User talk:SpaceSong/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi SpaceSong. Please have a look at the copyvio detector report, which shows exactly where the overlap is: The entire thing is copied from AllMusic. Please don't revert me any more on this, as you are reintroducing a copyright violation into the wiki every time you do it. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, but what's this supposed to prove? There are quotation marks in the parts that claim to have copyright violation! And as I already explained to you– it is not entirely a direct quote from AllMusic. I cut a few sentences and added a few sentences that are not from there. The way I edited it just before your last revert adds quotation marks to everything that is from AllMusic. So I fail to see the problem. However, There is a problem in making the entire paragraph in a block-quote or quotation marks claiming it is entirely quote from there when it is not. Not to mention that the paragraph starts with "According to AllMusic". — SpaceSong (talk) 14:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please look again. The material is a stunner, melding dark chamber pop ambience with lyrics that feel like they came from a surreal '70s AM radio hit was not in quotation marks, and it's copied directly from AllMusic. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. The other day I tried to say that an 80 for an album indicates acclaim on the page Emotion: Side B, and another user told me that only scores form 90-100 indicate acclaim. Therefore, your edits on After Laughter and Paramore's self-titled are vandalism. Please restrain from reverting again, and talk to me about it here instead. 208.28.133.202 (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- That is false. It literally says on Metacritic that a score of above 80 (81+) indicated acclaim. I don't know who's that user who told you otherwise but it's utterly false. Your edits are being reverted. — SpaceSong (talk)
- I told them that; I misread the video games score as being for music. Emotion: Side B has a score of 80 anyway, which is still "generally favorable". Ss112 19:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:SpaceSong, first off, great job on "Rollin" 👍. Would you be able to add this cover art [1] (bigger image here [2]) from the Official Australian Charts website to "Black Beetles" please? Replacing the remix art currently used. I don't know how to add images myself. Thanks if you can.--Theo Mandela (talk) 10:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
![[2]](http://hitparade.ch/cdimage.html?rae_sremmurd_feat_gucci_mane-black_beatles_s.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi, thank you! Just added it. In case you'd like to know: You can upload images through [3]– just make sure they're not copyrighted– unless it's an official artwork that you intend to use only for the main infobox, then you can choose "fair use" and explain the minimal use. Thanks for letting me know! SpaceSong (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:SpaceSong, could you upload cover art for No Favors (Big Sean song) that's near the bottom of this article here- [4]? Thanks if you can.--Theo Mandela (talk) 01:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Would you be willing to weigh in this discussion regarding The Needle Drop should be count as an reliable source or not. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Black Beatles Artwork.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black Beatles Artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Black Beatles Artwork.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black Beatles Artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Can you expand and revamp the article, remove some non-reliable sources. 115.164.219.76 (talk) 05:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Bury Me at Makeout Creek
Hi, I'm Boleyn. SpaceSong, thanks for creating Bury Me at Makeout Creek!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 07:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Could you expand the page please. Thank you. 115.164.179.252 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you...
... for expanding The Gate (song). I'm super excited about her new album! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Masseduction) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Masseduction, SpaceSong!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Looks great, I've just added a ref tag directly following the quotes.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Visions of a Life.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Visions of a Life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
Your recent editing history at Masseduction shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarkSewath (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Masseduction.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Masseduction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, SpaceSong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kelela Take Me Apart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kelela Take Me Apart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 7 (Beach House album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Skinny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hatchie (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Bloody Valentine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement
You need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Retired from Sad, New Career in Business. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. See this Earwig report for the infringing text. The last sentence of the "Writing and recording" section is a quotation and that is acceptable, but the other copied text is not. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)