User talk:Tvactorcreator

Welcome!

Hi Tvactorcreator! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 22:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. This refers to your edits of the page Laura Behrens Wu where you have removed content from a reliable external source.

Your edit to I Love You (2023 film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:36, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, understood, I thought film plot should be one as film makers have given, I’ll write in my own words. Wikipedian (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V can you please check again if the copyright problem is solved? Wikipedian (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tvactorcreator Hello, as you added copyright content in plot section, so I notified you. This is not my area of competence. So, I wont be of much help. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 10:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Delgado moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tony Delgado. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex McCurry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex McCurry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex McCurry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KH-1 (talk) 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Delgado (Entrepreneur) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tony Delgado (Entrepreneur), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anil Thadani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anil Thadani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Thadani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BoraVoro (talk) 07:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gurvin Singh Dyal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gurvin Singh Dyal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurvin Singh Dyal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 02:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Confluent, Inc.. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 08:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Pakistani Dubbing Artists

Hello Tvactorcreator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Pakistani Dubbing Artists for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want List of Pakistani Dubbing Artists to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 16:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, @DreamRimmer but I didn’t create that page, I moved it to drafts Because it wasn’t completed. Autograph (talk) 17:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, it's an automated message sent by the Page Curation tool. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 17:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BharatPe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BharatPe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BharatPe (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ARDEA Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ARDEA Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 09:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

prod for The Attack (TV Series 2015)

You wrote : "This article is created in 2006, but says 2015 show, and original release in infobox it says 2017"

In all suspicious cases you have to look into article history.

I did create it in 2006, but it was a completrely different content ;-)
Further, the article was moved under wrong title by another person.

That said, I have no objection to deletion, but it must be handled by AfD. - Altenmann >talk 16:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i am definitely Okay with it Because you know better i only suggested what I could see after you pointed im Okay with removal Okay PROD Wikipedian (talk) 16:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure you understood me. YOu wrote "what I could see" I say that you can look deeper: in article history. SOmetimes articles become vandalized and the proper solution would be to revert to a non-vandalized state, not to delete. - Altenmann >talk 16:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

Hi - have you ever edited under different accounts? And have you ever edited in an area where you have a conflict of interest? Thanks Girth Summit _(blether) 12:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not edited under any other account, but without account I have. and yes about conflict of interest there’s one article and I have disclosed about it already. Wikipedian (talk) 12:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know that this answer is not true, and that you have edited under another account in an attempt to create an article that you also had a conflict of interest with. I am concerned that you would operate multiple accounts to create articles where you are conflicted, and that you would lie about it when asked. As noted below, I have blocked this account - if you wish to contribute here, you will need to give a full and truthful account of yourself. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I already know even if I create any other account all the articles created with new account will be deleted when confirmed sock, and I’m not sock I have learned Wikipedia through out the time, this is full truth about myself, its been months I’ve been here if you check my account contributions you will see if I have ever made any paid contributions other than one disclosed. And I dont have any other account. I’m aware of using multiple accounts which will eventually lead to block all and IP, so that’ll just be waste of time for me, reading this will ensure I know a log of Wikipedia but yes, with help of AI, and reading guidelines I have learned the wiki markup and policies, you may just unblock once if you find anything COI about my activity I’ll permanently leave wikipedia, but I have given several months now and its pretty cool, there are 20-30 users who are having over 5K edit count and nominate deletion etc same amount of time period as me, 8-10 months. Allow me to contribute here if if you ever find once I have used this account to vandalise or promotional, or advertise I’m okay with block. Wikipedian (talk) 13:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again: I know that you have used at least one other account already - Indiebizpro. That account was used to create an article that has since been deleted per WP:G11 as a piece of promotion. I decided to give you the opportunity to be honest about that, but you chose to lie about it. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yess, but that was on simple english and I totally forgot about that Because I thought blocks are on all the wikipedia thats why I created indiebizpro but later found that I’m not blocked on main english so continued here, I just checked I requested unblock there and never replied Because I was focused here Wikipedian (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have never used Indiebizpro here Because I never had need for it Wikipedian (talk) 13:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not truthful. You realise it's easy for us to see this is false, right? --Yamla (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know I understand its just I’m forgetting what I did with that account, now I again checked here, there’s Mohsin Khan’s article which was deleted speedily here, but before that Indiebizpro was blocked on simple english. Wikipedian (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just dont want to leave wikipedia, Because even if I create any account again I’ll be blocked for sock of this account, so what should I do? Wikipedian (talk) 13:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will ensure you that will no more create any COI edits without going through AFC and talk page consensus. And this will always be my one & only account. I have always known in the beginning this day will come but I eventually forgot about the Indiebizpro and you caught me with it. Wikipedian (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Until you successfully contest the block on this account, you personally are not permitted to edit. You'll have to work extremely hard to regain our trust after attempting (and failing) to deceive us. Frankly, I don't believe anyone will unblock you in the near future. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to address your abuse of multiple accounts and your rampant dishonesty. --Yamla (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't realised that you were blocked over on simple. So, having been blocked there on the 9th of July as a sockpuppet, you came over here on the 27th and tried the same trick? I echo Yamla's advice. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t try any trick, I just didn’t know genuinely this account wasn’t blocked here, if I had known I would have never created Indiebizpro, but when Indiebizpro got blocked on simple I tried the edit here with Indiebizpro and it worked, so I stopped Indiebizpro and again continued with my main old this account and never logged in Indiebizpro, I’m just really trying to make you understand that I’m here to contribute and create few articles. If you guys want me go 6 months with zero edits without creating any other account I will do it. But 6 month will probably make me lose the thing I have for wikipedia now you will see it on history of edits. Wikipedian (talk) 13:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock| I don’t understand why I have been blocked where my contributions are in good faith only, I have been editing only towards New Pages Feed, where I mostly tag and correct if I can. If I my can you please tell me why I have been blocked ? Wikipedian (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC) }}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tvactorcreator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don’t understand why I have been blocked where my contributions are in good faith only, I have been editing only towards New Pages Feed, where I mostly tag and correct if I can. If I my can you please tell me why I have been blocked ? Wikipedian (talk) 13:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked because you are believed to be violating WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tvactorcreator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have expressed myself for unblocking me to checkusers above, thats all that I can say right now because I forgot about the one account I’m not being unblocked, but if u may please consider unblocking this account I will anyway not have to create and I will not create but idk why this genuinely looks like little harsh decision by CU as there’s already proven fact I didn’t use the accounts at the same time. Wikipedian (talk) 14:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As Yamla says you used both accounts the same day. PhilKnight (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"proven fact I didn’t use the accounts at the same time", this too is a lie. Both accounts were substantially active on 2023-07-27. At this point, I recommend removing talk page access. This user is continuing to go out of their way to mislead us, even after being called on this. --Yamla (talk) 14:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]