Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 April 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 9

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per this and related discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities of New Hampshire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 23:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Imams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Imam of Mosque (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Could be replaced by Template:Infobox religious biography or even just Template:Infobox person. Only 3 mainspace transclusions. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete due to enormous scope. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sahabah (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not viable as a single navbox, the current version has already over 280 names and the total number of Sahabahs is in the tens of thousands according to the article. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fatimah (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Mainly an infobox, the few links under the 'Career' section are unrelated to the template's subject. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abu Bakr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is essentially an infobox, and one about the same subject already exists within the article Abu Bakr. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISCL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's unclear whether anyone used this; happy to withdraw if they are. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - People can just use {{Infobox school}}. ❤ Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 14:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, it's easy to just cut-and-paste the blank template from the documentation for {{infobox school}}, and that does not require two edits. and, there is a danger that this one will become out of sync with the version in the documentation. Frietjes (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it works and causes no harm. I do use it. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 10:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it works and causes no no harm. I do (and just did) use it. Djharrity (talk) 10:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, after re-merging with the article. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miguel Cotto professional record (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I'm fairly certain that we don't make templates for single pages; I don't see the benefit when there was a perfectly serviceable table on the article itself. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:James Blake singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:James Blake (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:James Blake singles with Template:James Blake.
Musician is not prolific enough to justify having a seperate 'Singles' template; content is already covered in existing template. GiantSnowman 10:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Templates aren't large enough to justify the current situation. ❤ Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 14:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Template:James Blake singles. Separate singles template unnecessary. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.