User talk:The Optimistic One/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Draft:Better Call Saul (season 5)

They're gonna start filming this month, meaning you'll have to keep an eye out for sources stating filming has begun. And once you find a source, the draft may be moved to the mainspace. But first you may have to request G7 on Better Call Saul (season 5) to ease the move. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Yeah it's near-good enough to be moved. Maybe I could just submit it for a review or would that take longer? The Optimistic One (talk) 12:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Do you have Twinkle enabled? Using that, you can tag the redirect Better Call Saul (season 5) for deletion under G7, then I will move the draft Draft:Better Call Saul (season 5) to the vacant name. Shooting is supposed to begin on April 10, which is today per IST. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Sadly, I don't. Maybe you could do it. The Optimistic One (talk) 16:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Better Call Saul (season 5) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Better Call Saul (season 5). Thanks! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Onel5969, he can't request G7 since he hasn't enabled Twinkle. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

No need to worry. Onel5969 has already done it. See Better Call Saul (season 5). The Optimistic One (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bubbles (Trailer Park Boys) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bubbles (Trailer Park Boys) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubbles (Trailer Park Boys) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DaenerysTargaryenGoT.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DaenerysTargaryenGoT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simon Bird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Change Constant (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Change Constant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Change Constant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 05:51, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, The Optimistic One! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mjs1991 (talk) 05:51, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Troy Otto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troy Otto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Otto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Uno (Better Call Saul)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Uno (Better Call Saul) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Uno (Better Call Saul)

The article Uno (Better Call Saul) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Uno (Better Call Saul) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jim Hopper (character)

It seems you copy/pasted from Draft:Jim Hopper (character) to Jim Hopper (character). You should note that such editing is not allowed as by doing so you've removed any credit for other edit contributions and the edit history that goes with it. --Gonnym (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Isn't there a way to merge the two? The Optimistic One (talk) 17:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

There is something if I'm not mistaken, but not sure where so you'll have to search for that, but what you did requires unnecessarily extra work. Next time just place a move request if you can't move it youself, as that is the correct way to handle this. --Gonnym (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

How do I request moves? I didn't do it before. Also, I don't know about them new parameters. I preferred the old way. Why have a first major, (TV Series) and minor, (episodes) appearances. I think they were just on an infobox for one type of character, but were then merged with the main infobox for characters. Thanks anyways. The Optimistic One (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Gonnym: I have started a disscussion on Jim's talk page about parameters. The Optimistic One (talk) 15:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

You should have pinged me also before as I didn't see your previous question. --Gonnym (talk) 15:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

I know, I just realised that a few minutes ago 🙄. The Optimistic One (talk) 15:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wrecking Ball (Overwatch), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overwatch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Uno (Better Call Saul)

The article Uno (Better Call Saul) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Uno (Better Call Saul) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Congrats! I hope you'll considering working on other episode articles as well. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

@Legobot: Go raibh maith agat! (Thank you!)

@Another Believer: Cheers! I look forward to working with you in the near future.

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the help, I hope that we'll co-operate together pretty soon! The Optimistic One (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your removing "August 6" from Deaths in 2019

Please read the FAQ at the top of Talk:Deaths in 2019. Thanks. — Wyliepedia @ 13:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

The Walking Dead (video game series)#Series overview

Hi The Optimistic One, could you better the seasons' colors to match their cover art please? Theo Mandela (talk) 00:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Theo Mandela: What colours do you want me to add? Which seasons colours needs changing? The Optimistic One (talk) 03:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

All colors have to meet requirements at MOS:COLOR. The images were all changed recently, season 1 and The Final Season are using different covers from before. Some season colors might need to change if they get too close to anothers, thanks. Theo Mandela (talk) 15:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Theo Mandela: I've changed the colours of the final season, I'll look into the rest later for you. The Optimistic One (talk) 19:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Alright then, much appreciated. Theo Mandela (talk) 20:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Theo Mandela: The other colours seems plausible to me. Anyways, you're very welcome! If you need help again just message me here. The Optimistic One (talk) 08:45, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Bulk Game of Thrones GA nominations

The Optimistic One, earlier today you nominated 33 articles, each on The Game of Thrones TV series episodes, for GA status.

I did a spot-check of several of them, and as best I can tell, you are not a significant contributor to any of them; the most I saw were five minor edits to an article. Please note that the GA nomination instructions state that Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination., and I didn't see any sort of consultation as having occurred.

While I do not have time this morning, since these were all out-of-process nominations, my intention is to revert your nominations. You are welcome to consult on the talk pages of the various articles to see whether the significant contributors believe that the articles do meet the GA criteria at the present time, and for those where the consensus after seven days is that they do meet the criteria, nominate at that time.

Just as a general comment, 33 nominations at one time is unprecedented, and creates an enormous load for an already backed-up process. I would recommend that if you wish to get the GoT articles to GA status, that you take an active hand in improving them to that point one at a time—or confirming with other editors that they are already there—and nominate them when they're ready. Nominating also implies a willingness to address issues that may come up during the reviewing process—there isn't much point in nominating if no one is around to make the necessary fixes. Thank you for your interest in the GA process. BlueMoonset (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Okay, 33 is too much. From now on, I'm going to nominate two or three at a time tops. I've been on Wikipedia long enough to know whether an article is good or not, and there's a few episodes of GOT that I've edited quite a bit. I would say the majority of them would pass the criteria straight away. So there's an episode nominated already, so I'll revert one of your edits. The Optimistic One (talk) 14:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Update: I have reverted all my nominations bar two: Season 7's "Eastwatch", and "The Dragon and the Wolf". When each one gets reviewed and sorted, I'll nominate another. There's also "The Lion and the Rose" from season 4 that I nominated back in April. The Optimistic One (talk) 15:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

The Optimistic One, if you are willing to consult on those two articles' talk pages, I'll hold off from reverting them. Even at this late date, please also do so for "The Lion and the Rose". Whether a nominator is familiar with the criteria and process or not, the consultation should nevertheless be done. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: So... Do you want me to ask someone their opinion on them first, or ask them to do a GA review? The Optimistic One (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

As it says in the instructions quoted above, please consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. Typically, this means opening a new section at the bottom of the article's talk page, saying that you believe the article is at the level to become a GA, and asking whether folks agree or disagree, and if the latter, what ways does it fail to meet the criteria or what are the issues that would keep it from being ready. If, in addition to this, you want to consult with any specific editors, either to get advice or to ask if they'd be willing to conduct a review, you're welcome to do so (though if they're significant contributors, they shouldn't be reviewing their own work), but posting to the article's talk page is the minimum step. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Penitenciaría Federal de Sona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Infobox additions

The Covenant don't come from "Forerunner". You really need to stop adding infoboxes and filling them out when you don't understand or have any knowledge of the topics in question. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 00:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@David Fuchs: As a die-hard fan of Halo, I know quite a bit about it. I got mixed up a bit. Where are the Covenant actually from? Isn't it High Charity? Or is it Sangelious? The Optimistic One (talk) 02:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

They are from all different planets, none of which are very important to a general article and don't need to be mentioned, let alone in the infobox. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 14:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Edit synopsis

Howdy, I know you are an excellent and reliable editor of Star Trek articles, but seeing as some of us are too, I would really appreciate edit summaries so I can get an idea of what is going on rather than looking at your individual edits, such as the ones you recently did on Data (Star Trek). Maybe you were pressed for time? I dunno, but it isn't like you. StarHOG (Talk) 15:37, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

@StarHOG: Apologies. Most of the time, I provide an edit summary, unless it's very minor like inserting a comma where needed. The Optimistic One (talk) 17:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Halo (TV series) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Halo (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Halo (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 10:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, The Optimistic One! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 10:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trailer Park Boys: The Animated Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eastwatch

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eastwatch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eastwatch

The article Eastwatch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eastwatch for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Gears 5 and WWE 2K16 being within the Terminator universe

Hey, I checked out the articles in question and found out that there are indeed playable characters based on machines from the Terminator franchise. However, it doesn't seem to be more than that, which is to say that within both games they are intended as either novelty additions as in the case of WWE 2K16, or as DLC for multiplayer. In neither of these cases are they related to the plot or setting of either game. Looking at the list, Mortal Kombat 11 is listed as well, as again, a machine from the franchise is a playable character. Games in that franchise have featured many popular characters such as the Xenomorphs from the Aliens franchise, but it would be absurd to classify the game as taking part in that universe. The recurring theme here seems to be that these additions to the list amount to little more than pop culture references and are isolated from any deeper meaning within the broader context of the game. On the Mortal Kombat X article, there are a lot of categories like this, i.e Alien vs. Predator category, Friday the 13th category, etc, but in opening those, the game is actually not listed as being amongst the video games in the franchise. I think the compromise here could be that the games are removed from the Terminator category, but the categories kept. That way there's no implication that they're set within that universe, but the categories can still be kept. What do you think? Another options when looking at another game, Bulletstorm, is to change the category to include an additional tab for "related games", but in that entry, the Duke Nukem character is actually added as part of the main game, so I don't know if the terminator characters in the games above are "related" in the same way as Duke is to that game. Eik Corell (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

@Eik Corell: While I would agree with your opinion in that these technically aren't Terminator games, I do think that these affiliations with the franchise should at least have a passing mention. Another case is Negan from The Walking Dead, who appears in Tekken 7 as DLC. The game itself is in the template for the show. I would agree with the latter suggestion, a new tab could be added as 'Related media' instead of 'Related games'; that way we can include other mediums that had a similar situation to these games. The Optimistic One (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eastwatch

The article Eastwatch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eastwatch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trailer Park Boys, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ricky and Julian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave Erickson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eye of the Beholder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Shots!!!

Hi. Regarding this edit, please see WP:UNBROKEN. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

I edited that because the pre-existing link was to a baseball player. The Optimistic One (talk) 01:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lion and the Rose

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Lion and the Rose you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 03:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayans M.C. (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 3)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Better Call Saul (season 3) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobbychan193 -- Bobbychan193 (talk) 15:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Hey there, can I get a confirmation that you plan to work on this GAN at some point in the future? It doesn't have to be soon, but just let me know, so I can continue the review with assurance that you'll be around to improve the article. Bobbychan193 (talk) 04:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

I can make certain improvements like fixing typos, removing unnecessary trivia, unreliable sources. Unfortunately I can't add sources myself at the moment because I don't have a PC or laptop right now but I'll be able to help out with other stuff. The Optimistic One (talk) 14:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks. I will resume the review. Bobbychan193 (talk) 03:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Enid (The Walking Dead) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Open Your Eyes

Siddiq (The Walking Dead) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Open Your Eyes

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AltheaFTWD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AltheaFTWD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sons of Anarchy (season 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan O'Neill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dominic Santiago

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dominic Santiago requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Santiago (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lion and the Rose

The article The Lion and the Rose you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Lion and the Rose for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 15:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, much appreciated! The Optimistic One (talk) 03:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Hodor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hodor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hodor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hodor Game Of Thrones.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hodor Game Of Thrones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello The Optimistic One, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 14:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks! Merry Christmas to you as well, and may 2020 be upon us! The Optimistic One (talk) 10:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beta (The Walking Dead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today and Tomorrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)