User talk:Squeakmore

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Squeakmore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Planes (franchise), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Planes:Fire And Rescue[edit]

Hello, Squeakmore. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Planes:Fire And Rescue, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Planes (franchise)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bisswajit (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spy Kids 5[edit]

A tag has been placed on Spy Kids 5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Angelo Michael (talk) 03:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Paul Erik. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Squeakmore[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Squeakmore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://collider.com/planes-fire-and-rescue-trailer/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another copyright problem[edit]

You claimed to be the copyright owner of File:Planes,Fire & Rescue.jpeg, but that seems improbable, and the file has been deleted. You really must take copyright seriously, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Disney pixar cars 3[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Disney pixar cars 3. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Cars 3 (Pixar Film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Cars 3 (Pixar Film) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. freshacconci talk to me 04:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Whitney High School Marching Band[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Whitney High School Marching Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. LiquidIce (talk) 07:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2015 Kids' Choice Awards[edit]

A tag has been placed on 2015 Kids' Choice Awards, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. T3chl0v3r (talk) 01:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to userspace[edit]

I moved the article for the KCA to User:Squeakmore/2015 Kids' Choice Awards. The problem is that it is way, way too early for an article at this point in time. We can't guarantee anything about the awards ceremony at this point in time. Yes, it's likely that it will be held, but we can't guarantee it. For example, despite the Olympics typically being held every 2 years, there were several points in time where they weren't held. (World War I and II, if you're curious.) The point of mentioning this is that we cannot predict if something major or minor might change something about the ceremony or even keep it from happening. Until we gain more coverage it's usually better to create an article in your userspace and work on it until plans for the ceremony become more concrete- which usually means that it gains more coverage in reliable sources independent of Nickelodeon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Frozen 2[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Frozen 2. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Frozen (2013 film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Frozen (2013 film) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ruby Murray 21:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hope at the Cleearwater Marine Aquarium.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hope at the Cleearwater Marine Aquarium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ghost Adventures Aftershock.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ghost Adventures Aftershock.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dolphin Tale 2 Movie poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dolphin Tale 2 Movie poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Dolphin-Tale-2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dolphin-Tale-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dolphin-Tale-2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dolphin-Tale-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to How to Train Your Dragon 3 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Speculation about whether or not a video game release is not the sort of content Wikipedia needs. If there have been current reports in printed media about a game being planned, that can be included, but it must be accompanied by reliable secondary sources. Please see Referencing for Beginners if you are unfamiliar with how to add references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IPod Touch (6th generation)[edit]

The article IPod Touch (6th generation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Product doesn't exist yet and is merely a rumor (with no citations). Plenty of time to create an article if and when such a product is announced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zachlipton (talk) 23:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dolphin Tale 3[edit]

The article Dolphin Tale 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON, this film won't be released for years if ever, not enough reliable source coverage to establish notability. Also, fails WP:NFF as there is no evidence it has begun principal photography.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk 01:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dolphin Tale 3 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dolphin Tale 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolphin Tale 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 331dot (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dolphin Tale 3[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dolphin Tale 3, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blocking you because ultimately you have a long, long history of creating articles based on rumors and speculation, as well as adding in rumors and speculation to various articles in instances where the rumors weren't covered enough to warrant being added. You've been warned about this enough to where you should know that things like this aren't considered appropriate for Wikipedia, as it is not a place to host various rumors and speculations about franchises, products, and the like. Even if there weren't warnings about this on your page, the fact that just about every article you've tried to create has been deleted due to it being based on rumors/speculation should have alerted you to the fact that it was time to stop creating things like this. I don't see where you've ever taken any of that into consideration, so this block is permanent. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Squeakmore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Squeakmore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry that i made a some pages that dose not exist yet but i have been hearing some people that they will release ipod touch 6 and there has been talks about Dolphin Tale 3. And there also have been talks about Frozen 2 so again i am sorry that i made some pages that dose not exist yet again i am really sorry i will not make anymore pages that product or film that dose not exist. I understand that i will not do it again. I will only make pages that a product or a film that will be release and again i am truly sorry i completely understand that i will not do it again.

Decline reason:

Could you explain why you didn't realise what you were doing was wrong? PhilKnight (talk) 11:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've formatted your unblock request properly for you - as it shows in the block message, you needed "reason=" in there to make your explanation appear inside the unblock box. Squinge (talk) 10:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"reason=" I will not make any pages that product or film that dose not exist yet i am sorry im understand that it will not ever going to happen again.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Squeakmore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Squeakmore (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To be honest, I see where you've been warned several times about this and I can't see where you paid any attention to them in the slightest. I have a hard time believing that you'd suddenly stop now that you've been blocked. You've been warned multiple times and multiple pages have been deleted- why didn't you stop doing this back then? It shouldn't take a block to get you to stop. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Squeakmore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look, i been trying to tell you people that i keep saying that i am very sorry that i made pages that dose not exist yet can you please unblock me and again i am very sorry. With that said are you going to unblock me or not @ Tokyogirl79 i being serious about this now. I like making pages i will not make a page that dose not exist i am just keep repeating my self and i am sorry that i am keep repeating my self. I just like making pages i made some pages that dose exist and i willl not make anymore pages that dose not exist at all so really please unblock med ok so listen unblock me so i can make pages again i am really missing doing i was having fun creating pages that i made so ya. Again i am very sorry that i made some pages that dose not exist i WILL NOT DO IT EVER AGAIN !!!!.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I'm not going to unblock you. Like I said, you've been doing this for about a year now and you received multiple notifications that what you were doing was against Wikipedia policy... and you ignored them completely and kept doing everything that you were being told was against policy. I left you one message back in April and you ignored that as well. Your entire usertalk is full of people giving you notices that edits you made violated policy and you ignored them and kept doing the exact same thing. I have no reason to believe that you will now follow policy now that you've been officially blocked. Much of your editing revolved around adding in rumors, hearsay, and other things that would be considered WP:CRYSTAL violations at best (many thought that these were your attempts to add hoaxes to Wikipedia), so again- I will not unblock you. I just don't see where you've listened to anything before, let alone responded to any of these concerns directly, so I cannot believe that you will change your editing patterns because you have been blocked. It's a solid "no" from me as far as any unblock request goes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have to say as a casual observer--you seem to be having extraordinary difficulty formatting an unblock request per the simple instructions above in the big blue box. Other editors (Squinge, in particular) have had to format your responses so that they reach the intended admins. What do you propose to contribute if unblocked, if you have trouble following basic directions? I'm also concerned about your grammar deficiencies. If you speak another language as your primary language, you should probably consider editing at that language's Wikipedia instead of here per WP:CIR#Some common types. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb, I've declined their unblock request again. Far too much of their previous editing revolved around adding crystal violations that were almost borderline hoaxes (and some considered them as much in some areas) and I believe that this is their first time actually responding to anyone posting on their page about their editing patterns. They've been adding speculation, rumors, and such to Wikipedia for about a year now, along with some copyright violations. It's actually amazing that they haven't been blocked prior to this, to be honest. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Plus to further hammer this home Squeakmore, you have created 10 pages since you've been here and six were deleted for various different reasons like notability, being too soon for an entry, and for being based on various rumors. 05:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Squeakmore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can i really have my account back up really please i am sad that i cant make pages anymore because you guys blocked me and i keep saying that it will neveer ever going to happen ever again i promises i did not mean to create rumors it will never happen again. Squeakmore (talk) 07:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See the other unblock request, below. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are still not properly formatting your request so it will be correctly considered. The text you put should be placed where it says "your reason here". You are saying you won't do "it" again, but you also still are not addressing the admin's question as to what you will do if you are unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plus I really am not comfortable with the idea of this editor continuing to edit on Wikipedia, given that the bulk of their edits (as described above) were what caused them to get blocked in the first place. Until now they haven't responded to anyone warning them about these actions and they've been doing this for at least a year now. I can't see where they'll make any positive edits to Wikipedia even if they were blocked, since the majority of their pages they've created were deleted for various crystal ball reasons and a large majority of their edits otherwise had been reverted for the same reason. That they've kept reposting the unblock template with the claims that they'll "never do it again, promise" doesn't really give me any confidence that they've learned anything and if nobody has an issue with it, I'm tempted to just block them from editing their userpage. I think that regardless of how many times they're declined they'll keep reposting in the hopes of getting an admin that would unblock them. If by some chance this did happen (that they were unblocked) I think that it's only a matter of time before they're re-blocked for the same reasons because clearly they did not take any of this to heart in the nearly full year that they were editing on Wikipedia and continued to make the same type of policy violating edits despite several clear signs/warnings that this was not kosher. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyogirl79, you should really stop declining unblock requests of a user whom you blocked yourself. Nevertheless, my question to Squeakmore: could you explain information from what kind of sources is considered appropriate for Wikipedia, and why? Max Semenik (talk) 10:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I won't do it again, but I do have to note that this is the first time anyone has told me that I couldn't do this. (I don't mean to sound like I'm being petulant, just that this is the first time someone's said anything about it.) I would also like for you to get them to specifically state why they were blocked, why their actions were wrong, and to ask them why they didn't stop after multiple signs that these pages violated one guideline or another. I'm not trying to dog them, just that I don't see where they've taken anything to heart in the past or where they've suddenly learned their lesson now that they've been blocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I have doubts about this user's comprehension of Wikipedia policies, I don't think it would hurt to give them a second chance, given that this is their first block. That said, owing to the number of ignored warnings prior, I'd advocate for an immediate and indefinite reblock if any more articles were created that violated WP:CRYSTALBALL. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that there may be an issue with maturity and that Squeakmore might possibly wish to consider waiting a few years before continuing to edit. However, an appropriate reply to MaxSem's question should be sufficient for an unblock. Further disruptive editing of any kind would probably result in a new block without warning. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MaxSem

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Squeakmore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry what i said to you i am truly sorry may i please have my account please. I never should done it in the first place because those products or films that dose not exist yet again i am truly sorry about making the pages. Would you please give me a second chance. Squeakmore (talk) 03:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have gone out of my way to give you every chance I can to show that you understand the reasons why you were blocked, and that you will not make the same mistake again. Other administrators have been willing to give you a second chance to, if you could show that you understood. However, you haven't shown that understanding, and you have not answered questions that Max Semenik and I asked. I do understand what you meant when you wrote " i am sad that i cant make pages anymore", but I'm afraid that editors who don't understand what the problems are with their editing is likely to cause problems, even if they mean well. I suggest that you take a long break from Wikipedia (at lest six months, and really I think a couple of years might be better). After that, maybe you will have a better understanding. I have known editors who have had problems change a lot in that much time, so maybe you will. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey, I'm all for second chances, and you don't even need to apologise - to me, the best apologise is to prove that you understand how not to make the same mistake again, and the best way to do that is to answer my question which you haven't done yet. Max Semenik (talk) 07:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Max Semenik Would you please give me some examples please so i can know what to say thanks. I understand that i will never make mistake again.

You don't need to keep making unblock requests; your recent request was put on hold. If you wish to make further comments, simply type them. I also don't think MaxSem will give you the answer that is being looked for. Simply answer his question as he requests; if you cannot give an answer, I suggest you review some Wikipedia guidelines before you give an answer. 331dot (talk) 02:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- And if you can't give an answer to MaxSem, or don't understand what he wants, then you really are not ready to be collaborating on Wikipedia at all. If you can't/won't read the advice and comments of other admins , and continue refuse to read the instructions for making unblock requests, I or another admin will revoke your access to your talk page. Sorry, Squeakmore, but we really now have to bring this to a conclusion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The whole point of asking the question is to see whether you understand well enough to answer the question. If Max (or anyone else) told you what to say, then it wouldn't show us whether you understand or not. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Squeakmore, don't post a new unblock request every time you want to answer someone's question here. You have an unblock request on hold and you don't need to keep making new ones. Just post your reply below the latest comments in plain text. Squinge (talk) 12:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

MaxSem "reason=" I know that i am sad that i cant make anymore pages anymore because i know it was wrong that i was doing and i was not supposed to do it. The reason why that it is wrong to create a page for a film or product that dose not exist yet i don't know why i did that. So for the pages that i made i am really sorry that i created those pages. I just wish i could start over again. Can i please start over again?

You still haven't answered MaxSem's question, which is: "could you explain information from what kind of sources is considered appropriate for Wikipedia, and why?" The issue is not just the fact that you created pages for things that "don't exist yet", but the fact you did so without appropriate sources. You need to answer that question. 331dot (talk) 11:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MaxSem "reason=" I did not mean to create the pages the last page that i created witch dose not exist yet was Dolphin Tale 3. The reason why i created Dolphin Tale 3 page is because i love the first two Dolphin Tale movies so thats why i created Dolphin Tale 3 page. And the other pages that i created was Frozen 2 and i know it dose not exist yet because Disney has not made the movie yet so thats why i created Frozen 2 page. I also created Ipod touch 6th generation page because i also really like ipod touches but the 6th generation dose not exist yet but apple might release the Ipod Touch 6th generation in March alongside is the Apple Watch. So there you have i kind of explain why i made these mistakes. And if i created a page and someone else all created that page i could of created a different page or i can edit the page.

Squeakmore, I hope you don't mind a comment from me. I don't mean to offend you at all but it doesn't seem to me that you even understand MaxSem's question, and you are just repeating the same things and completely missing the question he is actually asking. You also don't seem to understand how to do replies or unblock requests properly, despite people fixing them for you and explaining several times. On the whole, I think Kudpung has it right and you are simply too young just now to contribute to Wikipedia productively (I'm not asking for your age or any personal details - if you're underage you should not disclose any of that). Young people make a great contribution to Wikipedia, but it is a tough place to work and you really need a bit of maturity behind you or the experience is likely to be unpleasant. So my suggestion is that you go and spend your time doing other things you enjoy, like watching your favourite movies or whatever else you like to do, and come back to Wikipedia in a few years time when you're a bit older - it will still be here and there will still be lots of work to be done! Squinge (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Squeakmore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi so the last time that i saw on the talk page that i was on hold but i was keep continuing making unblocks request i should of just left it as on hold so could you please put me back on hold thank you. Again i am sorry what i did i know it was wrong to create rumors that dose not exist yet. I been making to much pages but some pages that i made got a proved. But i was creating pages for films that dose not exist yet so i want to apologize for doing something like that it will never happen again.

Decline reason:

SEVEN unblock requests are more than twice what we usualy accept. You have failed to provide answers to questions that may have helped considering to unblock you. We have given you enough chances. You are now wasting admins' and other users' time here so your talk page access is now withdrawn. Please follow the instructions below for making any further unblock requests. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK, I've fixed your unblock request one more time - you can't be put back on hold once a request has been closed, so you do actually need a new request this time. It is "{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}" for an unblock request, and for ordinary replies it's just plain text with no "reason=". As I say, I really do think you are just too young to understand all this right now (and again don't actually reveal your age). Anyway, I'll repeat the question you were asked and have still not answered in case you actually want to make an attempt at it before an admin comes along to review:

"Could you explain information from what kind of sources is considered appropriate for Wikipedia, and why?"

Squinge (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DisneyNature monkey kingdom.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DisneyNature monkey kingdom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DisneyNature monkey kingdom.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DisneyNature monkey kingdom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hope at the Cleearwater Marine Aquarium.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hope at the Cleearwater Marine Aquarium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hope (dolphin) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hope (dolphin) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope (dolphin) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]