User talk:Sprucecopse

Welcome!

Hello, Sprucecopse, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Xiaomi M365, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xiaomi M365

The article Xiaomi M365 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Blatant advertising of non-notable new product that has received no coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xiaomi M365 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xiaomi M365 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiaomi M365 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Just Water concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Just Water, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crow

:) —Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 08:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! :) Sprucecopse (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

soge

withth e beans!!!! X-750 _{List of articles I have screwed over} 08:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@X750 so true!!!!!!!!!!!! Sprucecopse (talk) 15:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue balls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmless. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joeyy (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What is needed to confer notability is significant coverage in reliable sources that are fully independent of the person. See WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS, WP:INDY and in particular, he needs to meet criteria of WP:MUSICBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joeyy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 01:16, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sprucecopse! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Netherzone (talk) 01:16, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joeyy discography

Hello, Sprucecopse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joeyy discography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joeyy discography

Hello, Sprucecopse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joeyy discography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

Calling another editor a "lackey" as you did at User talk: Drmies is simply not acceptable. Your insult is especially ironic when you came to that page to complain about rudeness and Snarky remarks and belittling. Physician, heal thyself. Cullen328 (talk) 18:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll keep in mind that being snarky and rude is fine though, according to your standards. Christ I despise this community, but at least the admins have each others' backs. Sprucecopse (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, making fun of admins and saying that being snarky and rude is fine is just going to increase the risk of you being blocked. Trust me, it's going to be pretty ugly by continuously poking at admins like this. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 18:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NoobThreePointOh I appreciate you looking out for me, but if criticizing an admin "is making fun of" them, why should I care? If I express my dissatisfaction toward an admin, that results in an editing block? Restricting users that are actively contributing to the wiki based on what, personal preference? Why should users stay in a community where, as soon as those who are held as great editors with an additional level of responsibility, are criticized, they are banned? Sprucecopse (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joeyy

Hello, Sprucecopse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joeyy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]