User talk:Xipanddale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome![edit]

Hello, Xipanddale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Frederic Durán-Jordà, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dan Koehl (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xipanddale. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Frederic Durán-Jordà, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Frederic Durán-Jordà to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Dan Koehl (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan I´m working on it. The Article is not from a "living Person". He is dead (1957)

OK. Most important is the sources, and a reason why the person should have a page on Wikipedia, e.g. the notability.Dan Koehl (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan. He saved the life of some thousends of people. Is a very interesting subject and have plenty of sources in Internet.

March 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Frederic Durán-Jordà has been reverted.
Your edit here to Frederic Durán-Jordà was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://mollymew.blogspot.com/2013/10/norman-bethune-and-blood-transfusion.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xipanddale. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Alfred Benlloch Llorach, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Alfred Benlloch Llorach to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ― Padenton |  16:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Padenton. The person pass away in 2013.

My mistake. I removed the proposed deletion template immediately after in this diff: [1] Padenton |  16:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Meineke Test[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Meineke Test, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://medicalency.com/meinicke-reaction.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Meineke Test saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Biscuittin (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meineke Test requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://medicalency.com/meinicke-reaction.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from the Spanish Wikipedia[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Please use the template {{translated}} when copying material from one wiki to another. -- Diannaa (talk) 02:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]