User talk:Siyu Han

This user is a student editor in Emily_Carr_University_of_Art_and_Design/AHIS_320_Introduction_to_Feminist,_Gender_and_Cultural_Theory_(Spring_2021) .

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Siyu Han, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Siyu Han, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Contents without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 07:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Web Influencer Culture moved to draftspace[edit]

Hi Siyu Han. An article you recently created, Web Influencer Culture, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. You may also want to review our policy on refraining from original research: Wikipedia articles should summarise information that was previously published in reliable sources, and not reflect the personal analysis of individual contributors. Please feel free to get in touch if you have any questions or concerns. Best wishes, Blablubbs|talk 14:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Web Influencer Culture[edit]

Web Influencer Culture has been moved to Draft:Web Influencer Culture again. I see you are a student, and as far as I can see on the course page, you should not be moving Draft:Web Influencer Culture to Web Influencer Culture right now. Your work needs to be peer-reviewed first. I think it is best that you ask your teacher about this. Thanks. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 08:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Web Influencer Culture (March 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft does not establish how this topic is different from Internet celebrity and influencer marketing. Can it be merged into either or both? If this draft is resubmitted with the current references, it may wait for acceptance for a long time until it is reviewed by a reader who can read Chinese. English references are not required, but might help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Web Influencer Culture and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Web Influencer Culture, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 08:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Siyu Han! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Web Influencer Culture has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Web Influencer Culture. Thanks! Blablubbs|talk 14:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback[edit]

Hi. I see that your draft is currently at Articles for Creation. If you're concerned about this from a grading perspective, you shouldn't be - your instructor can see your work there (though you might want to provide them the link to make it easier for them to find). Whatever you do, stop moving the page. This is a form of edit warring, and it can get you blocked from Wikipedia.

Right now, your article has a number of issues that mean it isn't ready for mainspace. The first that it's under-sourced. Every fact in the article needs to be supported by an inline source that can be directly connected with the statement it supports. If one source supports every claim in a paragraph, then it's ok to have just one citation at the end of the paragraph, but if it doesn't, you need to include additional citations. You should also never have any text in a paragraph after the final reference in that paragraph.

The second issue is the quality of the references. While I can't read Chinese and I'm only relying on web translations, these don't appear to be scholarly sources. You need to rely on scholarly sources wherever they're available, and other high-quality sources when they don't. In addition, in the English Wikipedia you should rely primarily on sources in English when possible. If there are no high-quality sources in English, you should feel free to use non-English ones, but priority needs to be given to sources in English. After all, the sources are there so that readers can verify the claims in the article.

Finally, as the AFC reviewer says, Wikipedia already has articles on Internet celebrity and Influencer marketing. If you want to create an article that's specifically about influencer culture, it needs to be distinct from those articles. I think you'd be better off improving those articles though, rather than trying to create a new one that doesn't overlap with either of them. Regardless, you should be relying on scholarly sources - there's plenty of peer-reviewed scholarship on this topic. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Web Influencer Culture (2) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Web Influencer Culture (2). Thanks! Blablubbs|talk 10:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Web Influencer Culture (2) (March 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Web Influencer Culture (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Web Influencer Culture (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noby Big G syndrome moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Noby Big G syndrome, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi — just to explain, this article needs significantly more sources and citations; multiple independent, reliable sources are needed just to establish notability, and on a related but separate point, every material statement must be supported by citing one or more of those sources so that the statements can be verified. Currently the article has only two external sources cited, fandom.com (which is not reliable) and kidshealth.org (which is cited only once, and doesn't really support the statement it's cited against). Please note that citing Wikipedia as a source is pointless, and those 'citations' should be converted to internal 'wikilinks' instead. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noby Big G syndrome[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Noby Big G syndrome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EGGIDICAE🥚 17:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noby Big G syndrome moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Noby Big G syndrome, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EGGIDICAE🥚 17:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Noby Big G syndrome has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Noby Big G syndrome. Thanks! EGGIDICAE🥚 17:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noby Big G syndrome (April 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Largely unsourced, only reference has nothing to do with this specific topic

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noby Big G syndrome and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noby Big G syndrome, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Web influencer culture[edit]

Hello, Siyu Han. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Web influencer culture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Noby Big G syndrome[edit]

Hello, Siyu Han. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noby Big G syndrome, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]