Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 224

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 220 ← Archive 222 Archive 223 Archive 224 Archive 225 Archive 226 → Archive 230

Draft:Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem)

I would like to work on the article to address the issues that have been raised by the editor. The article was deleted because I haven't worked on it for more than six months. -ValeriyaMechkova (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

@ValeriyaMechkova: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"
Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note particularly the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Medicalresearch.com

I, 71.224.201.19, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.224.201.19 (talk) 14:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gerard Ramon

I, SP371, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SP371 (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

@SP371: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Southern Folklife Collection

OTRS ticket received -Darwinius (talk) 17:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Jehovah elyon sunday school

this page is it just an organisation for children so i just want the name of the organisation to be known -13:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)SegunIMichael (talk)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (JohnCD (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. That isn't what Wikipedia is for, and we routinely block users who're only here for that reason. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Not done Also this had no claim of importance. Perhaps Jehovah Elyon Parish should have an article, if there are independent references that talk about it. But Wikipedia is not here to encourage people to join the church or sunday school, it is here to provide encyclopedic information. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

List of League of Legends champions

requesting userfication, the deleting admin, sandstein, has declined to restore the page for a draft -Prisencolin (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

  • I'm somewhat hesitant to restore anything deleted at AfD that was declined by the deleting admin, in this case Sandstein. Maybe he'd be willing to e-mail you a copy? Otherwise I will note that much of the same material is already present at this Wikia for the game, but I am mildly concerned that there might not be enough sourcing to justify a character list page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I've declined undeletion because I don't think this can become viable as an article, it's just fancruft better suited for fan wikis. What other admins do with this request is up to them.  Sandstein  12:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Contrary to the near unanimous deletion consensus at the last AFD, I think beyond a doubt that this article is notable. Just look up 'league of legends champions' (without quotes) in the reliable video game sources custom search engine.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Can some other admin restore a draft to userspace? I'd like to have all of the edit history available, so it would be preferable to an email copy.--Prisencolin (talk) 01:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
@Prisencolin: I share Sandstein's doubts that the problems with this article can be overcome (especially after its recent disastrous deletion review), but tell you what. I'm willing to userfy this if you'll agree not to attempt to move or copy it into mainspace without getting approval at DRV first. I don't think that's likely to happen, and I can pretty much guarantee that it won't without significantly better sourcing; but still, nobody else seems to be stepping forward to restore it for you. Does this sound reasonable to you? —Cryptic 08:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the help, that seems doable. Just one thing though, is DRV really the right place to request that the page be restored?--Prisencolin (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
@Prisencolin: Cryptic is offering to restore the article to your userspace conditional on a promise from you that you will not move it to main article space without proper review. I would say DRV isn't the place where a such a review would be conducted, but a review by the deleting admin, to confirm that the article addresses the objections in the AFD discussion, would be appropriate. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
  @Prisencolin and Amatulic: Now at User:Prisencolin/List of League of Legends champions. One of deletion review's purposes is to review drafts to see if they've been sufficiently improved for restoration post-AFD (recent example); while this is usually in the context of the article having been protected against creation, the situation here is analogous. Review by Sandstein would be fine by me too, but his previous comments leave me with the impression that you'd have better luck at DRV. —Cryptic 04:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

ICF Junior & U23 Canoe World Championships

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Youngasianboys (talk) 07:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

 Not done - this is a blocked sockpuppet. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Asian Championships and other sports events that deleted by you

Sphilbrick, this admin delet many correct page because of the selfishness and stubbornness and this vandal and Destructive user Mohsen1248, he prevent any edit and creat in sports events.

hi and please help from delet Sphilbrick admin. You just deleted many article because not adopt parsa amoli and allfutsal ip. You should not have deleted them because it was contested. Please restore the articles. A banned user might have created it, poorly, but it is a valid subject and if nothing else, their research and typing can be used if I or someone else chooses to improve upon it. the user Mohsen 1248 has a Destructive role that prevent to creat any new pages and any edit in sport events page. He with this destructive behavior caused others angry and make vandalism. He takes prevent any creation or constructive modification. he make the sports pages to his personal property. all of pages you delet have a correct and usefull content. 1996 concaf futsal many years not exist. The removal process is inconsistent with the values of Wikipedia and Of the selfishness and stubbornness. thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngasianboys (talk • contribs) 07:17, 26 February 2016

 Not done. Since you have been blocked, you will not get anywhere by repeatedly setting up new accounts. It is you that is blocked, not the account. If you want to contribute, you should read the WP:Guide to appealing blocks and make an unblock request on the talk page of your original account or, if that is protected, through the Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System.
You need to read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources (you mustn't), Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia does not want articles about everything that exists, only things that other people have independently thought worth writing about) and Wikipedia:Verifiability (anything added needs a reliable source), to understand why your articles were deleted, and make clear in your unblock request that you understand those pages. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bobby McKeown

Need additional time to research sources -Jamck (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

@Jamck: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coalition for Responbile Home Education

I, Forgedimagination, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Forgedimagination (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

@Forgedimagination: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Coalition for Responsible Home Education (fixing the typo in the title). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Atlantic Airlines (United States)

Atlantic Airlines is a US airline, this page would benefit the company so googlers could find information about it quickly. -Jackpaylor (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

We don't do things for the benefit of a company; that would go against our core principles. What you'd need to show is that it meets our standards for inclusion, which is why it was deleted in the first place. — Earwig talk 02:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Airlines (United States), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Activated Filter Media

I, KiooTiaa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KiooTiaa (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

  •  Not done Unfortunately this reads like an advertisement saying how gret the product is. It would be better to start from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I will rewrite it, please provide me that content. KiooTiaa (talk) 07:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I think that part of the reason it seems promotional is that it's partially copyvio from here and here. Kioo, we cannot accept copyrighted material on Wikipedia per WP:COPYVIO. We could probably e-mail you a copy of the material but you would have to enable email on your account per instructions at WP:ENABLEEMAIL. Even if you were to grant Wikipedia permission to use the material (assuming you're the copyright holder) this would have to be completely re-written to fit WP:NPOV. Also, I have to assume that you are someone representing the company, so make sure that you disclose this conflict of interest somewhere per WP:COI. I'd also recommend that you look into going through one of the training programs like WP:ADVENTURE. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Arden Altino

Suzart1 (talk) 12:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Suzart1: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Bond (for international development)

Bond is a crucial and important international development body in the UK, with tens of thousands of members. I can't see any reason to justify its deletion, or understand why it has been. -Julius h (talk) 14:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. However there are no independent references at all, so notability is unproven. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

AWK Solutions

Look into the version history of Pollard's Chicken, the page was created on 5th April 2011 and the deletion status was tagged just 2 days a ago (After someone raised the point in the AFD AWK Solutions page). Surprised that a article like this stayed for 5 years, before it gets noticed (after giving the name as reference).

Few more embarrassing examples for you. Big Chicken, Bush's Chicken, Chicken Express, The Chicken Rice Shop. Let me know if you need more examples. Putting this articles for deletion (after someone raises a point like me), is not justice done. This articles are present in wiki, since long 6 to 7 years back and the purpose for this articles ( to have a wiki presence ) has been achieved long back.

in the deletion page, someone highlighted few sentences that were sounding very promotional in nature. So accordingly, I was on the process for getting those sentences removed and rectify it accordingly. But you didnt even give the chance for this, as you deleted it on 25th Feb. Please dont misunderstand me, I am not blaming you personally, as wouldn't have known, what i was planing to do. -Startupindia (talk) 21:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Startupindia: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AWK Solutions, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MelanieN (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Raphael Lataster

An earlier version of this page was deleted once, many years ago. After checking with the original deleter I went ahead and made a new one based on this author's more recent publication successes. But I'd like the hidden history restored so I can see if there are any gems of info to be drawn from it. Blessings!! Pandeist (talk) 05:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC) -Pandeist (talk) 05:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

  •  Done I hope the history is about the same person, as the content is totally different! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

List of college dropout billionaires

(AFD for reference) I contacted user:Go Phightins!, but his user page says he may not respond quickly -Prisencolin (talk) 00:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Darrin Hodgetts

Expired PROD by User:Liz. Creator (myself) does not appear to have been notified of the PROD'ing. Happy to take this to AfD if required. -Stuartyeates (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Dgpop (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 11:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Alok Prasad

I, Alok08, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deleted for being idle for more than 6 months -Alok08 (talk) 09:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

@Alok08: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mika Simmons

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alabama73 (talk) 14:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please renew this page as I have now more sources to add for Mika Simmons - her film Balcony just won best short at Berlin Film Festival amongst other things. Google has now listed her but the information is incorrect as she does not have a wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alabama73 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

@Alabama73: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Mieko Ishikawa

I'm working on creating some articles on notable women in video games, including one on Mieko Ishikawa. Having noticed that a previous version was created & PRODed, I am interested in seeing if it has any useful content. Would appreciate if the previous article could be restored to my Sandbox. -Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 03:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

@Ryk72: Done at User:Ryk72/Sandbox. — Earwig talk 03:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Earwig, Very much appreciated. Hopefully, I can turn it into a useful, well sourced, article. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 03:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Expand stub optic axis of a crystal

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Strickja (talk) 00:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Thought it looks like notes to update something else. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Todd_Schroeder

I, Stevenlevine1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevenlevine1 (talk) 02:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Drifts (film)

The film had its national première on 15 January 2016 as referred at ‘Production’. A missing source has just been added as reference.

Tertulius (talk) 23h:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Relationship of Luminous Flux to Luminous Intensity

Speedy deletion reason does not apply to page as I last edited it. I.e. page did not make any representation of policy. It is a long time ago, would like to ckeck what is going on as I did not log in between being notified and the page being deleted -Op47 (talk) 16:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gerald Braden - Composer - Musician

I, 2602:306:CF4E:2180:E0AF:8727:6EA9:369F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:CF4E:2180:E0AF:8727:6EA9:369F (talk) 17:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Gerald Braden - Composer - Musician

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pianoman1954 (talk) 18:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Danny Jowenko

I, Ruipgui, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ruipgui (talk) 15:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Dr. Richard V. Ganslen

I have had the request for restoration to my sandbox posted for a couple of weeks. Obviously the automation is not functioning. I have no idea what the previous editor wrote, but I have found additional mentions of this individual and would like to see if I can make it into a viable article. -07:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Trackinfo (talk)

@Trackinfo: I see no deleted article by that name or variations of it ("Dr." without the period, name without the title, etc.). ~Amatulić (talk) 07:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
I refer to this Trackinfo (talk) 09:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
@Trackinfo: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Richard V. Ganslen. May be notable; it would need a considerable rewrite, and trimming to remove stuff sourced only to "Family Papers and Interviews" and "Victoria Pinnick, daughter, Personal knowledge". JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Dan Shamash

Relevant NFL coach for our football club -50.196.115.84 (talk) 13:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Dirtlawyer1 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 14:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

michael felgate

English professional footballer in top european top flight division much needed page -Brap14 (talk) 20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Brap14:  Done. This page was deleted because at that time it was not clear that the Cypriot First Division was a fully professional league, but it is now accepted in the list maintained by WP:WikiProject Football at WP:FPL. Please bring the article up to date, giving reliable sources for anything you add. JohnCD (talk) 20:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Alex Milway

Shinykatie (talk) 15:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Shinykatie: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:FactChecker.in

I, Shijithpk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shijithpk (talk) 16:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Shijithpk: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Evotech motorsport

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -172.78.46.96 (talk) 17:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC) I would like to request of reinstating my article and allowing me time to fix content. If my Article violates wiki rules G11 and A7 so does this wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audi_Performance_and_Racing and I am quite sure I can find few more.

Mariusz Gil

 Not done. Notwithstanding your irrelevant WP:OTHERSTUFF argument (because each article stands or falls on its own merits regardless of what else exists on Wikipedia), Audi Performance and Racing cites significant coverage by a reliable source (Forbes) and is written in a neutral tone. Your article has neither quality. There is no evidence of notability provided, and most of the sentences are promotional in tone. There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring such an article. You are welcome to start over from scratch using Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Kedar_Das

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kedardas89 (talk) 14:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography. Writing about yourself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged. This isn't Facebook. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Asia Masters Athletics Championships

This was a contested, but received the speedy treatment anyhow. I have had a fruitless conversation with the deleting Admin who has simply dragged his feet. Please restore to my sandbox so I can use this as the core of a rewritten article. -Trackinfo (talk) 06:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Trackinfo: After reading the discussion on the deleting admin's talk page, I have to say that I can't condone using this page to try to circumvent a perfectly valid decision based on WP:DENY. Restoring the article anywhere is a violation of that. Therefore your request is no Declined.
Now, if there is a certain excerpt that you want to retrieve for the purpose of avoiding the tedium of reproducing it from scratch, I can email that excerpt to you. Otherwise, the article should be written from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Fine, I do recall there was a list of historical locations and dates of the event that I don't really want to research and type from scratch. The header will be almost boilerplate from other similar events unless there is something useful in they previous editor's header which I recall was poorly done. Regarding DENY, I'm getting used to overzealous enforcement of ridiculous policies. I have nothing to do with the OP or his socks. He simply started a chain of what should be a viable article that I would like to complete. Trackinfo (talk) 09:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
@Trackinfo: You don't have email enabled on your account. So I created a page in your user space User:Trackinfo/Asia Masters Athletics Championships and I moved (while reformatting) the list of locations and dates from the deleted article. You can take it from there. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Silk Music

BStyler (talk) 17:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Film_Cut_Post_Production

I, 62.30.132.99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 62.30.132.99 (talk) 18:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

International Misophonia Research Network

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Drjobrout (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear Wiki Editor,

Hello. This is Dr. Jennifer Jo Brout. I did not make this page. However, the International Misophonia Research Network belongs to me. It is an extension of the Sensation and Emotion Network, which I began in 2008. I believe the deletion of this page is a result of a debacle that has taken place concerning the Misophonia page. I will explain.

I have been personally attacked by Judith Krauthamer who as you can see threatened to use "her network" to change the Misophonia page back to how she wants it. Please see below. Notably, I never insulted her work and have no idea why she is so upset. I have not made any changes to the Misophonia page since this past summer at which point I was so distressed from my experience with wiki that I vowed never to come back here.

I now understand however that "imperceptions" changed the misophonia page ,and has that now her changes on the Misophonia page have been flagged as COI. That being the case, now this page is being deleted. The International Research Network very much exists and there was nothing on there that was not factual. How does one have a COI with facts? Regardless, this can all be traced to the mechanizations of one person with a personal vendetta. In short, for whatever her reasons are, Ms. Krauthamer also has a COI with me (read below) and should have no influence on any changes that include me or any of my programs. Again, from what I can see on the history page of Misophonia "imperceptions" was bullied and you, the wiki editors, were used as pawns. All of this has led to the deletion of my International Misophonia Research Network page. Please see Judith's comments below.

Judith

"noticed on wiki page your comments and edit of my work. I will use my network to change it back. However, I am beyond insulted and I am letting you know that you have lost an ally (and believe me, I have been defending and supporting you in ways you are unaware of). You can rationalize any way you chose for what you have done-- that is your option-- and the edits will be changed (yes, it will be an edit game going back and forth) but the damage is done and my community of support will ultimately know the behind the scenes story. . Just went into the edits and noticed that there are two! editors who have removed your stuff for "self promotion." I am going to create an account for wiki as you did so that I can edit the page myself. Jen, you messed with my work without talking to me about it first. I feel you have crossed a line here. Its no big deal-- the wiki page goes back and forth anyway. HOwever, to discredit my work is simply beyond the pale".

It is unfortunate that Judith took these simple changes that misperceptions made as a personal insult as they were not. However, this does not justify the deletion of a wiki page for International Misophonia Research Network. It most certainly exists. You can verify it by going to the website misophonia-research.com and you can see my other website senationandemotion.com which stands for Sensation and Emotion Network and has existed since 2008. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jennifer Jo Brout

@Drjobrout:  Not done The page International Misophonia Research Network did not exist until 10 February, when user Imperceptions created it and, within an hour, blanked it. Blanking of a page by its sole author is treated as a request to delete. This page would not, in any case, have been acceptable, being written in a promotional style and in the first person: "we build bridges between researchers we feel have our best interests in mind and with whom we can communicate... We stand behind research we believe in and stand against that which we do not..." That reads as IMRN telling the world about itself, and that is not what Wikipedia is for.
The page Misophonia has not been deleted and is being actively edited. You are welcome to contribute there, but since it appears that, in respect of this, you have from Wikipedia's point of view a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, you should read that page and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In summary, you should not edit the article directly, but suggest any changes on the article talk page, declaring your interest and citing reliable sources for the changes you propose. If discussion on the talk page fails to reach WP:Consensus, there are WP:Dispute resolution processes available, but edit-warring on the article is not the way to pursue these disagreements.
If you think the IMRN should have an article you may propose a draft through Wikipedia:Articles for creation for review by uninvolved users, but it should not be a manifesto like the Feb 10 one, should be written from an outside, neutral point of view, facts and achievements rather than opinions and aims, should be based on what others say about IMRN not what it says about itself, and needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
JohnCD, the article was recreated here IMRN. It was PRODed by Bonadea; i replaced that with a speedy-promo tag, citing this discussion and the previously deleted article. Jytdog (talk) 19:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, though as A7 rather than G11 because the actual wording was not so overtly promotional as the previous version. JohnCD (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I don't know who is trying to put the IMRN page back up and I wish they wouldn't. Is there any way to stop this? As I said before at this point my only concern is the misophonia page, which I still feel has some serious problems. IMRN belongs to me and I really don't know why people that I don't know are playing these games. It's embarrassing to me as a professional. I never put the page up, I never edited it and I don't want any part of this. Thank you for the suggestion that I propose a draft through Wikipedia:Articles for Creation. However, at this point, I would prefer to just concentrate on my own work and to concern myself with the misophonia page. So, is there a way to just take this IMRN page down and leave it down for a while until all of this nonsense stops. Unfortunately, there are people here trying to hurt others through wiki. I thank you for your help. ≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjobrout (talk • contribs) 04:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Zimbra Converter

I, Hermione.wheeler, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hermione.wheeler (talk) 07:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

The page is deleted as it was not being edited from last few months, now I need to make some edits and wants to publish the page. -Hermione.wheeler (talk) 07:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Veronica Murray

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Clahiffjenkins (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Draft:Veronica Murray

  • Not done @Clahiffjenkins: This contained copyright violations from here. Wikipedia cannot accept copyright violations, so please be aware that reposting content could lead to a block from editing if you do it again. (I thought you'd been warned about this before but hadn't been - be careful about this in the future.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

5 pages

  1. User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Anna Hairapetian
  2. User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Armen Zakaryan
  3. User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Armenian sports
  4. User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Arsen Yegiazarian
  5. User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Arusiak Grigorian

Please undelete the following pages deleted under G13. There is useful content out there which I wish to make use of. 103.6.159.91 (talk) 05:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Done These have been moved to the following pages:
  1. Draft:Anna Hairapetian
  2. Draft:Armen Zakaryan
  3. Draft:Armenian sports
  4. Draft:Arsen Yegiazarian
  5. Draft:Arusiak Grigorian
You could probably get some help working on these from the applicable sports Wikiprojects (like Wikipedia:WikiProject Chess) or from WP:ARMENIA, as they may be likely to know where to find sourcing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Woolworths Insurance

I, Darrenfriel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Darrenfriel (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done This comes across as fairly promotional in places and I get the strong feeling that this is likely closely paraphrased or a direct WP:COPYVIO from somewhere. Darrenfriel, I'll email you a copy of the material so you can re-write it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

ProperComm

The company got off to a slow start and we needed to get a better idea of the audience, uses and demand for the service; we have now been in business for several years and have narrowed our audience and can now effectively define, explain and what Propercomm can do for the community, especially domestic violence victims -Sds1263 (talk) 06:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I cannot see any deleted content with that name. There is nothing in the draft space either. If you do not know the correct name, please start again using WP:AFC perhaps at Draft:ProperComm. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: It was in AFC space. I restored it and moved it to draft space.
@Sds1263: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
The article had been restored to Draft:ProperComm. You may continue to work on it there. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Vecseyzs/Fligby

I, Vecseyzs, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vecseyzs (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I would like to work on the page again -Vecseyzs (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

@Vecseyzs: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mahmoud Sabri

I, Ymsabri, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ymsabri (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I restored it back in May last year but no one did anything to improve the page. What do youintend to do this time? @Ymsabri:? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Andre Tricoteux

The article Andre Tricoteux was restored by Fram. The rest of the talk page history should be restored in addition to the recreation by MenoBot. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Cardio First Angel

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Animall (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Cardio First Angel. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Blue Oyster Art Project Space

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 118.92.71.108 (talk) 01:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

  • This was restored last year, and no one worked to improve the page, so what do you want to do this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Christine Heppermann

I, Eric500, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Need to edit to meet guidelines -Eric500 (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

@Eric500: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

lant

I don't agree that there's no place in wikipedia for this article, one now must visit several pages to collect all the interesting facts regarding this -koszik (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

@Koszik: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Riventree (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This belongs in wiktionary not wikipedia. It's a term that describes a transition product that is discussed (well) in the directly related pages on either end of the transition: (urine, ammonia, saltpeter, phosphorus, urea, silver fulminate, etc.). Don't hit me with the WP:IDONTLIKEIT stick. The differences between a term definition (for wiktionary) and a topic (for wikipedia) are subtle for some people, but this is manifestly the former, and there is little that might be legitimately added here that isn't better inserted under the (more) relevant extant pages. (Vis, very few backlinks, even from the historical process pages)
I counterpropose it be moved to wiktionary, and then filled out as the undelete-proposer likes. Would that suit everyone?
Riventree (talk) 16:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
No, I don't agree. There is already wikt:lant, which is about the word; this is about the thing. JohnCD (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
What you're saying applies to most intermediate products, and as a consequence a lot of data is duplicated, but that's how encyclopedias work. The article I just linked provides little more than the definition itself - should it be deleted in your opinion? koszik (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Let's look at it another way: Is there any encyclopedia, regardless of how old, that has an entry for Lant? I suggest that this term has only become less worthy of an entry over time, so if it wasn't listed "back then" it'd be kind of silly to argue that it's worth an entry now. Does that make sense?
Or another way: What data belongs in Lant that doesn't belong somewhere else as well?
It seems to me that essentially no one will search for the term, and very few (well written) articles are going to link to LANT instead of some other much more specific and scientific term. Right? If so, then maybe we could agree that an unvisited page is almost ipso facto.
Lastly, does anyone besides the original resurrection-requestor honestly think lant meets WP:Notable?
Riventree (talk) 02:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Your argument 'no one will search for it' is faulty in itself, since the most important innovation of the internet-era is the invention of hyperlinks. These days people looking for knowledge don't have to search for specific things, but can browse interesting-looking links one after the other. That's how I found this article, and I still think its value is much higher than its keep.
You also claim that no one visits this page. Can you back this claim up? Looking at the edit history it seems the article had several editors before being removed, so at least those people found their way there. Also there's this statistic showing quite a few visits per day: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/#start=2016-02-12&end=2016-03-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&pages=Lant
Your other argument, that almost everything that goes under lant could be found in other articles is missing the point that I made previously that this applies to many intermediate products, and you don't seem to want to remove those, so why remove this? I think knowledge should be concentrated not dispersed, so having a central page for a single topic is always a good thing.
Lastly, does anyone besides the original deletion-requestor honestly think lant should be removed?
koszik (talk) 17:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Brains (Psychobilly band)

I, 66.130.200.59, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I wish to complete the page to add it to the server. I think this band deserve a place on this site. -66.130.200.59 (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Tom Crago

I, Wiki-r1nce, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wiki-r1nce (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Crystal dice songz

I created this page for my upcoming album which will feature great artist and to also boost my pop up in any search engine. Facebook:Crystal dice,twitter:crystaldicer. I am still in the building process of my wiki please give me some time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystal Dice Songz (talk • contribs) 05:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. @Crystal Dice Songz: Wikipedia is not to be used for publicity or promotion. Ever. This is not a vehicle for search engine optimization either. Wikipedia isn't a social media platform. Also see Wikipedia:Autobiography. Writing about yourself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Mobile Associate Communication Platform

I was not finished with the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fnw76 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

 Not done, nothing to do. The article isn't deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Spirit of the Rainforest: A Yanomamo Shaman's Story

I, HodgeBrad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HodgeBrad (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_224&oldid=1138664068"