User talk:Uhtregorn

Uhtregorn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Uhtregorn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Uhtregorn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Uhtregorn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Ways to improve Bridge the Divide

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Uhtregorn, thanks for creating Bridge the Divide!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

^{Babymissfortune} 12:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll see what I can do to improve it. Uhtregorn (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Bacon (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DACA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Uhtregorn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

References

Hi. Thank you for your article creations. Please see WP:CITE and consider correctly formatting the links in the reference sections of the articles you create. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me me. Happy editing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scott Ferguson (hedge fund manager) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Ferguson (hedge fund manager) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Ferguson (hedge fund manager) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Bost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Far right views, islamofobia, etc

Please do not add conspiracy theories from far right sites. Thank you. Jeblad (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Uhtregorn, and thank you for your contributions! I noticed your article Eric Scheidler and I think it’s a good candidate for Did You Know. DYK is the easiest and funnest way to get your creation on to the Main Page and in front of the eyeballs of 17 million people. Learn all about it here "DYK for Newbies." I'd like to take this opportunity to invite you to join other people who enjoy editing conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where you can can meet new colleagues and get answers to burning questions. I hope to see you there! – Lionel^(talk) 06:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you very much! I'll take a look at DYK. Uhtregorn (talk) 02:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bjorn Bjercke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bjorn Bjercke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjorn Bjercke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:09, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeff Denham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bolton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mimi Walters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paris Accords (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

David Valadao (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Central Valley, Kevin McCarthy and Joe Courtney

Randy Hultgren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Andy Barr

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Valadao, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Central Valley, Kevin McCarthy and Joe Courtney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citation templates

Hi, I wanted to direct you to WP:REFB and see if you're familiar with using the refToolbar. I noticed some of the citations you're adding are showing up a bit wonky (the article title isn't clickable, and the URL is showing up as bare text). Let me know if you have any questions on formatting citations, thanks. Marquardtika (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Just saw this. Thanks for the advice.[reply]

WP:COPYVIO

You seem to have introduced some WP:COPYRIGHT violations here. I specifically noticed "His record on firearms legislation earned him the 'NRA lap dog' label from the Brady Campaign, a leading gun-control group' ", which is copied word-for-word from the source. Please address this ASAP. Marquardtika (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC) So it just needs to be in different wording?[reply]

Right, we can't copy wording directly from sourcing. I'll leave you the COPYVIO notice below with more information. Marquardtika (talk) 14:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Uhtregorn, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Carlos Curbelo have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 14:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eddie Edwards (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eddie Edwards (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Edwards (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wolfson5 (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Uhtregorn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Linden Blue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasio Somoza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited François Rebsamen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jack Lang and Ligue communiste révolutionnaire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ted Paige (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to National Research Council, Royal Naval College and Graham Marshall

Obrana národa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pilsen and Josef Dostál

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted Paige, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Research Council and Royal Naval College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabriel Urralburu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roncal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgy Sofronov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luis Recasens, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Oliver Wendell Holmes and University of Rome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Taghi Amirani

Hello, Uhtregorn,

Thank you for creating Taghi Amirani.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Taghi Amirani, but it needs mch better sources. See WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS for guidelines on the types of sources to be used in a Wikipedia article to determine if a person is notable. If this issue is not corrected, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zdeněk Novák moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zdeněk Novák, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 00:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC) @Buidhe: the article was still under construction. I am adding the sources now.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dewi Meirion Lewis

The article Dewi Meirion Lewis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ~~ Alex Noble - talk 20:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you guys give me a second before you post these messages? I'm actively building the page.

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mario Recordón, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osorno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josef Bílý, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frýdek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Real de Azúa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dualism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Witold Sobków, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rudolf von Urban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carmel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergey Dmitriyevich Urusov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peremyshl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalikoqu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gurre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avtarjeet Singh Dhanjal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Georgia-Pacific. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Koch family foundations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Uhtregorn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Koch industries, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! This is laughable. Interesting that you are jumping to conclusions without any discussion. Rather than Assume Good Faith, you are actively hostile, leading one to fire back with the same question... do YOU have a COI?

Most of your edits are explainable by reasoning other than COI. This one I have a problem with though [1], I can't think of a good faith explanation other than COI or vandalism besides a simple mistake which it does not appear to be. This wasn't a copy edit and it wasn't correcting vandalism, so what was it? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous SPA added "denial" when "skepticism" would be more appropriateUhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't denial appropriate? Denial is whats in the article and denial is what WP:RS say the organization engages in, right? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's also due & undue weight and one of the things considered is what the source is. Proper attribution should be considered with a source.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does that have to do with the perfectly valid category you removed? It wasn't vandalism and it was accurate, so why did you remove it while crying vandalism? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change your tone. You are in violation of Assume Good faith and Civil. Your history looks impassioned and I advise you to take a step back and get back to a calm, rational state of mind.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I did not mean to offend you! Just trying to understand whats going on here. Are you aware that alleging vandalism where none exists is against WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, maybe vandalism was the wrong word. But its an SPA with no registration doing a drive-by edit on a page with a history of POV pushes. Hard to not assume its someone with a POV. Editors often (forgivably) forget to keep personal bias out of activity. No one is immune to it, its completely human to get impassioned about something. Doesn't matter how we feel about a subject, we should remain as unbiased as possible.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Might I suggest that you let your POV get the better of you in this situation? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aiming to remove POV is not a POV. I could suggest the same thing in your situation.Uhtregorn (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What POV were you removing? The edit you reverted appears to have been a legitimate one. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 03:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olivier Guéant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caleb Maupin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Caleb Maupin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 08:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohen Shah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rohen Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:B3:FE70:FCB8:F074:DED0:D201 (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First Media Corporation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, First Media Corporation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Begich III, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democratic Party and Republican Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Begich III for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Begich III, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Begich III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:First Media Corporation

Hello, Uhtregorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Media Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Caleb Maupin

Hello, Uhtregorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caleb Maupin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Draft:U.S._Ransomware_Task_Force, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Cray04 (talk) 05:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:U.S. Ransomware Task Force

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:U.S. Ransomware Task Force requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://decrypt.co/120105/doj-fbi-hive-network-ransomware-infiltration, https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/u-s-department-of-justice-announces-interagency-task-force-to-combat-covid-19-relief-fraud, and https://aag-it.com/the-latest-ransomware-statistics/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cray04 (talk) 05:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into U.S. Ransomware Task Force. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:First Media Corporation

Hello, Uhtregorn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First Media Corporation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edward B. Kurpis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward B. Kurpis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward B. Kurpis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Let America Vote

The article Let America Vote has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

LAV got some national media attention when it first launched, but that's mainly a function of having a good publicist and the fact that the group's founder was coming off a high-profile Senate run. The fact that they seem to have gotten barely any national coverage since then (nothing cited on this page and I couldn't really find anything) shows they aren't really notable. Most of the coverage I could find was primarily about LAV's partner group, End Citizens United.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Locus Robotics (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Locus Robotics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Refugee lens investing. scope_creep^Talk 07:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Refugee lens investing

Hello Uhtregorn, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Refugee lens investing, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refugee lens investing.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Locus Robotics (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It was looking fair until the "Operations" section had unsourced claims. The sentence before that is a massive citation overkill and you want to fix that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Locus Robotics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]