Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2021 January 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 26 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 28 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 27[edit]

Meenah Prime[edit]

Adewale Ayobami Junior commonly known as Meenah Prime is an Instagram influencer and a TV presenter He started his career as a personalist and a dancer State of origin :Lagos Nigeria Age: 18 years old — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adewale Ayobami Junior (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Adewale Ayobami Junior: have you got a question about using Wikipedia? Seagull123 Φ 00:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Patrolled articles on daily basis[edit]

Hi,

I need some guidance for the use of Wiki. Is there any way in Wiki where I can see patrolled topics on daily basis. For example: Patrolled & Approved Topics of today.

Thanks & Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:AC76:200:B0C9:1A72:1AEE:9FF1 (talk) 00:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not exactly sure what you mean. There are a variety of "patrols" at Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Patrols for an overview. For example, we have a page at Special:RecentChanges where you can see edits being made as soon as they happen across the encyclopedia, which is useful in helping out with reverting vandalism soon after it happens; the patrol description page is as Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol. By the way, this site is called Wikipedia, not wiki. A wiki is any website using wiki software; there are thousands of them.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism help request from 82.129.57.243[edit]

I have noticed some vandalism at Michel Ney. Namely, in the first paragraph of the section titled Alleged survival. Would an editor please assist me with fixing it? Thank you, 82.129.57.243 (talk) 00:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 00:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

edit to page Jim McGinty[edit]

Hello

Today I made a factual contribution to the Wikipedia page "Jim McGinty" ( [1] )

Extended content

I added the following text " partly responsible for the OATHS, AFFIDAVITS AND STATUTORY DECLARATIONS ACT 2005 (GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 23 December 2005 page 6244 ), which effectively changed the OATH and AFFIRMATION to remove the monarch and replace it with Legislative Council/Legislative Assembly. Despite the fact "REMOVING the MONARCH" is an act of blatant TREASON he was somehow recognised as a reformer " .

Removal of the monarch is an act of war against the Commonwealth .

[2]

Criminal Code Act 1995 Subdivision B—Treason 80.1 Treason

(1) A person commits an offence if the person: (d) levies war, or does any act preparatory to levying war, against the Commonwealth; Penalty: Imprisonment for life.

(2) A person commits an offence if the person: (a) receives or assists another person who, to his or her knowledge, has committed an offence against this Subdivision (other than this subsection) with the intention of allowing him or her to escape punishment or apprehension; or (b) knowing that another person intends to commit an offence against this Subdivision (other than this subsection), does not inform a constable of it within a reasonable time or use other reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence. Penalty: Imprisonment for life.


[3] [4] Oaths, Affidavits and Statutory Declarations Act 2005 Part 2 — Oaths and related matters

4.Oaths, general form of

(1)If under this Act or any other law or the exercise of the Royal Prerogative a person has to take an oath, the form of the oath is to begin with one of the following, according to the person’s preference —

(a)I swear by Almighty God…;

(b)I swear by [name of a deity recognised by his or her religion]…;

(c)I swear, according to the religion and the beliefs I profess, … .

(2)The fact that at the time of taking an oath a person has no religious belief does not affect the validity of the oath.

(3)Despite subsection (1) a person who has to take an oath may take an oath in any form or manner that he or she wants if the person before whom he or she is to take the oath is satisfied that —

(a)the oath will bind the person’s conscience; and

(b)the person understands the consequences of taking an oath.

(4)An oath taken under subsection (3) has the same force and effect as an oath taken under subsection (1).

5.Affirmation may be made instead of oath

(1)If under this Act or any other law or the exercise of the Royal Prerogative a person has to or may take an oath, the person is entitled to affirm instead.

(2)If under this Act or any other law or the exercise of the Royal Prerogative a person has to take an oath and —

(a)the person says that the taking of an oath is contrary to his or her religious belief or conscience; or

(b)it is not reasonably practicable, without inconvenience or delay, at the time when and place where the oath has to be taken, to administer to the person an oath in a manner and form that will bind the person’s conscience; or

(c)for any other sufficient reason the taking of an oath is found not to be appropriate,

the person may be required to affirm instead.

(3)An affirmation made instead of an oath has the same force and effect as the oath.

(4)The form of the affirmation is as follows —

I sincerely declare and affirm ... ,

which words replace those set out in section 4(1) as the beginning of any oath.

as a result of this act the oath and affirmation contained in Constitution Act 1889 ( Western Australia Constitution ) was altered on 1 Jan 2006 to remove the monarch and replace the monarch with "Legislative Council/Legislative Assembly". this is treason ! [5] ( constitution with monarch contained in schedule E [Section 22] )

[6] ( constitution with Legislative Council/Legislative Assembly contained in schedule E [Section 22] )

In Australia a Constitution of the state must be consistent with the commonwealth constitution .

http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s106.html COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 106 Saving of Constitutions 

                  The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the Constitution of the State.

Here is a list of referenda for the state constitution of Western Australia . Please not there was "NO" referendum to change the oath or affirmation let alone a referendum to replace the monarch with Legislative Council/Legislative Assembly

[7]

My edit to the page is based off factual evidence .

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_McGinty
  2. ^ https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00235
  3. ^ https://www.slp.wa.gov.au/gazette/gazette.nsf/21CD2EA31688B007482570DF00118DCC/$FILE/Gg242.pdf
  4. ^ https://www.legislation.wa.gov.au/legislation/prod/filestore.nsf/FileURL/mrdoc_41551.htm/$FILE/Oaths%20Affidavits%20and%20Statutory%20Declarations%20Act%202005%20-%20%5B02-e0-03%5D.html?OpenElement
  5. ^ https://www.legislation.wa.gov.au/legislation/prod/filestore.nsf/FileURL/mrdoc_378.htm/$FILE/Constitution%20Act%201889%20-%20%5B05-c0-05%5D.html?OpenElement
  6. ^ https://www.legislation.wa.gov.au/legislation/prod/filestore.nsf/FileURL/mrdoc_379.htm/$FILE/Constitution%20Act%201889%20-%20%5B05-d0-03%5D.html?OpenElement
  7. ^ https://www.elections.wa.gov.au/elections/state-referendums/past-referendums

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.143.173.1 (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I see that your good faith edit to the Jim McGinty article was reverted. Per the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, your next step should be to discuss your suggestions and concerns on the article's talk page: Talk:Jim McGinty. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My edit to the page is based off factual evidence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.143.173.1 (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this on the article's talk page, not here on the help desk. -Arch dude (talk) 05:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valerio Cardamone[edit]

Hi ! I would like to publish online my article, I think my draft is ready I respected everything :) Thanks in advance Cheers--Lucas76520 (talk) 10:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Lucas76520, check where it says "Improving your odds of a speedy review" in the template at the top of Draft:Valerio Cardamone. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer ! We can't publish online without a review even when it's not our first contribution ? it's my first on english version, but I already did on french wikipedia.--Lucas76520 (talk) 10:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas76520 The French Wikipedia is separate from the English Wikipedia. As far as the English Wikipedia is concerned, you are a new user and cannot directly create articles until your account is four days old here, with 10 edits or more. Even if you get there, unless you are very familiar with our policies (which may be different from the French Wikipedia) a review is a good idea. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, it's clear and I understand it's normal. When the review will be done, the article will be online even if my 4 days aren't spent ? Are you able to make my review please ? This work is a little bit urgent... Thanks again Lucas76520 (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucas76520: Why is it so urgent? Wikipedia doesn't operate on deadlines. However, yes, when the draft is reviewed (and doesn't contain some sort of rule violation that keeps it from getting promoted to article, like the verifyability requirement, it is going to be promoted to an article, no matter if you are online or not. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even if you are working on a deadline, Wikipedia is not. We are all volunteers here spending our free time on Wikipedia by our own choosing. JIP | Talk 17:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem I will wait. Thanks for your time.Lucas76520 (talk) 21:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lost access to account - how do I remove it[edit]

Hello! I used to be User:TheFanoulis on both the Greek and English Wikipedia sites, but now I want to retire the accounts. However, I have lost access to the email I used to register those accounts. How can I proceed with reclaiming them? --46.198.242.37 (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to retire, or reclaim the accounts? If you wish to retire, you can just ignore them. There is no way to delete accounts. If you wish to reclaim them, you'll need to remember the password, as there isn't an additional way to recover the password than by the associated email. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transgender[edit]

I was visiting the transgender page and found it had some erroneous and misleading statistics, particularly in relation to the statistics of transgender people in Canada. I joined Wikipedia expressly to correct this mistake but the page is protected. How do I get the page to share accurate statistics if I can’t edit it? Where do I go from here Wikipros? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassandra74f32 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the talk page on the article in question, use a {{edit request}} template with what needs changing. You will need to provide a reliable source to coroborate the information. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article is "semi-protected" to prevent vandalism (see WP:SEMI). That just prevents editing from IP addresses, which is not relevant as you have created an account. You'll be able to edit the article directly after your account is > 4 days old and you have made > 10 other edits (which in any case will assist you to learn about editing here, which can be a steep learning curve). Note that the advice about supplying reliable sources still applies — and edit summaries explaining what you are doing in an area of potential controversy will help, Cassandra74f32. Please "sign" any contributions on Talk Pages with 4 tildes, ~~~~ which also adds a datestamp. There is a bot that can do that sometimes (see above here) but doing so yourself is part of the etiquette. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Cassandra74f32: You are in the mobile version of the site where it's difficult to find the talk page. It's at Talk:Transgender. It's easier to post an edit request if you switch to the desktop version by clicking "Desktop" at the bottom of a page. Then you can click the "View source" tab at top of a protected page to get a button to submit an edit request. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a template to mention a current discussion that isn’t an Rfc[edit]

So I know that Rfc’s and Afd’s have a template that is used to let editors know there is a discussion taking place. Those templates are placed on the article page and the talk page. If there is a discussion taking place on the article’s talk page that isn’t and Rfc or Afd, is there a template a person can use that can be placed on the top of the article (not the talk page) to alert editors to that discussion? Elijahandskip (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Discussion notice may be what you're looking for ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 14:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article[edit]

Where do I go to start a new article? Artsy Koala (talk) 13:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the article wizard. Wikipedia:Article wizard. Elijahandskip (talk) 13:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Artsy Koala: The only absolute requirement for a Wikipedia article is that the subject must be notable by our definition: see WP:N. Therefore, start by determining that your subject is notable before you put any effort into actually writing the article. An otherwise-perfect article about a non-notable subject will be deleted. We delete about 200 articles every day. If your subject is notable, we can help you even if your first attempt is very poor, but we cannot help you with notability. See WP:AMOUNT. -Arch dude (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a Wikipedia Page[edit]

Good morning. Our school is looking to make a Wikipedia page. Is there is there a link to where I can get some direction or if someone can talk me through it? Please let me know if you can help me. Thank you! Jeannette — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.119.75 (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here : WP:YFA. that being said, sucessfully creating a new article is one of the hardest taksks one can undertake on Wikipedia. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note also that if you are looking to register an account to create the page, per Wikipedia's username policy, the account must represent a single individual person, not a group or other abstract entity. And furthermore, even for single-person accounts, the account must represent a fixed physical person, not a role. For example, "User:ExamplePlace school" or "User:Teacher of class 2B" are forbidden, but "User:Jeannette Mysurname" is allowed. JIP | Talk 16:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Also, see WP:COI and WP:PAID - if you are an employee of the school, you are recommended to not create a page on the topic. You also have to make sure that the institution is notable by Wikipedia's standards; you will also need to create a Wikipedia account to create a new article. Shared accounts are not allowed, so it will have to be your own independent account. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 16:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So what I an User:El cid, el campeador above mean is that the account must represent you, Jeannette, as Jeannette in person, not you as an employee of the school. JIP | Talk 16:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jeannette. I suspect that, like many people, you are making the mistake of thinking that Wikipedia is a place to tell the world about yourself. It is not. If Wikipedia at some time has an article about your school, it will not belong to the school, the school will have no control over it, and it will not necessarily say what the school would like it to say. Have a look at an article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing before you go any further. --ColinFine (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You should probably take a look at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Chuntuk (talk) 22:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Canceling Donations[edit]

I have recently closed my credit card account, so I will no longer make my monthly donation of $1.75. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.166.78.50 (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • You are welcome to stop donating at any time. There is no need to make a special announcement about it. JIP | Talk 19:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please see donate:Cancel or change recurring giving. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 04:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your past donations, which have gone to the Wikimedia Foundation and not to English Wikipedia, which is run by unpaid volunteers. We do it because we like it. Among other things, donations help to keep the servers running which host all the Wikipedia projects. On a personal note, I feel that credit cards are a Bad Thing, so congratulations on closing your account even if this may have been painful for you. Random donations are always welcome, so if you feel like contributing again (eg via debit card), that would be great. >MinorProphet (talk) 12:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okamoto Keito[edit]

In the article of the AADA (American Academy of Dramatic Arts) Keito Okamoto is listed as one of the alumnis in 2020, however they have neither been any announcements regarding that nor has the article regarding himself been updated.

So what is true now? Is he still studying at the AADA because studies have been prolonged due to Covid-19 or did he really had finished the two year program? It would be best to confirm that information, since he was supposed to return to Japan in 2020.

Here are the two links regarding the articles:

AADA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Academy_of_Dramatic_Arts

Keito Okamoto: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keito_Okamoto — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:9440:55EC:F0F6:E513:D018:FFDB (talk) 23:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible the article is in error. When in doubt, check the source. Everything in Wikipedia should be verifiable, meaning you can check an outside source to verify a statement and see where the information came from—Wikipedia isn't a primary source itself. In this case, it doesn't look like there is a citation for that fact, so I went ahead and added a "citation needed" tag.
If you ever want to fix something like that yourself, you can always add a citation tag by clicking "edit source" at the top and typing {{citation needed}} after the relevant fact. Or you can add a note in the talk page for that article, or even remove the uncited info. Thanks for posting. Cheers, Fredlesaltique (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you very much for your help! I already made some research on my own and was not able to verify that, so I was very surprised seeing Okamoto's name on the list. For now the issue is fixed. If there are any information I can get hold of, I will put them in, of course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:9440:55EC:49D0:6AD7:3F42:B0EB (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2021_January_27&oldid=1003848537"