User talk:VH2

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, VH2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! œ ^™ 08:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Subway (restaurant). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.NellieBly (talk) 00:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Television constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. NellieBly (talk) 00:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at MTV, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 00:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to M&M's. NellieBly (talk) 01:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Names of large numbers. Diannaa ^(Talk) 01:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Regular Show, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of DirecTV channels (United States), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 05:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of DirecTV channels (United States). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 05:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QFC

I undid your move of this page to WQFC because (1) you did a cut-and-paste move instead of using the Move tab, which is not within policy, since all the edit history of the article are lost, and (2) you did not discuss the move before doing it. In the future, please discuss any moves which are not non-controversial, and use the Move feature instead of cutting-and-pasting. Beyond My Ken (talk)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism and other unconstructive editing. Please also take this as a final warning: continuation in the same way may well lead to an indefinite block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clark Bright

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clark Bright requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 16:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Papa Murphy's, you may be blocked from editing. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maggiano's Little Italy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:56, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to MTV2. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Total Drama characters, you may be blocked from editing. You deleted about 3/4 of the article with no explanation. You must provide an edit summary for such edits, lest they be interpreted as disruptive. —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Total Drama Destination

The article Total Drama Destination has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fan adaptation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 03:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Total Drama Destination for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Total Drama Destination is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Drama Destination until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 01:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Total Drama characters. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Giggett (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You appear to have either be having some difficulty understanding the concerns raised by various editors, or choose to ignore these concerns. This is notice that it would be wise to utilize the articles talk page or at the very least an edit summary before changing information on an article that is might be considered controversial (ie. reverted, warnings left, asked to stop, etc.) If this behavior continues it may be considered disruptive editing and mat also result in a lengthy block. If you feel like I am missing something, please consider leaving a comment either here or at my talk page. Kindly Calmer Waters 01:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Netflix, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SudoGhost ™ 20:13, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]