Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/October 2024
This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to Wikipedia talk:In the news. Thanks.
October 1
[edit]
October 1, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
Mark Rutte installed as Secretary General of NATO
[edit]Blurb: Former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured) is installed as the Secretary General of NATO, succeeding Jens Stoltenberg (Post)
Alternative blurb: Mark Rutte (pictured) succeeds Jens Stoltenberg as Secretary General of NATO
News source(s): Associated Press
Credits:
- Nominated by Anomynous (talk · give credit)
- Updated by WikiGuff (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Weak support Neither ITNR nor a national leader, but certainly an extremely influential position, and Stoltenberg had been SG for a decade. The Kip (contribs) 00:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Although not a national leader, the Secretary General of NATO is still an important and influential position. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good Candidate, Per nom. TyphoonAmpil [citation needed] 03:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support(?) Nato Secretary General falls into a grey-area for ITN/R, but I think(?) we included Ursula von der Leyen being re-elected EU Commission president, so we should include Rutte too. Scuba 04:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: The position of NATO Secretary General is pretty important, according to me. High Admiral JMT (talk) 07:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The article is orange-tagged and the position seems a rather bland, bureaucratic one. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, the Secretary General of NATO is a bland and bureaucratic role? Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's right. The article makes it fairly clear that this is a civil service position -- one of facilitation rather than making military or political decisions. Those rest with the member countries. For example, there's currently a crisis in the Middle East with many missiles flying around. Does NATO have a position or part in this? It appears that various members are involved in various ways such as shooting down the missiles but NATO and its bureaucracy don't seem to be significant players. Even in Ukraine, which is closer to home, it doesn't seem that NATO has been as significant as the actions of individual members seem to have been taken on a national and separate basis. Even the EU seems to have been more coherent there. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, the Secretary General of NATO is a bland and bureaucratic role? Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality the main article is orange tagged with multiple cn tags. But, when those have been resolved, I will support the blurb. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support once fully cited: I might have a go at adding some. UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability as the NATO Secretary General seems like an important role, as the leader of the largest military alliance in the world. Oppose on quality as there is still an orange tag and 15 CN tags too. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 20:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support on significance Once citation issues are resolved. Arguably a role more significant than many national leadership changes we post. AusLondonder (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Theoretically support since NATO’s Secretary-General is an important position, but oppose for now due to quality issues. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 03:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment When or if NATO goes to war, he'll be subservient to the non-secretarial generals in his ranks. That's not to diminish his perceived power right now, mind you. I'm led to believe it's quite substantial. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality Rutte's article needs some ref work. Once fixed, I'd support posting especially given how NATO's presence has been more talked about in the news in recent news. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on significance. Principally a secretarial position, appointed, which is serving as the head of a steering committee (albeit an important one). Kcmastrpc (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose — Not even ITNR, who cares about the head or tail of NATO. STSC (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Probably the 32 member nations of NATO which contribute ~55% of global military funding and 45.65% of the global GDP. Scuba 20:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I visited the International Maritime Organization recently. This has 176 members which represent most of the world. It's responsible for the world's shipping and so quite important for vital commerce and trade. It has a Secretary-General too – Arsenio Dominguez – and he was appointed earlier this year. There are lots of international agencies like this with lots of staff and so forth. But are their staff changes significant or not? You can't really tell until they have been in post for a while and so determine whether they have made a difference. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Probably the 32 member nations of NATO which contribute ~55% of global military funding and 45.65% of the global GDP. Scuba 20:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are many other alliances and supranational organisations in the world, so it's really unnecessary to single out NATO and give it more importance. Furthermore, this position is largely ceremonial as this person doesn't wield any significant power. The decisions whether the United States or Turkey will go to wars are simply made by their presidents.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality, support once improved on notability article needs some work. I honestly don't know where those editors have been hiding for the past thirty years (or two) who doubt NATO's stature and the importance of what NATO's top leader does and says. _-_Alsor (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Over the past thirty years, several major NATO members have been at war (one its longest). That mostly stopped while Stoltenberg was attending meetings, issuing memoranda and all that high and mighty hidden stuff. In peacetime, it's the many other industry bigwigs whose technically unsexy jobs "really" matter. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- It might also help you understand others' apathy to wonder whether his two "big" vows (to work against Russian aggression and with the American president) are things NATO already routinely does. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready for the usual reason. Support on significance. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
US port strike
[edit]Blurb: Dockworkers strike at East and Gulf Coast ports in the United States (Post)
Alternative blurb: 45,000 ILA dockworkers go on strike at East Coast and Gulf Coast ports in the United States.
Alternative blurb II: 45,000 dockworkers of the International Longshoremen's Association strike across United States Gulf and East Coast ports.
Alternative blurb III: The ILA and USMX negotiate to suspend a three-day labour strike at US Gulf and East Coast ports by over 45,000 dockworkers.
News source(s): (initial CNBC report), (post-strike Reuters report)
Credits:
- Nominated by Interstellarity (talk · give credit)
This may impact supply and inflation and is newsworthy. Interstellarity (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - this may not last long. And hasn't exactly been getting anything other than local reporting. What other strikes have we ITN'ed? I'd have thought it would have had to be more of a general strike, or something unusual like the 1981 US Air Traffic Controllers strike, when they simply fired all the strikers. If we ITNed all similar strikes, we'd have a few a month just for France! :) Nfitz (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment US East Coast / Gulf ports process close to half of the value of imports coming into the USA, and if I'm not mistaken, the US is the biggest importer on the planet. Also, I believe we blurbed the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike which was entertainment workers, not people who oversaw trade. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike was blurbed in July 2023: see the posted blurb page. There was also coincidentally a blurb for a large-scale strike in France earlier that month. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Purely by the numbers, a French strike does not have the same economic impact as one that impacts the entire East and Gulf Coast ports, which as noted process about half of all imports/exports. IF this lasts long (more than a few days), it could be one of the largest strikes in decades. Wqwt (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- If this lasts long, then it can be reposted. Obviously strikes in bigger countries have bigger local impacts. That doesn't make it ITN. Surely the relative impact of the Canadian rail strike (which shut down virtually the entire rail network) was bigger - but not even nominated. Nfitz (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Canadian rail strike was nominated. It was mainly opposed due to article quality issues & also b/c the strike ended too quickly. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 18:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- If this lasts long, then it can be reposted. Obviously strikes in bigger countries have bigger local impacts. That doesn't make it ITN. Surely the relative impact of the Canadian rail strike (which shut down virtually the entire rail network) was bigger - but not even nominated. Nfitz (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – From the Impact section of the article, we can see the massive effects this strike has. First strike of this sort in nearly fifty years. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- There have been many, many, dockworkers strikes. It isn't even the first one this week - Montreal. The only difference is the rest of us don't rush here as fast as we can for local news. Nfitz (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Wait for a while to see if this is resolved very quickly (i.e. under 24 hours), but otherwise strong support. (argument moved below). GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Wait/WeakSupport If this goes longer than 72h then the impact could be rather severe. Kcmastrpc (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It looks like there isn't going to be a resolution to this anytime soon and the fact this story has dropped off the front pages of many MSM outlets has me suspicious. Blurb it! Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Wait/support per Kcmastrpc and George.The Kip (contribs) 00:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose now that the strike has ended. The Kip (contribs) 20:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hold for now, suggest 48h as the threshold for a revisit This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 00:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for at least 48/72 hr to see how this develops and how the wind blows in terms of negotiations to end it. The Impact section should likely be expanded to explain better about how much cargo goes through the eastern ports relative to other ports (known factors), as that will help put the dollar figures mentioned in better perspective. --Masem (t) 01:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Significant event that could have an important impact on the US economy and the US election. Tradediatalk 04:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Those of you who support are relying on conjecture and forecasts. Here we cannot rely on crystal balls: we must wait for a global and noticeable economic impact. For now it is something sectorial, local and exclusively newsworthy and Wikipedia is not a news portal. _-_Alsor (talk) 09:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- An issue with a case like this is that the onset of the strike will be covered by the news, but that when the impacts start to actually occur, it will be a trickle of news and very difficult to set a point where it could be then considered "in the news". We obviously don't want to rush but here's a case where there's multiple high quality sources expressing very likely results should the strike persist, so it makes sense to post at this stage (but as noted above, after being sure the strike isn't likely to resolve quickly). — Masem (t) 12:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Soft Support politically relevant, and the only glaring issues is that it needs more content in some sections. Scuba 20:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Support altblurb:45,000 ILA dockworkers go on strike at East Coast and Gulf Coast ports in the United States.
It's been over 24 hours since the strike commenced and a quick search for "when will the port strike end" gives no indication it will be an affair that will be resolved quickly. CNBC estimates a weeklong strike at East Coast / Gulf ports could cause up to 3.6 billion in economic loss, and compare that to 6.5 billion over a full 105 days for the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike, which was also blurbed. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)- Maybe I’m just being pedantic but I think “…dockworkers strike at…” is more correct than “go on strike”. –DMartin 03:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Changing my vote to Strong support per Reuters: No negotiations to end the strike are scheduled, and Joe Biden, the US president, is putting his support behind the ILA. This may truly be a long one. Also, as per economic loss, JP Morgan now estimates the strike could cost the nation up to $5 billion USD a day, significantly above the initial CNBC estimate of 3.7 billion in one week. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)- Altblurb 2 proposed, per @User:dmartin969's suggestion. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprising that he'd put his support behind them; it's a month to go before the general election, and the last thing he wants is to lose the sizable union demographic on failing to take a stance with a story like this. For that reason, I do not believe his support makes the strike inherently more significant. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- My stance is is that this is as opposed to no stance or an anti-union one taken by the president, had this happened last year. The president's stance is a not insignificant argument that this strike will go longer, whether or not it was done for political advantage. Besides, it's not going in the blurb. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait then Support - If this continues over an extended period of time then this will be one of the most significant strikes in the last few years. Already all over the news PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is very likely to have a significant effect on not just the US economy, but the global economy. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 04:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - This will likely be significant and companies are known for their greed, there is a very high chance that the protests last longer than 3 days and start affecting the global supply chain. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - This is a big one, comparable to the air traffic controller's strikes in the 70s and 80s, which also had similarly broad impacts. Duly signed, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 13:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - It's been 48 hours and the situation hasn't yet been resolved. The United States is the world's biggest economy and this strike affects the whole Eastern US. This will surely have a large impact. -insert valid name here- (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Becoming a big issue maybe even causing riots if it's seriously disrupting the supply chain. STSC (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- SupportMajor industrial unrest becoming social unrest. Remember, people: The class struggle is a political struggle. SerialNumber54129 22:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Word is that the negotiations have worked and the strike will be over by Friday [1] Masem (t) 22:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- And now confirmed. [2] — Masem (t) 03:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The strike didn’t last long enough to necessitate a blurb. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Strike put on hold so this doesn't need a blurb. Noah, BSBATalk 04:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-strike support - significant economical damage has already occurred, markets worldwide already fell, and regardless, this was the biggest US strike action since 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike (which we blurbed in 2023), and if the JP Morgan estimates are confirmed, would have caused twice as much economic damage as that (see Reuters source for more). Altblurb 3 proposed. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-Altblurb 3 Proposal Oppose Strike news is only news during a strike and markets were designed to fluctuate. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The strike has ended and I don't think we should post about an ended strike that lasted just few days. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Strike is over without major disruptions. DarkSide830 (talk) 00:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
RD: John Amos
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by Staraction (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Rusted AutoParts (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Amos passed 21 August 2024; it was announced 1 October 2024. Staraction (talk | contribs) 19:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose large chunks of article are uncited. Scuba 20:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I am shocked to see that they didn't let public know before 40 days passed. BilboBeggins (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready Referencing is extremely poor. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose orange tagged and many cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Iran strikes Israel
[edit]Blurb: Iran launches strikes against Israel following Israel's ground invasion of Lebanon. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Iran launches a missile attack against Israel.
Alternative blurb II: Iran launches a missile attack against Israel in retaliation for the assassinations of Hezbollah and Hamas leaders Hassan Nasrallah and Ismail Haniyeh, and of Iranian general Abbas Nilforoushan.
News source(s): WaPo CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by RockinJack18 (talk · give credit)
Early, but could have crucial consequences in the conflict - RockinJack18 17:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Altblurb1 until Iran's attack is directly connected to the invasion of Lebanon. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 17:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm sure this was just a spur of the moment thing. Scuba 02:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait - not much is known yet about the scale, impact, etc. Fog of war is still very much in effect. The Kip (contribs) 17:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm satisfied with the combined blurb. The Kip (contribs) 00:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Thousands of missiles launched simultaneously, with many dozens of missies making it through the Iron Dome and causing massive damage. Count Iblis (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Do we have sources for thousands of missiles launched, with dozens causing massive damage? It was hundreds and a handful with no indications of the degree of damage when I was looking. But at the same time, surely this is why we should Wait. Nfitz (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait we don't the scale or the impact of these missiles, let the dust settle a little. Also, currently the article coinsists mostly of the background information and has no information about the strikes itself. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's been widely reported that this is in response to Israel's actions against Hezbollah which could be covered under the ongoing item for Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) RachelTensions (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. This was a major, highly newsworthy attack that is important enough to have its own entry. Jerdle (talk) 18:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait We don't know enough at this point. However, if this results in a major direct military conflict between Iran and Israel, I suspect some kind of blurb will be justified. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - I know it's tempting to bundle together the crazy events in the last 2 days but I think this is a notable development on its own. A nuclear-armed state has been directly bombarded by a foreign nation. Tel Aviv and Jerusalem have had hundreds of missile strikes, the entire country is in lockdown, by far the biggest confrontation between Israel and Iran ever. This will have major ramifications for the future of the conflict. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I feel there's significant exaggeration in your statement User:PrecariousWorlds. It's not the "biggest confrontation between Israel and Iran ever". With less than 200 missiles fired, it's not even the biggest confrontation this year - as there was over 300 in April 2024. Also, with less than 200 missiles fired, what sourcing are you using for the "hundreds of missile strikes"? Surely the majority of the missiles were shot down, and didn't strike. Can you provide some kind of back-up for your comment, or edit it? Thanks, Nfitz (talk) 20:37, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- US Major general Pat Ryder says the attack was at least twice as big as in April ( ). Most were intercepted but many struck and caused significant damage in suburbs and in military bases. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your words are hundreds. Clearly Ryder is full of it, according to Israeli and Iranian claims. Nfitz (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- US Major general Pat Ryder says the attack was at least twice as big as in April ( ). Most were intercepted but many struck and caused significant damage in suburbs and in military bases. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- I feel there's significant exaggeration in your statement User:PrecariousWorlds. It's not the "biggest confrontation between Israel and Iran ever". With less than 200 missiles fired, it's not even the biggest confrontation this year - as there was over 300 in April 2024. Also, with less than 200 missiles fired, what sourcing are you using for the "hundreds of missile strikes"? Surely the majority of the missiles were shot down, and didn't strike. Can you provide some kind of back-up for your comment, or edit it? Thanks, Nfitz (talk) 20:37, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait/Oppose until we see if this has wider ramifications. Iran launched missiles at Israel just this year, in April, as a response to Israel killing five members of Iran’s revolutionary guards, but there was no larger effects. The middle east is a powder keg right now, and we should not be posting every salvo that occurs between all these nations. Natg 19 (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. a whole country waiting for missiles coming from +1000miles away to fall on its head, in what might spark a (choose your superlative / descriptor) war, is important enough. TaBaZzz (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a big breaking news live coverage on every major news network around the world. It should be "Alternative blurb" because blurb is original research that is probably wrong. Tradediatalk 19:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Covered in ongoing. Kcmastrpc (talk) 19:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb. We shouldn't try to read tea leaves about why Iran did this, nor should be broadcast their explanations. The article will cover all that. What's important to cover in the blurb is what happened. Hundreds of ballistic missiles were fired. Add casualty figures if there were any, as they become available, because we customarily include them. Jehochman Talk 19:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- comment reports say most of the missiles were shot down, and the few that landed did little damage with maybe perhaps one casualty. This would make this similar to the previous missile strike this year. It is probably better to try to keep it to one facet of this conflict, being the lebanon invasion. Masem (t) 19:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support original blurb unless there is a separate posting for the Lebanon invasion. Two for one. Bitspectator ⛩️ 19:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the consensus that this nomination and the below nomination regarding the Israel invasion of Lebanon from September 30th are mutually exclusive? On the one hand, the two events are directly connected and closely related, so it seems logical to group them in a blurb. But on the other hand, this attack by Iran has been in the works for a while - is it an oversimplification to imply causation by saying "After Israel does x, Iran does y"? In any event, support some blurb being posted. The admin who reviews this probably should assess and decide on the nomination for the invasion at the same time. FlipandFlopped ツ 19:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support the original blurb here with both launches strikesand Israel's ground invasion of Lebanon to be bolded. We can use one blurb to document two very related events.VR (Please ping on reply) 19:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Vice regent Not true, the IRGC said it was for the assassinations Personisinsterest (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose covered by ongoing.
- Noah, BSBATalk 19:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Observation 1: No one (of the general reader public, to a first approximation) notices/sees the "ongoing" items down there. See banner blindness. Might as well just remove the individual entries, just retain the "Ongoing events" link, enlarge text size a bit. Move all the "here are various Major Global Events" stuff to the top of that page. There, frees up space in the already crowded ITN box (this helps in making individual items stand out more). (Wikimedia really needs to hire a professional UI designer. The Right Thing to do would be for them to make suggestions on improvements, and work on things requested by the projects.)
- Observation 2: Assume waaaaay less general background & world events knowledge of a general audience (the audience Wikipedia is supposed to be written towards). Lowest common denominator. What % of the total English-as-a-first-language population do you estimate would be able to without looking up anything, correctly answer: Name a country that Hezbollah has something to do with? Which countries are immediately adjacent to Israel? Okay now do total world English speakers. Those things being necessary prerequisite knowledge, to know that for some kind of News related to "Israel" "Iran" "Lebanon", you might want to go looking under "Israel—Hezbollah war". --Slowking Man (talk) 20:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- on the ·second point, we don't assume readers are dumb as rocks and there is some degree of WP:CIR for readers, it's why we normally do not link country or major city names unless we are specifically talking about that as a geographic place, because we assume that readers have a decent knowledge of world geography. Masem (t) 20:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- To be fair, it's hard to keep track of axis of the three H-terrorist groups, and what they currently occupy, for a casual reader. I think a simple "Israeli wars" or "Fighting in the Middle East" might cover it better. Nfitz (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have some possibly bad news for you about the median level of geography knowledge of the general public. (Yes that's the right link though the website might look unexpected, they apparently commissioned the survey.) Hmm wonder what kind of results you'd get from a survey of one of the top 5 countries here after the US (the total # of which are in Europe: 0) Slowking Man (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC) (Clarifying addendum: top 5 by total # of en speakers --Slowking Man (talk) 04:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC))
- on the ·second point, we don't assume readers are dumb as rocks and there is some degree of WP:CIR for readers, it's why we normally do not link country or major city names unless we are specifically talking about that as a geographic place, because we assume that readers have a decent knowledge of world geography. Masem (t) 20:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted I've written a combined blurb with the 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, but phrased so that we don't imply that Iran attacked because of the Lebanon invasion. The blurb I've removed was the 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike, partly so that we don't overload ITN with middle eastern affairs, and partly because Maggie Smith was posted later than the blurbs above. Schwede66 22:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post posting Support - a case of dog bites man, relative to recent news relating to Israel. SerialNumber54129 22:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Thai school bus crash
[edit]Blurb: Twenty schoolchildren and three others are killed in a bus crash (pictured) in Pathum Thani, Thailand (Post)
Alternative blurb: A school bus crashes (pictured) in Pathum Thani, Thailand, leaving 20 school children and 3 others dead
Alternative blurb II: A school bus crashes and burns (pictured) in Pathum Thani, Thailand, leaving 22 school children and 3 teachers dead.
News source(s): Reuters, BBC, Bangkok Post
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Chainwit. (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Bloxzge 025 (talk · give credit) and Miwako Sato (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Bus carrying school children crashes and catches fire in Thailand, leaving 20 children and 3 other dead. Significant both in term of number of fatalities and that of the fact that most of which are children. PS Feel free to edit the blurb as appropriate. I'm not sure about its writing style. --Chainwit. (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Correct me if I'm wrong, but is that image AI generated? See the hose on the right disappearing and the nearly unintelligible Mercedes-Benz written in English. That, or this image was taken at a low resolution and upscaled, keeping the sparse details. Either way, I don't believe this image is a good fit for ITN. Neutral on the blurb, seems to be a relatively major safety incident more than it is as a loss of life, as the article states that over 20,000 traffic fatalities are reported yearly in Thailand. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Image is not AI generated I can confirm. It just happen so to be a screenshot from a low-res live stream on YouTube. And yes, the bus indeed bears a Mercedes logo. -- Chainwit. (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose The loss of life is horrific. However we almost never post traffic accidents, even really bad ones. And as GeorgeMemulous noted, Thailand has a bad reputation for traffic safety. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose a tragic accident, but I don't think this will any sort of long term impact or effect. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose, tragic but ultimately routine news. For anyone curious, on the livestream, we can see that there's a twist and fold in the hose making it flatter at one angle, and giving the impression that it's disappearing into the ground (and reappearing), especially with the low resolution. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Sigh... with respect, I find myself once again needing to correct the record and point out a double standard in relation to a bus crash which occurs outside of the western world. In March of this year, after 2024 Mmamatlakala bus crash was nominated, there was strong opposition with many claiming that we do not post "routine bus crashes" (similar to what is happening here). At that time, I pointed out that, quite contrary to those claiming we never post automobile accidents, we had actually in fact posted both the Carberry highway collision and Humboldt Broncos bus crash with minimal, if any, opposition. To post those accidents from the Western world but not one with more casualties from a non-western country, would leave ITN readers with the impression that white bus crash victims dying is notable where African or Asian bus crashes are not. In the end, the 2024 Mmamatlakala bus crash was posted to ITN. For consistency and to avoid systemic bias, that precedent should be upheld. This is a devastating event for Thailand and it is being widely reported by global news outlets and there is no reason to break from the precedent we set earlier this year. FlipandFlopped ツ 19:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I understand your position, but in my opinion, the Carberry bus crash would get an oppose vote from me. Of the four mentioned, I'd say the Humboldt Broncos bus crash and 2024 Mmamatlakala bus crash are the only ones that would deserve a blurb, given the former having important and notable passengers killed and the latter having a very high death toll of one identifiable group. That being said, Oppose the 2024 Thai bus crash until if and when a major new development occurs. If all is said and done, it'll stay oppose. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I wouldn't have supported posting any of these bus crashes. We can always point at previous times we did something to call it a precedent, but it means we never get to actually ask ourselves whether we should've actually be doing it to begin with. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not interesting to our readers. Tradediatalk 20:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- this is not a forum to discuss if articles are interesting but rather to post articles that are in the news ( WP:ITNPURPOSE ) so no offense but that argument is not valid (keep your oppose vote though not invalidating that!) Ion.want.uu (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per above. Absolutely tragic, but limited impact and likely to have a limited legacy. The Kip (contribs) 00:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support event is significant due to high fatality rate and the circumstance of it being children. Being "not interesting" to readers just because it didn't occur in the Western world shouldn't be any reason to oppose and doesn't diminish its significance and impact. Happily888 (talk) 01:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This is the type of event article that at the present time, it is not clear if it has the enduring coverage that we'd expect for event articles, as is the case for most road traffic accidents, even with the large toll. This is the trouble that we have overall with keeping the encyclopedia to covering news topics that are appropriate for an encyclopedia, with a long tail and influence elsewhere, and not for any current event that gets a burst of news coverage (even if worldwide). Maybe there is some long tail of a story here, but its definitely not obvious, and until it is, we really shouldn't even have an article on it (that's more what Wikinews is for). --Masem (t) 04:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A quick update here, investigations found the bus to have been illegally modified with 10 gas tanks fitted into it. It "likely would" cause a stricter reform in term of bus regulation in Thailand, which IMO makes the incidence significant in term of a lasting effect? (Again with another "?") --Chainwit. (talk) 08:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose although a tragedy, it doesn't have any impact outside Thailand. Willing to reconsider if this somehow changes bus regulations globally or something major happens due to this. Scuba 16:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ITNCDONT says:
Blaylockjam10 (talk) 03:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Please do not… Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
- generally unproductive, but not always Scuba 20:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ITNCDONT says:
- Support per Flipandflopped. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 03:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support: Very terrible bus accident. Notable, with significant death tolls. High Admiral JMT (talk) 03:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Certainly a notable and ITN newsworthy event about a school bus fire that killed many youngsters wherever it happened. STSC (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I looked at this and found it quite interesting as it was not quite the usual bus plunge. Points to note include:
- It was a coach rather than a school bus, having been hired for an outing
- It was about 50 years old and been extensively modded, being converted from an Isuzu to a Mercedes – don't ask me how
- Such incidents are common in Thailand which has a very high rate of traffic accidents – see List of countries by traffic-related death rate
- Andrew🐉(talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Andrew Davidson and the bizarre view that ITN only posts things if they have a global impact *facepalm* SerialNumber54129 22:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support without the image, we can make do without the low-res quality. There are updates in the article which indicate a move for stronger regulation (albeit a small start); suspension of the bus operator as a business; seizing of their other illegally modded bus inventory. – robertsky (talk) 03:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Accidents are posted - period. I see zero reason this does not meet ITN criteria, and the mere fact it's a "tragic accident" or only is impactful in one country is not a reason to exclude it. I do, however, agree with the others that the image is less than ideal and would prefer this not be an image post if a better one is not found. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 03:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per nom et al. InedibleHulk (talk) 08:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Numerically, it's almost even. I'm guided here by many editors expressing "weak opposes" and one oppose vote that had to be neglected for a non-policy based rationale. Schwede66 19:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Jimmy Carter turns 100
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Former U.S. president Jimmy Carter turns 100, the first U.S. president to do so. (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post, The Hill, USA Today, Al Jazeera, BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Moonreach (talk · give credit)
- Oppose Trivia, not the type of news we post. Masem (t) 14:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good for him, but this isn't really news, it's basically trivia, as Masem already said. TomMasterRealTALK 14:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The people over at DYK will probably love this one, good faith nom though. TwistedAxe [contact] 14:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. However, I'd set the criteria for a blurb at being older than Chau Sen Cocsal Chhum, age 103 years 4 months 21 days, the oldest state leader of all time. That or if he dies before then; either way Jimmy Carter is going to get at least one blurb by March 2027 (assuming no other leaders take the title before then). GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above; a birthday isn't exactly ITN. Send this over to the DYK folks instead and let them have at it. qw3rty 15:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support For once, it would be good to report someone continuing to live rather than dying. The topic is making headlines across the world and so qualifies here at ITN. It definitely does not qualify for DYK for several reasons -- it's not a new article or recent GA, it's already a GA and it has previously been run at DYK in 2021. OTD might be a possibility as they do anniversaries but I don't know the ropes there so well. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Now I check, I find that it's already at OTD but it's easy to miss as it's buried down the bottom "Jimmy Carter (b. 1924)". Andrew🐉(talk) 16:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-close clarification: please DO NOT send this to DYK either. The article exists since more than a week, a five-fold expansion is simply out of the question, and it has already been promoted to GA. There's no possible way for the Jimmy Carter article to meet WP:DYKNEW. Cambalachero (talk) 16:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Post-post-close: I already nominated it for OTD a few days ago and it is running today, so we couldn't have had it elsewhere on the main page either way. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Inauguration of Claudia Sheinbaum
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Claudia Sheinbaum (pictured) is inaugurated as the 66th President of Mexico, becoming the first woman to ever hold the office. (Post)
News source(s): NPR, NBC
Credits:
- Nominated by The Wikimonger (talk · give credit)
- Oppose Already commemorated as an election winner in June. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, Queen Victoria more or less founded Canada in 1867. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not only that. Elizabeth II more recently ruled Canada for 70 years.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- And not only that, but Mary Simon is more or less wielding that mace singlehandedly lately. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- 😆 Also 4 of the last 5 have been female + Sauve. Nfitz (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- And if we're playing Devil's semanticist here, there's Kim Campbell, more or less "elected". InedibleHulk (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- 😆 Also 4 of the last 5 have been female + Sauve. Nfitz (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- And not only that, but Mary Simon is more or less wielding that mace singlehandedly lately. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not only that. Elizabeth II more recently ruled Canada for 70 years.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything that's changed since the June ITN. Nfitz (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose we already posted her winning the election. Scuba 16:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think we post the presidential inaugurations. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: The news is when the candidate wins the elections. Unless notable for something else, the inauguration is trivial when it happens. Cambalachero (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) New Prime Minister of Japan
[edit]Blurb: Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) becomes the Prime Minister of Japan, succeeding Fumio Kishida. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) becomes the Prime Minister of Japan, after winning the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party leadership election.
Alternative blurb II: After winning the Liberal Democratic Party leadership election, Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) becomes the Prime Minister of Japan, succeeding Fumio Kishida.
Alternative blurb III: Shigeru Ishiba (pictured) succeeds Fumio Kishida as the Prime Minister of Japan, after winning the Liberal Democratic Party leadership election.
News source(s): NHK, Japan Today, Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by Midori No Sora (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Borgenland (talk · give credit), TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit), Faustino Sojo (talk · give credit), ValenciaThunderbolt (talk · give credit) and ギルディアス156世 (talk · give credit)
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Shigeru Ishiba has officially been accepted as the 102nd Prime Minister of Japan by the Diet. However, the article still needs some work done. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 05:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Duplicate nomination with the 27 September one, and the item should be posted ASAP. Unnamelessness (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- That nomination was closed with consensus to wait till inauguration. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Election article is good sourcing wise, but the background info is lacking info between 9/11 to 9/27 and that's a huge/crucial part of the election coverage. Ishiba's article also has a few cn tags, given the overall improved state of the article.Support Expanded the LDP article and addressed cn tags on Ishiba's article. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)- Support per ITN/R Scuba 16:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- amended as ITN/R. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support both the the PM's article and the election article are in good shape. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. The Kip (contribs) 17:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Still an orange tag in the election article, and agree with TDKR that the post-9/11 coverage is still lacking. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Chaotic Enby: Issues fixed. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support because it's a new head of state and ITN/R. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 23:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @JohnAdams1800, if something is ITN/R, then the only matter to comment on is whether article quality is up to scratch. Schwede66 23:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- To clarify, he's not head of state but head of government, Japan is a constitutional monarchy, with Naruhito as head of state. AusLondonder (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- @JohnAdams1800, if something is ITN/R, then the only matter to comment on is whether article quality is up to scratch. Schwede66 23:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support: Now that he has inaugurated, I support very much since the head of government in Japan has changed, and Japan is a very notable country worldwide. High Admiral JMT (talk) 03:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Addressed update/sourcing issues on both articles. Should be good. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey! That's my image I uploaded! In all seriousness, in all seriousness, support. Both articles look good. Someone vastly improved the LDP leadership election article also; thanks to them. River10000 (talk) 13:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)