User talk:Vanished User jdksfajlasd/Archives/2009/2009/April

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Translation of the Arabic page

Thank you for directing me to the translation of the article. Unfortunately it's not very clear, with statements like: "Abu Bakr in Marj Ibn Amer Ya'bad and pomegranate." But I think I get the gist of the article, and I will change my vote at the discussion accordingly. Anti venin 08:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikistress

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Ah, wikistress, I know the feeling. When I am right on the verge of going insane, I sometimes replace my userpage with this (or this) and then just leave for a couple hours. Anyway, I hope things quiet down for you soon!

By the way, I left you a question at Tassedethe's RfA, regarding your Neutral vote. Thanks, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 13:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Who can vote?

Any editor can vote, can I vote. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 01:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Im sorry im not quite sure what your talking about can you please give me a little more deatils on what you are referring to ?

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 01:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I see that you are on review, and I don´t know if those votes are only for adminitrators or any editor can vote or comment in your review. thanks --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 01:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Please do add your opinion there it is for editors also to express how they feel.

Regards

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 01:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok thanks. I Will add my opinion. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 02:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks any opinions are welcome on the editor review i can use the feedback that i receive to improve my editing on wikipedia.

Thanks

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 02:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

"troll"

I've removed your "troll" comment on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Toon05. Feel free to disagree with RfA participants, but do so with a degree of civility and without insults. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Emunobar.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Emunobar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello thank you for letting me know about this however i took this images but it needed to beplaced in the category that it is now for the reason that the images are copyrighted and is a product,please let me know what eelse i need to do so that the images stays as is i am currently building on the article as we speak i am using my own user space to make it so that it meets notblity,

Cheers

${\mathfrak {S}}{\mathfrak {t}}{\mathfrak {a}}{\mathfrak {f}}{\mathfrak {f}}{\mathfrak {w}}{\mathfrak {a}}{\mathfrak {t}}{\mathfrak {e}}{\mathfrak {r}}{\mathfrak {b}}{\mathfrak {o}}{\mathfrak {y}}$ ^{Critique Me} 05:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Damn!

Can you possible tone down your signature? It's a little bit large and distracting. Also, I'd ask someone like User:Neurolysis to help you fix up your talk page header. The font leaks, and the red is blinding. :P iMatthew : Chat 17:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! iMatthew : Chat 17:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

np :) take care and im gonna work on the edit notice right now see what went wrong.

Cheers,

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments}

I wanted to drop you a quick line to note that I strongly agree with iMatthew above. The code in your signature is quite excessive, WP:SIG suggests no more than two or three lines. The sig in the above section with all the math tags is clearly too much, and even your sig in this section is borderline. Please tone down your signature. GlassCobra 00:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

already done,i was only trying it out but i agree.

Thanks

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 22:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 April 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 03:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

No flagged revisions category up for deletion

The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009 April 23#Category:Wikipedia users who oppose Flagged Revisions and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue. Alansohn (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

PGP test

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is a message signed by Foxy Loxy's GPG signature. It can be
verified cryptographically using any OpenPGP standard supporting
program.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.5)

iEYEARECAAYFAkn0HpsACgkQNJgJfMMHL3Z+owCdFH7MWv9Bhj54XrFAXLFy82co
tZcAoJcSezbap0K4Q5lOKZxS8LSfAXZT
=DD+u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----