User talk:Starlighsky

Welcome!

Hello, Starlighsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far -- I have enjoyed working with you already. I hope you like it here! Here are a few important links for newcomers:

Wikipedia:Reliable sources, WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:NPOV
How to edit a page; How to develop articles; Editing tutorial
Manual of Style; Writing better articles
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Editing by consensus – working well with other Wikipedians

If you'd like some help with editing or otherwise, you can sign up at the new users log, post a question at the Help Desk, or ask me on my talk page.

As you have already noticed, you should always sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. It is a good idea to read the most recent entries at the bottom of the Talk page of an existing article before making major changes to it, to see if your proposed change has been discussed before. Before I make a major change to an article, I often make a proposal on the Talk page to see if anyone minds.

Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitra Fire Station has been accepted

Vitra Fire Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Royce

Unless you have a source that states that Fritzl was inspired by Sally, we can't say so. See WP:OR for more information. Note that the table is missing No, No, Nanette. Also, would you please re-order the table so that the oldest productions go first? Also, why not include his London stage credits too? Thanks. -- 17:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

These are good points. I just put the productions in that order. I explain in the article that "No, No, Nanette" was a show that he had left when it was a pre-Broadway production. I just added London stage credits to a new table and "No, No, Nanette" to the original table.

The article is coming along well; good job. I bet you can find out more of his early London credits. The George Edwardes shows were very successful, so it would be worthwhile to list more of them in the table. I recommend that, if you look at reviews of them, you try to figure out whether he was really directing them. Often, in those days, director was actually referred to as "stage manager", because he told people where to stand on the stage. Some theatrical history: Prior to the 1860s, there was no such thing as a "director". Shows were usually staged minimally either by the star of the show or by the theatre manager, and actors were pretty much left to their own devices and often mostly devised their own minimalist staging. Plus, the use of the stage was minimal. There were very few rehearsals! If, for example, the play called for a family dinner, a stagehand would bring a table onstage with the number of chairs needed, and everyone would sit down. When the table was no longer needed, the stagehand came back and took it off stage. This was changed by some innovators in the 1860s and 1870s, including T. W. Robertson, who directed the plays that he wrote and expected the actors to rehearse and obey his direction. Early on, the non-playwright directors were called "stage managers". Eventually, they were sometimes called directors (choreography was "musical staging"), although in Britain, directors were sometimes called producers, which is confusing, up until recent decades! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found the theatre for his British stage credits. Starlighsky (talk) 03:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found some of his earlier London credits. Btw, we are not allowed to delete discussions from articles' Talk pages (although we can archive them), except in certain limited circumstances. You can delete whatever you want from your own Talk page, but it fools people into thinking that you are a newbie if they don't see older messages here. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to undo it. It was just that the problem was solved. Now I know, thanks. Starlighsky (talk) 11:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Loni Ackerman

Please see Template:infobox person. The instructions for Parent are: Names of parents; include only if they are independently notable or particularly relevant. For multiple entries, use an inline list. If subject has only one notable mother and/or only one notable father, Schazjmd (talk) 22:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Starlighsky (talk) 22:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hilary Knight (illustrator)

added links pointing to Hempstead, New York and Eloise

Hugh Ellwood Macbeth Sr.

added a link pointing to Charleston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American lawyers of Lebanese descent has been nominated for deletion

Category:American lawyers of Lebanese descent has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yvonne Man has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yvonne Man. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yvonne Man (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yvonne Man and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Starlighsky! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Olsen cycle

Hello, Starlighsky,

Thank you for creating Olsen cycle.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The sources are incorrectly formatted, please correcr

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: Can you explain this in more detail? I want to repair the issue, but am having trouble understanding what exactly the problem is.Starlighsky (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Starlighsky[reply]

You first reference does not include the authors, year, page number etc; the second has no information that can be tracked --similar for the others. One approach is to use the automatic citation generator in the visual editor which formats them correctly. For details you can also look at WP:HOWCITE. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will start on it.Starlighsky (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Starlighsky[reply]

Hello

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Starlighsky (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ubiquitous (adverb or adjective)

Hello, Starlighsky

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Justiyaya, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ubiquitous (adverb or adjective), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Justi yaya 09:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Starlighsky, Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary should provide explanation to my reasoning behind the nomination. Wiktionary is the place to go for editing dictionary definitions, not here. If you think I've made a mistake, feel free to remove the tag or ping me to ask questions. Justi yaya 09:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Justiyaya::This article is needed, the present link Ubiquitous links to Omnipresent, which does not explain the word found in many Wikipedia articles. However, that link to omnipresent needs to link to the correct description of ubiquitous.

Once that happens, adjective and adverb can removed from the title. The system won't allow two ubiquitous articles. Ubiquitous needs to link to here Starlighsky (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ubiquitous (adjective) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ubiquitous (adjective) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubiquitous (adjective) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deor (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zometool moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zometool. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. People requested that the article become a separate article to the article about architecture, so I assisted in creating the separate article. I started with a best efforts to find references to the mathematics, but it is incredibly challenging. Starlighsky (talk) 23:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly why I moved it to draftspace. I hope you are able to find some references because it sounds like it will be a good fit for wikipedia. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 23:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Starlighsky (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:(Midori) Midori Arimoto

Hello, Starlighsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:(Midori) Midori Arimoto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Shipping Company (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interesting, but the sources are not enough to satisfy WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Shipping Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henry Sullivan (composer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Sullivan (composer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Sullivan (composer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is 3 Keeps, 100% Keeps for responses in the discussion. Isn't the discussion closed? Starlighsky (talk) 01:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Medical statistics

Hello - On my talk page, you said: I understand your line of reasoning, but the chart for probability distribution of CI is a standalone. You deleted everything I had written about CI. I am not sure how this can be repaired.

The chart for CI is an example of a statistic, so can stand alone. I don't understand your reasoning to emphasize CI among all the possible statistics, as it is not a rigorous determinant of significance, but rather an indicator of possible range. You also had entitled the section Use in medical literature, a broad section heading, but the content only addressed CI rather than more common and rigorous measures. For style of section subheads, see MOS:SECTIONS (not all caps).

Regarding "repair", this article is basically a WP:STUB and probably should be WP:MERGEd with Biostatistics. Perhaps you could consider working on a merger. As the banner says, the lists should be converted into prose. Also, all content is kept in article history, so everything is recoverable.

You might benefit from this link for formatting references. Check the ref tag, full journal title, and URL boxes. Zefr (talk) 00:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The general reader is not going to understand what CI with a chart and no explanation. I was trying to go from lists to prose. My reasoning what is used often in biomedical literature with a reference to how it used often in such literature. I can use your suggestions to introduce CI and related topics often found in the medical literature.

I will try to work on the merger as well.

All in all, it's no big deal...I just didn't know how to explain the chart with the deletion. Starlighsky (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Biomass Energy and Alcohol Fuels Act. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the content is from the legislation by Congress, which is public domain. Starlighsky (talk) 12:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael P. Grace III moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Michael P. Grace III. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 08:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murray Anderson's Almanac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jennifer L. Hall (physiologist)

Hello, Starlighsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennifer L. Hall (physiologist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starlighsky. Thank you for your work on Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

International Municipal Signal Association

added a link pointing to Rockledge

Noah Dietrich

added a link pointing to Madison

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gemma Wenger

Hello, Starlighsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gemma Wenger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

IEEE and Haaretz now available
Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Starlighsky. Thank you for your work on Corinne B. Grace v. El Paso Natural Gas Company. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for starting this clear and concise article. For the future, perhaps a little more focus on categories would be helpful, ensuring that they cover the scope of the topic using the most specific categories available.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: Thanks Starlighsky (talk) 13:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Starlighsky! Your additions to Hidden layer have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This may have been sent to wrong person. I went over the history 3 times and everything I had added is very brief and with citations, as I understand it. I am glad to review what you see as a problem, though. Starlighsky (talk) 14:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Starlighsky! The copyright violations were evident with the creation of the article, which is attributed to you. While there were citations, some of the sections had copy-pasted text from another source without quotation marks. This is considered a copyright violation. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morrow Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pennsylvanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert your change to the Biden article or risk being blocked

Joe Biden is under a "if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message" restriction, which you plainly saw when you edited the article. Zaathras (talk) 02:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the edit for you just so you know.

Cheers! TheWikiToby (talk) 02:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was my internet connection. There was no message. Thanks for explaining it. Starlighsky (talk) 02:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trapping mechanisms for carbon geosequestration

Hello Starlighsky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Melmann, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Trapping mechanisms for carbon geosequestration, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Carbon sequestration. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Melmann}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Melmann 06:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Melmann: I wrote in the Talk page the explanation of the article actually providing the needed links for Carbon sequestration. A lot of people don't realize that we can store carbon dioxide in underground storage as one of several ways to prevent global warming, but there is a risk of the CO2 leaking. The article about trapping mechanisms explains the published research on ways to prevent this serious type of leak. The article may be helpful information for many readers. Starlighsky (talk) 11:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To me, this is something that could have just been added to Carbon sequestration. But, as the speedy deletion was already reverted by an uninvolved editor, I'll leave it at that. Melmann 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your line of reasoning, but it would have made the carbon sequestration possibly too long and challenging to read in terms of the basic ideas. Carbon capture and storage also applies this topic. Fortunately, this artice provides content for the links from both articles on leak prevention. Starlighsky (talk) 12:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strawn Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Permian Basin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hyaluronic acid edit

On my talk page, you said: The reference cited was published in the National Library of Medicine. I can more published, reliable references, but I want to ensure that the COVID relation is okay to publish with more references.

First, this is not a publication of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). It is listed on PubMed, which is a search, retrieval and abstract display service of NLM, described further in this FAQ. The publisher of the article you cited is Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

Second, as the Methods section in the article explains, the study was only of 217 people with Covid-19. It is a preliminary ("primary") research study, not a WP:MEDRS review which would justify use of a reference as a source.

There is not enough evidence yet to establish that hyaluronic acid is a reliable biomarker for Covid-19. Zefr (talk) 18:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense based on that one article. What about the earlier research of 2020? Starlighsky (talk) 19:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made this edit to include the research on its potential involvement in lung diseases. Zefr (talk) 20:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Starlighsky (talk) 01:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COVID-19 basic research

On my talk page, you said: The research was the results of data analysis. I want to ask for the deletion to be reconsidered because it was based on medical data processed by a U.S. national laboratory.

The removed content was Along with cytokine storm, there is a medical theory of bradykinin storm as well. By means of genetic data mining techniques with the supercomputers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the lung-fluid samples from COVID-19 patients had a pattern of the overexpression of genes that produce bradykinin, while having a pattern of the underexpressing genes that would inhibit or break down bradykinin. The implication is a hyperabundance of bradykinin in a COVID-19 at the points of infection.

With WP:MEDRS as the background guideline for choosing content and sources, it's puzzling why you think this conjecture is important to mention for the encyclopedia: a) it's an unproven theory, WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC, b) it was produced by computer analysis, not by fully-developed clinical research, c) it's news, WP:NOTNEWS, not a MEDRS review of accepted clinical facts, and d) it's from an engineering institute, not an expert clinical organization; see WP:MEDORG.

You would do well to read the MEDRS guideline carefully, as you seem to have a misunderstanding for choosing good medical sources. Zefr (talk) 23:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, will do. Starlighsky (talk) 23:36, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

One new partner
1Lib1Ref
Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your edit to CITTA Foundation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. – Isochrone (talk) 16:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I rephrased the items from a newspaper article and presented the list of facts for the humanitarian assistance after the natural disaster. The event was in Nepal and the newspaper was in the United States, which helps to establish a neutral, unbiased, third-party source, Starlighsky (talk) 03:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CITTA Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CITTA Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CITTA Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Isochrone (talk) 16:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

I reverted your recent edit to Enrica Soma because it cited a site on Wordpress, which is not a reliable source because it only hosts self-published blogs. You can check whether a commonly used source is considered reliable at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. It was just very challenging reference to find for a requested citation for that family of articles.

I will look for a better source. Starlighsky (talk) 23:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The blog post directly links to the original magazine which should work as a source, albeit a primary source that does not verify whether the photo was "later famous" (this phrase might need to be removed). Helpful Raccoon (talk) 23:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will look into it. I even went to Life Magazine's website but still had trouble finding it. Starlighsky (talk) 00:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iris Flores (actress) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iris Flores (actress) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Legislation of the Energy Security Act of 1980

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Legislation of the Energy Security Act of 1980, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Isoelectric (electric potential) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isoelectric (electric potential) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isoelectric (electric potential) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited G. David Schine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The French Connection.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will fix it, thanks. Starlighsky (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
Wikimania presentation
New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dale Wood (William Lawrence Hansen) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dale Wood (William Lawrence Hansen) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Wood (William Lawrence Hansen) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]