This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
A fact from Kelly's of Cornwall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 August 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Kelly's of Cornwall produced the first advertisement shown on national British television to feature the Cornish language?
A Bold edit was made to crowbar in an infobox; I've Reverted, and now, although it's not my place to do so, I'll assume the position of Discuss. I'd hate to be accused of disruption, etc. Now, I'm not against an infobox here, entirely, but I do think the article should be left to mature, somewhat, before we "help the poor old reader" navigate their way through an article which is only at a few thousand bytes, at present. Because of that, I feel we only have a WP:DISINFOBOX at the moment. Let's be honest, it's not exactly a mission to read the very short lede, as it is. CassiantoTalk 11:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What's the problem with an infobox? They provide a concise summary for the casual reader, and all other readers too. North America1000 12:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've given it above; did you not read before you typed? But I'm now more interested in your ability to edit war than anything else, if I'm honest. CassiantoTalk 12:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Edit warring is sophomoric, not my thing. Sure, then maybe hold off on having an infobox in the article. It's not really important. North America1000 12:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'll AGF and say you didn't mean to break the BRD cycle, no problem. Like I say, I'm not against one; I just worry that at the moment it is redundant owing to the very short lead section, which I've tried to extend upon. I'd be quite happy to put it back in myself when more complex and obscure information is found. But it is a direct copy of the lede, at present. No hard feelings. CassiantoTalk 12:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not an ice cream salesman!
"The company (and, in turn, the family name) was renamed to Kelly's in the 1930s, moving to Bodmin in the 1970s.[" I'm assuming the family name was actually changed to "Kelly", not "Kelly's". Also, was the company really renamed first (as implied by the sentence), or did the family change their name first? --Khajidha (talk) 22:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good question. I am guessing that Calicchia was changed to Kelly, surprising as this is an Irish name? I'd guess that the family name would have been changed first. That local press source just says: "Kelly's was established by managing director Philip Kelly's great-grandfather, Joseph Staffieri, when he moved from Italy to St Austell in the 1890s. The business and family name was changed to Kelly in the 1930s and moved to its present Bodmin site in the 1970s." Martinevans123 (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
