User talk:Wasted Time R/Archive 14

DYK for Tony Bennett at the Talk of the Town

On 12 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tony Bennett at the Talk of the Town, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fans of the composer and conductor Robert Farnon attended tapings of the television series Tony Bennett at the Talk of the Town to hear his instrumentals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tony Bennett at the Talk of the Town. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tony Bennett at the Talk of the Town), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Precious

Three years!

Fits nicely! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you today for Hillary Clinton, "American Secretary of State, Senator, First Lady, and once and possibly future presidential candidate"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Puffy AmiYumi tours for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Puffy AmiYumi tours is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Puffy AmiYumi tours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

hey

Didn't notice you had snuck back in! I don't know about you, but I just don't have the heart to work on the one or the stomach to work on the other. Good to see you though! Tvoz/talk 20:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, to the extent I'm here at all I'm kind of focusing on more obscure things now. I'm not even qualified to write on what I used to – for the first three months I couldn't bear to look at the news at all, and now I'm just reading a few stories in the paper, nothing on radio or tv – too visceral an impact. The only political article I've had any real interest in is Impeachment process against Richard Nixon, for reasons that don't need much explaining ... Wasted Time R (talk) 01:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

With you on that. Tvoz/talk 02:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Questions Regarding Early Presidential Primaries (1940 and Back)

I've been working collecting data on the results for the Democratic Presidential caucuses or state conventions that were held in earlier years, 1940 being the starting point given I was interested at the time in the Anti-Third Term movement that had sprung up then, and while I can't access all the data in question anyway (I'm using the New York Times as a source, but I'm not a subscriber and so can't look at the articles in detail), I've provided them in the talk pages. Having gotten down to 1928 now, however, I'm not certain how best to display the information given, and I'm not sure if there really is a precedent(s) for it given the operational differences between the Modern Primary and the more Archaic Primary of yesteryear. For example;

1. In 1928 Al Smith clearly won the Democratic Presidential Preference Primary in Ohio over Senator Atlee Pomerene, but the latter was awarded the entirety of the delegation. The situation in question is in an article I provided on the talk page for the '28 Democratic Primaries, but when you have delegates not being bound or awarded based on the results of a Primary, should that be counted as a separate contest? How should we display that on a map? Should one be given preference?
2. Depending on the year in question you either end up with a handful, none, or a whole slew of favorite-son candidates ready to represent State delegations, and these candidates technically have "won" delegates. However in some cases, like those I identified for the 1968 Republican nomination race, are far more than the infobox could possibly handle when combined with the actual candidates (even if we are just talking about candidates and favorite sons that won delegates, that would make 17). Should we give preference based on delegates won? On actual candidates vs. Favorite Sons? What about if they've withdrawn and endorsed a candidate? Should Favorite Sons be combined somehow (for map and infobox purposes) and explained separately in another section?
3. In a number of the Presidential Primaries and even Caucuses I have encountered language that the delegates in question are officially unpledged or uninstructed, but have a strong preference or are generally understood for being for a certain candidate. Under those conditions, should those delegations be considered Unpledged, or should they be considered as being for the candidate? Should the votes of those delegations be included in a candidate's vote total?

These are the major questions at the moment. I'll also be asking a few others Presidential Elections Wikiproject as well to chime in, so if you have any ideas on how best I should proceed, I'd ask that the responses be put into Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 1932. Thanks ahead of time. --Ariostos (talk) 03:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for getting back to me. Now, I do wish that I did have the money available to subscribe to the New York Times, but I'm at that awkward point where I'm attending College and only working odd jobs for the most part, stuck in the parent's basement for the time being (literally). In terms of priorities of how best to apportion the money I do have on hand, it isn't far up there. Should I happen to somehow make a fair bit more though and so have disposable cash on hand, I'll consider subscribing to the Times. Now I'm familiar with the problems associated with the map and results for the 1972 Democratic Primaries (and the Chisholm section; nice work by the way), hell I think I made the present horrid abomination of a map that is being used, and I believe (and indeed have considered) the method used for displaying the 2012 Republican Primary results as being the best option going forward. The problem with this however is that I was hoping to establish some kind of consensus, fearing that major changes unilaterally would be redacted in the future for not following consensus, and the last couple times I've tried to bring matter to the Project they've fallen flat. I might do it again anyway though, as it would be better the effort is made then not in the long run, and for documentation purposes. In the case of contests won, I really don't think there is a good solution beyond counting Primaries and Caucuses, real or not, whilst giving preference to delegates won. It becomes a bit difficult to properly tabulate a result when with, say, the 1932 New Hampshire Democratic Primary the slate as a whole is Uncommitted, but you have Pro-Roosevelt folk and Pro-Smith folk both jockeying for votes to get onto that slate; how do get that across within the given guidelines? Anyway, thanks for getting back to me. --Ariostos (talk) 23:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

• • Well, that's what I thought in regards to the Times; unfortunately it seems that North Shore Community's access only goes back as far as 1980 (though they admitted they once had total access), and the Public Library here in Wakefield is in a similar situation. I don't know, I'll think of something in the short-term, though long-term I may well just end up subscribing to the Times.
  • I do agree that the labeling of these contests as Presidential Primaries is a bit of a misnomer given how few there were, and fewer still that actually allocated delegates based on their results, and a change in the titling of the article should be in the cards as well as the opening.
  • Contests won I believe used to be States won, but then people were reminded that you had some territories and commonwealths in the mix, as well as some States having multiple contests in selecting their delegates (such as Texas for the Democrats in '88 and '08), leading to the present term which I believe is essentially just "Primaries+Caucuses Won". That can just be converted to including State Conventions (if it doesn't already). As for favorite sons, well, I'd argue we should just consider them the same as other candidates, though with the caveat that they were principally a "favorite son"; the only caveat to that however would be if the delegation was technically Unpledged but strongly favored a candidate, in which case I would have the candidate not having won the contest, but still having won the delegation (as soft delegates). It's far from perfect, but it's the best method I can think of in terms of accounting for what was on the ballot and what the delegates and newspapers were saying.
  • In light of this I'm going to be creating a new table/format for the Primaries and State Conventions, concentrating far less visually on the results of the contests and more on the contests themselves, while also trying to attribute delegates won where I can. Only problem at the moment is trying to determine how best to display in this new table those State Conventions that selected uninstructed delegates that strongly favored a particular candidate; liable to just be yet another caveat under the Uninstructed label. --Ariostos (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Alright, so this is what the new results box I made is going to look like, with examples of what the various types of contests are going to look like.

Democratic Presidential Nominating State Conventions and Primaries
Date	State	Contest Type	Candidate	Votes Won (#)	Votes Won (%)	Delegates Won	Reference(s)
March 12	New Hampshire	Primary	Uninstructed (Support Franklin D. Roosevelt)	10,501	100 / 100 (100%)	8 / 8 (100%)	-
April 2	Wisconsin	Primary	Franklin D. Roosevelt	322,991	75.35 / 100 (75%)	21 / 24 (88%)	-
			John Nance Garner	105,662	24.65 / 100 (25%)	3 / 24 (13%)
May 7	California	Primary	Franklin D. Roosevelt	723,782	74.05 / 100 (74%)	44 / 44 (100%)	-
			John Nance Garner	114,594	11.72 / 100 (12%)	-
			Willis Allen	90,718	9.28 / 100 (9%)	-
			Ellis E. Patterson	48,337	4.95 / 100 (5%)	-
May 13	North Dakota	State Convention	Franklin D. Roosevelt	-	-	16 / 16 (100%)	-

• • Do you think there is anything I should change, or is it fine as is? --Ariostos (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Wasted Time R. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is The Wikipedia Library - Newspapers.com.
Message added 17:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Note it was sent via Meta --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 17:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Electrada

Hello! Your submission of Electrada at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 08:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Electrada

On 19 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Electrada, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Electrada Corporation, a 1960s-era conglomerate, ran into difficulties after its management reportedly spent more time on acquisitions and financial markets than on actually running the business? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Electrada. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Electrada), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Hughes Dynamics

On 24 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hughes Dynamics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one question about Hughes Dynamics, an early 1960s subsidiary of Hughes Tool Company, is whether Howard Hughes ever approved its creation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hughes Dynamics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hughes Dynamics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Donald Trump the Republican presumptive nominee

I believe you were the first editor of Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech to use the word "presumptive". I invite you to add any comment you may have on a discussion at Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump#Presumptive nominee. —Anomalocaris (talk) 03:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

@Anomalocaris: this is one of the reasons I've pretty much stopped working on current political articles – the having to go through hoops to use a simple and accurate phrase or term or word in an article that no journalist or scholar would object to. Wasted Time R (talk) 10:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

I understand. Attempted assassination of Donald Trump isn't a current political event; it happened June 18, 2016, and is not much discussed today. As it happens, for this article, we have an editor who hasn't accepted facts, but will accept what other Wikipedians say. There are dozens of articles that acknowledge that on or about May 3, 2016, Donald Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, but for some reason this particular editor is fighting it at Attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

DYK for Informatics General

On 30 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Informatics General, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Informatics General. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Informatics General), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Campaigns and Elections for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campaigns and Elections is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaigns and Elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 21:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

File:BidenCampaignButton1988.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BidenCampaignButton1988.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Dixie Chicks Photo Permission Request from Zumic

Hi,

I hope this message finds you having a good day.

My name is Jacob Grossfeld and I am the managing editor for Zumic, a music news website.

I'm writing to you because we discovered your photo of Dixie Chicks (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DixieChicksMSG062003.jpg) online with a Creative Commons license, and we would appreciate your written permission to use it on our website, as well as your preferred attribution credit and any other specifications you might require.

A little background about Zumic: We cover all styles of music, giving artists and fans the respect they deserve. The name Zumic comes from our goal of "Music that revolves around you." Our philosophy champions a true appreciation for musicianship. We celebrate artists and make their work more accessible to people who will enjoy it. We truly believe that music has the power to educate, heal, and bring people together.

If you would like to request more information about Zumic, please do not hesitate to inquire.

Best regards, Jacob Grossfeld jacob (at) zumic.com Jgrossfeld2 (talk) 21:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Trapped (Jimmy Cliff song)

On 25 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trapped (Jimmy Cliff song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while many people think "Trapped" is a Bruce Springsteen song from the 1980s, it was written and recorded by Jimmy Cliff in 1972? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trapped (Jimmy Cliff song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Trapped (Jimmy Cliff song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk 00:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bob Wills Is Still the King

Hello! Your submission of Bob Wills Is Still the King at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bob Wills Is Still the King

On 10 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bob Wills Is Still the King, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Waylon Jennings' 1970s song "Bob Wills Is Still the King" may have been less a tribute to Bob Wills than a friendly jibe at Willie Nelson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Wills Is Still the King. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bob Wills Is Still the King), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Los Angeles Times–Washington Post News Service

On 15 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Los Angeles Times–Washington Post News Service, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Los Angeles Times–Washington Post News Service, in existence from 1962 to 2009, had some 650 clients? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Los Angeles Times–Washington Post News Service. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Los Angeles Times–Washington Post News Service), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

WT

Hi WTR, I hope you’re well. I came across a blog thread about you, sort of. It’s very unreliable, of course:

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2017/11/so-much-wasted-time.html?m=1

Cheers. Anythingyouwant (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

@Anythingyouwant: Thanks for sending this, it was interesting to read and wise in places. I did see Cassidy's last words in the news. One of the Althouse commenters picked up on the Eagles song, but no one there thought of WP editing as a possible prime example. I still do some researching and writing on various topics here but a lot less than in the past and I'm certainly retired from current contentious political articles. Was all the effort I put in the past on those wasted? Partly yes, partly no, but what the ratio is is hard to say. I see you're still battling away on those ... if it makes you feel any better, no one's vote in Alabama is going to be changed by what a WP lede says – they probably think WP is fake news and read Conservapedia instead, where nary a troubling thought ever needs to be encountered. Did you know that "Simply put, E=mc² is liberal claptrap"? People will believe that they want to believe. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

No, Wikipedia wasn’t mentioned at that Althouse blog post, but there was this: “So much wasted time, so little browsing the internet.” Ha ha. Maybe we’ve wasted time by not editing Wikipedia enough?  :-) More likely we’ve spent too much time at it. That’s funny about Conservapedia and E=mc², though I certainly agree that it would be nice if that equation would not operate so well in, say, North Korea. As is my wont, I will also defend them a very little bit on this, by saying that both classical electrodynamics and quantum electrodynamics both run into problems describing the self-energy of a point-electron, and so the definition of electromagnetic energy-momentum may well be wrong in both theories, so we really don’t have a very good grasp of what the “E” in E=mc² means. But I will not go farther than that in defending them on this!  :-) Cheers. Anythingyouwant (talk) 16:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Physicists are always in the market for deeper understanding, but the Conservapedia folks are solely in the market for convincing themselves that the only things worth knowing were known 5,000 years ago. As for the Internet, I've found the most satisfaction on WP when I've been able to cite things that aren't on it. Call me old school ... Wasted Time R (talk) 17:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

You’re old school. Me too, I hope. I hardly ever look at Conservapedia, so you may well be correct. Anythingyouwant (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wasted Time R. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bartell Group

On 19 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bartell Group, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that five siblings and an in-law made up the Bartell Group, which owned radio stations around the United States during the 1940s–1960s and was a pioneer in the Top 40 format? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bartell Group. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bartell Group), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Paul Y. Hammond

On 30 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paul Y. Hammond, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American scholar Paul Y. Hammond sought to develop a more discerning understanding of how organizational behavior and domestic political considerations affected American foreign policy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Y. Hammond. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Paul Y. Hammond), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for First Day Hikes

On 23 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article First Day Hikes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on New Year's Day, tens of thousands of Americans take a hike? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/First Day Hikes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, First Day Hikes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Unix System Laboratories

Hello! Your submission of Unix System Laboratories at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 10:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Unix System Laboratories

On 13 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Unix System Laboratories, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a goal of Unix System Laboratories was the creation of their namesake product "for the masses"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Unix System Laboratories. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Unix System Laboratories), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Novell BrainShare 95 presentation book cover vol 13.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Novell BrainShare

On 8 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Novell BrainShare, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Novell BrainShare moved from the University of Utah to the Salt Palace? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Novell BrainShare. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Novell BrainShare), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 05:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RobertGordonFire.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RobertGordonFire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DancingInTheDarkSingleFront.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DancingInTheDarkSingleFront.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:AlaskaHallOfGovernors.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AlaskaHallOfGovernors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —innotata 04:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Magnetic Hill pamphlet cover 1969.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

John McCain

It has been a decade since this page was today's featured article. I am new to FAs. If we did a FAR and improved the article back to FA standards (which I believe it fails now), do you think we could nominate it for TFA on January 3 (his birthday). What is the qualification for a second TFA or "double header".--- Coffeeandcrumbs 16:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Coffeeandcrumbs: In the past I've had the impression that the TFA people are reluctant to put up the same article more than once, but I'm several years removed from the FA nominations world (nowadays I do DYK's a lot but nothing further) so I don't really know. As for article standards, any FA article will slowly degrade from meeting those standards if it loses a main editor(s) who is driven to maintain them, which this one did around 2015 or so (as I explained in the talk page there). If someone is willing to do the grungy work to bring an article back up to full standards, that is of value, even if the article doesn't become the TFA again. Wasted Time R (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

On that subject I noticed that you created the voting record chart on that page. I was wondering if we could update that with more recent data and format it so it doesn't look like it came out of Excel 2003 with the default settings. I can do it if you want, but it would be helpful if you sent me the old Excel file so I don't have to track down all the data again. ~Awilley (talk) 17:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Awilley: I have updated the voting chart image for the 2016 ACU and ADA and the 2017 ACU scores ... unfortunately the 2017 ADA ratings are not out yet (every year ADA takes a ridiculously long time to publish them, not sure why). But the chart still looks the same in terms of style. If you would like to make it better looking/more modern, that's fine, I will be happy to send you my Excel file. It looks like Wikipedia email does not support attachments, so if you send a Wikipedia email to me, I can respond to it with my regular email and attach the file. Wasted Time R (talk) 18:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Yale at Princton football ticket stub 1953.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wisconsin School (diplomatic history)

Hello! Your submission of Wisconsin School (diplomatic history) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wisconsin School (diplomatic history)

Hello! Your submission of Wisconsin School (diplomatic history) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Barney Gottstein

Barney Gottstein died today. Some oldtimers in the Alaska Democratic Party, when I've brought up Mike Gravel's name in conversation in the past, have attempted to dismiss his contributions with statements to the effect of "Mike Gravel was nothing more than the frontman for Larry Carr and Barney Gottstein in their attempt to take over the state Democratic Party". I have copies of some newspaper stories from the 1964 state House campaign, where Carr's father and father-in-law were elected along with Gravel. Curiously, Pop Carr and Homer Moseley had nearly identical-looking promotional materials for their campaigns, but Gravel didn't. Anyway, just wondering if you had anything in your collection of sources related to Gravel which would suffice to create an article on Gottstein. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:00, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

@RadioKAOS: No, I don't know anything extra about Gottstein. The Carrs-Safeway article has a little biographical coverage of him, but more on the Carr family. The Gravel article should really mention Gottstein a bit more, including their falling out over the Saudi Arabia F-15 fighter sale issue in 1978; I'll try to get to it. As for Gravel being a frontman for anyone, that's kind of amusing – he's too idiosyncratic/egotistical/individualistic for that – which is also why party regulars probably don't remember him too fondly. As for an article on Gottstein, if you have access to Newspapers.com, there are dozens of newspapers stories there that mention him, and a Google Books search shows a number of useful hits too. So I think you could do it. Wasted Time R (talk) 10:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Wisconsin School (diplomatic history)

On 3 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wisconsin School (diplomatic history), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Wisconsin School is a school of thought that uses economic interpretations to explain much of American diplomatic history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wisconsin School (diplomatic history). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wisconsin School (diplomatic history)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wasted Time R. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:F-15 Eagle magazine ad 1982.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:F-15 Eagle magazine ad 1982.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:F-15 Eagle magazine ad 1982.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Waving

Hey! Passing through, came across your name. I'm still keeping half or maybe quarter of an eye on some of our mutual works, but not like the good old days. Hope all's well. Best Tvoz/talk 18:48, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, doing okay. Your half or quarter is more than me – the big articles in question are off my watchlist (I'm of the 'better not to know' school). Yes, definitely not like the old days ... Wasted Time R (talk) 11:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Walter LaFeber at Beacon Theatre farewell lecture 2006 program.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Cornell University notebooks for History 313 and 314 1974-75.JPG

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Four-Place Mathematical Tables cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Cover of the Aquarian weekly 1983.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Walter LaFeber

On 9 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Walter LaFeber, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cornell University professor Walter LaFeber gave his farewell lecture on American diplomatic history before nearly 3,000 people at New York's Beacon Theatre? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Walter LaFeber. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Walter LaFeber), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights

Hello! Your submission of Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cornell University notebooks for History 313 and 314 1974-75.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cornell University notebooks for History 313 and 314 1974-75.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights

On 5 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two years before it closed due to lack of funds, the Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights put out the "Sheroes Womyn Warriors Wall Calendar" to raise money? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Greater London Group

Hello! Your submission of Greater London Group at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Greater London Group

On 6 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Greater London Group, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Greater London Group, a research centre at the London School of Economics, played a major role in the reformation of the structure of London government in the 1960s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Greater London Group. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Greater London Group), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Princeton Shopping Center

Hello! Your submission of Princeton Shopping Center at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for William A. Robson

On 15 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William A. Robson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the career of pioneering scholar of public administration William A. Robson was made possible because playwright George Bernard Shaw wanted to experience an aeroplane flight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William A. Robson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William A. Robson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Palm Treo Blazer browser screen image 2007.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Princeton Shopping Center

On 6 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Princeton Shopping Center, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a New Jersey shopping mall has a California-style design? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Princeton Shopping Center. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Princeton Shopping Center), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jill Biden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Town and Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Gravel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Bullock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WPATgaslight.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WPATgaslight.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 21:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Movie ranch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KHTS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Hillary Clinton scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Hillary Clinton has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 21 August 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 21, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 16:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Biden 1988 presidential campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tylenol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Mary Jo Kopechne.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mary Jo Kopechne.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Job Control Language

I just wanted to say thank you for rescuing my edits to the article on IBM mainframe Job Control Language. One of the problems I saw was the use of IBM terms without explaining them. I mean nobody except IBM uses the term "dataset" as everyone else says "file", and there's USS, etc. So I added definitions, but lacking sources the other guy rolled back the article (but did warn me.) Without knowing you had found references, I figured, well, OK, I'll go look in the manual, and use that, only to discover IBM just uses the term dataset, for example, without ever defining it. So I find you had references, and solved my problem! So again, thanks. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 12:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

@Rfc1394: Happy to help. I dusted off some books from back in the day that covered JCL in full or in part and that could be used as sources. And yes, IBM mainframe terminology is often a thing unto itself. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your archives

I've changed the format of your Archives list from the dotted list to a navigation box. I think it looks better and makes archive entries easier to find. But I have made it easy to revert if you don't like it. Your old list is still there, just diked out. To restore, delete my box and the line starting with

<!--

and below your box delete the line ending with

-->

which will restore it back. If you do like my changes then just delete your list! I think it looks better and I hope you like it. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for The Book of Gutsy Women

On 2 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Book of Gutsy Women, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in The Book of Gutsy Women, the mother-and-daughter authors feature, among others, the 17th-century nun Juana Inés de la Cruz and climate activist Greta Thunberg? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Book of Gutsy Women. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Book of Gutsy Women), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Caldera Systems and SCO merger card.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Caldera Systems and SCO merger card.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Caldera Systems logo.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover-mww.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover-mww.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in

section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover-voa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover-voa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I Don't Want To Go Home album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Don't Want To Go Home album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC)