan Suresh has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 11:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Kindly update the name of chief justice in the list of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_office-holders_in_India
Do the concerened.! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_office-holders_in_India Divyam1699 (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject Military history
Welcome!
Hello, Sarvatra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AshLin (talk) 08:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Armed Forces Hospitals In India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Betul and Ghaziabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Indian military history task force
Hi, I invite you to join the Indian military history task force, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This task force is created to deal exclusively with the topics related to Indian military. If you are interested, please add you name in alphabetical order to the participants list. In addition, you can also indicate areas of special interest across your name. Please free to ping me if you have further questions. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 02:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Sarvatra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Welcome
|
The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Sushil Chandra moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sushil Chandra, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Too Many Reverts Abhinandan Varthaman
Hi @Sarvatra: I Checked you reverted my edits on Abhinandan Varthaman's Repatriation section I beleive I gave corrected source and edited his release news with WP:NPOV could you please explain why did you exactly reverted edits ?-- MrZINE | talk 13:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- I have done a lot of reverts on that page. Can you please link which specific one you're talking about? —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey, this was the revert I'm saying -- MrZINE | talk 13:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- From what I can see in the news right now, he is yet to return to India. Plus the time of his return isn't necessary to be included in the wiki article. That was my reasoning behind the revert. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I have tagged you in a doubt (HERE) on Commons related to the National War Memorial pictures. Please comment if possible. Regards. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 15:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Air Marshal Rajesh Kumar, Indian Air Force.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Air Marshal Rajesh Kumar, Indian Air Force.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Nazir Ahmad Wani
On 6 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nazir Ahmad Wani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nazir Ahmad Wani, the first Ashoka Chakra recipient from Kashmir (posthumous award ceremony pictured), was a militant before he surrendered and joined the Indian Army? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nazir Ahmad Wani. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nazir Ahmad Wani), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
[Train-the-Trainer 2019] Applications open
Hello, I am happy to inform you that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2019 programme is going to be organised by CIS-A2K on 31 May, 1 & 2 June 2019.
What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT was conducted in 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Who should apply?
- Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project (including English) is eligible to apply.
- An editor must have 600+ edits on Zero-namespace till 31 March 2019.
- Anyone who has the interest to conduct offline/real-life Wiki events.
- Note: anyone who has already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, cannot apply.
You may apply using this link, and more details can be found here. Last date to apply is 7 May 2019. Please note that travel and accommodation support will be provided to participants. Given your recent contributions around India-related content, I encourage you to apply. Let me know if you have any questions. Best, KCVelaga (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sushil Chandra (May 7)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sushil Chandra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sushil Chandra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Sarvatra!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Otr500 (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
|
- (talk page stalker) Otr500, hi! I am afraid that you may have made an error in judgment here; the position of Election Commissioner of India is a constitutional one, and one which has a great deal of prestige and power attached to it. The Election Commission of India is the independent and constitutional body which has the mandate to conduct presidential, vice-presidential, parliamentary, and state legislative elections in India. The role of the commission is somewhat similar to the role of the Federal Election Commission, the Secretary of State, the state secretaries of state, and the state election commissions in the United States, combined; hence, as one might imagine, as one of the three heads of the body responsible for administering and conducting elections in India, an Election Commissioner exercises quite a bit of influence. Also, it is to be noted that an Election Commissioner's service conditions are same as that of a judge of the Supreme Court of India.
- In addition, the Central Board of Direct Taxes is the body of the Government of India which collects, among others, the income tax. The chairperson of the aforesaid body hence, has a status analogous to that of a secretary to the Government of India.
- In light of the points above, it should be quite clear that Chandra is independently notable and easily qualifies WP:NPOL; vide: some articles created by me, viz., Sunil Arora and Ashok Lavasa.
- Notwithstanding the stuff I wrote hereinabove, the draft, in its, current state isn't worthy of being in the mainspace and needs some work; I wrote this screed just to inform you of the reasons as to why Chandra is an independently notable person. 16:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging you, @Otr500:. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 16:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Reply, @SshibumXZ: Thanks for your comments but I feel it possible you should reconsider that I made an error in judgement. Your opinion on this may be because of part of my "special note" about passing. This is related to possibly being passed with a continued severe lack of content being the pseudo part.
- Please note in my review: I did not decline the submission "because" the subject was an Election Commissioner or past Chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxes that I might not have considered notable. I stated "I am not sure" but related that I do know policies and guidelines and my assessment was that the notability of the subject could not be substantiated by the sources. You apparently "specialize" in articles related to India so I will defer to your judgement and opinion as to the notability of the discussed positions.
- I never intend to be biased but on new articles but I cannot take so much times as to completely research articles and sources or make edits in attempts to approve them. I perform a search and look at provided sources. In this case the sources provided, of which I feel I gave an accurate assessment, were severely lacking for any article and certainly a BLP. My ability to search will sometimes be biased because of a lack of available and credible hits I receive, and that I can review, but "if" I even think this may be the case I just decline with reasoning. I am in the camp that even what is considered intrinsic or inherent ("presumed") needs sourcing and certainly if contested by comments or tags.
- In cases where I do not see clear notability, especially if a draft has been reviewed and declined multiple times with reviewer sources and/or notability issues unresolved, I will reject an article (indicated by a "stop sign") of which I am pretty sure I did not do in this case. I sometimes get daunted, that I may be swinging towards being a verified deletionist, when I randomly review several articles that do not show to have notability, so will "take a step" back to ensure I am not being too restrictive.
- I strive to be as accurate on my assessments as possible with a #1 consideration being: "Would a new article survive an AFD", specifically, would I !vote other than keep, understanding that a presumption of notability requires more than just surmising, and that even a stub must have at least enough substance to be more than a dictionary entry or pseudo biography. A BLP does require a higher standard. The end result is that two of us agree that as written (and of course sourced) the draft is not ready for acceptance.
- I am now saddened by seeing that you are "semi-retired". I might certainly exploit your knowledge on India related subjects should the need arise. Again, thank you for the comments and if you take interest I hope you can add content and references to result in a survivable article. Have a great day. Otr500 (talk) 18:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Otr500, hi! First of all, sorry for the later reply! Now, my comment was not an inimical aimed at you; you're an accomplished Wikipedian whose experience far dwarfs my own. My comment, rather, was just to give you a brief rundown of how the Indian electoral system works, so that, if you were to encounter an AfC draft like this one again, you'd have some more context to judge the draft; nothing more, nothing less. I am sorry if I didn't make that clear!
- I don't specialise in Indian-related topics, i.e., I am not an Indologist, but, yes, I do take special interest in topics such as law and government and I would be more than happy to help should the need of such help arise!
- Yes, I am more or less semi-retired because I am preparing for law entrance examinations, so, that does not leave me with much time for Wikipedia. That is the very reason as to why I am not working on Chandra's article, as, I am just focusing on the article of the Fifteenth Finance Commission (perhaps my greatest article creation) and members thereof for now; after I am done with the aforementioned article, and if time permits, I would certainly have a look at Chandra's article!
- Again, I am sorry for any ad-hominems I may have intentionally made! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 10:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the reply and the vote of confidence. I actually didn't take your comments as any ad-hominem (attack or otherwise) and I did not know the political layout so your comments were insightful. Any expertise I have in law and politics centers more around Louisiana and Civil Law. I espouse Constitutionalism but equally support that our country has survived with our Constitution since 1789. The trend of the last several years, that the budget can continually fall into an endless hole of deficit, is troubling. The move for an Article V Convention is growing and if the budget is the only goal, as a Single Subject Amendment, it would be great. A problem is that when special interests get involved the scope and outcome can become unpredictable. Louisiana has an arguable history of illegal politics. The Constitution of Louisiana has been rewritten eleven times but mainly for a specific agenda and most of the time the rest is symbolic. I think "Fifteenth Finance Commission" is indicative of what Wikipedia is all about.
- Good luck with your future studies and congratulations, as I am sure you will pass the examinations, and and I offer an advance "welcome back" when you can. Otr500 (talk) 02:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Otr500, first, thank you for your well wishes! They mean a lot, really! And yes, even here in India we regularly get news of your presidents and your Congress ending up in a tussle over the federal budget, purely because of the United States' status as the global hegemon; in the not too distant past, I have also read about Donald Trump imposing a state of emergency over there to fund his border wall, as, he wasn't able to get his budget pass through the Congress; it's also kind of hilarious as an outsider, but, must be annoying as a citizen of the United States. Also, thanks for your comments on 'Fifteenth Finance Commission'! That article took a lot of time to build.
- Once again, thanks for your positive comments! And may we cross paths, though in a more positive setting, again! Cheers! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 13:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
1965 images
Please take a look at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:1965 war.jpg
It is happening on other Images as well. I am not sure if this is a CIR issue or Malice. AGFing I am going to assume the former. --DBigXrayᗙ 06:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @DBigXray: I'm just holding out till the picture clears over usage of GODL-India. Titodutta is in talks with some expert lawyers to clarify the issue - c:Template talk:GODL-India#Some expert opinion. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 07:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
A request
Can you add the article MARCOS to your watchlist? It is prone to disruption. I am asking you since I am about to leave Wiki for a wikibreak. Regards, VaibhavafroTalk 07:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Vaibhavafro: I've added it to my watchlist. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 11:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
A request
If you think that I did the right thing by creating this article before I leave for a wikibreak, then please add it to your watchlist. Thank you.— Vaibhavafro 💬 09:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Well well well. I have never even heard of this force. Nice article. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 09:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Vaibhavafro: Is it in any way related to Special Frontier Force? —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 09:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Sarvatra:I am glad that you have never heard of it. Because if you knew about it some 10 years ago, you would be in trouble. Just joking. No, it’s NOT A PART OF THE SFF. It is a separate unit. The SFF recruits Tibetians and is just an airborne force. The Mavericks (Special Group) are the Indian equivalent of CIA’s Special Activities Center.— Vaibhavafro 💬 10:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Only Sandeep Unnithan had the privilege of knowing about this force BACK IN 1999, just like he was the first to talk about K Missile family and INS Arighat! Coincidence? Lucky guy? I don’t think so. Maybe the government loves to leak secrets through him. (I know talk pages are not forums, but just telling)— Vaibhavafro 💬 10:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Read this. There is no dearth of content on Wiki.— Vaibhavafro 💬 10:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Please make correction!!
I have seen a lot of false informations. E.g. Sashastra Seema Bal director general, FCCII Chairperson. Make corrections please. Manja 420 (talk) 15:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- "List of office-holders in India" Manja 420 (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Manja 420: You can make the changes yourself. Just don't forget to add proper news sources. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 04:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- "List of office-holders in India" Manja 420 (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Requesting comments on MSMC move
It would be gracious of you to voice your valuable opinion on Talk:Modern Sub Machine Carbine/Archive 1#Requested move 2 December 2019. I have just finished updating that article and have proposed the rename.— Vaibhavafro 💬 18:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- I actually do not have any opinion on that. I am not that aware of small arms development in India :| —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Overcite on several Pages
please see WP:OVERCITE There is no need to add WP:PRIMARY sources when we have WP:SECONDARY sources for the same. please discuss on talk if you disagree. --Happy New Year! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 12:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for North East Delhi riots
On 26 February 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article North East Delhi riots, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. --⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 10:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Would not have been possible without your helping hand to update this.--⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 10:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
For all the patience you have shown while responding to the requests on the talk page of riot article. You deserve an appreciation. ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 07:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC) |
Draft:Sushil Chandra concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sushil Chandra, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Sushil Chandra
Hello, Sarvatra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sushil Chandra".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Image request
Hi. Hope you are doing well. I was wondering if there was any usable image for this former IPS officer Farooq Khan. DTM (talk) 14:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi DTM. There is one portrait image on pib which can be used, though it is of low resolution. There's another high resolution image but the image does not look suitable for using here. There's another image at http://jksocialwelfare.nic.in/ , but I'm not sure if GODL-India would be applicable over there. Regards. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 10:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)