User talk:Searcher 0077

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Dakotaparty (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

June 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Glaiza de Castro with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Glaiza de Castro with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Lupin (Philippine TV series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 09:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Searcher 0077, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Searcher 0077! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Jodense Sol Valencieno"

Jodense Sol Valencieno, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects to a page that does not exist.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC),[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Jodense Valencieno"

Jodense Valencieno, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects to a page that does not exist.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC),[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jodense Valencieno. Jim1138 (talk) 07:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Searcher 0077, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Second Chances (Filipino TV series) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. –Davey2010^Talk 01:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned before about not using edit summaries - When making edits such as this and this you need to explain what you're doing otherwise you're going to be reverted, Also edit warring here is stupid - Again had you used the edit summary you wouldn't of been reverted!, If I catch you not using it again you will be blocked, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]