Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Members

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following is a full list of all editors who have joined WikiProject Editor Retention. These editors are willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.

Joining as a member doesn't obligate you in any way, but allows you to be notified occasionally when there are important issues being discussed that are central to the cause, either here or at other venues.

To add your name to the member's list, click the edit button or just click here.

  1. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © - Founded @ 15:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC) (inactive)[reply]
  2. Ryan Vesey Review me! -Joined 18:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ipigott: Particularly interested in supporting new contributors
  4. Dr. Blofeld
  5. Thine Antique Pen
  6. MRRaja001 (talk) 12:06, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dirk Beetstra T C 16:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Buster Seven Talk 16:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Also interested in supporting our new editors.[reply]
  9. Elizium23 (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Count me in! Pesky (talk) 06:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Worth a shot. WormTT(talk) 07:20, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. EpochFail(talk|work) 19:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mark Miller 20:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Steven Walling • talk
  15. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 23:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ncmvocalist (talk) 03:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cailil talk - Particularly interested in helping retain long term good faith editors who are suffering with burnout etc
  19. Count me in Corporate 17:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — Yash! (Y)
  21. Rich Farmbrough, 03:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC). Absolutely![reply]
  22. Dougweller (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC) interested in retaining both good editors and editors who are also good Administrators[reply]
  23. Sarah (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Focusing specifically on bringing more women into our project, but also interested in creating a more inclusive and encompassing environment for all underrepresented groups and editors.[reply]
  24. benzband (talk)
  25. Count me in. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 02:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Gandydancer (talk) 14:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. DGG ( talk ) 20:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. SlimVirgin (talk) 23:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. the wub "?!" 01:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Count me in Lotje ツ (talk) 09:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --j⚛e deckertalk 22:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Aschmidt (have suggested to bring a WikiProject like this to German Wikipedia)
  33.  — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I'm not really a project kinda guy, but this topic interests me, so I'm willing to give it a try. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. I'm in. I'm interested in retaining more women and LGBT editors. We need Wikipedia to be less beurocratic, less hostile, and less battleground-like to do this. ツ Jenova20 (email) 11:28, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. doncram Seems like a good try, to date has addressed issues I've long thought about, differently.
  38. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 11:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. BusterD (talk) 03:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. heather walls (talk) 22:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:38, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. MistyMORN 21:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Wikid77 (talk) 10:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 05:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. DocTree (talk) 11:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 13:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. RexRowan -- RexRowan  Talk  14:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 08:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Good idea. Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Mediran talk|contribs 12:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. While I'm not a "follow the leader" type in the sense of "joining" groups, in my own way I very much support this whole concept, and will do my best to advance the goals of this project. — Ched :  ?  08:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sure. Shooterwalker (talk) 04:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. KillerChihuahua?!? 20:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Jayron32 05:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC) I'm particularly interested in retaining editors who are getting burned out.[reply]
  57. This is an important issue. Not sure I'm going to have time to help much... Hobit (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. -- J R Gainey (talk) My apologies for any problems my over categorizations and I will subsist. However, in my defense, I am a librarian by training and we are taught to think of and record every possible way that people may look for information. Hence, I was endeavoring to help Wikipedia not make more work for people. JRG
  59. Me Too - UnbelievableError (talk) 05:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. User:Spanglej Span (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ocaasi t | c 19:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. I think reaching out to new editors is important. Particularly writing your own messages on their pages when issues do occur; rather than relying on pre-generated template spam; let them know a person is talking to them and not a bot. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Not sure what I can contribute but I'm here to help. Mlpearc (powwow) 20:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Somewhat of a formality for me at this point, given the fact that one of the things I'm most interested in doing for this site is building its community aspect, but I guess I'll add my name here as someone who supports the cause. Kurtis (talk) 00:55, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Hope I can help in some way. Editor retention is critical. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Like hosting at the Teahouse and watching the Moodbar Feedback, I'm always interested in finding ways to keep new editors coming back for more. Glad to join the initiative. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:21, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. —Quiddity (talk) 08:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Yes, I do some of these things already. – Fayenatic London 16:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. -- Netha (talk) 18:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC) Particular interest in welcoming new editors.[reply]
  71. §h₳un 9∞76 20:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC) Why not?[reply]
  72. Yazan (talk) 19:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC) Retaining experienced (and less so) editors should be a top priority.[reply]
  73. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC) We need to retain good editors and gain more of the same.[reply]
  74. Tito Dutta (talk) 17:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Rlendog (talk) 15:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Kozuch (talk) 16:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Kierzek (talk) 19:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ
  79. Torreslfchero (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. xanchester (t) 01:24, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. dci | TALK 19:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Shearonink (talk) 05:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC) I will help any way I can. [reply]
  85. Greenmaven (talk) 01:56, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Go Phightins! 13:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC) I'll help however I can, particularly with newbies over at the Teahouse.[reply]
  87. Adjwilley (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC) I figure I've been stalking this page for long enough to add my name to it.[reply]
  88. gwickwire | Leave a message 18:01, 1 December 2012 (UTC) I'll do anything I can, but especially Teahouse help and with editors who get tagged/warned and don't understand.[reply]
  89. Edwardx (talk) 01:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC) Been thinking about this subject a lot lately, so I'd better join up![reply]
  90. Keri (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Lova Falk talk 12:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC) I spend a lot of time thinking about this, and I am happy to get involved.[reply]
  92. Need to retain new editors, not be trigger happy with them. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Enquire (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Interested to support constructive dialogue and support, avoiding acerbic commentary.[reply]
  94. Yes. — ΛΧΣ21 04:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. I'm in. Statυs (talk) 04:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. TheStrikeΣagle 06:54, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support goals and people, coming from WP:QAI/missed users, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Khazar2 (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC) It constantly strikes me how much more successful Wikipedia would be with just a little more encouragement between editors.[reply]
  99. Lord Roem (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. TBrandley 23:30, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing)
  102. ragesoss (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:08, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Kerry (talk) 01:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  105. -- LWG talk 19:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC) I'm disappointed that I only just discovered that this exists.[reply]
  106. Carlotm (talk) 08:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Jebus989✰ 18:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  108. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 09:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  109. --SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Greengreengreenred 07:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  111. --I am One of Many (talk) 06:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  113. -- Ross Hill • Talk • Need Help? • 23:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Gregg L. DesElms (talk) 23:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 14:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  116. DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 13:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Andrew327 16:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:45, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Morrasl 4:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC) Curious as to what this will bring.
  120. Mkdwtalk
  121. Lionratz (talk) 06:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Sophus Bie (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC) I'm glad that this is a thing that exists, now![reply]
  123. Way2veers 07:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  124. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Count me in.[reply]
  125. --Jackson Peebles (talk) 21:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  126. FeralOink (talk) 00:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC) I accidentally noticed the Snuggle application, and am enjoying using it! Also, I want to encourage other women, especially any who are new to Wikipedia, to remain, rather than getting fed up and leaving.[reply]
  127. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  128. User:Justaguy120 Sounds great! I'm kinda new, so this will be fun.Justaguy120 (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Miniapolis 22:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  130. User:Anderson I recently gave some advice on malware, So i want to make it my goal to help out editors who are having some trouble.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 22:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Vanjagenije (talk) Dear new member, ask me anything you want to know! 00:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  132. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 00:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Wpollard This sounds like a worthwhile project. Bill Pollard (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  134. User:Falkirks
  135. Miss Bono [zootalk] 17:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  136. NewJerseyLiz Let's Talk 14:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Particularly interested in helping new editors who are being bitten, want to give them comfortable space. Sou Boyy (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  138. I am here too! Don't forget mee .Sohambanerjee1998 15:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  139. — MusikAnimal talk 01:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  140. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 02:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Marek.69 talk 21:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  142. DiptanshuTalk 14:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  143. —Anne Delong (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  144. User:Msmonkeybean
  145. User:CopyEdit Bliss
  146. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 15:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Balaenoptera musculus (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Randykitty (talk) 14:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Mz7 (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Tutelary (talk) 02:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  152. SatyamSatsContactMe09:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  153. RomanSpa (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 00:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  155. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Strong YES.[reply]
  156. Ruby 2010/2013 17:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Kamranm1000
  158. Fgnievinski (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 18:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Jim Carter 05:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Rhoark (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  162. LorTalk 01:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  163. --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  164. —Picardin (talk) 21:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  165.  Buaidh  06:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC) I am particularly interested in retaining editors over the age of 50 years.[reply]
  166. Carepescientiam (talk):17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  167. Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 08:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  168. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  169. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 09:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  171. MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 23:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Atsme📞📧 20:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC) Absolutely! We're losing 'em faster'n we can recruit 'em.[reply]
  173. JQTriple7 talk 11:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  174. -- samtar whisper 23:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  175. --Ches (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  176. --Chickadee46 (talk|contribs) 21:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Smith012
  178. WikiPancake ✉ 📖 14:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Irondome (talk) 21:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Found myself mentoring colleagues as an alternative to the block/banhammer, formalised in various Admin board decisions. Hate to see eds with good potential but fixable issues going. I have I think three at the mo, two def. This seems a good place to be ending up![reply]
  180. EllenCT (talk) 17:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Joe Roe (talk) 13:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  182. I can always help! VarunFEB2003 15:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  183. KDTW Flyer (talk) 00:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  184. White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  185. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 14:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)+[reply]
  187. LucasOne (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  188. KingAntenor (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 07:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  191. TopCipher (talk) 08:24, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Zymurgy (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  193. MarnetteD|Talk 17:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Player 03 (talk) 02:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Vermont | reply here 01:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Zazpot (talk) 04:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Bobherry Talk Edits
  198. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 09:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Kpgjhpjm 18:07, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  200. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Siliconred (talk)
  202. Wingedspy (talk)
  203. Newslinger talk 12:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  204. ~ BOD ~ TALK 23:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  205.   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk)
  206. Dr Jarse (talk) 11:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC) .I hope I can be as supportive as the community has been to me. God be with you all[reply]
  207. strange. I added the retention notice to my talkpage like over an year ago. Surprising to find my name is not in this list. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  208. ~SS49~ {talk} 23:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Morgan Leigh (talk) 10:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Cheifly to work on Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. UninvitedCompany 17:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Chris vLS (talk) 22:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  212. User:Anime Roblox&More
  213. User:Markworthen
  214. NirvanaTodayt@lk
  215. I coulda sworn I added my name here a long time ago... Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Kingofaces43 (talk) 03:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  218. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 00:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Signimu Great initiative! I fully support it! --Signimu (talk) 03:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Heart rounak
  221. Might as well make my membership official :) Clovermoss (talk) 01:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  222. happy to help out! very interested in helping to improve our processes. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  223. FelixtheNomad (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Tiputini (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Puddleglum2.0(How's my driving?) 20:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  226. Mathglot (talk · contribs) 21:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  227. totally interested Tbiw (talk) 11:19 11 June 2020
  228. Mar4d (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 15:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Kaizenify (talk)
  231. Fransplace --Fransplace (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  232. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 12:02, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  233. making my membership official! SD0001 (talk) 03:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  234. important initiative! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  235. I believe in editor retention as well as helping them to ensure success on their Wikipedia career. You can ask for help! MarioJump83! 09:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  236. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 20:38, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Md Tanbir Islam (talk)
  238. iRDM
  239. Neon (Talk)
  240. feel free to drop me a line about anything Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 00:08, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Been tryna get on the list since March 2019. Huggums537 11:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  242. IllQuill I've been involved with volunteer and member retention things in the past and would like to participate IllQuill (talk) 09:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  243. I'm so glad I found this project. A very important initiative. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Neopeius (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  245. I am EMsmile - I am particularly interested in helping to retain new editors from developing countries / low and middle income countries / Global South. EMsmile (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  246. History DMZ (HQ) † (wire) 22:12, 3 April 2021 (UTC) – This initiative is vital to the Wikipedia project, glad to help out [reply]
  247. Future Astronaut (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  248. HarkiratParas
  249. Ashlesh 19:49, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  250. Emplexis (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  251. I am here for you! If you need any help Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 22:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  252. I'm usually up front in supporting newbies. I always behaved to them in a civil manner whenever they approached me. Now only I'm discovering this project. So I would love to be a member. Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 18:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  253. I am available if you don't know how to do something or wanna cool name signature or want help in a Article creation. I am happy to help. Brascoian (talk to me) 11:23, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  254. Pyrrho the Skeptic There is an awlful lot of newcomer-biting that goes unchecked and keeps Wikipedia from reaching its potential. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Sign me up. Chlod (say hi!) 15:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  256. VarietyEditor (talk · contribs)
  257. User:wakelamp I have spent the last few months reading all the papers and data I can find Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 10:40, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  258. 좀비 브렌다 - 2¢ @ 7:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  259. ARoseWolf 18:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  260. '❤12Moon~ligh❤ 6:34 05 Feburary 2022 (UTC)
  261. Isro! (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  262. Tow (talk) 23:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  263. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 14:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC) This will be fun, I like helping editors.[reply]
  264. Volten001 ☎ 19:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  265. Justyouraveragelechuga talk 16:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC) Oh come all ye newbies[reply]
  266. Mooonswimmer (talk · contribs)
  267. EPIFANOVE(TALK) 23:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  268. Happy to lend a helping hand. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  269. Carpimaps (talk) 11:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  270. Dustfreeworld (talk) 20:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  271. Sure sign me up. Always happy to help whenever I can :) 𝕿 📱 ✍
  272. DimensionalFusion (talk) 15:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  273. Alanasings talk, 11 September 2023 Will help if I can!
  274. It is important to make our fellow editors feel appreciated by recognizing their hard work. After all, we should make WikiLove not WikiWar, right? #prodraxis connect 03:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  275. Thinker78 (talk) 23:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  276. Rickyurs (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  277. Without editors we have nothing. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 15:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  278. Happy to help others feel appreciated, this is a daunting site! EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 01:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  279. I love Wikipedia and would love to see it replace compulsory state schooling—no teaching, just Mortimer J Adler's Assisted Learning, Janos Abel (AKA academic orphan). Janosabel (talk) 12:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  280. I'd love to make people feel more welcome here and reach their full potential! > Tesseractic: talk? ✎ 08:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  281. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Editor_Retention/Members&oldid=1218765922"