User talk:SrihariKastuar

Welcome!

Hello, SrihariKastuar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Chinedu Ekuma, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 03:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. I do not have conflict of interest as per this page. SrihariKastuar (talk) 12:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made more edits to the page. I do not think the page violates any of the policy. Let me know what you think or remove the tags SrihariKastuar (talk) 12:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq I appreciate your guidance and inputs. Can you please take a look at the three pages that I have edited and approve by removing the deletion tags, and others? Please let me know if you have any questions. SrihariKastuar (talk) 12:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. The article improvement tags are all appropriate, and the deletion notices must remain until the discussion is concluded. -- Whpq (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Thanks for the clarification. I think the edits are okay now as I do not have much to add again at this point. SrihariKastuar (talk) 14:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Chinedu Ekuma. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 11:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I've taken a look at the issues raised, and I believe I've addressed them. I'm eager to ensure the pages are as constructive and neutral as possible, and I appreciate your input. I'm confident that the pages meet the notability criteria and contribute positively to the platform. Let's continue working together to make them even better. SrihariKastuar (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Gmp007 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gmp007. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]