User talk:ShivaniLocks

December 2023[edit]

Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. JBW (talk) 21:24, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ShivaniLocks (talk) 03:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akash Anand (December 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akash Anand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShivaniLocks! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Akash Anand[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Akash Anand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://dfrac.org/en/2021/11/30/female-politician-facing-abuse-on-social-media/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BuySomeApples (talk) 17:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rana (clan)[edit]

Hello ShivaniLocks, please stop trying to remove the article about Rana Clan. First you unilaterally decide that the sources are not reliable and then you remove the article because it has no sources. The article has been there for years, so we can consider it a fairly stable version, I think it would deserve a discussion before removing it, don't you think? DoebLoggs (talk) 15:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, you can see Rana (clan)'s history, this article was redireted to Rana so i redirected to Rana (title). ShivaniLocks (talk) 15:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jatav article moved to Jatav Chamars[edit]

Hey Shivani, I hope you are fine, I saw that you have moved the Jatav article into Jatav Chamars. This method is wrong. You will have to give a solid reason on the talk page of that article. Cheers and Happy editing. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ShivaniLocks (talk) 13:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bunt community[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bunt (community). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TuluveRai123 (talk) 13:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ShivaniLocks (talk) 13:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]