User talk:Seegers6188

Speedy deletion of Andrew john weaver

A tag has been placed on Andrew john weaver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ros0709 (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Andrew jake weaver

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Andrew jake weaver. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of deletion notices

Please do not remove notices from articles, such as those indicating that it is being considered for deletion. Also please do not remove warnings from your own talk page. If you do either of these you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John McCain

Your edits at John McCain look like vandalism. If they were accidental please be more careful. If they were intentional then please stop, or you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jake ugly grill

A tag has been placed on Jake ugly grill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ThreeDee912 (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilbert Cosme

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gilbert Cosme, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Ricky Banderas. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph James

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joseph James, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Bob Armstrong. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:IMatthew/Sandbox5

Stop re-adding it, please. It's my sandbox. iMatthew 01:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Seegers6188 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Seegers (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.