|
This list is transcluded from the to do page, to edit, click here
|
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
|
- Consent search needs to be developed
- Terry stop needs to be fixed...multiple warnings
- Can Traffic stop be added and fixed? Or separate page called "Traffic stop law"
- Should Fish v. Kobach be renamed Fish v. Schwab? Document 573 in this case in the US District Court for the District of Kansas filed 01/18/19 says, "Plaintiffs sued Defendant Kris W. Kobach in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Kansas. Kobach served in that capacity until noon on January 14, 2019. At that time, his successor, Scott Schwab, was sworn in as Kansas Secretary of State. By operation of law, Secretary Schwab “is automatically substituted as a party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)." The final rulings were issued June 18 and 19, 2018, but the case was appealed. I suspect that people with Wikipedia:WikiProject Law may have standard procedures for dealing with situations like this. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 04:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Legal redress - currently a redirect, should be its own article. --evrik (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. needs to be developed
- At Steele dossier#Litigation we seek to document various lawsuits related to the dossier, its author Christopher Steele, and other entities. It would be nice if legal experts could improve this content, for example by adding the correct numbers for each case, making things chronological, and making other improvements. -- Valjean (talk) 14:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Brown v. Board of Education is currently undergoing a Good Article Reassessment at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Brown v. Board of Education/1 and any help with the article would be appreciated. Gusfriend (talk) 10:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.
|
Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Law:
Page reorganization in progress
We are currently seeking to impose a better organizational scheme to this page. Please see the Talk page for more information and to discuss. Also feel to jump right in and help with this project.
- See the top of an article's Talk page to determine its importance to WP:LAW.
- Articles listed on this "Tasks" page should have one or more cleanup tags (for the entire article or for sections). Cleanup tags are also known as "template messages", which are applied to a page using a cleanup template affixed to the top of the article. See a description of the cleanup process and a list of cleanup templates, also known as "template messages".
Articles in this section have been rated "Top-class" (also known as "Top-importance") on the WikiProject Law Importance scale.
- Case law
- Murder - needs cites, could become a GA with a bit of work. Would it be worthwhile to take the knotty legal issues out of this article and instead try to deal with them more clearly (and accurately) in separate articles by jurisdiction? There is significant chat on the talk page but I'm not sure how active it is. Would be willing to help as best I can but need guidance Shayday~enwiki (talk) 03:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC) SH[reply]
Cleanup needed: High-importance articles
Articles in this section have been rated "High-class" (also known as "High-importance") on the WikiProject Law Importance scale.
Articles in this section have been rated "Mid-class" (also known as "Mid-importance") on the WikiProject Law Importance scale.
Articles in this section have been rated "Low-class" (also known as "Low-importance") on the WikiProject Law Importance scale.
Cleanup needed: Unknown-importance articles
Articles in this section have been rated "Unknown-class" (also known as "Unknown-importance") on the WikiProject Law Importance scale.
These articles were placed on this Tasks page at some time in the past. They might require cleanup of some kind, but since they do not contain any cleanup tags their status is unclear. See a description of the cleanup process and a list of cleanup templates. (Cleanup tags are also known as "cleanup messages" or "template messages").
- Copyright Term Extension Act - No cleanup tags.
- Insider trading - No cleanup tags, and it is not listed as of interest to WikiProject Law.
- Panayiotou v Sony Music Entertainment (UK) Ltd (was "George Michael vs Sony") - No cleanup tags, and it is not listed as of interest to WikiProject Law.
- Alford plea - The current page is extremely weak and lacks nuance. Most significantly, as discussed on its talk page, the definition section is repetitive and nigh unreadable and the commentary section reads more like a set of book jacket reviews than a critical discussion. I don't have the legal knowhow to really fix the page up, but I figure someone here does. Gazeboist (talk) 07:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved to this category on 27 Jan 2020. I agree with Gazeboist's assessment. I changed the WP:LAW quality rating from B-class to C-class. - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 14:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The articles below have not yet been reviewed to determine their proper placement in the new organizational scheme. You can help by determining the article's importance to WikiProject Law and then moving it to the appropriate section above. (2 Jun 2019)
- Missing topics
- Selective publication – a process by which courts (especially appellate courts) in common-law systems (such as the United States) decide which decisions should be published. If I understand correctly, only published decisions are binding precedent; rules vary as to whether unpublished decisions have persuasive authority, or have no precedential value at all. (draft stub)
- Rule of criminative circumstances (Scotland)
- Article clean up and references needed
This list is transcluded from the current projects page, to edit this section click here
|
These are the current projects that the WikiProject Law is working on:
- Wikisource: If you're so inclined, please help with the importation of United States Supreme Court cases on our sister project, Wikisource. A bot is currently in the process of importing every Supreme Court decision from bulk.resource.org's collection of the United States Reports. The project is in need of people to assist in proofreading, editing, and disambiguating decisions added by the bot. WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases on Wikisource has information about formatting and other guidelines, as well as a to do list.
——
|
If there is a legal subject that you feel needs to be covered, but hasn't, please add it to the needed article list by clicking here. Please follow the instructions on the needed articles page.
Did you know
Articles for deletion
- (9 more...)
Proposed deletions
Categories for discussion
Redirects for discussion
Featured article candidates
Featured list candidates
Good article nominees
Requests for comments
Peer reviews
Requested moves
Articles to be merged
- (2 more...)
Articles to be split
- (3 more...)
Articles for creation
- (31 more...)
|
|
