Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Notice board

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Comics

Home Assessments Cleanup Discussion Improvements Notice board Help Popular pages Workgroups
Article alerts · Copyright · Getting Involved · Manual of Style · Naming conventions · Recognized content · References · Statistics · Templates · Userbox

Welcome to WikiProject Comics, a project formed by Wikipedians to increase, expand, improve, and better organize articles related to comics in Wikipedia, the largest encyclopedia in the world! We rely on comics enthusiasts worldwide to make this the best comics encyclopaedia on the web. If you are interested in participating, why not see how you can get involved?

If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.

For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.

Scope

The scope of WikiProject Comics is improve the vast expanse of knowledge that comics have become. This WikiProject will attempt to cover all comics-related information included on Wikipedia. We will do this through volunteer contributors and editors. If you are interested in joining the WikiProject, please feel free to add your name to the Participants list below, and find yourself an article to adopt.

WikiProject Comics
Information
Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, Contents
Threads older than 20 days may
be archived by MiszaBot II.
Departments
Project organization
Resources
Task forces
Comics Portal
Shortcuts

Alerts

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(4 more...)

Proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Templates for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Files for discussion

Featured article candidates

Featured list candidates

Good article nominees

Good topic candidates

Featured article reviews

Good article reassessments

Requests for comments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

(7 more...)

Articles for creation

Deletion discussions

To edit this section, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation

Moon Over Isla Island

Moon Over Isla Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as an individual episode. Can't find anything on Google Books, while Google News is just listicles from pop culture websites. Sources provided on page are just ratings digests that don't even name the episode, and even the one review reviewed everything else on Fox that night. Unknown Temptation (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nestor (comics)

Nestor (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor character from French Tintin comic book series. Nothing here suggests WP:GNG is met. Pure plot summary and list of appearances. Fr wiki article is no better; my BEFORE failed to find anything that goes beyond a plot summary. Per WP:ATD-R, we can redirect this to List of The Adventures of Tintin characters. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:46, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of The Adventures of Tintin characters per nom. No real SIGCOV I could find either. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:14, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Adventures of Tintin locations

List of The Adventures of Tintin locations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced list that fails WP:NLIST. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:41, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of boats in The Adventures of Tintin

List of boats in The Adventures of Tintin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So, there's some interesting stuff here in the form of well written and referenced text on "The maritime world in The Adventures of Tintin", but this is wrapped in fancrufty and poorly referenced list that fails WP:NLIST (and while the list appears to have plenty of footnotes, many are just unreferenced notes or commentary). As a list, I think his has no reason to exist, but the content could probably be merged somewhere, or maybe split (or perhaps we could just delete the list part of this article and rename it?). It's a weird case, I've very rarely seen some good content bundled with bad one in such a way... If this is somehow kept, obviously, this is not a list of boats, but ships (or ships and boats?). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorn (Tintin)

Unicorn (Tintin) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a Good Article (from 2015), but it also seems to be a major piece of WP:FANCRUFT with big WP:GNG issues. There is no analysis or significance section; there is "Plot role" but that's pure WP:OR based on the original graphic novels(!). The only part using independent sources is 'creation', but that's just some SIGCOV trivia about how the author was researching materials for his work. Fine, I don't dispute The Secret of the Unicorn is notable, but I don't see how this article meets WP:GNG. Per WP:ATD-R, I suggest this is redirected (maybe partially merged?) there (while the ship appears in another book; there is no source that cares about that that's not a plot summary). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:36, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article seems to be consistently well-sourced to books discussing the Tintin series, and discusses at length the creation of the fictional boat and what is admittedly some trivia about similar real boats, but given this "trivia" is present in multiple reliable secondary sources, it's probably OK to include. If the article was just the "In the Adventures of Tintin" section, which is mostly a plot summary (although just the fact that it is a plot summary does not make it OR, which is important), then I could see this AFD, but with the quality of reliable secondary sources, I think it's worth keeping.
I don't know if it's really a good candidate to merge, either, given it features in two books and the articles for those are already quite long. Maybe take it as a necessary split of The Secret of the Unicorn? WP:GNG just requires significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources, which this article does have. Mrfoogles (talk) 17:21, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mrfoogles Size wise, The Secret... article is just 3516 words, so can easily absorb this rather small one (particularly since the only useful content is the 'creation/design' stuff, with the plot summary being non-encyclopedic plotcurft, per WP:ARTICLESIZE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: There are non-fiction published reliable sources currently present in the article, including Hergé, the Man Who Created Tintin, Hergé: Son of Tintin, and The Art of Hergé, Inventor of Tintin, supporting behind-the-scenes information about the creation and design of the ship. There are a lot of plotcruft articles to delete; this is not one of them. Toughpigs (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/Merge to The Secret of the Unicorn. The dev info here is valuable, but given the ship is primarily associated with The Secret of the Unicorn, and shows no indication of any actual real world impact beyond merely existing, I don't see much value in it remaining afloat. If the dev info isn't already at the respective book's article, I'd merge it there, since this is good stuff, but tied almost exclusively to the development of the Unicorn's appearance in this story. An article without any evidence it's notable in way of SIGCOV or actual Reception/Analysis of its role just isn't notable, no matter how much BTS info exists, especially when the ship itself has only appeared three times (With all being tied directly to Secret of the Unicorn) Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:45, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Farquaad

Lord Farquaad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I went deeper to find sources about this character. However, I found only this source is proven to be usable [1] (this source alone wouldn't be enough). This source [2] didn't discuss Lord Farquaad, while this one is just a theory thing [3]; thus failing WP:GNG. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 12:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vampire (Marvel Comics)

Vampire (Marvel Comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely non-notable subject with no significant coverage I could find in a BEFORE. Though there's a few subjects in the Marvel Comics lore that relate to vampires (Such as Blade (comics) and Morbius the Living Vampire, the topic of Marvel's specific incarnation of vampires is just entirely non-notable. All mentions of vampires in sources I could find are just discussing characters who happen to be vampires, like the aforementioned Morbius, and notability is not inherited from these characters. Most of the article is just overly detailed in-universe information, so I don't see much need to keep the article around, but if there's a valid merge/redirect target, I would not be against a very light merge or redirect per AtD. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

George DiCaprio

George DiCaprio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTINHERITED, George here is only known in connection with his famous son Leonardo DiCaprio. His "acting debut" is a very small few second cameo, his work as a writer/artist (not really clear) fails WP:ARTIST and his work as a filmmaker fails WP:FILMMAKER, getting a small stint editing on local newspapers does not make you notable. Source 5 in the article shows he's worked on... three comics? Don't know if it's even reliable as a source but clearly not noteworthy in itself. jolielover♥talk 14:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clop (erotic fan art)

AfDs for this article:
Clop (erotic fan art) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

To put it simply, the fact that there exists an article for "Clop" on Wikipedia is unbelievable. Clop, as a subgenre of a subgenre of pornography, fails to meet any expectations of relevance or importance a Wikipedia page ought to have. This kind of page explaining a specific form of internet phenomena belongs on Know Your Meme. At best, it warrants a small subsection on a larger Brony or MLP-related article. If there's going to be an entire Clop article, there may as well be articles for Sonichu and Sneed's Feed and Seed. Patriot of Canuckistan (talk) 18:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Keep fuck tha hayters and neighsayers
174.48.68.98 (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Felix The Cat Kept On Walking

Felix The Cat Kept On Walking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had redirected this, and would suggest this as the outcome of this AfD. Neither source is significantly about the short film, and no better sources seem available that give this film more than a passing mention or a database treatment in lists of animated shorts or in more general Felix the Cat sources. This, with a short plot summary, is about the most extensive source I could find. In books specifically about Felix it gets nothing but a mention[4] Fram (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and United States of America. Fram (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as in the nom. I must thank both of you this morning; Fram's nomination at Herostratus's suggestion gave me exposure to an old film I'd never seen. I had a friend (long since passed) who was a huge fan of Felix, and as a child I was frequently exposed to many of these shorts on TV in Honolulu. As much as I'm happy to see these films available and in the public domain, I concur with Fram's source analysis above. I'm interested to see if Herostratus can find more direct detailing. BusterD (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but, on further consideration, let's rename and rearrange -- let's make the article be about the song, which seems more notable (and came first), so rename the article to the song name ("Felix Kept On Walking") and move the film stuff down to the bottom (or delete it, but why).
As a song It meets WP:NSONG I would say (the song is notable if it is the "subject of multiple, non-trivial published works...This includes published works in all forms", and "all forms" would include advertisements and chinaware and toys and t-shirts and what have you I think, and there are plenty of those (([5]) and some even still today ([6], [7]). and it meets 2 of the 3 supplementary bullet points (which are not proof of notability, but are worth considering and de facto considered pretty much sufficient I think): "Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts", which they didn't have charts in the 1920s I don't think, but the song was clearly a hit which would have at least made the Hot 100 surely, and "Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists", which we have a number of artists notable enough to have their own articles covering it.
It is true that there aren't any reviews or articles on the song, but this was 100 years ago, there weren't even music magazines then, and things were generally different then, and so of course not; I think we need to be a little flexible here or else we are going to end up overemphasizing recent material just because we have the sources for it rather than it being actually more notable, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER says not to do that.
And on top of that there's even a whole idiom based on the song (obscure and obsolete, granted, but still) -- "well, Felix kept on walking" probably something like "Well, another day in paradise" or something. I don't think we should throw info like that back into the darkness.
Whether to leave the stuff about the film in a short section at the bottom is a judgement call, something for the article talk page. Herostratus (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your extremely expansive reading of WP:NSONGS is contradicted by the explanatory footnote about the "non-trivial" nature of the published works: ""Non-trivial" excludes personal websites, blogs, bulletin boards, Usenet posts, wikis and other media that are not themselves reliable. " Advertisements, chinaware, t-shirts, ... are not reliable sources and thus don't count towards meeting WP:NSONG. A deviant art page similarly is of no value for this discussion. Fram (talk) 08:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh hi Fram. I am glad that you are here with us, hope things are going well for you here.
OK. So, there are three things to untangle here for sources, reliability, notability and standing.
So, considering the pictures of the banks and ads and toys and cups and t-shirts, of course these entities do exist and we can rely on that. Yes, there is an (infintesimal) chance that maybe for one of them somebody decided to deploy their time, effort, and advanced photoshop skills to make a fake photo of a non-existent object, for some unfathomable reason, I suppose. That there is a pattern of this (which no one has picked up and reported this highly amazing, very high-effort conspiracy involving a number of people) is about as likely as the moon landing being a hoax, so we can dismiss that and agree that the photos of the tchockes and other stuff are indeed photos of actually existing objects. All entities are reliable for their own contents. A website of a photo of a Felix the Cat doll is reliable for that photo. Maybe not for other details like when and where it was made and by who, but for the photo, which is what I am referring to. As you know, many sources are reliable for some of their content, and unreliable for others. Whether I would use these sources in the article is a different issue.
So all these are real things. Do they indicate notability? Well of course they do. People don't banks and ads and toys and cups and t-shirts etc.for obscure entities. They just don't is all, because that would be silly and a dumb business model, and if they did that by itself would 'probably confer notability I think. Having one or two or three of these doesn't demonstrate notability. The plethora of tchotchkes we do have does.
Again, we are not going to have magazine reviews of the song because the world didn't work like that then. We also don't have magazine reviews of 17th century chanson. Doesn't mean anything.
So we have reliable indication of notability, done. If we can't use those sources, that's a problem, but it's a technical problem, the main fact that the entity is notable, so it's our job to find a way to keep the article if we can. Notable entities should have articles. (Anyway, we can use these sources. If one wants to play WP:DMV it it could be argued that rule 17, paragraph 4, subparagraph 6, bullet point 3 (or whatever) proscribes that, and then we'd have to dig up a contradicting rule (most rules have 'em) but really just say WP:NOTBURO and move on.
Anyway, doesn't matter cos 1) the song was covered by many notable artists, and 2) was surely up there in the "chart" of record sales and sheet music sales (they didn't play records on the radio much yet I believe), altho any figures are probably lost to history. This seems self-evident and the burden would be on editors trying to disprove it, I would say; and I don't think that any song that meets both these criteria has been deleted, or if so, not many and those cases would be mistakes, because of course we don't want to 404 readers searching such a notable entity when we already have an article. And really what rules are supposed to codify common good practice, and that trumps a rule that tries to hold the dam against the river of common good practice. Herostratus (talk) 04:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I can't be sure if any of tchockes with the phrase preceded the song or not. They very probably came from the song, but we can't be sure, so I don't thin we should even mention. Since works of art are their own regs, all of the article is ref'd (technically) even tho there's only two refs at the botton. Herostratus (talk) 06:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • So, I WP:HEYed the article, so it is now mainly about the song, so we are looking at NSONG and so forth. It's basically a different article, so I think the best next move, Fram, is to close this AfD, then can retitle the article (to the song title), and if you want you can make a new nomination of the song. I wouldn't because as a song it's not likely to be deleted, and if it is that would be unfortunate cos it's as good as very many of our other song articles, and no gain in causing unfortunate things. My 2c. Herostratus (talk) 06:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since this article was reworked such that it is mostly now about the song... does it pass WP:NSONG?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of X-Men: The Animated Series and X-Men '97 adaptations

List of X-Men: The Animated Series and X-Men '97 adaptations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Beyond being a largely WP:INDISCRIMINATE list that is only supported by a few sources (largely for the X-Men '97 portion) and can be considered trivia, this information seem better suited to note, if applicable and notable, in each series' respective articles rather than its own article (I do believe X-Men '97 already has some of this information in its "Writing" section). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edd Gould

Edd Gould (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've been pondering on nominating this for AfD, and I've finally come to the conclusion that this article is not eligible for standalone notability and should either be deleted or merged into Eddsworld (if that article is even notable at this point with such sketchy sourcing). A WP:BEFORE search brings up obituary-style sources and passing mentions in articles. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 01:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: while i agree Eddsworld isn't sourced properly (and that it probably is impossible to source well given the mainstream media snobness about early-2000s internet culture), this article in particular seems pretty well sourced to me. That his notability mostly comes from the continuation of his work by Ridgewell (ie he became notable mostly posthumously) is irrelevant because he is notable. I think EddsWorld should be merged into etiher TomSka or this article, but that's not the subject.
Themoonisacheese (talk) 09:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There aren't very many in-depth sources (including in the article) but I think there are just enough to support a short article on Gould or Eddsworld. However, most of the coverage is overlapping between Gould and Eddsworld and I don't think there is enough to justify articles on both of them so I would support a merge to Eddsworld (or vice versa). Shapeyness (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Eddsworld and Edd Gould have alot of disconnected stuff from eachother, and do have their own histories, alot of content involving the show and it's creator reference these articles, so they are definitely in use.
They should'nt be deleted or merged Charliephere (talk) 19:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 02:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or Keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Eddsworld. Not sure about sourcing individually but I think merging together would be good. Procyon117 (talk) 14:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Edd's influence on the indie animation community and Internet as a whole is worthy enough to warrant a seperate article Flixxy0 (talk) 18:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Flixxy0: With your permission, I have bolded your position:[8] Kind regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. There's yet to be a consensus on whether this is a keep or merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:06, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comics and animation proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Templates for discussion

Requested moves, merges, and splits

To edit these sections, see moves, merges, and splits

Requested moves

Proposed merges


Proposed splits

Recent creations

Bot generated

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2025-02-01 20:14 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.

Human generated

To edit this section, go to this page


April 2011

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

Cleanup

Quality

The project has 17 featured articles. 7 of them, or 41.2%, are flagged for cleanup.

ArticleMaintenance categories
300 (film) «FA» Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009)
Captain Marvel (DC Comics) «FA, High» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008)
Megatokyo «FA» Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)
Roy of the Rovers «FA» Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009)
Superman (film series) «FA» Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009)
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008)
Watchmen «FA, High» Articles to be merged (Aug 2009)

The project has 1 featured lists. None of them is flagged for cleanup.

A-Class articles

The project has 2 A-Class articles. None of them is flagged for cleanup.

Good articles

The project has 71 good articles. 7 of them, or 9.9%, are flagged for cleanup.

ArticleMaintenance categories
Barbara Gordon «GA» Vague or ambiguous time
Clara Elsene Peck «GA» Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009)
Hergé «GA, High» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007)
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy «GA» Cleanup (Jun 2009)
Michigan State University libraries «GA» Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007)
The Transformers (IDW Publishing) «GA» Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009)
Wanted (2008 film) «GA» Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)

Importance

Top-importance articles

The project has 57 top-importance articles. 35 of them, or 61.4%, are flagged for cleanup.

ArticleMaintenance categories
Alan Moore «Top» Articles with minor POV problems (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009)
Alternative comics «Top» Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008)
American comic book «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009)
Archie Andrews (comics) «Top» Articles needing additional references (Feb 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jan 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007)
Archie Comics «Top» Articles to be split (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008)
Carl Barks «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007)
Cartoonist «Top» Articles lacking sources (May 2009)
Cerebus the Aardvark «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Jul 2008, Feb 2009, Mar 2009, May 2009)
Comics «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008)
Comics Code Authority «Top» Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007
Comic book «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007)
Comic strip «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Apr 2008, May 2009)
DC Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Nov 2007, Dec 2008, Aug 2009)
Dilbert «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008)
Doonesbury «Top» Articles needing additional references (Jan 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008)
Fantastic Four «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Jan 2009, Feb 2009)
Graphic novel «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Jack Kirby «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Nov 2008, May 2009)
Jean Giraud «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008)
Justice League «Top» Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009)
Little Nemo «Top» Articles lacking sources (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Mar 2009)
Mad (magazine) «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009)
Manga «Top» Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007
Marvel Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009)
Osamu Tezuka «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2008)
Peanuts «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with dead external links (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2007, Mar 2008)
Penciller «Top» Articles needing additional references (May 2009)
Popeye «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009)
Robert Crumb «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Apr 2009)
Stan Lee «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008)
The Family Circus «Top» Articles needing additional references (Apr 2008)
Will Eisner «Top» Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009)
Wonder Woman «Top» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008, Nov 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)
X-Men «Top» Articles needing additional references (Feb 2007)

High-importance articles

The project has 378 high-importance articles. 214 of them, or 56.6%, are flagged for cleanup. A detailed listing is suppressed due to size restrictions.

Listing by number of categories assigned

Articles with 13 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Mister Fantastic «High» Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Dec 2008), Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009)

Articles with 12 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Sabretooth (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008, Feb 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009, Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Comics articles needing issue citations

Articles with 11 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Green Goblin «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jan 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009)

Articles with 10 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Fictional history of Wolverine Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2008), Articles needing additional references (Jul 2009), Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles to be split (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
Juggernaut (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles to be split (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Kryptonite «High» Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Mar 2008, Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Feb 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2008)
Mystique (comics) Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Apr 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009)
Stan Lee «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Super Friends Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009)
X-Force Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, May 2007, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Sep 2008), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Sep 2008), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup

Articles with 9 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
American comic book «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009)
Beast Wars Neo Articles lacking sources (Aug 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2007, Sep 2007), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2007), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Transformers articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Aug 2007), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup
Beavis and Butt-head Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Jan 2009, Jun 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2007, Jun 2009)
Brainiac (comics) Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Feb 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Vague or ambiguous time, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jul 2008, Oct 2008)
Dazzler Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2007, Mar 2008, Apr 2008, Jun 2008, Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Jean Grey «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jun 2009)
Krypton (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with too many examples, Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2006, Feb 2007, Feb 2008, Nov 2008)
Luke Cage Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Mar 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Magneto (comics) «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008, Jan 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses
Nick Fury «High» Articles with trivia sections (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Popeye «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009)
Professor X «High» Articles that may contain original research (Nov 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Jan 2008, Aug 2009)
She-Hulk Articles needing additional references (Jul 2008), Articles needing more detailed references, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Dec 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Sovereign Seven Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008), Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Uatu Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that may contain original research (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009)
WildStorm Productions «High» Articles needing additional references (Jun 2007, Aug 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (May 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jun 2007, Feb 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009)

Articles with 8 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
Beast (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008)
Bullseye (comics) Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses
Comic book «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007)
Frank Miller (comics) «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2007, Dec 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Oct 2007), Articles to be expanded (Aug 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009), BLP articles lacking sources
Kingpin (comics) «High» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2009)
Magik (comics) Articles lacking sources (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Sep 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Nightcrawler (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
S.H.I.E.L.D. Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Jul 2009)
Silver Surfer «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with improper non-free content, Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Superhero «High» Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, Jan 2008, Jul 2008, Jan 2009)
Surge (comics) Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Sep 2007), Comics articles needing cleanup, Comics articles needing issue citations
The Cisco Kid Articles to be expanded (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2009), Wikify (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing rewrite (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Aug 2009)
Thing (comics) «High» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2006), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Jun 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Tokyopop Articles lacking reliable references (Dec 2007), Articles needing expert attention (Feb 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2007, Dec 2007), Miscellaneous articles needing expert attention, Wikipedia articles in need of updating, Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007)

Articles with 7 cleanup categories assigned

ArticleMaintenance categories
A Modest Destiny Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2006, Articles lacking reliable references (Sep 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2007), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007), Cleanup (Sep 2007)
Black Widow (Marvel Comics) Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Cannonball (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008)
Electro (Marvel Comics) Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
Forge (comics) Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Hal Jordan «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Mar 2009), Articles with dead external links (May 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009)
Jesse Blaze Snider Articles lacking reliable references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, May 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), NPOV disputes (Mar 2009), Wikify (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009)
List of characters in Megatokyo Articles lacking reliable references (Jul 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008, Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with trivia sections (Feb 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jul 2008)
List of DC Multiverse worlds «High» Articles with dead external links (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008, Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Jul 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Nov 2008)
List of female comics creators Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Jun 2008, Jul 2008, Aug 2008, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jan 2009)
List of Green Lanterns Articles lacking sources (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Feb 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be merged (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Feb 2009)
Manga outside Japan «High» Articles that may contain original research (Jun 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Vague or ambiguous time
Marvel Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009)
Marvel Nemesis: Rise of the Imperfects (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Mary Jane Watson «High» Articles lacking in-text citations (Oct 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2008, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Apr 2009)
Meggan Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
One Year Later Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Rachel Summers Articles needing additional references (Apr 2009, May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009)
Reboot (fiction) Accuracy disputes (Apr 2009), Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007, Dec 2007, May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009)
Richard Branson Articles with dead external links (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Jun 2007, Jul 2007, Oct 2008, Aug 2009)
Rogue (comics) Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
X-Men: The Manga Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles to be expanded (Jul 2008, Oct 2008), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Cleanup (Apr 2007, Oct 2008), Wikify (Jun 2008)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Notice_board&oldid=409356299"