Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 23 February 25 >

February 24[edit]

Template:Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Parent article Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland uses {{The Troubles}}. Not obvious why 8 people are included when countless others could be too. Nigej (talk) 13:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not unused. The template is intended to include all known victims, but this is only for "punishment" attacks and not other forms of Troubles-related violence (t · c) buidhe 13:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it's used now. The parent article says "Police received reports of 6,106 punishment attacks between 1973 and 2015.", so it'd be a long navbox. Nigej (talk) 13:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Navboxes are only supposed to list notable articles with wikilinks. The vast majority of victims are not notable. (t · c) buidhe 14:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
True, but I'm thinking that a "list of victims ..." article would be a prerequisite, otherwise it's always going to look like an arbitrary list. Nigej (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the template confuses punishment attacks with—in the perpetrators' parlance—executions. These eight people were all killed, but punishments were not always intended to be deadly, and indeed the majority were not (six-packs, etc). It's also pretty exclusive in terms of orgs; does anyone suggest that the OIRA, INLA or UFF never "punished" anybody? The template uses an unacceptably artificial definition of "punishment attack", while not being able to include everyone that RS state were subjected to it (as noted above: ~twice the number of people who died in the course of the war were "punished" during it). SN54129 14:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, interesting topic, but better as an article (or list article) and not as a navbox. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US Rap Albums[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete/Keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:US Rap Albums with Template:US R&B Albums.
Billboard consolidates R&B and rap-specific charts into one R&B/hip-hop chart as one subgenre is distillated from one another; as per WP:CHARTS. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 02:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Rap Albums. All the links are redirected to articles already linked in the R&B template. DBrown_SPS, I'd say be bold and redirect List of number-one rap albums of 2011 (U.S.) without the need for a merge request on your own. No one would revert as this page is the same as List of Billboard number-one R&B/hip-hop albums of 2011. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: I have just redirected the number one rap album 2011 archive to the R&B/hip-hop page upon your suggestion. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 02:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sensitive Content[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NODISCLAIMERS/WP:NOTCENSORED. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - Alison ❤ 02:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 05:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No disclaimers in articles. Also, Wikipedia is not a modern university campus where students have to be given a trigger warning before reading Shakespeare, Dickens and Charlotte Bronte.[1] [2] They are assumed to be intelligent and mature people.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom and above comments. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and above comments. This template is bad, sorry for making it. -A Fluffy Kitteh | FluffyKittehz User Profile Page 20:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canberra Capitals roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused basketball rosters. Content already at List of 2017–18 WNBL team rosters. Nigej (talk) 06:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete templates not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No subst required since the content already exists in those articles. Nigej (talk) 05:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:London Knights Roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused roster for a minor Canadian ice hockey team. Not updated since 2019. It seems that generally rosters are not maintained at this level. Nigej (talk) 06:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Maudslay II/Sandbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The author has been absent for about ten months, so it is unlikely to be worked on. They are free to request undeletion and userfication at WP:REFUND. ✗plicit 11:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Despite the name, this is not a sandbox of an existing template. It is an experiment, and its intent appears to duplicate {{Massacres against Palestinians}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Medcomdiff[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no categories, no incoming links from discussion pages. Only edits were creation in 2012. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlanta Falcons retired numbers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see we need a navbox to say that there aren't any. Must be better ways. Nigej (talk) 07:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the point of a template is to navigate between articles, this template has 0 links (as nobody meets the criteria). One of the most pointless templates every created in my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is article content that already exists at Atlanta Falcons. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Being Muslim[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template that has 1 link with the main link being red. Not useful for any navigation. Gonnym (talk) 07:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BHL[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 07:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BabylonProject wikia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 07:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this was something like a decade old idea for how to approach the balancing of fannish information with the generalist encyclopedia perspective we offer here that never really got off the ground. Hell, they're not even called Wikia anymore. Can't see why we'd keep it. El Sandifer (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RouteConnectorTop[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Only substantive edits were in 2009. Presumably orphaned by preferred templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Club Stats of Cristiano Ronaldo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and out-of-date, surplus to Cristiano Ronaldo#Club which is maintained. Nigej (talk) 07:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Resolution pending[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Only substantive edit was creation in 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Death of Judas narrative comparison[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Seems more like WP:OR than potential article content. Nigej (talk) 07:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Togglebox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and duplicates one of the collapse templates, such as {{Collapse top}} or {{Collapsible list}}. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Duplication. Doesn't seem to serve a purpose that is not handled by other templates. Nigej (talk) 19:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WBSC World Rankings/data[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it has been converted to Lua Module:SportsRankings/data/WBSC Women's World Rankings. Gonnym (talk) 07:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may delete this as it entirely relies on the article you mentioned. You should look into Template:FIBA World Rankings/data as a similar issue is seen. Thank you!Sqldf03 (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:England international rugby union records[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, out-of-date and surplus to List of England national rugby union team records. Nigej (talk) 07:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ŠHK 37 Piešťany roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template with no piece of information. Gonnym (talk) 07:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Ice hockey roster from 2012 with no one in it. Couldn't be more useless. Nigej (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Euro Tour rankings[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content already at 2019 Euro Tour season#Men's. Nigej (talk) 07:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:George Floyd protests timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished. Realistically this is overly detailed and unsuitable for use, even if completed. See List of George Floyd protests in the United States. Nigej (talk) 07:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hartford Hawks women's soccer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article, it even has an infobox. Either needs moving to mainspace (although it looks unfinished) or deleting. Nigej (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Moroccan parliamentary election, 2011[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful as the content is already at 2011 Moroccan general election. Nigej (talk) 07:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Peter Mills succession[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused "Purported genealogy" of Peter Mills (pretender). Probably overly detailed for a minor character. Nigej (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm the creator of the template. 100 % support removal - I think Mills's invented genealogy is interesting but it's probably not of much encyclopedic value. Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete per author approval. Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sri Lanka national football team tournament History[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old information, surplus to Sri Lanka national football team#Competitive record. Nigej (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Statistics of COVID-19 deaths in Tajikistan[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn for the first two, delete the third. ✗plicit 11:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Covid-19 charts and table. Not updated since 2020. COVID-19 pandemic in Tajikistan has somewhat more up-to-date information. Nigej (talk) 08:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Table London top birth countries expandable[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Covered by Ethnic groups in London, although not in this detail, which is probably not required. Nigej (talk) 08:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Table of United States Army Field Organizations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content already at United States Army#Army commands and army service component commands. Nigej (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wadebridge to Wenfordbridge[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{Bodmin and Wadebridge Railway}} which is used at Bodmin and Wadebridge Railway and Disused railway stations on the Bodmin to Wadebridge line. Nigej (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Droylsden F.C. squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Club inactive since 2020 and no longer part of a league, so no players for squad template - see news article Zanoni (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete we don't keep squad templates for defunct sports clubs. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As the club's not active and doesn't have a playing squad the template doesn't currently serve any purpose. I've no objection to it being recreated or restored if, in the future, it can contain enough bluelinks to make it viable. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 12:43, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as above, not needed. GiantSnowman 12:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Warsaw Metro route diagram[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route map. Warsaw Metro uses different diagrams. Nigej (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ymbb[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing why this template is so much easier than just writing the five words in the template, so seems like a pointless template to me. Not sure how to tell how many times it's been used recently (as it's a substituted template), but I would imagine not many). It was kept in 2011 based on 1 vote by the creator, but I disagree that this is a useful template Joseph2302 (talk) 10:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One of the standard user warning templates should be used instead of this vague threat template. Gonnym (talk) 11:22, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm sure there are a large number of 5-word phrases that are used more frequently used that this, but don't have a template. As noted all the standard templates have it hard-wired anyway, where required, so I suspect usage is minimal. Nigej (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JMA seismic intensity scale[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Content already at Japan Meteorological Agency seismic intensity scale#Scale overview. Nigej (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Largest Metropolitan Areas in Quebec[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused list. We have List of population centres in Quebec but this isn't used there. Nigej (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FS Month Stats[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the project has stopped operations over 10 years ago. Gonnym (talk) 12:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of I Can See Your Voice (Philippine game show) episodes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete list of episodes. Content is already at List of I Can See Your Voice (Philippine season 1) episodes. Nigej (talk) 12:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of Kedah State Assembly Representatives (2018–)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content already exists at List of Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (2018–2021). Nigej (talk) 12:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aimeos version[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimeos. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - also has 2 CS1 errors. Oculi (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Art caption[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or categories. No edits since creation in 2013. Appears to have not been adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedialink[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, or incoming links. It looks like people have found other ways to meet this need. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPJ1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one transclusion of any of the linking templates in this set, created in 2006. It appears that people don't mind copy/pasting the name of a WikiProject to create a link to it. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As a newbie, I actually don't mind using the name of a WikiProject to link to it. Doing a WP:FOSS is easy and concise enough for me. On the other hand I never heard about WPJ1-3 and don't even know from where I should know it. Most references seems to be from this TfD and I didn't find any explanation. Even I tried to understand it I still don't know what it does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GavriilaDmitriev (talk • contribs) 09:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Most and least-used stations in the United Kingdom[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused navbox from 2020. The main problem with it is that there is no parent article. The navbox has a reference but what is required is an article (assuming that one is suitable). I'm not convinced that even then a navbox would be required, since the stations are not really "related", only in the statistical sense of being at the extremes in terms of usage. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep List of busiest railway stations in Great Britain and List of least used railway stations of Great Britain are the main articles, which I've added to the template and seems to address the majority of the nominator's problem with this template. It hasn't been updated in a couple of years, but I'll flag that up at WT:UKT and I'm sure it will get done shortly as updating all the individual articles is normally done pretty quickly after each release of the statistics. The main articles go into detail, but given the amount of attention these statistics generate it seems very likely that people will be navigating between these articles based on their usage stats only. Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The issue then is whether the stations are truly "related" (see WP:NAVBOX). Just being in the top 20 doesn't make them related. Why are no. 19 and no. 20 related, but apparently not no. 20 and no. 21. This is always the issue with navboxes that cover the top n. Nigej (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm supportive of most things UK Railwayss, but this is the sort of trainspotter nonsense that quickly becomes unencyclopaedic when the next year's passenger figures are not updated. Even update-to-date I think it's about as useful to me as a list of train stations beginning with the letter "W" that don't have coffee shops. More seriously, I believe that passenger numbers in station articles are updated automatically, so why not simply have sortable table containing every single UK railway station. That way we can find least used or most used simply by sorting the right columns (and of course see the ones that begin with "W") 10mmsocket (talk) 16:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Just to add a bit of weight to my support of deletion. This article exists List of busiest railway stations in Great Britain and contains a lot more useful information. It still has to be manually maintained, but given that it duplicates the upper half of the template (together with much much more information) I really can't see what purpose the template serves. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:38, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Per WP:CLN the existence of a category, list or navigation template is not a reason to create or delete any of the others - i.e. in this case the lists existing is not a valid argument for the deletion of the navigation template. Thryduulf (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete these are valid articles, but not valid templates, as I don't see why anyone on one of these articles would automatically be looking for any of the other articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Arbitary - why 20 of each, and not (say) 10 of each? Or 30 of each? In short: what is so special about 20 as a quantity? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NFHSTopScorers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused list of "NFHS Basketball Top Scoring Games Since 2000". Better covered at List of basketball players who have scored 100 points in a single game. Nigej (talk) 17:53, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox aircraft begin/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Mike Peel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: This was a test, I've deleted it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox airport/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Joseph2302: lol, because infoboxes normally contain so many references? Mike Peel (talk) 08:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Usually (at least when I create them), all the information is sourced somewhere in the article. Whereas most Wikidata stuff I find is just "sourced" to another language wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Same thing? You're just saying 'sourced elsewhere in the article'. But in general, it's good to have sourced data on Wikidata (and that's often filtered when used in infoboxes like these). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it looks unfinished -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox civil conflict/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it looks unfinished -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox curler/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment looks unfinished. There's only one call on Wikidata, and that's to determine the gender; everything is is set by passed params. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:38, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox protected area/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox recurring event/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox religious building/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox video game/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete But not because of Joseph's rationale. The main infobox already implements Wikidata, so this is a redundant unadopted version. -- ferret (talk) 19:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox video game series/Wikidata[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Wikidata version of the infobox. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused, probably because people realise that using unreliable Wikidata for an infobox is inferior to using sourced data on en.wiki. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Botsummoned[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Summoned by bot. Primefac (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Except one Request for comment comparing {{Botsummoned}} with {{Botsum}} in 2017. Serves the same function as {{Botsum}} (now {{Summoned by bot}}) & may be merged with it. This template is not substituted either (find "Bot Summoned" in source code). ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 19:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikidata / FamilyTree[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. It's in Category:Pages with template loops, which I occasionally patrol, as I am now, and whose members I routinely delete as test pages created by editors who haven't yet figured out how templates work. Without prejudice to recreation as a functional template. wbm1058 (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and broken template. Gonnym (talk) 19:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikidata Infobox/line[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete but feel free to recreate it if needed in the future. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template. Gonnym (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now please. I think this is used in Template:Wikidata Infobox, although I thought I'd depreciated it, removing it could break things unexpectedly. E.g. see the uses at [3]. I'm planning a rewrite of the template into Lua anyway this summer, which will definitely depreciate this, and I'd be happy to speedy delete it after that has happened. But for now, safest to keep please. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you point to the specific line it is used in that template? I did not see it. The list of transclusions you linked to is for a template on commons, not this one. Gonnym (talk) 07:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's the same template here and on Commons. I'm puzzled by the transclusions on Commons, and why the same isn't happening here. It's a complicated template, I'm not sure where those uses are coming from. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Besides the fact that these are really not the same templates, but two instances of similar templates, this template is still unused and has no appearance in the code. As its creator, do you remember where you added it? Gonnym (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, can be easily recreated if needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nitter[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and links to an error page on the Nitter website. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ships built by Bethlehem Hingham Shipyards[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of {{Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyards}}. Nigej (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a redundant copy of a working template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I wish I could remember why I made two, but I can't.Pennsy22 (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Antarctica 2021[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Template:Country data Antarctica already exists. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 21:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Template:Country data ICA (also unused) redirects to Country data Antarctica 2021. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 21:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Nafplio[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Low likelihood of substantial use. No flag is linked to the template either, meaning in effect it operates the same as a regular link could. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 21:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as broken and not currently fixable. Nafplio is a real place that looks very pleasant, but the article does not show a flag, and without one, this template is not useful. It can easily be recreated if it is needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CDCVesselSanitationScore[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. I don't think it can be fixed by editing, because search results are provided at https://wwwn.cdc.gov/InspectionQueryTool/InspectionResults.aspx now, in which no ID is present. Trying the example given in the documentation results in an error message. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam statistics chart in 2020 and 2021[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. ✗plicit 23:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and just duplicates Template:COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam statistics charts. Was being trancluded on Template:COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam navbox, but I removed for using improper transclusion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • no Disagree The statistics in 2020 and 2021 template is different from the 2022 template. In addition, it is meaningful for readers to refer to the situation of the COVID-19 epidemic in Vietnam in those 2 years. So why delete it? Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 01:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy Not actually being used, so no reason for it to be in template space. No one can access it from any article, so copying to the creator's own space makes most sense at the moment. Nigej (talk) 08:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Userfy: The x-axis labels and data points on all but one are unreadable on full-screen desktop due to too many data points squeezed together in a horizontal layout. Most of the charts source daily data points and is more likely to cause a WP:PEIS warning if used on articles. Same daily data found in Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Vietnam medical cases chart. Jroberson108 (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Calcio.com[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused external link template that links to a 404 error page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per G7. When I created the Template it worked but doesn't now Dr Salvus 23:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:My edit count[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant, as Special:Contributions has a "edit count" link at the bottom. Rusty4321 talk contributions log 23:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_24&oldid=1075535983"