Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests/2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2021[edit]

January[edit]

Returning (Jan)[edit]

User:Wxidea[edit]

I have previously been involved reviewing new articles a number of years ago, and I have a little extra time in my schedule, and would like to work on reviewing and/or creating new articles. My profile now alerts me about "AFCH error: user not listed". I don't recall the details of AFCH implementation, but I presume I used to have access for the AfH helper. I'm up to date on notability guidelines. Feel free to reject if you require a high volume or work, but I am happy to contribute quality in occasional bursts.
Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Wxidea (talk) 04:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Txcrossbow[edit]

Hello, I've been an experienced editor and new page reviewer for 6+ years. I'm back from a break and am ready to start working again to improve the encyclopedia. Cheers! Stella BATPHONEGROOVES 00:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. As much as I am thrilled to have someone back after a long hiatus, I'm afraid it's a little too long. The last time you edited in the draft space was 2012, and your last 50 edits take us all the way back to 2017 (your last 500 edits bring the date back to 2012). The notability policies and guidelines have changed quite significantly since you were last heavily involved in the project, and with no recent (or any, nearly) involvement in AFD I'm not really sure I can comfortably consider you (from an AFC perspective) as anything other than a newbie. I'm happy to reconsider once you've been back for a few months. Primefac (talk) 17:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Davisonio[edit]

Hi I took a break from editing Wikipedia and am interested in reviewing the AfC again (am currently inactive), would be interested in getting restored. Thanks! Craig Davison (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (Jan)[edit]

User:Kieran207[edit]

I have read through and studied the reviewing instructions, as well as the notability guidelines (GNG,BASIC,NRV,NEXIST,SUSTAINED, etc..). I have also participated in multiple AfD discussions. I want to be a reviewer because drafts submitted via AfC take a considerable amount of time to be approved (2-3 Months usually), I want to fix that by reviewing as much pages As I can. Thanks- Kieran207 talk 20:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Toddy1[edit]

I have had a good time with Toddy1 and worked on a number of articles along with him like Masrat Zahra. He is a good patroller and already has Rollback and pending change reviewer flags. Just encountered a little issue on Draft:Tariq Masood, and posted an explanatory message on his talk page. If he gets the AfC flag, it'd be really great. ─ The Aafī (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, this is one of those things in which a user actually needs to request it themselves. Primefac (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bgredmchn[edit]

To clear some of the backlog in sports pages, mainly the college basketball areas. I have been on Wikipedia for about 10 years and have over 8,000 edits and numerous page creations. Would love to help out. Brian (talk) 09:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 16:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Extraordinary Writ[edit]

I'd love to help cut into the AFC backlog. I have read the reviewing instructions, and I understand all relevant policies. I have been involved in the deletion process, via PROD, AFD, and (occasionally) CSD. I also have experience interacting with new users, as evidenced by my counter-vandalism work. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Christophervincent01[edit]

Hello, I have contributed to over 1,000 articles. I would love to help fellow contributors with their drafts. That being said, I would love to help clear up AfC backlogs. Christophervincent01 (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Your talk page is full of declines for the most common issues that drafts face, and if your own drafts have these issues it implies that you will not be able to recognize them in the drafts of others. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Inexpiable[edit]

I have been on Wikipedia for 10 years now (joined in 2011), have nearly 9,000 edits and have created numerous articles and redirects. I am familiar with the guidelines, rules, notability criteria, etc. and would like to assist in helping with the AfC backlog. I have participated in multiple AfD discussions and nominated pages for deletion in the past. Inexpiable (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noidaabc[edit]

Hello, I am requesting to become an AFC Reviewer to help reduce the backlog of articles in Draftspace and under WP:AFC. I noticed they're articles dating back to August which I believe I have the experience based on Wikipedia guidelines to help review them. I have been actively participating in tagging articles with G13, G11 and G12 in Draftspace for the meantime. I have experience with AFD as well, i am very familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and believe I can be of great help. Cheers Lord Grandwell (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:HaltlosePersonalityDisorder[edit]

It's probably better if I'm an official "Reviewer" instead of an unofficial "Whoops did I just help that person seeking help getting approved by lifting the velvet rope for them?" kind of reviewer. Won't do much, probably average one a day - won't do any that seem borderline, stubs or controversial - but I can help whittle down the extensive backlog at least for the next couple months until my full-time job arrives back in the country. HLPD (talk) 05:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jr8825[edit]

To assist with the backlog. I have read the reviewing instructions and have a solid understanding of our notability and deletion policies. I previously participated in NPP (mostly prior to the page curation revamp), have been involved in a handful of AfD discussions and recently had an article reach featured status, so I'm confident with content creation side of things. Over the last few months I've mostly been participating within contentious DS areas, so a spot of AfC reviewing would be welcome change of scenery. Jr8825 • Talk 15:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Perryprog[edit]

I've been fairly active on IRC/wikipedia-en-help for a bit now, and I think I've reached a point where I'm comfortable enough to help out with reviewing obviously failing drafts. I have read through and understand the reviewing instructions, and I believe I have a demonstrated understanding of the notability guidelines through my participation in the IRC help channel. I do not have experience in AfD, although I do think I have a decent amount of experience with CSD (I don't have a CSD log, but I have sent at least 67 speedy deletion notifications). Perryprog (talk) 16:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:BatYote.[edit]

Hi there, I would love to help in the AfC reviewing process as I have experienced first hand how long it may take for some articles to get reviewed in a timely manner. Let me know what I can do to help! BatYote. (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ezlev[edit]

I am interested in becoming an AfC reviewer and helping to hopefully make a dent in the backlog of AfC articles. I have read, understand, and will continue to study the reviewing instructions. I believe that I meet all criteria: my account is well over 90 days old, I have 885 edits to mainspace, and I have some experience being on both the applying and receiving end of CSD and PROD tags. I have little applied experience with notability issues but I am aware of and understand the guidelines, and I am fairly active on Wikipedia and will be able to respond to questions about reviews in a timely manner. warmly, ezlev. talk 19:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Panini![edit]

I have now met the page edit requirements, the reason for declining previously. I have familiarized myself with the procedure and am willing to review articles. Panini 🥪 14:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Northern Escapee[edit]

I have been an active editor and I will like to participate in AFC review to help reduce backlog.

Regards. Northern Escapee (talk) 10:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Greenman[edit]

Came across a draft article waiting for review for over a month, and saw the huge backlog, so perhaps I can help. Greenman (talk) 01:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Umakant Bhalerao[edit]

I am a new page reviewer and would like to review articles that were moved by me to draftspace once they have been worked on. I would also like to help in reducing the AFC backlog.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ashleyyoursmile[edit]

Hello, during recent changes patrolling I regularly come across drafts like this one, that doesn't have a chance of getting accepted. I would like to sign up as an AfC reviewer so that I can help reduce the huge backlog of AfC submissions. I am mostly active in CSD tagging, and have started participating in AfD discussions. While I am active in counter-vandalism areas, I would like to contribute towards AfC as well. Ashleyyoursmile! 19:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Scorpions13256[edit]

Since 2020, I have become more active in the administrative areas of Wikipedia. I have also created 21 articles and have successfully nominated 2 for DYK. I have also begun tagging pages for speedy deletion (98% success rate) and participating in AFD. I just got done reading the requirements and instructions for carrying out AFC. I now truly believe that I am ready to become an AFC reviewer. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February[edit]

Returning (Feb)[edit]

User:Firefly[edit]

I was a reviewer previously, and have returned after a period of real-life-driven inactivity! I have re-familiarised myself with the relevant policies to check for any changes. Happy to go back on probation if you feel it is necessary. Thanks! ƒirefly ( t · c ) 09:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Arthistorian1977[edit]

Hi, I was participating in AfC time ago with the old AfC helper script. Stopped it for a while and now want to come back. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (Feb)[edit]

User:CommanderWaterford[edit]

Hello Primefac, hope you are doing well. I would like to sign up as an AfC reviewer so that I can help reduce the backlog of AfC submissions. I am active in CSD tagging + AfD Discussions, WP Sorting and improving new articles. While I am very active in counter-vandalism I would love to contribute towards AfC as well. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:BubblySnow[edit]

I would like to be a member of WikiProject Articles for creation so let me know if i am eligible or not. BubblySnow  💬 17:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - sock blocked — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:IN[edit]

I am interested in becoming an AfC reviewer and helping to hopefully make a dent in the backlog of AfC articles. I have read, understand, and will continue to study the reviewing instructions. I believe that I meet all criteria: my account is well over 90 days old, I have over 600 edits to mainspace, and I have some experience being on both the applying and receiving end of CSD and PROD tags. I have little applied experience with notability issues but I am aware of and understand the guidelines, and I am active on Wikipedia and will be able to respond to questions about reviews in a timely manner. Alcremie (talk) 08:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, too many issues expressed on your talk page regarding, well, just about every administrative area. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aseleste[edit]

I like to become an AfC reviewer to help with the backlog of 4,200+ pending submissions. I have read the instructions for reviewing and am aware of the notability guideline and its subject-specific variants. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 12:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.. This is mostly due to a lack of AFD participation, but everything else looks good. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:MakeRocketGoNow[edit]

I have read the reviewing instructions, and like to help in reviewing new article even in past i have created 69 articles. So now I have good knowledge of reviewing and would like to review new articles and decrease burden of AFC backlog. MRGN (talk to me!) 19:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, while I appreciate the interest (and your rather impressive edit history) the entirety of your editing experience was more than 10 years ago, and the guidelines and policies have changed a lot since then. I think getting back into the swing of things first is a good idea. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jenyire2[edit]

I would like to assist with the backlog. I have the time and willingness. I have gone through the reviewing instructions over and over again. Thanks. Jenyire2 06:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Novem Linguae[edit]

Hello. I'm about halfway done with New Page Patrol School, and I'd like to help out in this closely related area. Seems like a natural stepping stone and a great place to apply all this knowledge I'm learning. I have about 5000 edits. Not much AFD/CSD experience, but we've gone over notability in detail in the school, and after doing 4 source assessment tables and a bunch of RS assessments, I feel quite comfortable with GNG now. We reviewed SNG's in the school and I'll look those up as needed. Here's some additional commentary from my trainer, Onel5969. Thanks for considering. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AmirahBreen[edit]

I would like to participate in the project to help to maintain good standards on Wikipedia Amirah talk 22:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Editoneer[edit]

Hello, I've gain interest in reviewing something else beside GA nominees. Even tho my edits appears to be weekly or monthly, it doesn't mean I'm busy, I'm just browsing Wikipedia without doing something, I'm going to be passionated about this project for now. Editoneer (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing and experience criteria. Primefac (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:NoahDavid771[edit]

I would like to become an AfC reviewer. While I am mainly focused on coutervandalism I am interested in helping to get through the backlog of pages needing review. Thank you! Noah!💬 19:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kammill[edit]

Hello Primefac, I am a Counter Vandalism Unit Academy graduate and I have enrolled myself at NPP School. I would like to join this project. I have read the related policies. Thank you! –Kamilalibhat ⟨talk⟩ 11:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Primefac, will you please update the list. I have been renamed. I'm unable to use the script. Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 04:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:HouseOfChange[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I see this job as something like "rescuing" articles about notable topics at AfD, which I enjoy because I like improving articles and helping new editors. Also, the backlog at AfC needs help. HouseOfChange (talk) 02:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC) HouseOfChange (talk) 02:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March[edit]

Returning (Mar)[edit]

User:paul2520[edit]

I was a reviewer in the past, though was not very active due to having more interest in starting new articles myself. I have been involved with a couple of edit-a-thons recently where I shared my experience and advice with newer editors. I've reviewed the criteria again, and am interested in helping review. I would be happy to review articles for creation, providing assistance/guidance to editors who clearly have good intentions. = paul2520 💬 21:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renames (Mar)[edit]

User:Tol[edit]

I changed my username — could someone please update the page with my new username? Tol | Talk | Contribs (formerly Twassman) 20:20, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to "returning" as I am already approved for probation. Tol | Talk | Contribs (formerly Twassman) 20:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (Mar)[edit]

User:TheGoodAndHolyLord[edit]

Hope you're having a great day so far! I'd love to join the project and make myself useful here. I've become familiar with the deletion policies and hope to be a good addition to the reviewer team. 😀 — TGHL ↗ (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing and experience criteria. Primefac (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chris1834[edit]

I have thought about it in the past and have been reviewing pending changes for some time. That being said, I have reviewed the instructions multiple times and have experience with notability and independent sources. I would like to branch out in a different area to help out. Thanks. I also have some Afc history from back in 2014 but only for a short time. Chris1834 Talk 20:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twassman[edit]

I'm fairly active in speedy-deletion tagging, and there's a large backlog here. I plan to be primarily but not solely declining under the quick-fail criteria to reduce the burden on other participants. I'm very familiar with the GNG, and to a lesser extent the entire notability guideline. I have also read the reviewing instructions. Twassman | Talk | Contribs 02:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Luciapop[edit]

I have been actively editing for sometime now mostly creating new articles. I want to contribute in other areas when I'm not working on new articles and I think I should start from here to help reduce backlog. Luciapop (talk) 09:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kieran207[edit]

Exactly 2 months ago, I was granted probationary rights. I have since reviewed 111 drafts and counting, and would like to go full time. Thanks-- Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't generally like to do this but I would like to register a strong objection to the continuation of Kieran's AFC perm. There are a series of really questionable, exceedingly promotional and poorly sourced AFC accepts, redrafitications by other editors and full on deletion in the history here. CUPIDICAE💕 18:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:SoyokoAnis[edit]

Salutations! I am SoyokoAnis and I would like to become an AFC Reviewer. While I haven't created any articles myself successfully I have re-read most policies and I believe becoming an AfC Reviewer would be a great start. I have read the reviewing instructions and the notability policy and the deletion policy. I have also participated in AfD discussions. Thanks, SoyokoAnis 01:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)![reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kp2016rockin[edit]

Trying to speed up the process of getting drafted articles on the main page kpgamingz (rant me) 19:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bop34[edit]

I want to make it faster for users to have their drafts reviewed. I often see users wondering how long it will be before someone reviews their draft, and it bugs me that I can't help. In the past, I have helped a couple of new users out with their drafts before they submitted them, helping out with things like red links and references. βӪᑸᙥӴ • Talk • Contribs 17:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; while the numerical minimums have been met, there's not a lot in the way of XfD, and majority of edits are semi-automated. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kashmorwiki[edit]

I am actively editing for the past couple of months and has already created 52 articles (only my first article have been deleted so far) and is well aware with the notability criteria. I have now gained plenty of experience in participating AFD discussions and most of the articles I nominated have been deleted. Thats all. Regards. Kichu🐘 Discuss 11:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:VersaceSpace[edit]

Hi! I am requesting this permission because of the extremely long list of un-reviewed drafts. I meet the criteria (over 850 live edits, account has existed for over 100 days, read instructions, understand policy, have experience at AfD). I'm very active on this website, so I'll be able to answer questions very quickly. Have a good day. versacespacetalk to me 16:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 20:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iflaq[edit]

Hello, I am requesting temporary right so that I can practice reviewing. If my reviews will have a problem It will be ok to remove the right. I have seen bundles of articles waiting in the list for review, so I want to contribute in position manner. I already have PCR and Rollback rights. Thankyou. Iflaq (talk) 18:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. While I appreciate the enthusiasm, the majority of your edits appear to be vandal-fighting; it is a worthwhile activity, but doesn't necessarily demonstrate that you understand the notability and content-related guidelines enough to be granted AFCH access. That being said, come back in a month or two and I would be happy to look at a new request. Primefac (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:JPxG[edit]

I've been hanging out on Wikipedia for a while: I've spent a fair amount of time on RCP, and I've made 115 articles (including 16 DYKs and 1 GA). As for reviewing others' articles, I have reviewed a fair number of DYKNs and GANs, and have participated in a slew of AfDs. This is a different process, certainly, but I think it could be a fun change of pace. Mostly, I hear people complaining a lot about how there aren't enough AfC reviewers, so I figured I would give it a shot. I can't promise that I will review ten thousand submissions, but I'd like to help out where I can. jp×g 05:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theleekycauldron[edit]

Created 4 articles so far, participated in dozens of AfDs, I've been here for a few years and have over 2,000 edits. I noticed that AfC backlogs can take a while, and I wanted to be able to help out in any way I can! Already read through the general instructions on how to review an article. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. While I appreciate the enthusiasm, there are a few too many issues for me to feel comfortable having you review drafts, mainly having to do with sourcing, fair use, and the fact that most of the AFDs that you nominated were closed as keep. Primefac (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: My last AfD nomination was a month and a half ago. I have a much better grasp on notability guidelines and fair use by this point. I had to learn about those at some point– it seems unfair to penalize me for things I've already accepted and learned from. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 18:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shushugah[edit]

I already regularly help improve Draft articles made by other users, and have participated in several AFD, PROD discussions. I admittedly need to read more up on CSD, and would exercise discretion in areas I am not strong/confident in. I would request to be on 3-6 month probationary status and seek feedback/let others handle a task, if I am unsure what to do. I am quite inspired by WP:HEYMAN case. I understand the distinction between a low quality article, and the inherent WP:NOTABILITY of a specific topic. Shushugah (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Shushugah (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. (per request) Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:VersaceSpace[edit]

Hi. I now meet the one criteria I was missing last time I applied, so this is just a copy-paste of my last submission: Hi! I am requesting this permission because of the extremely long list of un-reviewed drafts. I meet the criteria (over 850 live edits, account has existed for over 100 days, read instructions, understand policy, have experience at AfD). I'm very active on this website, so I'll be able to answer questions very quickly. Have a good day. versacespacetalk to me 23:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DanCherek[edit]

I'm interested in helping out with the AfC reviewing process. I understand that quality over quantity is important when it comes to reviewing, and will carefully follow the detailed workflow for each submission that I review. I'm familiar with the various deletion processes, have gone through the reviewing instructions, and am comfortable with the notability guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:KathrynLybarger[edit]

I'd like to participate in this project. I am an active Wikipedia editor and sometimes participate in edit-a-thons where participants create new articles. KathrynLybarger (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Playlikeastar[edit]

Hello Primefac, Sir hope you are doing well. I would like to participate in the project to help to maintain good standards on Wikipedia. can you Give me opportunity to work with you as your team member Thank you Playlikeastar Playlikeastar (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, too many declined drafts and lack of AfD/CSD experience for my liking. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Serafart[edit]

I am requesting permissions so that I can try and help with the backlog of AfC requests. Though most of my edits are anti-vandal, I have created a few articles and contributed to the wiki in other ways. Serafart (talk) (contributions) 01:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, serious BLP issues. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Greshthegreat[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

I am requesting afc helper script rights because:

1. I meet the requirements to be a participant in this WikiProject.

-My account is over 90 days old as I created it back on July 24, 2014 nearly 5 years ago.

-I have over 500 undeleted edits. According to xtools, of my 1,837 total edits I have made so far, 1,626 of them are live (87% of them).

-I have thorougly read the reviewing instructions (I'm not sure how to prove I actually read it, but if you want any proof I am happy to provide some).

-I have definitely demonstrated understanding of the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including the various notability guidelines. According to xtools, 87% of my total edits are live, and of my 104 created articles, only 29 have been deleted. Having looked through [Page creation log] it looks like only four of those articles were deleted in the last year, and only one was deleted in 2019. The rest of my created articles that got deleted, were deleted more than two years ago, when I had far less understanding of Wikipedias notability guidlines. I have since familiarised myself better with Wikipedias noteability guidlines, and as such, am not suprised that most of those deleted articles that I created were deleted years ago.

-There is lots of reasonable evidence I understand the deletion policy.

-I definitely have a willingness and ability to respond in a timely manner to questions about any review that I get. I'm quite active on Wikipedia, having made 222 edits so far in 2021 (according to xtools) and have been active on Wikipedia most days this year. I also have email notifications set up for any messages I get on my user talkpage, and have email notifications on my iPhone, so my phone basically notifies me of any messages I get on Wikipedia. If there is a way to do something like, or some other way to get a phone notification for any questions about reviews I get that are made on my user talkpage, I will see most review related questions I get within the hour they are asked, and can then respond to them ASAP.

2. I would like to help with the backlog of draft articles submitted for review.

If you have any questions or comments regarding my request feel free to contact me and I will get back to you with a response ASAP. Greshthegreat (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greshthegreat, 30% of the articles you have written have been deleted. Half of the articles you created in 2020 were deleted, but yet you have not commented on a single AFD. I'm concerned about such metrics as it indicates that you might not understand the inclusion criteria. I'm on the fence but leaning no, barring a reasonable explanation or insight as to how this will not affect your reviewing. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Primefac, thanks for the reply. I can provide a reasonable explanation as to how half of the articles I created in 2020 being deleted will not affect my reviewing. Of the pages that were deleted last year that I created:
-The most recently deleted article I created last year, about Hester Ford (the oldest living person in the United States), had a lengthy deletion discussion here, before it ultimately got deleted. Many users sharing differing opinions on wether it should be deleted or not and was noteable enough for an article. I had thought it was noteable enough, but after that discussion occured, and it eventually got deleted, it was clear that the article was almost noteable enough, but not enough so to be kept in the mainspace. I've since started a draft for the article here. I will only submit it if for a review if Hester Ford (who the article is about), becomes quite a bit more noteable, and meets the issues brought up about their notoriety.
I have also proven that I understand these things in my recent creation of a similar article about Lucile Randon (the worlds second oldest living person and oldest survivor of COVID-19) on March 23, 2021. That article is still up in the mainspace, has not been proposed for deletion, and is about a person who is far more noteable (as well as having lived a very long time just like Hester Ford).
-I created three articles about a few teleconference and in person rallies held by then President Donald Trump, during his re-election campaign ahead of the 2020 Presidential Election, but they were deleted for not being noteable on there own, except for being held by a noteable person. I haven't created any articles about events or political campaign rallies since then, but have familiarized myself better with the noteable events inclusion criteria, so I understand that better if I do create any articles about noteable events in the future. Additionally, all of my other articles about events that I created prior to those three deleted ones, have been kept, such as 2020 Salute to America, South Dakota's Mount Rushmore Fireworks Celebration 2020 and Mountain Fair.
One article I created this year was deleted, which was about the PPP Extension Act of 2021 (a bill introduced in the 117th United States Congress, to extend the covered period for people and businesses enrolled in Paycheck Protection Program). It got moved to a draft by another editor since I had forgotten to cite sources for it. After I added a few sources and expanded the article, I submitted it for a review. However the submission was declined, and the reviewer suggested it be merged into the existing article, Paycheck Protection Program. The following day I proposed it be merged into that article, by leaving a mesage on the talk page about the merge to see what other editors think before I do anything. I'm waiting to here from other editors.
All of my other articles I've created this year about bills introduced in the 117th United States Congress have not been kept, as I have tried to only make articles that I think are noteable enough for there own articles.
Every other article I created that got deleted, was deleted in 2019 or earlier.
If this explanation is not good enough, you are welcome to put me on a probation or I can make another submission after the issues you brought up have been met. Greshthegreat (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Greshthegreat If we set that on one side, I wonder if you would mind addressing the lack noted by @Primefac of comment at AfD. I ask because our work as reviewers is to pre-handle AfD likelihood, accepting only drafts that have a good chance of surviving an immediate deletion discussion Fiddle Faddle 21:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GKFX[edit]

I would like to help clear the queue of AfC submissions. I have a chemistry degree so I would mostly pay attention to science-based articles. I have read the relevant guidelines. User:GKFXtalk 22:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kautilya3[edit]

Interested in reviewing new articles. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:IceWelder[edit]

I would like to join the AfC project to help out with video game (primarily) and company submissions. My account is eight years old and has more than 95,000 edits attached to it. IceWelder [✉] 21:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trialan[edit]

I am interested in getting involved in the AfC process. I have acquainted myself with the reviewing instructions and understand notability guidelines as well as the deletion policy. Trialan (talk) 08:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum time requirements (I do not consider 1 edit from 2015 to be a reasonable indicator of time-on-project). Primefac (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Balablitz[edit]

Hi, I wish to become AFC reviewer. Though am resuming editing after some time, i hope am eligible to obtain the permission and contribute for reviewing the submissions thereby reducing the backlog. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 18:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April[edit]

Name change (Apr)[edit]

User:Bennv123[edit]

I recently changed my username, was formerly known as Bennv3771. I would like my new username to be updated on the active reviewers list. Thanks. Bennv123 (talk) 06:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yeeno[edit]

Global rename completed; please change Yeenosaurus -> Yeeno. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 06:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Locomotive207[edit]

I changed my username recently, please change "Kieran207" to "Locomotive207", thanks-🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 (Formerly Kieran207) 15:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removals (Apr)[edit]

User:Chicdat[edit]

This may sound strange, but I am requesting removal of my access to AFCH. The Draft:Itamar Medical and Deniz Unay controversies have really taken away my interest for the AFCH tool, and I believe I have better things to do with my time here. Lastly, if/when you remove my name from the list of AfC reviewers, please simply remove it and do not put in on the inactive reviewers page. Thank you. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New requests (Apr)[edit]

User:Kp2016rockin[edit]

About a month ago, I've asked to become an AfC reviewer but was rejected by @Primefac: for not having a lot of undeleted edits. So I've worked harder and gained over 700 undeleted edits with my deleted edits under 10%. I've also created some other articles (more on the way). I hope to become an AfC reviewer to speed up the draft articles and not letting them wait for too long. I will show I can earn this user right even during the probation period. kpgamingz (rant me) 11:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Huggums537[edit]

Hello. I have read, and understand the Reviewing instructions. I also have a good grasp of WP:Notability and WP:Deletion policy. I decided to request rights because I recently began working on my first article at Draft:LinuxConsole, and after submitting it for review, I noticed the backlog of thousands of AfC submissions that might take months to review. I realized a great need for AfC, and New Page reviewers so I've put in a request there as well. I hope my draft and editing experience is enough evidence I understand how to help in this area. Thank you for your consideration. Huggums537 (talk) 11:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I have decided to withdraw my request. I don't think I will have the time needed to devote the proper attention to helping here. I will be more than happy to come back and apply when I think I can be of useful service. Huggums537 (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Félix An[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I have helped several new editors fix up articles that are laden with promotional material and grammar mistakes, and I have helped to remind editors of the conflict of interest policy, while still helping them to get their articles published if they are notable enough and covered by reliable sources. Félix An (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kitoba[edit]

I've been an active editor on Wikipedia for 16 years, with over 700 live edits. I'm interested in being a reviewer to help accelerate the review process for articles by and about members of underrepresented groups. Kitoba (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2021 (EST)

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Paradise Chronicle[edit]

I was deemed a possible participant to the AFC project by Barkeep49. My actual goal is to become a reviewer, as I'd like to help the reviewers who often review my articles. I think it is great to review articles as one often learns something new. I have created more than a hundred articles so far, most of which are interesting.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Solarra[edit]

I am a well-establish user with thousands of edits and would like to help with the article for creation process. ♥ Solarra ♥ • T ♀ C 18:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iflaq[edit]

Hello, I want to apply again for AFC participation. I have already covered the minimum requirements needed for the request. Iflaq (talk) 19:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mottezen[edit]

I saw the backlog was heavy and I'd like to help trim it down. I read over the reviewing instructions and I'm quite familiar with the notability and deletion policies. Mottezen (talk) 09:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DoubleGrazing[edit]

I keep coming across articles that apparently have been waiting for a long time to be reviewed (unsurprisingly, given the backlog), and I'm myself also adding to this daily by draftifying articles that aren't ready for the main name space... so I guess I should become part of the solution instead of part of the problem, and start helping out to earn my keep. I'm familiar with notability, OR, POV, etc. key issues, and reasonably good at spotting spamming, hoaxes, copyvios, etc., as well as having a decent hit rate at AfD and speedy nominations, so I feel like I could cope pretty well. Very happy to be given only temporary rights at first, if it's felt I should serve a probationary period. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bonadea[edit]

I have a reasonable number of edits and a pretty good grasp of the relevant criteria, I think. I have hesitated to sign up in the past because I don't know how active I will be as a reviewer, but even if I don't make more than a few reviews each month, it will hopefully help. --bonadea contributions talk 07:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC) bonadea contributions talk 07:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nearlyevil665[edit]

I'd like to request a trial run for AfC rights. I am quite active at AfDs and have had only a small portion of my nominations withdrawn or shot down due to my misinterpretation or ignorance of establishing notability for non-Western subjects. I am an author of 14 articles, with the latest tagged for deletion due to my misunderstanding of WP:NMMA. Lessons learnt on that one. I understand that any job requires constant improvement and that is why I have already positively responded and learnt on my mistakes. As an AfC participant I would refrain from making any decisions in fields I am not yet confident in and would instead stick to topics that are more or less non-contentious. nearlyevil665 04:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC) nearlyevil665 04:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yitzilitt[edit]

I'd be interested in helping out here, as there seems to be a pretty intense backlog, which seems worth trying to alleviate to at least some small degree. Yitz (talk) 01:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.

User:PK650[edit]

Hi! I've been doing some NPP work for a while now, save for most of last year due to a COVID-related pause. I also have some experience with AfD, naturally, and I've come across the occasional AfC submission. I am familiar with notability criteria, proudly committed to increasing the number of female academics on Wikipedia (I have added a few such articles myself). I would be happy to participate in this space, especially considering your extraordinary backlog! Might it be due to the pandemic? Thank you, PK650 (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Furius[edit]

Hello, I've been an active participant on wiki for 17 years, particularly in subjects relating to history, art, and architecture and I've created a range of articles (most translations). I think I've been a sensible and level-headed editor throughout that period. I've engaged with AfD many times over the years and have familiarised myself with the AfC process and requirements just now. I'm aware that in AfD discussions I lean to the retentionist side of things and would take that into account when reviewing. Furius (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Furius (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nomadicghumakkad[edit]

Hello, I would like to help further with AFC backlog. I am familiar with notability guidelines and have read reviewing instructions. Have been very active with AFD, CSD and PROD and have a good success rate. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Qwerfjkl[edit]

Reason

I would like this to help approve or deny creation requests. ― Qwerfjkl|✉   19:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum time requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Owula kpakpo[edit]

Hi my name is User:Owula kpakpo, I have been an active Wikipedia editor in Ghana for close to 4 years now and I lead workshops which most often has new editors joining and so by making me a reviewer I can help the editors in our community. We currently engaged in a series of workshops and this would help me timely give feedback to new editors on the articles they may create. Owula kpakpo (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. For what it's worth, you do not need AFCH in order to assist new editors with the articles they create. The primary reason I am declining this request is because of the number of your creations that have been deleted on reference-related grounds. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:JackReynoldsADogOwner[edit]

I have more than a thousand live edits. I've read over the requested material(s). I will be fair and will not use the power that has been granted to me for my own welling being. I've also been going through Special:NewPages/hidepatrolled and moving the pages into draft form (if needed.) If there are any issues that come to my hand, I will not be biased and will act according to Wikipedia's Guidelines and will try to resolve the issue with minimal distributions. If there are tasks that are asked of me, I will get them done as soon as I can. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 13:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheChronium[edit]

I have been editing for a while now and I'd love to help cut the AFC backlog, I'm mostly tagging pages and doing cleanup. I have read and understand the reviewing instructions, and I understand all relevant policies and most especially the notability guidelines. I have been actively involved in deletion process, via AFD, and CSD, mostly G11, G12 and G13. With this I can help cut the backlog dating back to November 2020 one page at a time, cheers. TheChronium (talk) 22:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GRALISTAIR[edit]

Hello I would love to contribute as a reviewer to help reduce the pretty large backlog. I did "blot my copybook" so to speak a few weeks ago when an article about Mars G. Fontana was repeatedly denied due to copyright and too much copy and paste. However, I am almost obsessive about proper referencing and I do believe I could make a good contribution in certain areas particularly railways, science and engineering. I would probably avoid biographies. GRALISTAIR (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GRALISTAIR. I don't usually participate in assessing these requests, but happened to see your post at the Teahouse, which I idly clicked on. We certainly need help with the backlog—and the very fact anyone makes a request here to donate time to help out is admirable—but after seeing your post here, including its misspelling of copyright as "copywrite", just made me wonder whether you have taken on board the very important issues surrounding this subject. Please be aware that the very first step listed at the AfC reviewing instructions is to check submissions against "quickfail criteria", and the very first of those is that every draft should be checked for copyright problems (advising how to do so, and providing detailed instructions [I composed] for what to do if found). Will that be any problem?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No it will not be a problem now I see it is a reviewer tool. I have already had a go at some of my articles awaiting publication (or not) to check that I have not inadvertently violated copyright. Now I know about that tool I will never ever make that mistake again and absolutely would pull up editors and ask for a complete rewrite or even speedy deletion. Sometimes in life, the lessons learned the hard way are the lessons learned best. So I would be obsessive about copyright violation and proper citation/referencing. I believe notability is subjective and would certainly in the interim (probation period of 6 months perhaps?) avoid biographies even though I have written a few of those myself. I am a Technical Editor and reviewer btw of Journal of Coatings Technology and Research ISSN: 1547-0091 part of the Springer publishing group. So editing and reviewing is not exactly my first rodeo. Whatever is decided I am good with - and as suggested perhaps a 6 month probation period would be a great compromise. GRALISTAIR (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. I'm on the fence about this, but the above issues combined with continuing declines of some of your draft pages just barely tips the scale in the "no" direction (honestly, I started writing out an "accept as probationary" response and all of the caveats and "must-do's" that I was listing made me think it's not quite appropriate to grant). I think in a few months you'll have more experience and be much better prepared to review drafts. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Styyx[edit]

Hi! I've been on Wikipedia and on AfD for a while and would like to become a reviewer to help clear the massive backlog. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 16:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:JTZegers[edit]

I have done AfD for a while and was wondering if I could review pages too. I have an understanding of the AfD policies (even though most of my votes were losing). JTZegersSpeak
Aura 17:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, indeffed. Primefac (talk) 15:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May[edit]

From inactive (May)[edit]

User:ජපස[edit]

I am now working with some new users who are creating new drafts and it would help to have the scripts to do this. jps (talk) 11:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New requests (May)[edit]

User:Bsoyka[edit]

Hey! I'm interested in finally helping out on AfC – I think I meet the requirements and would like to get involved in this area of Wikipedia. Thanks for your time! Bsoyka🗣️ 15:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:SmartyPants22[edit]

After creating well over 100 pages and making nearly 7,000 edits to Wikipedia over 3-4 years, I feel like I have some experience to offer in helping to clear the backlog. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 21:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Poppified[edit]

Hello, I have been a active editor here for a while. Had created 31 articles. Reasonable amount of knowledge with different deletion criterias. I hope I can help to clear the backlog. Best wishes Poppified talk 08:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:A.A Prinon[edit]

Hello, I want to become a Articles for creation reviewer to help in reducing the pressure of thousands of pending submissions. I think I meet all the criteria for becoming a reviewer. I have more than one thousand undeleted edits including more than 500 live main space edits since I created account four months ago. I also created 15 articles. I also have experience in participating in AfD discussions or nominating articles for AfD or PROD. I have read and understood all the reviewing instructions. If I be a reviewer, I will try my best to respond in a timely manner to questions about reviews. Thank you and hope to get positive response from Primefac! — A.A Prinon  Conversation 11:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vincentvikram[edit]

I have been active at the AFD and would like to help out at AFC for a while. VV 11:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr Salvus[edit]

I would like have AfC rigths beacause I would like to help here. I also meet the criterias. Dr Salvus 18:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Dr Salvus 18:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bangalamania[edit]

I believe that I fit the criteria for the project as I know Wikipedia's policies on page creation and would like to help out. --Bangalamania (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Bangalamania (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, a full quarter of created articles have been deleted, and multiple drafts declined. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Freshacconci[edit]

I've been editing on Wikipedia since 2006, created a number of articles myself, including two successful Did you know... submissions. I find my editing has mostly been vandalism watch lately and I'm not creating or expanding articles as much as I used to. I think reviewing articles for creation would be a good use of my time here and would be helpful to the project. freshacconci (✉) 15:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Asukite[edit]

I have been reviewing pages on and off for a while, and thought I might try out helping with AfC. I have a good understanding of the page review process already and have the patroller right. Thank you!  A S U K I T E  14:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:HeinzMaster[edit]

I have experience in the AfC, AfD, and have read through the notability reviewing guidelines and feel like I have demonstrated understanding of them by creating 103 articles, off which none were nominated for deletion. I have been making considerable number of edits on Wikipedia for almost a year now, so I hope to take a larger role within it. All the best, cheers. HeinzMaster (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Qwerfjkl[edit]

I am requesting access to this script to get more involved in creating Wikipedia articles, and to help add to Wikipedia. ― Qwerfjkl  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 21:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Somej[edit]

Hi I've been editing Wikipedia since 2005, with several thousand edits to English wikipedia and a few diversions into other European languages. It's probably time that I contributed a bit more to the wikipedia community by reviewing pages. Thanks! Somej (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Babegriev[edit]

Been involved with WP:RCP and WP:GAN. Looking to expand my wikipedia contributions by helping with the AfC backlog. More than happy to answer to any questions, concerns or reservations on my talk. Babegriev (talk) 00:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kepler-1229b[edit]

My account has passed the time limit, and I have over 500 undeleted edits. I would like AfC script rights to review drafts. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also involved with multiple XfD nominations.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, while you pass the minimum editing criteria, the sheer number of unaccepted drafts and deleted articles (which at the moment are almost 50% of your creations) do not indicate a solid knowledge of our inclusion criteria. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most of my deleted "articles" are redirects.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 14:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I was quite new at the time, but I have now read WP:NASTRO and now know that reliable sources are needed.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 14:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Berchanhimez[edit]

I'm requesting to be able to help with medical AfCs which many of them need declined, but I can't technically do so. Hopefully this will help with the backlog a bit. I like to think I have a good understanding of notability, and a decent understanding of speedy deletion criteria, but I doubt many of these will need speedy deletion, and so my primary concern will be with deciding whether the article is notable enough and written neutrally enough to survive an AfD. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 00:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Borophagus[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Borophagus talk 07:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would like to apply for AFC. I have roughly 634 uncontested edits, and if I remember correctly, at least 575 of those are in the mainspace. I have been here 223 days, so I more than exceed the minimum requirements. I have done extensive work on translating and updating palaeontology articles, have moved some pages, such as this one, and have some familiarity with the review process.

ETA: I probably won't be doing too much, and all the reviewing I do will be on palaeontology articles. Borophagus talk 07:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:15[edit]

I meet the minimum criteria, have read the appropriate guidelines and am familiar with notability criteria. I intend to mostly work on and review academic and academia-related biographies, as well as articles on economics. 15 (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC) 15 (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:QuantumRealm[edit]

I'm currently enrolled at NPP School[[1]] by Rosguill, I finished the notability course in the school. I want to practice with AfC(to put my skills to use) as I continue with my NPP school and expand my knowledge. Thank you! QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 05:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kp2016rockin[edit]

I've been denied twice to become an AfC reviewer [1][2] but now I've surpassed 500 undeleted edits to the mainspace.
Like I said in the previous request, I hope to become an AfC reviewer to speed up the draft articles and not letting them wait for too long. kpgamingz (rant me) 16:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorely tempted to decline this purely based on the fact that you have been asking here every month for three consecutive months. I will have to give this a think before deciding.
The reason why I've been asking every month is since there isn't a clear way to see how many undeleted edits to the mainspace a user made. Sorry if this was bothering you. I'm just trying to help with the AfC project. The average reply rate for draft articles are mostly a few hours for declining and over a month for acceptance. kpgamingz (rant me) 19:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]
You can see the amount of undeleted edits you have here, under "Live edits". Currently at the time of writing this, it says you have 1,021 undeleted edits. Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) (please ping on reply) 19:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, that's undeleted total edits. Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) (please ping on reply) 19:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kp2016rockin: It says you have 578 undeleted mainspace edits. Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) (please ping on reply) 19:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@-Zai- That isn't the number of undeleted edits. That's the total amount of edits in the mainspace. kpgamingz (rant me) 20:06, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants", Wikipedia, 2021-04-06, retrieved 2021-05-17
  2. ^ "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants", Wikipedia, 2021-03-14, retrieved 2021-05-17
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:-Zai-[edit]

I have over a thousand edits and understand all the notability guidelines and other guidelines. I have participated in multiple AfDs and have created multiple articles. I have one article that's nominated for deletion, but I was newer at that time and have learned my lesson from that. And I also have experience in the deletion policies. Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) (please ping on reply) 19:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:QuiteUnusual[edit]

I have been here for about 14 years and, many years ago, used to work at AfC. Finding a little more time on my hands, I'd like to help out again although I will focus on areas I have a particular interest / expertise in. Recently I've spent time at NPP and think I've demonstrated sufficient content and policy knowledge to be trusted. Thanks QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nirmaljoshi[edit]

I think I can help new editors now. Regards! nirmal (talk) 06:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac/Admin, Thanks. Could I be listed in the participants list so that the script is activated? Best! nirmal (talk) 09:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops! Added. Primefac (talk) 12:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mcguy15[edit]

I'd love the help with the backlog! I'm quite sure I meet the min requirements. Thanks! Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 17:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Israell[edit]

Hello, I'd like to apply for AFC participation. I meet the minimum requirements, and I intend to contribute as time permits. I'll respond to questions in a timely manner. Israell (talk) 02:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Israell (talk) 02:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pbrks[edit]

I've been on Wikipedia for over around 15 years and have nearly 30k edits. I'd like to help reduce the immense backlog. Pbrks (talk) 01:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Robertsky[edit]

I fulfil the criteria for AfC reviewer. I also have been performing page curation work, and would like to assist here as well. – robertsky (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – bradv🍁 04:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:BusterD[edit]

An active contributor on en.wikipedia since 2005. New Page reviewer rights. Clean block log. Time for me to step up. BusterD (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – bradv🍁 04:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chennai Passangai[edit]

I'm completed the afc helper script rights criteria. Chennai Passangai (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 13:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Primefac , Can you please explain ,Which is not completed . Chennai Passangai (talk) 20:18, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You have fewer than 500 article-space edits. Primefac (talk) 10:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nyanardsan[edit]

Hi! I want to help to reduce the backlog. Im pretty familiar with notability guidelines and im sure i met all the criteria for AfC reviewer. Have been editing and active for a while, thanks. Nyanardsan (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ken Tony[edit]

Hai. I'm Ken. I've been a regular contributor here for seven and a half months. I've created more than 30 articles, and has over 5300 edits to this date. I pass every general criteria required to acquire a membership in AfC. I've made myself familiar with WP:ROLL, WP:VD, WP:BLP, WP:NOT, WP:N, WP:DP and WP:CSD. I believe I can help clear the backlog. Regards. Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 17:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June[edit]

Returning (Jun)[edit]

User:Mortee[edit]

I am currently listed as inactive and would like to be reinstated so I can help out with some reviews. I was previously approved and have written 26 articles (listed on my user page). › Mortee talk 14:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (June)[edit]

User:Doric Loon[edit]

Greetings. I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2005 and have created over 200 articles. Until now I have mostly confined myself to content improvement but I have some experience of AfD and PROD. I would be interested in becoming involved here in AfC. I seem to meet all the general criteria, and have read the instructions. --Doric Loon (talk) 12:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nizolan[edit]

I have around 60 substantive articles and no non-procedural deletions, 8,000 edits and a decent AfD track record. I'm interested in helping to chip away at the backlog. —Nizolan (talk · c.) 19:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Laplorfill[edit]

I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2013, though more active recently, with close to 5000 edits. I have created a number of articles, including McEwan Pratt, Brockham Railway Museum, Gloddfa Ganol, Baguley 774, A. Horlock and Co, Slate industry in the Nantlle Valley, Francis Claude Blake and a dozen others. I contribute to WP:AfD, and know how to use WP:PROD and WP:CSD effectively and have recently been granted rollback rights. I often come across AfD submissions both good and ones in need of improvement, and am happy to volunteer my time to reducing the backlog. Laplorfill (talk) 05:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 10:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trialan[edit]

Dear Sir or Madam,

I would like to apply for Articles for Creation rights on Wikipedia.

Below I will expose why I believe that I meet the criteria at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation.

My Wikipedia account has been very active in the last 106 days, in which I've made over 500 edits: correcting typos, fixing grammar, adding sources and extending articles with too little content.

Thorough understanding of the reviewing instructions

I have thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions. In order to give evidence of this I have written a short summary of the recommended reviewing workflow below.

Once a draft has been created and submitted, the first step is for it to go through the quick fail process: the idea is for bad drafts to be killed quickly. A quick fail consists in: irreparable copyright violation, a blank, test or nonsense article, and vandalism. If an article isn't in English it should be trans-wikified.

Then comes the standard content review phase, the key here is that content should be encyclopaedic in nature, on a notable subject, reliably sourced and adopting a neutral point of view.

Demonstration of understanding of notability guidelines and deletion policies

I have carefully read the notability guidelines and applied what I learned to contribute to multiple AfD discussions.

As evidence of my understanding and involvement in this process I have made many edits on AfD pages making the case for or against deletion based on what I read in the reviewing policies and instructions. AfD discussions taken part in include: articles on Rob Lord (software developer), the international theatre in Vienna, Time and Space Limited (theatre company), International Financing Review, Kain Rivers, ...

Willingness and ability to respond in a timely manner to questions about their reviews

I have ample time and am more than willing to respond in a timely manner to questions about my reviews.

I have the above demonstrates my enthusiasm and goodwill to contribute to the wikipedian community by becoming an AfC.

Many Thanks for your consideration. Trialan (talk) 15:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for various reasons, including the apparent need to make dozens of edits to make relatively minor typo fixes and a G11'd draft. Primefac (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clearfrienda[edit]

I would like to apply for Articles for Creation rights on Wikipedia, I believe I have met all criteria, and I've created many articles (listed on my user page). I would love to help reduce the backlog of AfC articles. Thanks, Clearfrienda 💬 14:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:JoelleJay[edit]

I have a lot of experience with NPROF and NSPORT articles at AfD and believe my familiarity with those guidelines would be helpful here. JoelleJay (talk) 23:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ulubatli Hasan[edit]

Hey, I want to become a Articles for creation reviewer to help in reducing the thousands of pending submissions. I've over a thousand edits and understand all the notability guidelines and other guidelines. I think, I meet the requirements. Hasan (talk) 07:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:ECTran71[edit]

I think I meet the basic requirements, with numerous edits as well as several articles created demonstrating good understanding of the requirements for inclusion. I would like to help out whenever I can. ECTran71 (talk) 11:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sahaib3005[edit]

Hello I’m Sahaib3005. I think I have enough edits. I also know the importance of notability, references, neutrality, etc. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now. There isn't any one issue that I'm seeing, but it's a bunch of tiny issues that indicate to me that you just need some more time editing. Primefac (talk) 13:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheBirdsShedTears[edit]

I have participated in NPR, AfD, and CSD. I would like to work at AfC to reduce workload. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fade258[edit]

Hi Administrators, I humble to request this rights to reduce the number of articles which is waiting for review.Not only the reduce of those articles which is waiting for review but also for the quality establishment of articles. I had passed the criteria for this rights and i am familier with the policies, guidelines and reviewing instructions. Thank you !(Fade258 (talk) 12:36, 24 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July[edit]

Returning (July)[edit]

User:CodeLyoko[edit]

Returning after a long period due to some medical issues, would love to start reviewing AFC articles again! CodeLyokotalk 21:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CodeLyoko, looks like you've never been removed. Primefac (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I guess my searching skills are terrible now I swear I did not see my name, sorry about the annoyance! CodeLyokotalk 15:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hah! No worries, I was processing a lot all at once so one more I-don't-actually-have-to-do-anything name isn't that big of a burden! Primefac (talk) 16:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sionk[edit]

I'm a returning AfC contributor, having previously become inactive when I moved on to other things. Would be interested in helping with keeping the backlog down. Would be handy to have the AfC Script back again :) Sionk (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheChunky[edit]

I believe I meet the basic requirements, as evidenced by numerous edits and several articles written that demonstrate a thorough understanding of the criteria for inclusion. I'd like to assist whenever possible. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 02:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're already on the list. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (July)[edit]

User:Lajmmoore[edit]

I like to give a bit back to Wikipedia and help with the AFC process. I've been editing for a couple of years and feel like it time for me to help out a bit more! Lajmmoore (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GermanKity[edit]

I wanted to help Wikipedia by reviewing pending Drafts. I have also granted recently New page reviewer and Pending changes reviewer. GermanKity (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, you just started a 1-month trial run for NPP, one permission at a time please. signed, Rosguill talk 18:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Rosguill, I respect your decision. GermanKity (talk) 10:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Happily888[edit]

I have read and understand the criteria and reviewing instructions. I believe I meet all criteria as I have over 7000 edits made over three years, have created 30 articles and I have had experience with the deletion policy and understand the notability guidelines. Happily888 (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reidgreg[edit]

To take part in the July 2021 backlog drive... and to improve the encyclopedia. Reidgreg (talk) 21:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DocFreeman24[edit]

Hi! I'm interested in helping with the current backlog drive. I've been an active editor for a little over a year, have created around a dozen articles, and have familiarized myself with the AFC guidelines. Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks! DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chalst[edit]

Wikipedia would benefit from a smoother-functioning AfC system and that needs more editors participating, so a few months since I first thought about it, I'm putting my name forward. I meet all the criteria. I've been fairly active over the years at AfD (see my AfD stats) and DRV, and so I understand the "is it likely to survive AfD?" criterion reasonably well. — Charles Stewart (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nitesh003[edit]

I have meet the requirements. My account is more than 7 months old and I have more than 500 undeleted edits. I'm also familiar with reviewing instructions and notability guidelines. Nitesh003 (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; I'm mainly concerned with the number of declined drafts and deleted pages (in particular, those for copyvio concerns or pages that were draftified). Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TrangaBellam[edit]

Help with backlog. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC) TrangaBellam (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, concerned mostly about temperament, multiple DS alerts, and 3RR warnings. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Re-evaluated, see my talk. Primefac (talk) 18:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noobie anonymous[edit]

Note that Noobie anonymous has been blocked as a sockpuppet. KylieTastic (talk) 08:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly blocked, from the looks of it. Primefac (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not the first time that's happend :/ KylieTastic (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Correogsk[edit]

Hi! I am a Wikipedian in Spanish, English, French, and German since 2007. I think I meet the requirements. Thanks, regards! Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 19:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Correogsk or Gustavo (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cabrils[edit]

I've been editing since 2018, I have 600+ main space edits and have created 20+ pages. I've familiarised myself with the AfC guidelines. I'm quite active on the AfDs (particularly at improving nominated pages to meet WP:GNG where possible) and would like to help out more. Thanks very much, Cabrils (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DMySon[edit]

Though i have been contributing on Wikipedia for last two years my edit counts are 12K+. I want to help Wikipedia as an AFC reviewer. Please also check my Deletion logs. CSD Log, PROD, XFD and Draftify. DMySon (talk) 00:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Princess of Ara[edit]

Hello, I will particularly like to help with reviewing Nigeria-related and entertainment drafts. I've created 50+ articles including BLPs and entertainment-related articles. One of them got draftified with good reason and I've gone ahead to learn from it. I understand notability guidelines and can identify RS. My participation in AfD can be seen here (Link added to reflect my participation with my old username; User:TheSokks). I've also read and understood the reviewing instructions. For full disclosure, I engaged in sockpupptery as a novice editor, without knowing it was against the rules. I now edit only on this account after my appeal was granted to continue editing by Arbcom. My past account is Kemmiiii. I also have an active TBAN. Kind regards, Princess of Ara(talk) 19:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Please note that this is extremely conditional, given the past issues and/or concerns around UPE. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tamingimpala[edit]

I have made more than 6000 edits, and I'm confident about my understanding of the rules and regulations of Wikipedia regarding to notability, AFD, reliable and independent sources. So far, I have created 64 articles on this wiki, and 2 of them appeared in the homepage, also I came out in the top three position at Women In Red participants list in the past two months. Prior to this one, I have applied for couple of other Wikipedia rights and have been granted so. I believe I can be an useful addition to the AFC community. If you think otherwise, please tell me what's wrong and what needs to done furthermore. Thanks. Tame (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TipsyElephant[edit]

I've done some work with AfDs and PRODs at WP:POD, but I have not done any speedy deletions. I've mostly contributed to articles relevant to WP:POD, and I was hoping to go through the AfCs at the Wikiproject (I might branch out after that). I've made 20 different articles that have already passed AfC (i.e. Dissect (podcast) and Art Napoleon) and I've also made substantial edits to pre-existing articles such as Minjung theology and Nicholas Galanin. I just read over the guide to AfCs and I believe I meet the criteria for a reviewer. I'm not sure how relevant it is, but I've also created 10 different categories and I've uploaded or edited nearly every image used by articles at WP:POD. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, mainly on account of the number of declined drafts I'm seeing in your contributions. Yes, I do realize that there are also a number of accepted drafts, but the ratio is a bit too low for indicating a good understanding of notability. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Totally fair, no hard feelings. I was actually a little worried about that. Maybe I'll apply again in like a year. Thanks for reviewing my application. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iamfarzan[edit]

I have been editing in English wiki for the last one year. So far created 26 number of articles (Only my first article got deleted) and have good understanding about vandalism and almost every notability guidelines. I hope I can improve myself further and hope meets all the necessary requirement for the right. Iamfarzan (talk) 14:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:HenryCrun15[edit]

I am seeking to become a draft reviewer to help clear the backlog. In particular, there are a number of webcomic drafts that I would like to examine as part of my work on WikiProject Webcomics, but otherwise I'll be generally looking at whatever random articles catch my eye. I've been an editor since 2015 (though not always active), I've made over a thousand edits in this year alone, and I'm an active member of WikiProject Webcomics where I'm the main person who sorts through requests for new articles. HenryCrun15 (talk) 03:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Correogsk[edit]

Hi! I am requesting to be included here, as an Active Reviewer, since I consider I fulfill the requirements of the list. I thank a lot in advance for the opportunity!! I've just seen I was already here, twelve days ago, thanks again! Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 12:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 12:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Already done. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August[edit]

Returning (August)[edit]

User:Overthrows[edit]

My username was globally renamed and removed by AfC bot with a message on my talk page citing inactivity. Prior to my rename I remained with AfC perms for about a year or two prior. Gave reviewing structures and deletion policies a read before this in case. Thanks. ‒overthrows 00:18, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed. Primefac (talk) 12:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Andrewman327[edit]

Former AFC user. I'm getting back into editing Wikipedia and would like to help review new articles again. Andrew327 13:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Andrew327 13:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:FeralOink[edit]

I was formerly active in articles for creation for several years. I am now listed as inactive. I would like to be restored to active status. I satisfy all the criteria. I was not involuntarily removed from the active list. Thank you for considering my request. FeralOink (talk) 10:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (August)[edit]

User:Sahaib3005[edit]

I requested to have AFC rights in June, but it was declined. I have created over 60 pages. Since June I have created many new articles such as John Traill, John Gray (nightwatchman) and Equestrian statue of Robert the Bruce, Bannockburn. Although a small number of the pages have been deleted, I have learned from them. I know that Wikipedia is not news, books and films with only database sources are not notable, etc.Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac:, I believe I must make a note here that the user hasn't read AfC guidelines properly. They inappropriately close an AfD where they've been a participant, and then accept an AfC draft improperly to a disambiguated title. The user needs to demonstrate that they understand the AfC guidelines, and imo they should be removed currently. Inappropriately closed the Miniminter AfD, inappropriately approved Draft:Miniminter to Miniminter (YouTuber). The draft has now been deleted though. ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:30, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TheAafi:, I have reviewed a lot of AFCs (check my contributionss) amd msot of them have been uncontroversial, so I don’t think I should be removed from the afc list.

The Miniminter thing is confusing. So I created the page Zerkaa. I have improved the draft page of Miniminter (I did not create the draft). The thing is that someone created the page Miniminter despite there already being a draft. I participated in the deletion of Miniminter, as every single person voted to redirect, I decided to redirect the page. I regret redirecting the page, I thought since it was uncontroversial that it would be okay if I redirected the page even if I was involved in the discussion. Meanwhile today I spent hours improving the draft Miniminter even more. As I was an afc participant I moved the page to Miniminter (YouTuber), I couldn’t move it to Miniminter (because there was a page there). I was acting in good faith. My goal was to get rid of the poorly referenced Miniminter article and replace it with the much better draft article. I am saddened to hear that the draft article has been deleted when multiple editors have contributed to the draft. I would like to apologise for making this mess. I would also ask for the draft Miniminter to be undeleted because it was promising unlike the Miniminter page.

User:Artem.G[edit]

I'd like to participate in reviewing AfCs and I think I'm quite experienced to try it. I've created 10+ articles and reviewed 10+ GAs. Artem.G (talk) 20:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Peter303x[edit]

I would like to help with AFC reviews. I have done lot's of AFD and experienced editor of 8 years. Peter303x (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 13:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To Primefac: which particular criteria did I not meet and what do I need to do to demonstrate that I am ready before I reapply? Peter303x (talk) 00:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Edit count. Primefac (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AmirahBreen[edit]

I have read and understand the criteria and reviewing instructions. I believe I meet all criteria as I have over 5000 edits made over five years, have created several articles and I have had experience with the deletion policy and understand the notability guidelines. Amirah talk 15:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC) Amirah talk 15:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bwmdjeff[edit]

Now that I am extended confirmed protected (>500 edits) I would like to become a reviewer here. I spent some time reviewing content policies, notability guidelines, and deletion policy. If you look through my edit history, I really do not edit anything controversial (mostly Japanese parliamentary constituencies, Japanese city districts, and creating redirect pages.
Thanks for considering me as a reviewer Bwmdjeff (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Riteboke[edit]

I am requesting for this right to help patrol and review articles in WP:AFC. I have been editing for sometime now, i had a long break sometime ago and was editing through an IP every now and then. I would love to help review articles in draftspace, i believe i meet the criteria for this role. For now, i would appreciate if I be given on probationary basis, thanks in advance. Cheers. Riteboke (talk) 12:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Danre98[edit]

I'd like to help review articles submitted for creation. I have read the reviewing instructions, am familiar with relevant policies (CSD, Notability and associated guidelines, BLP, verifiability), understand deletion, and have participated at AfD some. Danre98(talk^contribs) 21:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lightbluerain[edit]

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

I have a fairly good idea of what makes a Wikipedia Article acceptable. But, I don't have much experience in reviewing new pages. I go to New Pages Feed sometimes and correct as much as I can or tag with appropriate problem templates. I think being a participant here would help me with New Page reviewing with the AFC Script. I would know better of what to do other than just tagging with problems or making some of the corrections. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 16:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vukky[edit]

I'd like to help with AfC reviews - I've seen several completely unsourced articles and such, and I want to help with keeping the backlog down. Vukky (talk 🎒 - Random text!) 07:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:FormalDude[edit]

I'd like to help review articles for creation because I have a good understanding of Wikipedia policy surrounding notability, reliable sources, neutral point of view, and deletion, which I believe will be beneficial in reviewing draft articles. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 08:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AshLin[edit]

I would like to become a draft reviewer as I feel that I should contribute in this field. I have about 30K+ edits since 2006, created over 500 articles, and participated in WP:GA in the past. I have fair understanding of Wikipedia policies including WP:NPOV, WP:RS, & WP:Notability. Do let me know if there is any other qualification that I need, I would be happy to do whatever is necessary. Thank you in advance. AshLin (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheChronium[edit]

Hello! I am doing edits for a while now and have a good understanding of Wikipedia notability guidlines and deletion policy. I am requesting to be an AFC reviewer now. So, I would be more efficient in editing Wikipedia and to help in clearling the AFC backlog. TheChronium 13:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:MatEditzWiki[edit]

I am seeking to help with the AFC process. It's pretty slow and some help from me would speed it up a bit when EST/PST/etc is asleep. I'm not sure if I have over 500 undeleted edits, but we'll see. MatEditzWiki (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Capsulecap[edit]

I would like to be an AFC participant because I know how to vet articles for any unsourced, promotional, or false information and already have the know-how from making some prior pages. Helping IP/non-autoconfirmed users make articles is something that I think I'll do great at! Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 03:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I didn't read the fine print. I'll come back when I have 500 mainspace edits. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 23:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla[edit]

I was waiting for my account to become eligible for the right. I think I meet all the basic criterias needed for this. So far Ive created 15 articles. I have reasonable knowledge about all deletion criterias. I would love to eliminate backlog.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 12:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bada Kaji[edit]

I would like to help out — I believe that I meet the requirements. Thanks. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 11:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Luxtaythe2nd[edit]

I did not have the minimum editing requirement during my last request. This time, I have 600+ edits and I'm fairly confident that I can have a successful request for membership if nothing goes wrong. Please notify me if there are any issues. For my earlier request, see here. Luxtaythe2nd (talk) 11:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, still fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikinights[edit]

I want to help reduce to backlog. I recently became concerned with the future of Wikipedia while reading Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2021 review/Issues. A competent and speedy AfC and NPP corps will encourage casual one-time article creators to become invested in the project. I am familiar with the relevant content policies and have participated in AFD, RFD, and MFD. wikinights talk 13:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September[edit]

Returning (S)[edit]

User:John Cline[edit]

I am returning from a period of absence and asking to be reinstated to this WikiProject. I am also requesting afc helper script rights. Thank you. --John Cline (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (S)[edit]

User:AnsrieJames9[edit]

I'm created a draft articles for me and also i'm the new member of AfC. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, has not met all of the requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Breamk[edit]

Returning to AfC list. Over 1000 articles edited, relevant policies reviewed, teach on WikiEdu Breamk (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Should this be rerequested? Breamk (talk) 19:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pax85[edit]

Returning to Wiki after a long absence. Including my previous work in AFC, I have also been around AfD, GOCE, vandal fighting, and a few other projects. Pax Verbum 05:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. This is mainly due to the rather large absence, and the fact that the notability requirements have changed significantly since '16. Primefac (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:S0091[edit]

I see the backlog slipping after the monumental feat to get it under control so would like to pitch in. S0091 (talk) 16:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:RacoonyRE[edit]

I would also like to help with AFC as part of my work here and in German Wikipedia and would be happy if you could include me here. RacoonyRE Message meContributions 18:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For the record I'm on the fence here. Discounting Huggle edits, there are <100 mainspace edits and only one AFD. Will have a think, but any delay is because of this. Primefac (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac Thank you for the open words. I understand that you want to think about it. However, I have done a lot of edits in different wikis and have gained enough experience. I only offer my help here when I see that there is currently a backlog of several weeks. Feel free to take your time thinking about it, but please understand my application as an offer of help. RacoonyRE Message meContributions 15:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Melaleuca alternifolia[edit]

Hi! I would like to ask for an access to the AFC Helper Script to be able to reduce an increasing backlog of new articles a little bit. It seems that I fit the required criteria (account's age, edits) and I've also read everything required. I regularly contribute to Afd process and I'm familiar with notability criteria & policies, as well as deletion process. (Besides enWiki I'm also a contributor on slWiki – as an editor and administrator.)

Since I have no experience working with this script yet, I would like to request it on a probationary basis. Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 10:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing my request for now.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 14:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nitesh003[edit]

I am interested in helping with AfC and reducing the AfC backlog. I believe I meet the criteria and I'm familiar with reviewing instructions. Nitesh003(TALK) 10:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AnsrieJames9[edit]

I'd like to be an AFC participant. I am interested in helping with AFC. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 22:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Your request was already denied, and deleting the response in the hope that you'll get a different, more favorable one from a different admin is not the way forward. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sdkb, and said to Primefac that may re-apply your criteria AnsrieJames9 (talk) 23:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AryKun[edit]

I'm interested in AfC and would like to help reduce the AfC backlog. I think I'm reasonably familiar with the AfD criteria. AryKun (talk) 06:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I'd like to see more involvement in AfD prior to @AryKun putative future acceptance. Understanding AFC is one thing, but AfD is the other side of the same pancake. It's not possible to eat one side without eating the other. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sennecaster[edit]

I have a strong understanding of RS, NPOV, and copyright, and a good understanding of the notability guidelines. I am more than willing to read and study the supplementary notability guidelines as necessary for the topic. I enjoy backlog work and has interested me for a while. Sennecaster (Chat) 17:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. for 6 months. While Senne has demonstrated very high competence in what are traditionally some of the trickier areas, such as copyright, and their deletion experience is fairly normal for a probationary grant, they have less conventional mainspace editing than most. However, their 3Os and similar demonstrate sufficient awareness of these fields to avoid issues - plus anyone capable of being a CCI clerk has demonstrated sufficient competence. I would advise focus on the bottom of the list (new submissions) for your first month or so, and then asking with close-cases (either to me or at WT:AFC - used for 2nd opinions). Nosebagbear (talk) 20:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Nosebagbear, I'm going to overrule you. I see nothing in their contributions, editing, or stats that indicates that they shouldn't be a full reviewer. Primefac (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:NagalimNE[edit]

Hello, I have a good understanding of Wikipedia notability guidelines, reliable sources, and deletion policy. Having this right will surely help me to be more productive in editing and to help in clearing the AfC backlog. NagalimNE (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bapinghosh[edit]

Hi, i want participate in this project. I believe i meet every criteria. And also I have good experience at afd. Grant me Afc reviewer right if granted will help me to reduce backlog. Thanks Bapinghosh (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, too many declined drafts or deleted pages. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: thank you. I respect your decision. I will apply again after gaining more experience. Thanks Bapinghosh (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xclusivzik[edit]

I’m interested with helping reducing the current backlog (mainly articles in music and arts), I've been fairly active over at AfD and have familiarised myself with AfC guidelines. Thanks Xclusivzik (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:WaddlesJP13[edit]

I've been a page patroller for about 2 months now, and I have familiarized myself with notability guidelines and general page maintenance and maintenance tagging as well as the criteria for speedy deletion. I also come across many articles that I have to move to draftspace since they're not ready to be actual articles on Wikipedia yet. With that said, I'd love to help actually review drafts to further assist those whose drafts I've moved and also help clear through the backlog of other drafts that are awaiting review. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shushugah[edit]

I am active, with 5,000 edits over past 3 years and a clean log/record of amicable interactions especially with newer editors. I was on probationary status a year ago and would like permanent tools this time. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 20:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kazamzam[edit]

Interested in improving the quality of biographic and zoological articles as some of them are very...spotty. Kazamzam (talk) 17:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mikehawk10[edit]

Hello. I am interested in joining the AfC team and reviewing articles for creation. I'm about 5.5K edits in, and I've been involved in a good deal of anti-vandal work. I'm hoping that I can assist in clearing the AfC backlog. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. This is mainly due to less-than-ideal AFD stats. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Luxtaythe2nd[edit]

This is my third time requesting permission to participate, and third time's the charm!

I am a Wikipedia user with experience regarding GNG and similar guidelines. I know the full AfC process and am ready to join it. I am passionate to work in this community and will actively participate during hours when most reviewers are inactive. I also have experience with new changes patrol. Luxtaythe2nd (talk) 18:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DeltaSquad833[edit]

Hey! I would like to request for the position of a reviewer. My main language is English which makes it much more easier to communicate with people. Moreover, I am much more specialized and have more experiences in naval related topics and some other non-naval related topics too! I’ve been on Wikipedia for almost a year with many more articles created. Due to these reasons, I would like to assist/help out new comers of Wikipedia and make sure they can produce good quality articles on this website. Delta (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Londonfifo[edit]

I would like to help with reviewing drafts for publication. Londonfifo Londonfifo (talk) 04:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jiggyziz[edit]

I'm aware for Helping to Draft for Publication. I can Read WP:NPOL.Best Regards

JiggyzizTalk✍️ 14:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tajwar.thesuperman[edit]

I would like to be a participant. I've read all criterias. And I've made over 3000 edits. I'm now sure about notability guideline. Thanks. ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN!【Click to Discuss】 20:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 11:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Which criteria? ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN!【Click to Discuss】 15:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Time, and now that you've been blocked from the Draft space, that's a definite no. Primefac (talk) 23:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Sorry to disturb you! What did you mean with Time? And now I'm unblocked from draftspace. Thanks!— Tajwar.thesuperman Talk • Contributions 09:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gorden 2211[edit]

Hello, I would like to help with AFC. I've participated in a few AFDs recently, have a good understanding of notability guidelines and have written a few articles. I have broad ranges of interests and I have the time to invest into reading articles to making sure they're suitable for Wikipedia, especially now as the backlog of articles grow. Gorden 2211 (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:WellThisIsTheReaper[edit]

I'd like to help review articles submitted through AFC. I am familiar with many Wikipedia guidelines (WP:CSD, WP:GNG, WP:N, WP:NFF), and I also understand the process of deletion. I also believe I fulfill all of the criteria shown on the main page. WellThisIsTheReaper (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, mainly because of the number of declined drafts, copyright issues, and deleted pages indicated on your userpage. Primefac (talk) 23:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: According to my mainpage, I have not had an rejected draft since June 28th; there was one exception however for Minor League Cricket (it was declined, then accepted). I have also not had a whole lot of copyright issues (Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Big Shot taken, however) in my entire Wikipedian span. I also have had only 2 deleted pages on this user, in which one (East Bay Blazers) was deleted by my own request and another (Barbados national under-20 football team) deleted simply because it was created during a time of block evasion. WellThisIsTheReaper (talk) 03:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's not any one of those things, it's the combination of all of them that indicate to me you need more time editing before you will be an effective reviewer. You are welcome to reapply in a month or two to demonstrate that. Primefac (talk) 12:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TipsyElephant[edit]

I was going to wait longer to apply again, but the AfC reviews have gotten really backed up and I'd like to help. Since last time I've applied I haven't had any drafts rejected. Since then I've had Geekshow Podcast, Alone: A Love Story, How to Be a Girl (podcast), and There Goes the Neighborhood (podcast) approved. I also have more drafts in the works such as Draft:Tell Them, I Am and Draft:The United States of Anxiety among others. I've participated in nearly 100 AfDs with about 70% of my votes matching the final consensus. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trakinwiki[edit]

Hello, i want to participate in the project. And I want to help in reducing backlog. I have created over 20 articles and most of the articles had been accepted through afc process and rest of the articles has been reviewed through normal process. Not a single article got deleted. And I am familiar with the Wikipedia's rules. So grant me permission please. Thanks and regards Trakinwiki (talk) 11:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: may I know which criteria i am not meeting now ? Then I'll work on it. Trakinwiki (talk)

User:331dot[edit]

I've been giving advice at the Help Desk for some time and have decided that maybe it's be a good idea if I actually participated in reviews. 331dot (talk) 11:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October[edit]

User:Wingwatchers[edit]

I am familiar with the above minimum criteria and had contributes significantly to many articles in the past months. This includes GA and a potential FA, and therefore I am confident that I am eligible for the right. Wingwatchers (talk) 00:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC) Wingwatchers (talk) 00:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Portuportu2[edit]

Hello, I have been editing Wikipedia for a while and now I like to help in clearing the AFC backlog. I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and identifying spam pages. Having AFC reviewing rights will make me more efficient in editing. Portuportu2 (talk) 11:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done. You only very recently started gaining meaningful experience with our deletion processes, and I don't have enough to assess your proficiency with our notability guidelines. You also have very few non-automated edits to mainspace, with many of your edits being indiscriminate redlink removals or rapid-fire uses of refill, which artificially inflates your edit count. Most of your unautomated edits are to an article that is an unattributed translation of w:fr:Adolphe Amouroux, which is a copyright issue. I am also somewhat concerned by the relatively recent warnings for disruptive editing on your talk page, which you blanked immediately after responding ([2]). Please gain some additional experience before re-requesting this right. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Blablubbs (talk) Thanks for your valuable input. But I didn't do any disruptive editing. I got that warning for a speedy page deletion which I didn't create. The page was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mak_Chili_Stadium&action=edit&redlink=1 and was created by User:Aiman Rasid 7 This page was not created by me. Not sure why I got the warning. That's why I removed it from my talk page by giving an editing summary not my creation. I am sorry if I did wrong in removing that. Other than that I will follow your advice and will apply later for the permission when I gain some more experience. :) Portuportu2 (talk) 13:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:MoonlightVector[edit]

Hello im MoonlightVector, I commonly check New Page Feed to check for quite a bit of stuff, and due to the nature of that, I would formerly request AFC permission to complete the job. Thank you MoonlightVectorTalk page 18:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Slywriter[edit]

Would like to help cut down on the backlog. Change of pace from vandalism patrolling. Familiar with the neccessary guidelines and standards for an article to be acceptable Slywriter (talk) 13:25, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gyan.Know[edit]

I am interested in helping the AfC and reducing the AfC backlog. I believe I meet the criteria and am familiar with the reviewing guidelines. GyanKnow contributions? 09:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Idoghor Melody[edit]

I am interested in helping with AfC and reducing the AfC backlog. I believe I may meet the criteria and I'm familiar with reviewing instructions. Idoghor Melody (talk) 06:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 07:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Advait.kansal[edit]

I wish to contribute in reducing AfC backlog. I have good understanding of the processes and I think I would want to start with probationary role. Advait.kansal (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, just not seeing the AFD/policies experience at this time. Primefac (talk) 07:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your feedback. I'll work on it. Advait.kansal (talk) 10:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lazy Maniik[edit]

Though i have been contributing on Wikipedia for last two years my Maniik edit counts are 2,015+. I want to help Wikipedia as an AFC reviewer. Please also check my Deletion logs. CSD Log,PROD, XFD and Draftify. Best Regards. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 04:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just a placeholder note, waiting on a half-dozen AFDs to close before making a final decision. Primefac (talk) 07:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note that this editor earlier made a request (see above) under the username User:Jiggyziz. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Not too concerned about the previous request as it was declined for numerical reasons. Primefac (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pyrrho the Skeptic[edit]

I'm hoping to become a draft reviewer. As a Teahouse host, I see a lot of draft space questions from editors. I want to be able to help these editors more directly, and attempt level-headed, civil reviews of drafts. I try to be a precisionist, and follow the example of other editors who I admire, that give real effort to keeping emotions, bias, and cynicism separate from their editing. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 17:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC) Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 17:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria (and AFD stats aren't great). Primefac (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response. Just so I know for the future, what minimum criteria did I fail to meet? According to the project page, the minimum requirements are: a Wikipedia account at least 90 days old, a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles, thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions, a demonstrated understanding of the policies mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including the various special notability categories, reasonable evidence of understanding the deletion policy (experience in areas such as CSD/AfD/PROD or page curation, while not mandatory, are beneficial), a willingness and ability to respond in a timely manner to questions about their reviews. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pyrrho the Skeptic you currently have only 388 edits in article space, also although it says "CSD/AfD/PROD or page curation, while not mandatory, are beneficial" they are probably the primary way to show an "understanding of the policies", another way is a number of non trivial articles created, but it is all a bit subjective. If you haven't already enable Wikipedia:Twinkle and set the CSD and PROD logs on, and have a look at some WP:AFDs. Hope that helps explain, Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the explanation. I was thinking of my total edits, not just article space, so that makes sense now. I'll keep plugging away. Thanks. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 18:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TTP1233[edit]

I'm very familiar with AfC rules as I always engaged with this Wikiproject. Since I passed basic criteria (90+ days old account; 500+ edits undeleted), I enter my name here. I want to help in reviewing those articles which are engaged in Wikiproject:Indian politics. It is what I used to research regarding this. I hope that I would be issued rights scripts. If I failed over this please mention the criteria I have to do for. Best Wishes. Jyoti Roy (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 07:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Orbit Wharf[edit]

Hi. I joined on 10 July 2021. And today is 13 October 2021. So my account is more than 90 days old. And I've made some deletion discussion and CSD. You can see my contribution history. I was partially blocked from mainspace. But I was unblocked on 10 October 2021. Can I be granted now? I've requested autopatrolled permission on the following day when I was unblocked. But I wasn't granted for my block. Thanks.  ||  Orbit Wharf  💬 09:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This editor previously applied (see above) under the username User:Tajwar.thesuperman. Liz Read! Talk! 05:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, Orbit Wharf please stop requesting advanced permissions. You have repeatedly requested multiple advanced permissions over the past few days despite clearly not being qualified for such, and barely hanging on to your ability to edit the mainspace at all. At this point, requesting permissions suggests that you either are trying to abuse the permissions or truly have no understanding of the standards of the editing community that you are volunteering to enforce. signed, Rosguill talk 05:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dege31[edit]

I am requesting the rights because I meet all the criteria and want to help with reviewing articles for creation. Dege31 (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theleekycauldron[edit]

I previously applied for AfC rights to review new articles and help reduce the backlog, but was turned away for AfD stats, among other things. I think my stats and understanding of policies has improved since last March, and I'd like to re-request the right! If not, let me know what else to improve on. I've written over a dozen articles and have one GA. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 04:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 04:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:LEvalyn[edit]

I am intrigued by AfC work, since I am interested in helping newbies have a smoother arrival on wikipedia, through a shorter wait time at AfC and helpful explanations of how to improve their drafts. I've been an editor for 5 years (actually active the last 2), with 1,900 edits and 40 articles created. I've grown quite familiar with notability guidelines through participation in AfDs, as reflected by my autopatrolled rights. I have reviewed the reviewing instructions. I am open to probationary permissions for now, since I'm not sure if I will enjoy AfC reviewing as much as I hope, and may not turn out to be very active. Thanks! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 19:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:2006nishan178713[edit]

I have been editing Wikipedia for more than a year and have also created some articles. I have read the reviewing and deletion policies and I am quite familiar with the notability guidelines. I would like to join the Afc reviewing team to help clear up the Afc pending backlogs. I believe that I have a good undrstanding of NPOV, reliability and notability. Reviewing Afcs would be a great privilege for me which would help me become more productive and efficient in editing. Partha Basak 04:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 06:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:T[edit]

I would like to get back into Wikipedia and also learn some new things. T (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC) T (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. The guidelines and policies for notability have changed quite significantly since you've last seriously edited in 2014, and it would be good to see you back to regular editing before reviewing drafts. Primefac (talk) 20:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:RPSkokie[edit]

I would like to contribute to the AFC reviewing exercise. I believe I meet the requirements and I have a clear understanding of the notability guidelines, reliable sources, and deletion policy. RPSkokie (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. RPSkokie (talk) 12:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November[edit]

Other[edit]

User:Mhawk10[edit]

I had AfC helper script rights under my old account name (User:Mikehawk10), but they were not transferred over when I usurped this username. — Mhawk10 (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:RegistryKey[edit]

Returning inactive reviewer getting back into editing Wikipedia, including reviewing Articles for Creation. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 01:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New requests (Nov)[edit]

User:Joojay[edit]

I am familiar with the above minimum criteria and had contributes significantly to many articles in the past months. I think I can help with the backlog. Joojay (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DigitalChutney[edit]

I would like to request AfC rights to try to help to reduce the growing backlog of submitted drafts, I have experience in counter vandalism and some experience with CSD. I have read the reviewing instructions and feel that I meet the criteria. Thanks, DigitalChutney (talk) 21:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. You have no AFD experience, and while you have some solid CSDs in the draft space (which for the record, you should really enable logging with Twinkle) there's not a ton and it's fairly recent. I'm also concerned (from a "demonstration of knowledge of notability" perspective) that >90% of your edits are semi-automated and mostly counter-vandalism work; while there's nothing wrong with this type of editing, it doesn't necessarily indicate a knowledge of our inclusion criteria. Primefac (talk) 09:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your consideration, I may reapply in the future if I gain some experience with AfD and the notability guidelines, I think that I may have enabled CSD logging on Twinkle a few weeks ago, thanks, DigitalChutney (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elijahandskip[edit]

I have a few thousand edits (Just passed the 5,000 edit mark) on Wikipedia and I have been editing a little over two years now, beginning in October 2019. I work with a few WikiProjects (Weather, Severe Storms, Hurricanes, Tropical Cyclones, and Twenty-Tens decade) and I revived and sort of coordinate the Current Events WikiProject, so I feel like I could review drafts more in tune with weather events and current events. Current events is always a tricky thing to manage, especially with multiple new articles and drafts possibly being created on the same event, so as an Afc reviewer, I could at least help control the draft side of the current events. Elijahandskip (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, AFD stats are rather problematic and there's the AP2 topic ban that you keep going up against. Primefac (talk) 09:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Matilda Maniac[edit]

I wish to apply for afc rights. Happy to contribute more for background information and the behind the scenes working of Wikipedia. I have made over 200 articles myself, mostly small ones for football tournaments and individual football seasons, so i am pretty aware of the relevent guidelines. I have this year done some time on fixing broken references and adding missing references and notelists, but i have frankly lost interest in these tasks which no longer seem so rewarding to me. Matilda Maniac (talk) 03:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TTP1233[edit]

I was a former reviewer of AFC under probation. I resigned due to my education purposes. And since it is completed, I want to re-grant the right scripts. Since I was in probation, I may be removed anytime. It would be better if I was be given a permanent status, still if probation status is given to me then ok. I will manage it. Jyoti Roy (talk) 07:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Re-added. Primefac (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Batamore[edit]

Hello, I am interested to participate in this project. I have read the rules for participation and i believe that i meet all the criterias. And i also have 1,800 + edit count and i am holding auto patrolled right. I am familiar with Wikipedia's guideline so I want to help in reducing AFC backlog. Thank You, With Regards Batamore (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Having AUTOPAT is usually an automatic "in" but your AFD stats are a bit lacking. Primefac (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for accepting my request and giving me the AFC reviewer right. As you mentioned, my AFD stats are a bit lacking, I will definitely work on that.

Batamore (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Urve[edit]

I'm requesting to help out with the backlog in my areas of interest. While I'm not too interested in reviewing (or writing) BLPs, I have a good understanding of our policies about them, should I review one. I think my understanding of our deletion and notability guidance is fine; I've made some mistakes, but my knowledge has improved over time. I'm not planning on my primary activity to be about AFC submissions, but if I have the time to lend a hand, I might as well offer. Urve (talk) 21:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Severestorm28[edit]

I agree on the instructions on becoming a Articles for Creation reviewer, and just passed the 1,000 edits mark very recently, and the minimum criteria sounds familiar and understanding to me. Also battles vandalism. I can agree on this, however if I make a mistake I understand the policies for a reviewer and doing the best I can. Also rapid increase in significant edits starting from September 2021. However, if it is declined, I will accept and try to have a more restating opinion to be a participant for the Articles of Creation. Severestorm28 (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, not enough experience where we need it. Primefac (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Thank you for your response. Maybe one day I would be more experienced and try again later. Severestorm28 (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do, we can always use more help. Primefac (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:No such user[edit]

I plan to occasionally review selected draft articles. I have 10+ years experience, ~30k edits and I'm an active page mover versed in policies. No such user (talk) 11:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheTechnician27[edit]

I am a new page patroller and pending changes reviewer who has performed two GA reviews and has written a Good and possibly (soon) Featured article. I have (no outdated joke intended) over 9000 edits, and I've created 21 (non-disambiguation) mainspace articles. I have spent a lot of time at AfD and am deeply familiar with notability criteria. I have been editing Wikipedia for four years, and while I would likely only occasionally review an AfC (once or twice per month), it would still help to clear out the backlog. I would furthermore be able to give personalized help to new editors to improve articles for promising subjects. My areas of expertise are video games, technology, current events, US politics, US history, and crustaceans. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 19:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:spiralwidget[edit]

Hi, I would like to be a part of this process. I am currently doing my PhD and have plenty of spare time in the evenings, and I find it very enjoyable to review other people's work. I do not know if I have the prerequisites, but if I do I would love to be involved in this. I just read the review instructions, and I will follow them diligently. Spiralwidget (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, not enough experience where we need it. Primefac (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Arunudoy[edit]

I guess I am qualified now for AFCH. If I do qualify, please allow me. Arunudoy (talk) 04:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, AFD stats are not stellar and the number of deleted articles is concerning. Primefac (talk) 09:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:The4lines[edit]

I would like to help with lowering the backlog just a little more. I believe I meet the criteria to become a AFC reviewer. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 15:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eviolite[edit]

I would like access to the AFCH script in order to help with chipping away at the backlog. I have read the reviewing instructions and am familiar with guidelines like those for notability, having participated at a few AfDs (see for example this one, which for some reason doesn't appear at AfD stats). I have also helped at CCI and CopyPatrol, G12ing several drafts in the process. A majority of my edits are semi-automated, but I do have over 500 non-automated ones in mainspace, including the creation/expansion of several articles to DYK and one to FL. eviolite (talk) 23:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December[edit]

Other[edit]

User:QuantumRealm[edit]

I've been on probation since May 2021. Would like to get permission if you guys feel I'm ready. Any constructive criticism or feedback is most welcome. :) QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 11:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I plan on looking at probationary members and a few other things in the next week or so, hopefully this weekend. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! :) QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 13:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jodi.a.schneider[edit]

Re-requesting (had lapsed due to 6 months between edits). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alyo[edit]

I was a reviewer as User:Nolelover before an account name change--I'm requesting rights be re-added. Alyo (chat·edits) 18:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:MarcGarver[edit]

More a technical request. My username has changed from QuiteUnusual to MarcGarver, so the list of participants needs updating to my new name please. Thanks MarcGarver (talk) 13:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New requesets (Dec)[edit]

User:Firestar464[edit]

Hello, I have made many edits and have been here for around two years. I have made many successful CSD requests and understand the inclusion policies. I would like to request AFC script access so that I can review articles. Firestar464 (talk) 02:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. While you meet the numerical metrics, and your CSD logs seem to be okay (you should enable automatic logging of CSDs in your Twinkle preferences), your AFD stats are (to be honest) quite problematic. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TechnoTalk[edit]

I'd like to be able to more easily add comments to the onpage discussions versus just on the help desk pages. You can see my positive contributions there in my editing history. TechnoTalk (talk) 20:44, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. It's not any one thing that's troublesome, but a whole lot of little things (i.e. you've had about 1/3 of your created pages deleted and there isn't a lot of AFD experience for starters). Primefac (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Thanks for considering me. I'll point out for future consideration that all the deletions were earlier inferior articles, before I got the hang of notability and sourcing. All of the articles I've created in the past 5 years are still up. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rusalkii[edit]

I've read about the review process and want to help with the backlog. My experience in AfD is fairly recent but larger than the tool shows - it seems to be missing a number of AfDs I participated in, such as Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2021_November_30#Malefic_planet and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lamar_Johnson_(prisoner). Rusalkii (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Whiteguru[edit]

I am a New Page Patroller and Good Article Reviewer / GA Reasssessments (120+). I get into AfD from time to time and add short descriptions to every page I come across on NPP. I've just started doing merges, to learn a new area. Interested to work in this area. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC) Whiteguru (talk) 22:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Platonk[edit]

I would like to apply to become an AfC Reviewer. I have the requisite 90 days and 500 not-deleted edits, have read the reviewing instructions in full, and am frequently online and available for answering questions. I am familiar with notability and verification standards, including having participated in several RSN discussions. I am familiar with PROD, CSD and AfD, and have participated in many AfD discussions including saving articles from deletion after I cleaned them up mid-AfD, submitting AfDs, getting articles deleted and snow deleted, and withdrawing my AfD after others TNTed and rebuilt an article from just the title. I have merged and split articles, and am familiar with redirects. I am a fairly regular participant at WikiProject Cleanup and enjoy reading articles on topics I've never before thought to look into. My interest in helping in the AfC step came about from discussions related to the proliferation of non-notable articles in the Ethiopia/Africa area and the notability of future films policy problems (causing repeated fights at AfD over prematurely created articles). Platonk (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kavyansh.Singh[edit]

I am currently a New page reviewer on trial run, and have reviewed various articles, rated them, added necessary tags when required. I have reviewed various GANs, and have various GAs, 7 FLs, and 1 FA. I meet the basic requirements, and I think have a fairly well understanding of notability guidelines. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC) Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chumpih[edit]

Might be able to help out a little. I've created a few articles including Marc Canham (composer) and Jimmy Jewell (saxophonist) along with associated work to tidy inbound links and disambiguations, so I'm familiar with the review process from the receiving end. I'm familiar with WP:NOTE and have not pursued page creation for articles of dubious notability. I've had one page Open general licence AFD'd including repairing the wounds. Perhaps mostly, I would like to think I have the sensibilities to duck out and leave things to more experienced editors where appropriate, including making notifications and requests to them. Chumpih. (talk) 10:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Chumpih. (talk) 10:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chumpih, some of my colleagues might be concerned that you have zero AFD experience; out of curiosity, why have you not participated in that side of Wikipedia yet? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 08:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Primefac for the consideration. Re. "why no AfD" there's no particular reason. If it's any consolation, I've been a little involved in Redirects for Discussion, with varied suggestions expressed. (Ok, perhaps exhibiting a bit of an bias towards 'delete' — the bog standard Search function is actually pretty helpful so I'm not so keen on these never-used, un-natural redirects). But in case of no consolation, I'll go away, show some form on AfD, then come back in (say) a month. Cheers, Chumpih. (talk) 19:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's some AfD form now. Chumpih t 13:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:RandomCanadian[edit]

I believe I have enough of a clue to know what I'm doing, and well there's no reason I couldn't help around here? Anyway, I've created a few decent articles, significantly expanded others (see my DYKs, helpfully listed on my user page); and generally my records at AfDs shows I generally have a clue about what meets and what does not meet inclusion criteria. Plus, over 20k edits... Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Caleb Stanford[edit]

I would be happy to help with AfC reviewing.
  • I have over 1000 edits on Wikipedia (most undeleted), have been a user for 12 years, and am currently actively editing.
  • I have participated in many AfD and notability discussions. I have a basic understanding of the criteria for independent, reliably sourced material; notability; uniqueness/noveltly (not already covered by an existing article); neutrality and tone; and special rules including for pages about living persons, copyright violations, and image use restrictions.
  • I view backlogged AfCs as undesirable and would personally contribute work to resolve AfCs and curb the backlog as much as possible.

Thank you for your consideration. Caleb Stanford (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Caleb Stanford (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Delqa[edit]

I have thoroughly read through the reviewing instructions and believe I have what it takes to help on AfC.
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 16:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AssumeGoodWraith[edit]

I think I can try to help with this backlog. I've read through the reviewing instructions, and I do a bit of CSD tagging. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 04:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ajshul[edit]

Hi! I'm interested in helping with AfC review and with reducing the AfC backlog. I've requested to participate in the past, but was declined because of a couple of the articles that I've created in the past that were deleted. Since then, I have spent time reviewing the guidelines for notability and what makes a good page and also thoroughly looked at WP:AFCR; further, I have spent time on discussing AfD and with article maintenance tagging. I have 1000+ edits and have written over 10 articles that were determined to be notable (the two articles that I created that were deleted were made in late 2020 and I've grown as an editor significantly since then as can be seen by my 10+ articles created since then); since my previous request, I have gained a much better grasp on what makes a good article. Ajshul 😃 14:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lectrician2[edit]

Hi! I'd like the AFC script rights in order to review AFC articles. There is a obvious backlog to AFC, and I'd like to participate by helping clean it up by reviewing articles. I'm interested because I think that the more articles, the better (as long as they meet the qualifications of course). I'm qualified for this position because I have over 500 article edits, and 1000+ overall edits, I also have the rest of the required criteria. I have also read through all of the required documentation, and I thoroughly understand it. I have written 2 articles, and I have one article that I have contributed heavily to in the GA review stage right now. I've had one AFD, which was rejected, and multiple PROD's, some of which were rejected. After reading the documentation from the rejected PROD's and the AFD, I now understand why they should have been kept, and learned more in the process. Thanks! Lectrician2 (talk) 18:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now, primarily because of said XFD experience (it's one thing to understand, it's another to demonstrate). Primefac (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shrinkydinks[edit]

I am an editor with decent experience both creating articles and improving them through various stages of quality. I’ve created 9 mainspace articles of decent quality (examples purely created: 1 (BLP), 2 (BLP), 3, 4, 5, 6; examples significantly built up: 7, 8, 9). I have brought one article from start class to GA, and I’m hoping to bring a second, BLP article to GA now that it's through peer review, and a third, list-class article to GA once it is exhaustive (nearly there).
I have experience with a broad set of Wikipedia guidelines, including the high standards applied to BLP and current events. During May 5-7 2020, for example, I was the single largest contributor (by Wikitext) to the Murder of George Floyd. I have four DYKs (1, 2, 3, 4), and I created a Wikiproject for a cappella because I figured creating and organizing resources for other editors could help improve the quality of articles in that space.
I have been part of only 3 AfD experiences because I generally prefer to work on subjects I'm passionate about, but I believe my work across GA, AfD, BLP, etc. taken together shows that I apply an even standard across all my work. New article creation is, in my view, one of the best opportunities we have to inspire new editors. I would like to apply to help with AfC to help make Wikipedia a nice place for its newest and most ambitious editors. I wouldn’t be the most active editor but I could definitely help reduce the backlog. My areas of expertise include universities, a cappella, technology, internet culture, and BLP. — Shrinkydinks (talk) 02:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants/Old_Requests/2021&oldid=1137394071"