Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/February-2024

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Widtsoe, Utah[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2024 at 16:32:57 (UTC)

**Original** – Emery Valley Mercantile Co. store in Widtsoe, Utah, 1936, by Dorothea Lange

Reason: high quality and high resolution picture by a famous photographer, lead image in the article
Articles in which this image appears: Widtsoe, Utah
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/History/USA_History
Creator: Dorothea Lange, restored and uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Tilt counterclockwise a tad? – Sca (talk) 15:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All vertical lines are not parallel, so it is rather a matter of taste. Yann (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 08:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 20:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 10:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Howard🌽33 22:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Grocery-store-widtsoe-utah-.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook, Line and Sinker (1930 film)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2024 at 22:14:32 (UTC)

Original – Hook, Line and Sinker (1930 film)

Reason: high quality copy of a film
Articles in which this image appears: Hook, Line and Sinker (1930 film)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Edward F. Cline, uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm not wild about the watermark in the top right corner. GamerPro64 05:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I'd support a copy without watermark. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Dark, scant EV. Meh. – Sca (talk) 15:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore Roosevelt[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2024 at 04:55:17 (UTC)

Reason: It's very high quality, even if a large number of fine scratches made it a nightmare to restore.

We do have an FP of him, File:T Roosevelt.jpg but it's barely used anymore, and I'd say that, while the restoration is fine, this is simply a better photo. Don't think we need to delist the old one, but I leave that up to others to decide after this passes.

Articles in which this image appears: Theodore Roosevelt + like 30 more, more if you count the 3x4 crop (used because it better goes along side the terrible image we have of his vice-president in a few articles on elections; Did check, didn't find a better image for Alton B. Parker, so it's probably best to cater a bit. Compare [1] [2])
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Pach Brothers; restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wow (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Non-govt. image. Infobox play. Characterful visage. – Sca (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support and images that are barely used should be delisted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 15:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – At the time of this comment, this image does not appear on the Theodore Roosevelt article. Another editor is trying to reinstate a different version, which is black and white, and cropped. --Wow (talk) 11:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ech. Just because someone didn't document their changes and passed off a desaturated version as an original is no reason to use it. In any case, it's stable in every other article. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion is at Talk:Theodore Roosevelt. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Theodore Roosevelt by the Pach Bros.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Council of Clermont[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2024 at 20:31:00 (UTC)

Reason: A nice example of late Middle Ages artwork, and about as good of an illustration as we're likely to get for an event in 1095.
Articles in which this image appears: Council of Clermont + 8
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Literary illustrations. I'd say it's used more for the former on here.
Creator: Jean Colombe

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think it is a good example. If you look at a benchmark of excellence - say Filippo Lippi - take a look at the faces and you will see what I mean. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's a big difference between a manuscript illustration and large-scale paintings, though. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 22:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The Council of Clermont occurred nearly a millennium ago. – Sca (talk) 13:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 21:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 14:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Passages d'outremer Fr5594, fol. 19r, Concile de Clermont.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haile Selassie I official portrait[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2024 at 00:45:28 (UTC)

Reason: It is a high quality image, it has multiple articles featuring it, it also is the official portrait of an Emperor, that being Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia. Is among Wikipedia's best work.
Articles in which this image appears: Haile Selassie, Marshal of the air force, Field marshal (United Kingdom), Benito Mussolini, Rastafari, Second Italo-Ethiopian War
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: unknown photographer

Support as nominator – CtasACT (talk) 00:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image is ineligible since it measures less than 1500 pixels in both height and width. – Howard🌽33 13:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Howard, it fails FP criterion #2. Bammesk (talk) 02:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Martin and Anna Bates[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2024 at 08:36:57 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution. High EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Martin Van Buren Bates, Anna Haining Bates
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Other
Creator: ???

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 08:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The photos, especially the marriage photo, have the EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp - Yes, but a lot of photos of their marriage don't meet the resolution requirements. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 06:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That just means we need to wait for better ones... Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Waxworks (film)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2024 at 22:15:52 (UTC)

Original – Waxworks (1924), silent film by Paul Leni and Leo Birinski.

Reason: 4K restoration of an old film
Articles in which this image appears: Waxworks (film)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Paul Leni and Leo Birinski, uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 22:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Watermark top right.©Geni (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It's odd that we have a non-free image in an article about a film that is itself PD; could I encourage you to look into that, Yann? Josh Milburn (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find a better quality on the Net. The earlier version should be undeleted and moved to Commons. Yann (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Farewell to Arms (1932 film)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2024 at 22:23:28 (UTC)

Reason: high resolution and quality copy of a notable film
Articles in which this image appears: A Farewell to Arms (1932 film)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Frank Borzage, uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Shackleton[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2024 at 23:36:25 (UTC)

Reason: A little formal, but high quality. Appears to be signed by Shackleton (comparing it to known signatures)
Articles in which this image appears: Ernest Shackleton + several others
FP category for this image: Not seeing anything more specific than Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
Creator: George Charles Beresford; restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 23:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ – Tretiak20 (talk) 04:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Struck vote as user doesn't has the necessary number of edits (only 7 of the required 100). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the color balance is wrong. Yann (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How so? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: By which I mean, too light, too dark, needs adjustment in the lower end to bring out detail, too saturated? There's a lot of possibilities. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks a bit yellow to me. Yann (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Presuming the original is accurate - and it's a museum scan - I've readjusted accordingly, allowing for the slight levels adjustment as the original is quite dark in the lighter areas.

This revealed a ton of hidden damage, so.... @Yann, Bammesk, Charlesjsharp, and Hamid Hassani: New version with additional restoration up. I try not to do this, but it's also true some things only show when you've stepped back a while. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 12:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Old paper often turns yellow. Yes better, so Support – Yann (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I try not to over-speculate in the absence of evidence in that line. But I do know for a fact that different copies of photos can have wildly different exposures, and often do, and that sepia images can also vary a lot in tone between copies of the same photo (both of these were very hard to precisely reproduce between copies, as they involved some very precise timing. For an example of how much things can vary, while they're not exactly the same image, compare the tones of [3] and [4], or the exposure of [5] and [6]), so I do think a little tweaking of a widely reproduced image isn't so bad. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 12:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ernest Shackleton before 1909.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daft Punk[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2024 at 21:10:09 (UTC)

Reason: Quality photo with a sleek shine. I am willing to say this photo is highly compelling.
Articles in which this image appears: Daft Punk
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Sony Music Entertainment

Support as nominator – – Howard🌽33 21:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - GamerPro64 21:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 10:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support (prefer alternative). If you were wondering about the copyright status, see [7]. MER-C 13:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also a 2016 archive link: [8] has a CC-BY-3.0 license. Support. Bammesk (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Commercial promo pic. Free adv. Scant EV. – Sca (talk) 14:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

″Commercial promo pic.″ So what? It doesn't change the EV. Yann (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Henry Fonda pic above is also what you might call a ″Commercial promo pic″, as are many other older photos of actors and artists. I wish that more agents would release the copyright of at least one or two good hi-res photos of the people they represent, that would give us better images for many articles. Cart (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support either – Yann (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but the right side is too tight compared to the left (cutting the fist's glow a bit). Brandmeister^talk 17:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you prefer a more centered version, where the glow to the right is not so cropped, one is now avaliable here: File:Daft Punk in 2013 2- centered.jpg. I like that one better. Cart (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer ALT, centered version by Cart. Bammesk (talk) 04:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer ALT, I must admit the centred version is better. – Howard🌽33 13:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer ALT, good to have it. Brandmeister^talk 16:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd probably go Alt. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 21:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GamerPro64, W.carter, MER-C, and Yann: can you please indicate a preference for a version? Bammesk (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer ALT - GamerPro64 00:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer ALT (like I said in my comment above). Cart (talk) 06:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 11:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Daft Punk in 2013 2- centered.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Fonda[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2024 at 00:48:26 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and good resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Henry Fonda, 39th Golden Globe Awards, 54th Academy Awards
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Author unknown

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – On the file page, the source link: [9] is incorrect. Also I think the background color is distracting. Bammesk (talk) 16:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I fixed the source. – Yann (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Image is stable on the page Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though I kind of prefer something at least closer to the original crop uploaded. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 15:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Henry Fonda in Warlock.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahad bint Abdullah[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2024 at 01:03:24 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Ahad bint Abdullah, Women in Oman
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: مداد عمان

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Bio target at 160 words is stubby and contains no info on subject's activities. Negligible EV. – Sca (talk) 14:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I don't think it would be accurate to say the author of the photo is 'unknown'. If one checks the commons page, one would see that it is attributed to the uploader: مداد عمان – Howard🌽33 22:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Howardcorn33 Fixed. – Vinícius O. (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 21:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Howard🌽33 22:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:عهد البوسعيدية.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quercus robur acorns[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2024 at 11:44:35 (UTC)

Reason: high quality image illustrating diversity of the subject
Articles in which this image appears: Quercus robur
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
Creator: W.carter

Support as nominator – cart-Talk 11:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Would be better aesthetically without that empty acorn crown. – Sca (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. That way you can see the inside structure of the crown too, adds EV. --cart-Talk 14:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't find the empty crown interesting at all, and at full rez its detail isn't great. For this user the interest lies in the collage of nutty colors. -- Sca (talk) 14:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a weirdly specific criticism. – Howard🌽33 21:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Howard🌽33 21:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – but the greens have a blue tint. Is that real ? Bammesk (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As stated on the file page, it was photographed in natural daylight. There was an overcast, so the light may have been a bit blue. Other than that, all colors are as nature made them. If desired, the color temp can be tweaked. Cart (talk) 17:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 19:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Does not add significant EV. Lost in the article. Lead image has the EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm a bit new on this forum so I don't know all the criteria yet. Can only lead images be FPs? Cart (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, certainly not. Bammesk (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first line of FP guidance states that 'Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles'. So if not in the infobox, they should add significant EV in some other way. One test surely is that if the image was removed, would we lose significant EV? So if the acorns were shown in a timeline, indicating the stages of growth and colour changes, then that would add EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All FPCs that get 'promoted' (approved) on this page are potentially TFPs -- if chosen as such by eds who assemble the main page. -- Sca (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that part I know. I've had several TFPs since other users have nominated my photos here. Cart (talk) 14:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Quercus robur acorns in Tuntorp 1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wounded Angel[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 11:27:36 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: The Wounded Angel etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Hugo Simberg

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – --Janke | Talk 17:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cart (talk) 11:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 11:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Wounded Angel - Hugo Simberg.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

London King's Cross railway station[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 11:41:11 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimous FP on Commons, one that has stood the test of time in the article.
Articles in which this image appears: London King's Cross railway station, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: Colin

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cart (talk) 11:31, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:King's Cross Western Concourse - central position - 2012-05-02.75.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aucanquilcha volcano[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 17:29:21 (UTC)

Reason: The image does illustrate the volcano and the typical landscape of such volcanoes in the Central Andes well
Articles in which this image appears: Aucanquilcha
FP category for this image: Landscapes
Creator: Poco a poco

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cart (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 11:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Volcán Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 11.JPG --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Janetta forester[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 22:10:31 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Euphaedra janetta
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 15:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 19:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Janetta forester (Euphaedra janetta) underside Ankasa.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Australian brushturkey head[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 21:59:50 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. Not the lead image which is of the whole bird.
Articles in which this image appears: Australian brushturkey, Megapode
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's a potentially featurable whole-body photo of the female of this species (and the male one is already featured). I think generally EV is higher in full-body animal photos. Brandmeister^talk 17:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a terrific image, but I agree with Brandmeister that the full-body photo of the female has more EV, and it's also a great photograph in its own right (wonderful posture!). One point in particular regarding the EV: the full-body photo of the female gives an excellent view of the feet, which are obscured in the other lead photo in the species article (the Harrison photo of the male). This matters, because the feet are what this family of birds, the Megapodiidae, are named for. That's what makes the photo of the female such a good lead image for the Megapode article, and gives it a value that the nominated detail, for all its excellence as an image, doesn't have. Charles, how would you feel about nominating that photo instead? Choliamb (talk) 14:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to agree. That photo is amazing; this one is only quite good. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 15:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:}Trying to withdraw this nomination. Can't remember how to. Full body image nominated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chestnut-crowned antpitta[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 22:03:09 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Chestnut-crowned antpitta
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 15:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chestnut-crowned antpitta (Grallaria ruficapilla ruficapilla) Caldas.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reynoutria japonica[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 12:02:38 (UTC)

Reason: High quality photo, illustrates the subject well, stable main image in article
Articles in which this image appears: Reynoutria japonica, Lists of invasive plant species in New Jersey, Oregon, Connecticut and Pennsylvania
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others
Creator: W.carter

Support as nominator – Cart (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Interesting article, unwelcome, perhaps delicious plant. Well rounded photo, no harsh shadows. Bammesk (talk) 02:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trial of Gaetano Bresci[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 13:21:28 (UTC)

Reason: This is a historically significant image of a high technical standard, with a high resolution (2,784 × 1,713 pixels). It is already recognised as a Featured Picture on Wikicommons. It is one of the few illustrative depictions of Bresci's trial, and adds significant encyclopedic value to the respective section of Bresci's article. It is in the public domain and all the details of authorship, creation and publications are known and detailed in the file description. Minor image manipulation was carried out to cover up a page break in the middle of the image.
Articles in which this image appears: Gaetano Bresci
FP category for this image: Other history
Creator: Illustration created by Gennaro D'Amato; uploaded by Grnrchst; cleaned-up by PawełMM.

Support as nominator – Grnrchst (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you have access to the original still, given this is a two-page spread, I'd prefer it at higher resolution and including borders and original captions. Tentative Support if not, though. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 21:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – per Adam, but there is room for improvement in the restoration where the two pages meet. Bammesk (talk) 03:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Would have to oppose unless quality improved at the join. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp; @Bammesk: I have requested further restoration work from the Commons graphic lab. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PawełMM has now done some extra work to improve the join. Thoughts? --Grnrchst (talk) 11:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, thanks for improving it. Bammesk (talk) 04:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The amount of reworking that's been done to hide to join makes me uneasy. It's blurry in some places and there are others (such as the pattern on the stairs) where the current revision contradicts the original. At the same time, there's a lot of attention to detail that makes me think that truly hiding the crease isn't possible. Given the choice, I would favor a B&W version of the original, preserving the join as an innate aspect of the physical, analog source. Moonreach (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think the join is original to the image, though.It's a repair. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Monument to the Battle of the Nations[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 21:48:45 (UTC)

Reason: Good composition, strong EV. Infobox image in the monument article.
Articles in which this image appears: Monument to the Battle of the Nations, Battle of Leipzig, Leipzig
FP category for this image: Artwork/Others
Creator: Stein53

Support as nominator – Brandmeister^talk 21:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – it's lacking an English description on the image page, per FP criterion #7. Bammesk (talk) 03:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Added now. Brandmeister^talk 09:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Very dramatic, but this user isn't usually a fan of nighttime water-reflective compositions, which don't present the subject as well as daytime photos do. – Sca (talk) 14:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Daytime images have more EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose From having visited this rather strange monument (which the official guide notes was in part constructed to discourage Germans against democracy), the photo doesn't really capture how it appears. A daytime photo would have stronger EV in regards to appearance, as well as to better capture it's rather over the top design: there's a risk that night shots glamorise it. Nick-D (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rather simplistic. Keep in mind that allies on the anti-French side included not only Prussia, but also the UK. -- Sca (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A colour-adjusted image of Trou au Natron from space[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 13:17:22 (UTC)

Reason: The image shows the appearance of the crater in the arid landscape, emphasizing both the volcanic neighbours and small volcanoes in the crater, which shows white layers of lacustrine deposits.
Articles in which this image appears: Trou au Natron
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking back
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't much detail when viewed at full size, compared to more recent satellite photos. Bammesk (talk) 03:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like this one? That image has a lower image quality when closed in, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the one you linked to has less pixels per mile. ESA has a version Here but that's also less pixels per mile. I was comparing it to Google Earth's top view. But that's not really a good comparison. Google uses multiple images, lots of processing, and very likely AI sharpening, so the result can be somewhat fake. The nom image has 400 pixels per mile, and per This link that is technically "high resolution". Same as This FP. It's just that the nom image looks soft at full size. Per MER-C, some (or all of it) is because of the original's small file size (449 KB), although I don't see any JPEG artifacts at full size. I sharpened it slightly. And for archiving, I uploaded the original as a separate file. Bammesk (talk) 18:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - too highly compressed, visible JPEG artifacts. MER-C 17:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MER-C can you elaborate on the artifacts. I see softness, but otherwise nothing unusual. Bammesk (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black ground, top right, near the boundary with the lighter ground. MER-C 19:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Now, a high quality image. --Ras67 (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – new upload by Ras67. Bammesk (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In case it is necessary to say it, the new file is even better than the version I nominated, so keeping my support. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Trou au Natron caldera satellite photo.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lascar, Laguna Lejia and Aguas Calientes[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 13:21:54 (UTC)

ALT – less sky on top (CSS image crop)

Reason: Bit of a borderline case, this image illustrates the neighbourhood and appearance of the volcano Aguas Calientes rather well: Both the lake with animals (oasis in an otherwise desert landscape) and the activity of the neighbouring volcano Lascar
Articles in which this image appears: Aguas Calientes (volcano), Lascar (volcano)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Silvio Rossi

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ~~It could be sharper, but~~ it shows 2 volcanoes in a somewhat remote location, so good EV. I prefer ALT with slightly less sky on top. The ALT is a temporary CSS image crop, I will replaced it with an actual crop if it gets the votes. Bammesk (talk) 03:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC) . . . . The sharpness is fine, the foreground lake (and camera) is 10 miles from the volcanoes, and the two volcanoes are 3 miles apart. Bammesk (talk) 03:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It would've been easier to set up with {{Easy CSS image crop}}. But Support. It probably could be done better with focus stacking, but.... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Easy CSS image crop. It makes it easy! Bammesk (talk) 04:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – particularly if the caption mentions the oasis in the foreground. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 02:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geyser cone at El Tatio[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 13:25:15 (UTC)

Reason: This image shows both an inactive geyser cone but also a large cut of the surrounding landscape, including the gas vents that form a haze, the multicoloured and textured deposits from the geyser cone and the surrounding desertish landscape.
Articles in which this image appears: El Tatio
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: User:Poco a poco

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 19:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I was hoping to support this, but it is too noisy to be FP. MER-C 17:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MER-C, I uploaded a new version to address your concerns. Guys, in cases like this (easy fix), just ping me and I'll improve the file right away. --Poc o² 10:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have withdrawn my oppose - but I haven't quite made up my mind yet. MER-C 11:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Brilliant colors. ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 11:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The blue sky looks a bit unnatural on my display, too saturated perhaps? @Poco a poco:. It's a support for me regardless. Bammesk (talk) 04:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bammesk: we had this discussion often on Commons. I haven't applied any additional saturation to this picture in comparison to all others. Believe me, at a height of 4,320 metres (14,170 ft) the sky looks darker than at 1000 m. --Poc o² 20:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A citation showing that this is a well-documented atmospheric effect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Géiseres del Tatio, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 03-05 HDR.JPG --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cinder cones in the Mojave Desert[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 13:28:28 (UTC)

Reason: This image illustrates both the landscape and vegetation of this semi-desert and the occurrence of the older (these cones were not active in history) and thus slightly eroded-looking cones.
Articles in which this image appears: Cima volcanic field
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Stan Shebs

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - relatively low resolution, visible JPEG artifacts. MER-C 17:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wau-en-Namus[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 13:32:14 (UTC)

Reason: This image shows the interior of the Wau-en-Namus caldera, including the colour contrasts that this volcano is noted for between black volcanic ejecta, the grey and eroded cinder cone and the vegetation surrounding the small lakes, which are (somewhat purposefully here) not very prominent
Articles in which this image appears: Waw an Namus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: StFr

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - relatively low resolution, visible JPEG artifacts. MER-C 17:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Cotacotani Lakes[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 13:44:04 (UTC)

Reason: This image shows the typical appearance of "Lake" Cotacotani; it is more a labyrinth of waterbodies embedded within debris from a giant volcanic landslide, thus characteristically illustrating what such a landscape looks like.
Articles in which this image appears: Cotacotani Lake
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: maxstottrop on Flickr

Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is only convention, no rule, but we wouldn't normally nominate so many together. Also, please see the detail of how others nominate according to the guidelines i.e. linking to all enwiki articles where the image is used; also choosing image shape - usually landscape. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added the link but I don't know for sure what each image shape is named. This is the last image for quite some time from my side, I think. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Image conveys little about why the "waterbodies" may be of interest. Rather a lot of nondescript foreground. (Similar concerns about some of nominator's other posts below.) – Sca (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The sky (particularly left side) looks posterized on my display (at full size). That's strange for a 10 MB file size! Bammesk (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - yeah, that sky is posterized. MER-C 15:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Views Of Comet Kohoutek[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 18:34:45 (UTC)

Reason: Interesting image that shows how comet evolved with time.
Articles in which this image appears: Comet Kohoutek
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
Creator: NASA, based on Edward Gibson's sketches

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 18:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'd prefer actual photos. Furthermore, this is an artist's impression of an astronaut's impression, so not first-hand info. --Janke | Talk 10:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a good semi-historic documentation of the event, and if we didn't have the infobox photo [10], I would have supported. But I prefer the infobox photo (which is noisy at full size, but acceptable for 1974). Bammesk (talk) 04:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is nice, but it doesn't show how it changed over time. Artem.G (talk) 13:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the nom image is a good visual documentation of what happened, and is based on first hand observations (not unusual for 1974). It has good EV. Bammesk (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Per previous three posts. Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 13:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dust bowl, Texas[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 13:02:53 (UTC)

Reason: great historical picture by a notable photographer, FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Dust Bowl, Great bison belt, Negative (photography)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Arthur Rothstein, restored and uploaded by Christoph Braun

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 13:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Classic photo, but dust storm images in the dust bowl article have much more EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – It has EV, for the era, in displaying the side effects in Great bison belt#Euro-colonial effects. @Yann: there is 'retouched template' plus a 'compressed template' on the file page, so is this a contrast adjusted version of the original Here? If yes, then why the heavy adjustment? Or is this a direct scan of an old print Here? If it's a direct scan (unadjusted) of an old print or negative, then I support. Bammesk (talk) 00:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not made from the positive, but it seems the levels were adjusted to match it. Yann (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, I did a search and found This print, the link includes both sides. It looks like an authentic print. It matches the negative. I don't quite understand the darker version, the nom version, it looks like a night time (or evening) photo. I wonder whether the darker nom version was the dominant version published (or used) at the time. The lighter version (the negative) looks more realistic. But if the darker version was the dominant print at the time, then Ok, I would support it. Bammesk (talk) 04:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding this. I will restored it. Yann (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oath of the Emperor of Brazil[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 01:25:23 (UTC)

Reason: High quality, high resolution, and good digitalization
Articles in which this image appears: Brazilian Constitution of 1824
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
Creator: Brazilian National Archives

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a tiff file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Watching the Dancers[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 22:19:34 (UTC)

Reason: striking, often reproduced/printed photo by a notable photographer, now in a restored version
Articles in which this image appears: Walpi, Arizona, Photogravure
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Traditional dress
Creator: Edward S. Curtis, restored by W.carter

Support as nominator – Cart (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Despite the image only being a photogravure, it's on the Library of Congress list of "Miscellaneous Items in High Demand". Luckily, a second photo from the same event is preserved as a photo print, so I could use that as reference when I restored this one. Cart (talk) 22:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why has the writing around the original been removed? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The writing has to do with the printing company who printed the photogravure, not the photographer. As mentioned above only this photogravure has survived, not the original plate or a photo print. The photographer only made small number notes on his prints, as can be seen on the print of the other photo of the scene. Cart (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; so the 'original' here is the photogravure which should not be cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's arguments. I usually go with "Is there a salvagable border?" Because weird grey paper (due to being a black-and-white-scan, when paper tends to have a very slight yellow tone) isn't really worth saving. I'd say Support, as long as the text cropped is in the description. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 08:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I like this a lot. It puts the 'people' in the 'place', their ancestral place. Bammesk (talk) 01:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC) . . . . . Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image. – Yann (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another version of the image was previously nominated on Commons FPC, but it failed since the restoration wasn't properly made. That's when my interest for these photos started. Cart (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Can the caption text be tightened, and also a date (even just year) be added to it? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 02:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For example, "Four Hopi women on the adobe roof of Walpi Pueblo in <19xx>, looking down at the plaza where dancers are performing. The women have traditional squash blossom hairstyles, indicating they can be courted." (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 02:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, all texts can be tweaked. Now fixed. Cart (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: Little advice: when the Library of Congress - and only the Library of Congress - write "c1906" as a date, they mean COPYRIGHT 1906, not circa. It's one of the weird quirks of the archive. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 09:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Adam, very useful info. That explains a lot. Deciphering archive codes isn't always easy. ;-) Cart (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Btw Did you know that this hairstyle was the inspiration for Princess Leia's hairdo? [11] If this is featured and a TFP, might May the 4th be a good date for it? :-D (half kidding, half serious) Cart (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I know you're half-joking, but I would oppose this. I'm certainly not someone who believes that cultural appropriation is inherently evil and colonialist, but I think it is important not to make the appropriative use the primary one in which a cultural tradition is understood. Particularly for something like this that is coming out of a now severely endangered indigenous culture, the original context should always be primary, the later reference secondary. Anyway, this is a great and important image--thanks for restoring it and nominating it. blameless 19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input, and I agree with your reasoning. I come from a culture where we freely float odd ideas and we like to brainstorm, to see if anything constructive can come from it. I know that is not generally embraced on wiki, hence my caveats. I was sort of going for the boost a big present-day thing could have for highlighting what you rightly call a "severely endangered indigenous culture" in some way. Cart (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Blameless. Bammesk (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. No brainstorming here. Cart (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 15:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. blameless 19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Watching the Dancers by Edward S. Curtis 1906 - restored.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lakhta Center[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 01:31:12 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution, good quality
Articles in which this image appears: List of tallest buildings in Europe, Saint Petersburg
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Anton Galakhov

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not in Lakhta Centre article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this photo is better than the current infobox photo, I think it should be swapped. Artem.G (talk) 08:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, then this image can be renominated after10 days. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good composition and may be better for infobox, but at full size it's not FP quality. Maybe cell phone quality? Bammesk (talk) 00:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doris[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2024 at 04:41:13 (UTC)

Reason: A rather nice... I want to say four-colour lithograph - Yellow-blue-black-white, and I do mean white ink. Illustrates an opera with few other available images, the other big one being the polka by P. Bucalossi.
Articles in which this image appears: Doris (opera)
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: Nicholas Hanhart, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cover to Doris Waltz by P. Bucalossi after Alfred Cellier - Art by Nicholas Hanhart.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indochinese green magpie[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2024 at 11:21:54 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Indochinese green magpie
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 14:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 11:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Crop a bit of fuzzy BG from left? – Sca (talk) 13:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support We should not crop other's images without asking first. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking, with a classic crop that combines lead room with balance between the dense log and airy space up left in a very pleasant way. Cart (talk) 11:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Rule of thirds. -- Sca (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankfully, this is not a "pure" rule of thirds. That so-called rule is just a guide for newbie photographers to keep them from placing everything in the middle. Once you are more confident and advanced in image compo (like JJ Harrison certainly is), you can finetune how you balance the photo with other parameters. Cart (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True. Maybe we should call it the concept or guideline of thirds (which does have its uses). -- Sca (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Indochinese Green-Magpie (ssp. hypoleuca) 0A2A5802.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Amado[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2024 at 11:38:07 (UTC)

ALT – Easy CSS image crop

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Jorge Amado
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Bernard Gotfryd (restored by Yann)

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. MER-C 17:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support either (I can hear some people screaming...). Thanks for the nomination. – Yann (talk) 20:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – prefer ALT. Bammesk (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An ok picture but doesnt screan special to me. Flat lighting --Muhammad(talk) 11:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo, and irreplacable given his death in 2001. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How about slightly trimming the right and the top? for a more balanced image, the ALT? Pinging participants (supporters) @MER-C, Yann, Hamid Hassani, and Adam Cuerden:. Bammesk (talk) 04:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feels a little tight. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 23:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support original. Gotfryd generally relied on available light, as here, it seems. Well-composed portrait. blameless 02:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK with alt, prefer original. blameless 03:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt; slight trimming the right and the top of the picture makes it balanced and causes his face to be in the middle. Brightness is also fine, transparent. In addition, I think that the colors combination is now better. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Jorge Amado, gtfy.00010.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original has 6 supports, while the alternative only 4. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temple of Garni[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2024 at 16:02:42 (UTC)

Reason: Aesthetically appealing (good composition and lighting) and technically informative (showcases the temple in its environment, with people for scale). There is some slight graininess in the dark areas at the highest resolution, but I believe it's subtle enough to be acceptable.
Articles in which this image appears: Garni Temple, plus equivalent pages on four other language Wikipedias
FP category for this image: Places
Creator: Yerevantsi

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Nicely framed shot of a historic structure (reconstructed in the 1970s), with decent detail. Subject dates from over two millennia ago. Thorough and amply illustrated target article. Nice lighting.– Sca (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ W7070 (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I struck this vote. Editor has less than 100 edits on en-Wiki, per instructions on top of the WP:FPC page. Bammesk (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Archives908 (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Little blurry, but that's drones. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 09:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Garni temple 2021 drone.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Australian brushturkey female[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2024 at 22:48:33 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. Lead image in infobox
Articles in which this image appears: Australian brushturkey
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 23:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The bird is fine, but the two twigs in the background that seems to be "growing" from the bird's head are really bugging me. IMO such a blooper should not be in an FP. --Cart (talk) 13:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blooper is harsh in England. May be OK in Sweden. Please look up the meaning. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it? I've only heard it in the context of "blooper reels": silly mistakes from discarded takes in films. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Australian brushturkey (Alectura lathami) female Atherton.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitri[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2024 at 11:21:27 (UTC)

Reason: One of Chaperon's most gorgeous set designs. It must have been stunning on stage. Opera is... not a particularly famous one, but it is an image from the première production.
Articles in which this image appears: Dimitri (Joncières), just added to Philippe Chaperon
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: Philippe Chaperon, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent quality copy of a lovely image. Moonreach (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 15:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Philippe Chaperon - Set design for Act V in the première of Victorin Joncières' Dimitri.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

X-ray by Wilhelm Röntgen[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2024 at 21:11:30 (UTC)

Reason: famous historical picture, restored, FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Wilhelm Röntgen, Radiography, List of photographs considered the most important, L'Homme truqué (The Doctored Man), Radiographer, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator: Wilhelm Röntgen, restored and uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support "First" images like this, are given FPs to me. Cart (talk) 11:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Agree with Carter. – Howard🌽33 18:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I fixed the source links on the image page. Yann, looking at it at full size, the "upper" right border has a dark edge (just a couple of pixels wide), it can be improved. Bammesk (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mounts are seriously the worst. Often take twice as long as the image Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 22:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 14:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:First medical X-ray by Wilhelm Röntgen of his wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand - 18951222.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Sciences/Biology instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A. J. Muste[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2024 at 13:44:58 (UTC)

Reason: high quality image used as lead, notable photographer
Articles in which this image appears: A. J. Muste
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Support – Linked to fairly comprehensive 2,000-word bio target about an outsopken Vietnam-era antiwar crusader largely overlooked today. He met Ho Chi Minh in 1966. Considerable EV. Characterful face. – Sca (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though I suspect you could clean up the description (it's a mess of copy-paste), but it's fine, I guess.

More importantly: Two white spots on the scarf, and two much smaller black spots on the nose. Minor black spots on the paper he's holding. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I cleaned a few more spots and scratches. Yann (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That got it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 21:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. blameless 01:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 15:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:A.J. Muste, anti-war activist, cropped.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asher Brown Durand[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2024 at 01:10:28 (UTC)

Reason: A good picture of a notable artist.
Articles in which this image appears: Asher B. Durand, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Abraham Bogardus restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 01:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Historically influential artist. The 1869 pic. shows decent detail for the period. (Is that a newspaper he's holding?) – Sca (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. There's faint traces of text, but not enough to really tell for sure. Looks like a newspaper or journal, but there are other options Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 23:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Asher B. Durand by Abraham Bogardus.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Girl in Blue[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2024 at 03:30:50 (UTC)

Reason: Quality image of this notable painting by Amrita Sher-Gil, "an important painter of 20th-century India" per her article.
Articles in which this image appears: The Little Girl in Blue, +2
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Amrita Sher-Gil

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I buy the American copyright status. It requires it to never have been published, but "published" is such a vague meaning here.... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adam, reading the "ownership" section of the article, it remained with the Fabri family until 2018. I think we can assume? 2018 as its first publication date (in the U.S.). If so, and the author passing in 1941 (70 years plus), that would make it PD in the U.S. Bammesk (talk) 02:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we presume that the first show where it was bought from counts as publication, though.... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 02:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Fabri, owner/custodian of the painting, worked for (wrote for [12]) Civil and Military Gazette, an India based newspaper. The painting became a national treasure and legally had to (and still does) remain in India. So the presumption that there was "no U.S. showing" is reasonable. The 2018 sale was in the digital age, so there was a worldwide showing in 2018. Bammesk (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first show was in 1937 in India, calling that a publication in India and looking at Hirtle chart again, yes, you have a valid argument. Bammesk (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the copyright's certain, don't think we can promote Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gemini 7 in orbit[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2024 at 03:16:56 (UTC)

Reason: Meets all criteria. Note: previous nomination [|here].
Articles in which this image appears: Gemini 6A, Space Race, Project Gemini
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
Creator: This file is in the public domain in the United States because it was solely created by NASA.

Support as nominator – (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 03:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the technology of the time is inherently shown in the photo, since both the foreground and distant Earth could not be in sharp focus using cameras available in 1965. (It's a feature, not a bug.) (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 03:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - bad composition. MER-C 11:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide any details on that? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 07:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously wondering which criterion it fails to meet:
Line — the visual path that enables the eye to move within the piece

Shape — areas defined by edges within the piece, whether geometric or organic

Color — hues with their various values and intensities

Texture — surface qualities which translate into tactile illusions

Value — Shading used to emphasize form

Form — 3-D length, width, or depth

Space — the space taken up by (positive) or in between (negative) objects

Line and shape
Replies will aid understanding for future candidate proposals. Thanks! (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 00:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The blurry foreground. MER-C 18:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historical image and irreplacable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Anstett[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2024 at 13:52:46 (UTC)

Reason: high quality picture used as lead image, notable photographer
Articles in which this image appears: Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA 1968, List of Miss USA titleholders
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — A 55-year-old promotional glam pic. Target bio at 155 words is a stub, with nothing about subject's notability other than her three-year marriage to Bill Russell half a century ago. (Subject now 76.) Scant visual interest. Lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Scant visual interest" for a model and a Miss USA. I will take that as ironic... Yann (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just another pretty fem. Not notable. -- Sca (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you thin she's not notable, than WP:AFD is that way. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think she's notable? For what? -- Sca (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Conditional~~ Support Lead image of a couple articles. I might not be interested in Miss America, but it certainly passes the General Notability Guideline many times over. That said, there are a few obvious dark blotches on her face and neck that clearly aren't meant to be there, like the one on her left cheek (right as you're looking at it), and some less intrusive ones on other bits of skin. Can you do a quick secondary pass? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 01:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OOPS, how did I miss that? I think I uploaded the wrong version. Thanks for spotting that. Fixed. Yann (talk) 11:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All good now. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also Support Alt Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 15:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - High quality portrait and an interesting glimpse of the past. Moonreach (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
*Oppose @ Yann i would be careful when editing old film pics. Anycase 2nd version made by GRuban is best here. While new edit is trying to "correct" film colors to digital, and is grevious mistake. Please make renomination in seperate and revert to 2nd option of GRuban. --Petar Milošević (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GRuban's version obviously too dark, and 669 × 991 pixels, while my version is 3,170 × 4,768 pixels. Yann (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
She is much sharper on that size in thumb on screen than your edit, I think you should make another Upload and leave original, since its better than your edit. --Petar Milošević (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's nonsense. A thumbnail is always sharper that a full size image, but you must compare what is comparable, at the same size. Yann (talk) 15:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 07:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdsds:, your oppose vote is missing an oppose rationale. Per instructions on top of the WP:FPC page: "Oppose, followed by your reasoning .... All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale". Bammesk (talk) 02:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This image does not meet criterion 3: "Is among Wikipedia's best work." It does not illustrates the subject in a compelling way, making the viewer want to know more. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 04:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further, the subject's facial expression appears forced and the background buildings are distracting rather than contributing context. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 04:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Appears to be on the cold hue side, as some photos of that era. Warming the colors up a bit would look more natural, I think. Brandmeister^talk 20:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Brandmeister: I already did that compared to the original TIFF. Isn't that sufficient? Yann (talk) 10:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a warmer version which is likely more faithful to natural vision. Brandmeister^talk 12:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Support Alt. Yann (talk) 11:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the images has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Ford[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2024 at 21:39:40 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality and resolution
Articles in which this image appears: John Ford, AFI Life Achievement Award, Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement, National Film Registry etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Los Angeles Daily News

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – would support the original as well, but prefer this crop. Bammesk (talk) 15:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wikipedia should not be promoting distortions. This is cut from an iconic picture of Ford in uniform standing in front of a portrait of himself with his Oscar on the mantlepiece. It is misleading and has no place in an encyclopaedia. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, so it is. I'd support that one as a featured picture candidate. Moonreach (talk) 15:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Charles. And dark glasses decrease suitability. – Sca (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree on that second part. You can clearly see his eyes, and in any case the glasses were part of his look. He's wearing them in the painting that's in the background of the original photo, and you can see his eyes there, too. Moonreach (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This crop is just odd: the original image is much better, and has stronger EV. Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt, oppose crop, per above. Since others have commented on the uncropped version I have added it. blameless 02:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect it'd need to stabilise in at least one article. That's an awfully major change to just presme will stick. It's probably not a suitable lead image, nor suitable for many other uses, so I'd like to see its new usage(s) stabilise.

Slight worries about the painting copyright, but I suspect that it's hard for an American painting to keep copyright in this era. I'd also like to see a new lead image, instead of just crop and uncrop in the same article. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it would be better to have a new lead image, but just for clarification, I didn't add the uncropped version to the article; it has been there since 2008. blameless 19:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. ~~Support uncropped without replacement of crop~~, then. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Struck vote that was cast after voting period ended. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Intervention of the Sabine Women[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2024 at 21:59:10 (UTC)

Reason: High quality, high resolution. A great work of art, notable painter.
Articles in which this image appears: The Intervention of the Sabine Women, The Rape of the Sabine Women, Jacques-Louis David
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Jacques-Louis David

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - too noisy to be FP. MER-C 11:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great painting, poor reproduction. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lonesome[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2024 at 04:49:30 (UTC)

Original – Lonesome is a 1928 American sound part-talkie comedy drama film directed by Paul Fejös, and starring Barbara Kent and Glenn Tryon.

Reason: National Film Registry inductee for 2010. Early part-talkie film from 1928.
Articles in which this image appears: Lonesome (1928 film)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Paul Fejös

Support as nominator – GamerPro64 04:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Good and interesting. Yann (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Moonreach (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Très charmant. – Sca (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lonesome (1928).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coal tipple in Kenvir, Kentucky[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2024 at 06:15:33 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution, good quality. Photograph of Kenvir, Kentucky, a small community in the hills of Harlan County, Kentucky. The community is a coal camp that was founded by the Black Mountain Coal Company in 1919. You can see the company houses in the background.
Articles in which this image appears: Kenvir, Kentucky
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Russell Lee

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 06:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Foreground a bit blurry, but everything important is in focus. I like it a lot. Not sure why no-one else voted yet. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 12:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2024 at 11:07:25 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Paul R. Burley

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Cart (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support could be in infobox Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Nice framing. Tiny people for scale. Agree with Charles re infobox. – Sca (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! – And thank you all for your hard work and nice tone of discussion--good stuff.

Promoted File:Forte de Santo Antônio--Farol da Barra Salvador Bahia Vista Aérea 2021-0149.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orbicular batfish[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2024 at 11:21:37 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two months ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Orbicular batfish
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Cart (talk) 12:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pez murciélago orbicular (Platax orbicularis), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-19, DD 01.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Little pied cormorant[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2024 at 20:14:34 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. One of two lead images in infobox
Articles in which this image appears: Little pied cormorant
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Surprisingly cute for a cormorant! Choliamb (talk) 00:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kent Wang (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 11:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Little pied cormorant (Microcarbo melanoleucos) Freycinet.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) fawn morph Esk Valley.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2024 at 20:03:57 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image of Endangered animal. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Eastern quoll
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 00:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support some beautiful fur detail. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) fawn morph Esk Valley.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Little corella[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2024 at 20:18:00 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. Lead images in infobox
Articles in which this image appears: Little corella
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Howard🌽33 00:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Amazing shot of a cool creature. ⚒️★MinecraftPlayer★³²¹⚒️ Let's Chat! 04:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 11:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Little corella (Cacatua sanguinea gymnopis) Blanchetown.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dust storm approaching Stratford, Texas[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2024 at 21:01:02 (UTC)

Reason: restoration of historical image, used 10 articles in Main namespace, and many more in other languages. There is an old nomination of another version. The exact date it was taken is known. I even found who is the photographer. See his story here.
Articles in which this image appears: Dust Bowl, Black Sunday, + 9 articles +
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: George Everett Marsh Jr. (1877–1953), restored and uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Much more EV than the previous nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think it's pretty good. A very nice non-colored photo; the author really pick a excellent angle to take a shot. ⚒️★MinecraftPlayer★³²¹⚒️ Let's Chat! 04:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small hint MinecraftPlayer321, in nominations (like this one) to promote images to to FP you should vote 'Support' or 'Oppose'. The "Keep/Delist" options are for nominations where users vote if an image should be stripped of its rank as FP. Cart (talk) 10:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Detail isn't great, but it's an image that tells the story pretty well. Good EV. – Sca (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Good quality transfer of a source image that's unfortunately slightly out of focus. I agree with Sca that's not a dealbreaker. Moonreach (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Cart (talk) 09:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dust storm approaching Stratford, Texas.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coal miners homes in Benito, Kentucky[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2024 at 06:00:20 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution, good quality, high EV
Articles in which this image appears: Benito, Kentucky, Coal town
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Russell Lee, restored by FatCat96

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 06:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I like this image. FP criterion #5 says "It is preferable to wait a reasonable period of time (at least 7 days) after the image is added to the article before nominating it, though this may be ignored in obvious cases". I suppose this is an obvious case, though most nominators would wait. Same with your other nominations. On a sidenote, it would be nice if the article had a little more info about the current state of the town, for example population, if it's still sustained by coal mining and such. Bammesk (talk) 02:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – it's a good lead image in both articles listed above. Bammesk (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk: For the record, adding an image where none existed is almost always a good reason to ignore the waiting rule, in my opinion. No-one's going to say no image is better than an image, unless the image is so bad and misleading that it's never pass here anyway. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 12:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Company store in Lynch, Kentucky[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2024 at 06:06:45 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution, good quality, high EV. Good historic, representative photograph.
Articles in which this image appears: Lynch, Kentucky, Company store
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Russell Lee, restored by FatCat96

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 06:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is an unremarkable photo of a building, with nothing indicating that it's a company store. As such, the EV doesn't seem very strong. Nick-D (talk) 10:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is a company store: The Company Commissary, known as the United Supply Company, Inc. Built 1919. But it is not a great photo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I honestly think it's a good view into the past. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Encapsulated PACE Spacecraft Transported to Launch Pad[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2024 at 00:11:07 (UTC)

Reason: Vividly and accurately represents technologic efforts to monitor global environmental changes.
Articles in which this image appears: Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem
FP category for this image: link to category (listed on the WP:FP page) that best describes the image
Creator: NASA/Ben Smegelsky

Support as nominator – (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 00:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – fails FP criterion #2, 1500 pixels minimum. Also there is too much tilt, excessive perspective/lens distortion. Bammesk (talk) 02:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Would this one meet those criteria? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 04:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is already on Commons: File:PACE Spacecraft Transport from Astrotech to SLC-40 (KSC-20240201-PH-JBS01 0036).jpg. Yann (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sdsds, that's better, but it's noisy when viewed at full size. Also, when used in the satellite article, it doesn't show the satellite itself, so it's EV (FP criterion #5) isn't strong. Bammesk (talk) 02:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gustave III, Act III[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2024 at 14:48:47 (UTC)

Reason: One of my favourite set designs: Atmospheric and disturbing.
Articles in which this image appears: Gustave III (Auber)
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: Pierre-Luc-Charles Cicéri, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~ Support, provided that the spot on the left that is visible on the file description page is removed. MER-C 19:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MER-C: Presuming it's the one I think, it's done. You may need to clear your browser cache (Shift-Reload, usually). Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 21:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that's the one. MER-C 17:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is the artist's signed watercolour which was presumably used for the set design. It is not the set design. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have a few that exist in multiple states, and this is part of the stage design process. The next is seperating out the backdrop from the standing pieces, etc. And, of course, it's from 1833, so well before options like photography existed to document final state. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stockholm City Hall[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Feb 2024 at 09:49:04 (UTC)

Reason: Infobox image in main article, excellent photo of iconic view for any Swede. To non-Swedes mostly know as the venue of the Nobel Banquet. Blue hour winter photo that eliminates all the tourists, foliage, boats and commercial stuff that usually clutter this area. Bonus points for including the noted Västerbron bridge, which also gives depth to image.
Articles in which this image appears: Stockholm City Hall, List of metropolitan areas in Sweden
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Julian Herzog

Support as nominator – Cart (talk) 09:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Nifty nighttime tableau, but daytime pix illustrate such subjects better. – Sca (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree. Should not have put in infobox. The daytime image it replaced has far more EV than this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Forbach[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2024 at 14:06:17 (UTC)

Reason: A very nice illustration. The layered colours really work well for it.
Articles in which this image appears: Battle of Spicheren, just added to Jules Férat, Franco-Prussian War
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War
Creator: Jean-Adolphe Bocquin after Jules Férat, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Historically significant – a key French defeat in the Franco-Prussian War. – Sca (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Shouldn't this image be cropped? It has far too much of an empty margin imo. – Howard🌽33 00:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you crop it, you lose text and also make the multi-layered coloured more confusin to interpret. It's CSS cropped in the article, which is less destructive. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh ok then. – Howard🌽33 13:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Bataille de Forbach, 6 août 1870 - Jean-Adolphe Bocquin et Jules Férat.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Swados[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2024 at 11:25:57 (UTC)

Reason: high quality image used as lead
Articles in which this image appears: Elizabeth Swados
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Bernard Gotfryd, restored by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 11:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Sanpshot-quality image with poor detail. Dark. – Sca (talk) 18:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The background is dark, not the person. And it is a feature, not a bug. It helps separate her from the background. Yann (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but fails Criterion No. 3, IMO. -- Sca (talk) 15:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I agree with Sca, harsh flash lighting. MER-C 11:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, artistic styles have moved on a lot, but I don't think this is bad for its time, it's just a discredited effect after it turned from "look at the neat effect these cameras can do with a flash" to "...everyone's camera can make a photo like this easily" Weak support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 08:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boundary Fire (2017)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2024 at 22:29:39 (UTC)

Reason: High quality map that I created using public domain data that I think fulfills the FP requirements
Articles in which this image appears: Boundary Fire (2017)
FP category for this image: Maps
Creator: Guerillero

Support as nominator – Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Fine for target article, but questionable EV by main page standards. (All FPCs approved here are perforce potential candidates for TFPs.) – Sca (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I could always label the fire on the map if it would help -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 15:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Alt 1 -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger Fire[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2024 at 02:55:11 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution/quality image used as the lead for the Tiger Fire article
Articles in which this image appears: Tiger Fire, Wildfires in 2021, Climate change in Arizona
FP category for this image: USA History
Creator: InciWeb, restored by JoleBruh

Support as nominator – JoleBruh (talk) 02:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - visible JPEG artifacts. MER-C 11:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm willing to accept a lot more in a photo of a one-off event taken at night, but a little filtering might improve this a lot Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I took a similar photo of bushfires near Canberra at night in the 2020 bushfires, and agree that the technical difficulties are quite significant here. This photo is dramatic and useful, but isn't of FP standard technically. Nick-D (talk) 03:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visible artifacts, somewhat hazy (like it's a photo of a wildfire or something...) some bright spots. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 03:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearded vulture[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2024 at 12:08:27 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Bearded vulture
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Giles Laurent

Support as nominator – MER-C 12:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture used as lead. – Yann (talk) 22:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:010e Wild Bearded Vulture in flight at Pfyn-Finges (Switzerland) Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Cathedral[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2024 at 12:12:19 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Chester Cathedral
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: Diliff

Support as nominator – MER-C 12:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Diliff's usual careful framing and resplendent detail. The lavishly illustrated article contains three other photos of his his. – Sca (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chester Cathedral Lady Chapel, Cheshire, UK - Diliff.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Amory tornado[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2024 at 16:14:25 (UTC)

Reason: Image seems to meet FP criteria. One of the best radar-images of an ongoing tornado. Also high-quality for an image as well.
Articles in which this image appears: Tornado outbreak of March 24–27, 2023
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams
Creator: National Weather Service (NWS), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and United States Air Force (USAF) — Uploaded by WeatherWriter

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 16:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose see this discussion at Commons FP Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So your only reasoning is literally, "Messy". Gotcha. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 14:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn – As this will be using the common's FPC, I am withdrawing this. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. @WeatherWriter:, this image can be a FP if it is added to an article where it would serve as a depiction that supports the text (meaning, the concept), such as in an appropriate section in the Weather radar or NEXRAD article. Bammesk (talk) 17:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]